|Page 5 of 22:||              |
|Index||215 reviews in total|
When I went in to watch Hackers, I was worried because some of
the reviews here.
I don't think we saw the same movie. From scene one, I was
surprised the characters were teenagers. I knew Angelina was
only 19 or 20 when she did this movie, but I hadn't realized that
until I saw it.
The romance and interaction between Angelina's character and
Jonny's is classic. Really. It's great. When they're arguing or
fighting or dreaming about each other spitefully, it's fun to watch
their little denying their attraction and criticizing one another. Before
Angelina Jolie, I did not have a favorite actress. I knew actresses I
liked several films of, but hated others.
Angelina Jolie is different. She's my favorite actress now. It's not
because she's pretty, although she is. It's because she has a
magnetism, charisma and draw that I've never before seen in an
actress of the 90's. This shows through in her portrayal of Kate
"Acid Burn" Libby. She's cocky and difficult, with a rebel charm
we've seen in many of this star's movies. If you love Angelina Jolie
for reasons OTHER than how large her chest is or nudity, please
see this. The performance may not have been academy award
winning, but it's a great performance. Very fun to see where she
The rest of the performances are also very good. Jonny's Dade
has a puppy dog charm, in that you feel sorry for him and can't help
but laugh when things don't go his way. He is in no way Mr. Deep,
but he's smart with a funny exterior.
Matthew Lillard never fails to make me laugh, and he's prominent
with his pigtailed braids and goofing off.
I must give kudos to the villain. Sure, nothing unpredictable or new.
But he's positively funny. "Never fear, I is here." And arrogant and
I loved the special effects. I loved the plot. I loved the premise. I
loved the romantic relationship between Kate and Dade.
This is not an academy award winning movie. It's not extremely
dramatic or epic. But it sure is a GOOD movie. It's fun, it's a
comedy, it's a drama, and it's just great to watch. I very much
enjoyed the technology used, and the entire movie as a whole
made me smile.
If you are looking for an epic movie of high proportions with big
name actors and a hole-less plot, stay away.
But if you're looking for a movie that will make you smile at the
antics of the multi-dimensional characters and their escapades
and problems, set in a technological world and featuring a cute
teenage romance, go see it.
And if you love Angelina's acting, appeal, charisma and gorgeous
smile, don't see it. BUY IT. I know I will.
More like a very young Angelina Jolie stars in hackers, a tale of a bunch of
kids who hack into systems and networks for fun.
It does drag on a bit, but there's some good performances, a perfectly respectable script and some good directing. Unlike other computer films, this isn't full of too much BS and some of the technical stuff is believable -- nice change!
I saw this three times in the early autumn of '95, and those admissions
likely accounted for about half of its box office. I was dazzled by its
visuals and techno-electronica soundtrack, and mesmerized by one of its
young stars; a Ms. Angelina Jolie.
I knew the instant I saw her that she was going to be a huge star. In fact, many people in the cast--then complete unknowns--would go on to success. Johnny Lee Miller, Matthew Lillard, Jesse Bradford, Marc Anthony, Wendell Pierce. But everything and everyone else ceases to exist when she's on screen.
I talked the movie up to everyone who would listen, but my pleas fell on deaf ears. 20 years later it remains one of my favorite films, and as I understand it, it's developed a cult following. Through adult eyes, its "Hack the planet" lip service is pretty obvious for what it is, but strictly as a piece of pop art, I absolutely love this movie.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
What a gem of a 90's movie.
Before I start let me say I have built two datacentres and I am currently a domain admin of another in the telco industry so I will not comment on the IT glitches.
Hackers is a story about liberation and fighting the man and that us hackers have more morals than the governments and people who control the government who trying to stop them. I did get nostalgic when i heard things like 28k bit per second and PCI bus with direct memory access. I wonder if the actors knew that a modem was short for modulator/ demodulater :)
For this story to work it had to have some magic, as someone else highlighted ... "if you really see a real hacker at work it is truly boring stuff" btw computers do zeros and ones at best .... not these mathematical formulas that was blowing past screen but that would be boring. Amazing graphics on these PC screens didn't exist back then which IMHO made it date better than other Computer movies of its day.
I liked how some scary facts about the government holding files on its people which you would be amazed today on what they hold on you. And you would be surprised just how many skimming scams are going on .... these issues hold true today.
It was a more innocent time when only a select few knew how to do things and I even remember doing the tape digital sounds .... oh those where the days :)
Enjoy it for what it was .... oh and you get to see sexy Jolie when she was only 19 .... pretty simple story line and some truism that even today not many people would know.
I loved the early days of computers and we all thought it make the world better, safer, provide us with freedom, make it more transparent. Sadly it has made it for the worse and even our civil liberties are all but gone.
I was in IT in the 90s and i think my pride back then stopped me from watching it but I am glad to see it as it is worth my time and hopefully your time to watch it.
Making a movie about computers is difficult. Even the latest equipment
looks ridiculously antique within a few years of release. There is not
really anything to see -- just people sitting at keyboards. You must
interpret it poetically. There is not much action. The public has no
idea what is really going on.
The best attempts, like Tron, work at two levels, direct action for the kids, and subtle in-jokes and metaphors for the computer savvy.
Hackers has lots of energy, but it is downright silly.
For a start, the techno-babble is complete gibberish. The screenwriters did not even know the difference between a modem, a screen and RAM. I think they composed the dialogue by looking up computer jargon in a dictionary and throwing the words into a hat. They make zero attempt at plausibility.
This incompetence quickly destroys the illusion we are viewing whiz kids capable of bringing down civilisation as we know if they so chose.
