CIA analyst Jack Ryan must stop the plans of a Neo Nazis faction that threatens to induce a catastrophic conflict between the United States and Russia's newly elected president by detonating a nuclear weapon at a football game in Baltimore.
When some Russian rebels takes control of some ICBM's, the Americans mobilize. Among the vessels sent is the nuclear sub, the Alabama. But before they leave they need a new X.O. and among the choices is Commander Hunter, who hasn't seen much action. But the ship's Captain, Ramsey OK's him. While on the way, there was an incident and Hunter disagreed with how Ramsey handled it, it's evident that Ramsey doesn't think much of Hunter because Hunter was college educated while Ramsey worked his way up. They're given orders to attack but when they were in the process of receiving another order, the ship's communications were damaged, so the entire message was not received. Ramsey decides to continue with their previous order while Hunter wants to reestablish contact first. That's when the two men butt heads that ends with Hunter relieving Ramsey. Later when some men die, some of the officers feel that Hunter is not up to the task so they team up to retake control. But Hunter has taken ... Written by
Sometimes the propeller is turning clockwise, and sometimes it is turning counterclockwise. The sweptback design being a mirror image. See more »
Mr Ince, Mr Ince, unlock the tactical firing trigger.
Peter "Weps" Ince:
Sir, it is my duty to...
Son, do'nt talk to me about duty! Open the fucking safe!
Peter "Weps" Ince:
I ca'nt do that, sir.
[Ramsey draws a gun and places it to the back of Weps's head]
I'm gonna count to 3, then I'm gonna blow your fucking head off! One... two...
...SHIT! It does me no good to kill you. You're the only one who knows the combination!
[sees Weps's assistant]
But petty officer Hilaire doesn't know the combination. Millions of lives are...
[...] See more »
Enjoyable, good tension, good dilemma, good cast. But:
You have a movie like this where either Washington's or Hackman's character side could be right about their course of action. The aim of the movie, ostensibly, is to present both sides and let the viewer figure out which is the correct course.
But you can't possibly side with Hackman, can you?
After all, his character goes nuts when everything starts happening. His character is possibly racist. And his character is prepared to launch nukes. Washington's character is, quite nobly, none of those things.
Ho hum. Hollywood audience manipulation at its finest.
Would it kill these writers and producers to present a dilemma movie in an intelligent fashion for once? I'd like to struggle with "who's right and who's wrong?" just once in my moviegoing life.
76 of 139 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?