Most of the dialogue is theme and variation on "I'm the king of the castle, and you're the dirty rascal". It sounds like something first graders would say. It is so juvenile, it is jarring.
Another jarring thing. Dade and his mother stayed in a one-bedroom apartment where mom slept on the couch. Yet Dade had thousands of dollars to spend on clothes and hairstyling.
There is a goony character called Cereal. He appears to be brain damaged, perhaps from too many drugs. Yet we are supposed to believe he took over all TV channels of earth.
But the main problem with the movie was the lead Dade, played by Johnny Lee Miller. He was badly miscast. His hair was expensively bleached and each curl pressed into place. He wore a leather jacket costing thousands of dollars that Liberace might have coveted. His facial features were so sharp he could cut cheese with them, but he had no sizzle. He came across as soggy as yesterday's waffle, a sort of young Lawrence Welk. His voice was as flat as Houston astronaut ground control.
Angelina Jolie did a great job with the atrocious dialogue they handed her. She was like a time bomb about to explode. It is too bad the movie was not written more around her acting skills.
A touch I did like was the way the characters got around their city with dazzling speed on roller blades. It added some visual excitement and flash.
Some of the CGI visuals to poetically represent hacking into computers were of course completely unrealistic, but at least interesting and metaphorically evocative.
A movie is a team. The writers were incompetent though the basic plot was quite clever. Most of the actors were great. The visual effects people were ahead of their time (but of course dated now). A movie is as good as its weakest link.
its been enough years now that it can be said - this is a story out of
north Carolina, and the general atmosphere of computing in north
it allegedly involves a mother, but they crossed that out and put in an actor and a well majorly actress, to support that role- which was the ideal
it is a great film, it was well put together the interest for it was mined off of the net
but there's a bit of an issue that the people that were used for the story for the film remember having seen it in a theater - when they never did - and witnessed it in their sleep
there's enough supporting evidence to support this , but as the film that made Angelina jolie - her career appears to have not done so well because she was detached from the origin of the film, and its possible appropriate credits were not given
I rate this as a 10 star film, since I know the main story that it was based on - and can provide photos and all of the background information that the film was based on to prove it - but I am mostly concerned that it was kind of a twist on a story that was not good, to promote it as good - and the general production didn't particularly understand that the original story was not good, when releasing it to the ... distribution, indicating that it was a good thing - when its a good spin on a good thing and a good depiction and a great movie
Revisiting 'Hackers' after a long time, not because it's a great movie or anything but the reasons are nostalgic. Needless to say, computer technology and cyberspace have come a long way since the movie's initial release and so obviously it has a dated look. I mean, the special effects are quite bad. 'Hackers' is pretty much another teen saves the world movie, this time using technology. Although it is a teen flick, I liked that it's not heavily sugarcoated. The romance isn't overly mushy though poorly developed. The comedy aspect of it works. The pacing, especially midway, is very slow. Now the script is definitely full of holes but there is a reason why this film has achieved cult classic status. It has heart. One can easily relate to the characters. Jonny Lee Miller, Angelina Jolie, Fisher Stevens, Lorraine Bracco and Matthew Lillard do a good enough job. Jolie looks quite cute and sultry and Bracco is hot. However, where acting is concerned, Jesse Bradford steals the show as the youngest one in the group, the rookie, who tries to fit in. He appears spontaneous and his performance is very natural. In addition, to the good performances, 'Hackers' has an awesome soundtrack. So when one expects something unrealistic and cheesy and is not looking to nitpick, 'Hackers' can be fun.
When it comes to Hackers, you have to take it for what it is. Which is
a completely ridiculous, over-the-top, happy-go-lucky
Hackers presents every tech nerd's dream. Every geeky kid wants to be as good looking as Johnny Lee Miller, have Angelina Jolie fall for him, beat some skeezy bad guy at his own game, and live in a psychedelically manic underground world where you rollerblade everywhere with your best friends, secure in the knowledge that you're "elite".
For anyone who knows anything about computers, the "hacking" and technology parts of this movie are the best (funniest, most ludicrous) parts. But what the hell, it makes sense in context with the film's absolute lack of sense.
So don't watch the movie expecting any sort of reality other than the surreality contained within the film. Just watch it for the pretty people pretending they know something about hacking, and enjoy.
Okay, so the plot of this movie seems a bit outlandish in 2003, but in 1995
this is where hacking was going! Of course, hacking has been misunderstood
from day one, and aside from social-outcast stereotypes and the horrible
hacking emulations, at least "Hackers" got the ball rolling for the defense
of good-natured hackers, as opposed to 'crackers' (the ones who actually try
to do damage).
The movie was meant to be taken only somewhat seriously eight years ago, and those who had no idea about computers (and some who still don't) were overwhelmed by what computers could supposedly do. Of course, we all know now how irrelevant the plot of this movie is to legitimate hacking, but it's still a great laugh for those of us that use computers too much.
Hackers is too lightweight to be a good thriller, but it works well if you see it as the hackers do - a series of games. The bet between Crash vs. Burn (ultra-hot Angelina Jolie) isn't very different from the competition between Plague and the younger hackers, except for the stakes. If you ignore the flashy and mostly meaningless computer graphics, you may notice some good in-jokes and a remarkable chemistry between many of the characters Crash and Plague, Lord Nikon and Cereal Killer, and especially Crash and Burn. Apart from Lorraine Bracco, who seems completely lost, everyone seems to be having an enormous amount of fun: grab a can of Jolt, forget everything you know about programming, and join in the game.
|Page 5 of 22:||              |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Newsgroup reviews||External reviews||Parents Guide|
|Official site||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|