|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|Index||15 reviews in total|
The previous comment sounded to me like they weren't criticizing the movie.
Sounded more like they were bashing the Country and the author...I found it
was a good movie. I've seen better, but it's not at the bottom of my list,
and neither is The House Of The Spirits. Of Love and Shadows is a book
explains in the background what was going on politically in Chile and it
a way to kind of get it out in the open - I don't know...create an
awareness. I admit, it must be difficult to translate an amazing novel
a movie and have it come out the same. I find that Isabel Allende's books
are absolutely fabulous!! She is a great story teller. And for this
particular one, I also think you may need to have a bit more knowledge of
what had happened in Chile to have a better understanding of what the story
is about. The Movie - I enjoyed it...it deserves to be seen at least once,
but...maybe..to get a better sense of what it's all about, it's best to
the book first! Maybe if this film was shot in Chile it would have been
different using Chilean Actors that do an amazing job anyway. The movie
have been better. But I am glad that Antonio Banderas and Jennifer
decided to be a part of this movie. Both are great actors that tried to
give the movie feeling...
But not much else. As a story, it is something of a docudrama -- part
history and part love story. The historical part must be taken for
granted, as the author maintains high credentials as a witness. The
love story is just so-so, however -- predictable and depending for its
attractiveness on a good deal of gratuitous nudity. We see here rather
more of Antonio Banderas than is probably necessary. Ditto the Chilean
The main weakness of the film is that it is not presented in Spanish with English subtitles. To have Spanish-speaking actors mouthing English is extremely distracting, and to my mind unforgivable in view of the locale and the facts of its production. Jennifer could surely have been taught to fake a little Español with some artful dubbing later on.
Still, one has to appreciate the scenery and the score, played apparently by a full symphony orchestra somewhere in Bratislava or the like. As a travelogue it succeeds admirably, even if it is on the sunrise side of the Andes and not the other way round.
Irene (Jennifer Connelly) is a daughter of privilege in 1970's
It is a time of government repression and citizens of Chile are turning up
missing, never to be found. Working as a magazine writer, Irene meets
photographer Francisco (Antonio Banderas). Francisco is a passionate young
man with a dangerous secret: he is working for an underground movement
investigating the government's actions. Although Irene is engaged to a man
in the military, she falls in love with Francisco and joins him in his
underground activities. Will they be able to expose the misdeeds of the
government and remain alive?
This movie is based on a novel by Chilean-born author Isabel Allende. Her political views are to the left; yet, this film is not totally biased. Real events occured under Chilean leader Pinochet, who eventually was deposed. This movie, therefore, offers a glimpse into the horrific tortures and deaths at the hands of the Chilean government in the seventies. Not as exciting as it could be, the film nevertheless provides enough drama and pathos to touch the hearts of its viewers. Connelly and Banderas give fine performances that resonate. Recommended for fans of the two leads as well as those who admire films with a political agenda.
The subject matter of this movie couldn't be anymore serious. This movie failed because the studio advertised this as a passionate movie between Antonio and Jennifer. The poster and box cover for the movie shows them engaged, half naked in the middle of an act of love. In the first 10 minutes of the movie, we see some kind of a foreplay situation between Jennifer and her cousin / lover. Then, the climax of the movie has nothing to do with the investigation they had been on. The movie peeks when both Antonio and Jennifer make love. While the one scene has been said to be the only good part of the movie, I must agree that the studios allowed the audience to believe that this movie was going to be packed with sex, sex, nudity, and more sex. You can't sell a box of cereal with a naked woman on the cover and then have the cereal filled with little marsh mellow religious figures of Christ and Saint Peter and Paul. Much like the cereal, the movie has its moments but fails to hold an audience because everybody is waiting for the sex scene. The movie tries to get serious but we are overwhelmed by the eye candy that is Jennifer and Antonio that we can't wait for the passion to take over.
If you don't go by the poster of the movie(which portrayed it to be a
passionate love story), you'd enjoy the movie.
I haven't read the novel and I was engrossed very quickly with what was shown in the movie. The year is 1973 and Chile has been taken over by military coup. An woman talks to Francesco(a phychiatrist) about the nightmares she is having after military has tortured her and her husband. Her voice breaks as she says "one after another..again and again" Irene (Connelly) belongs to the upper class, she is innocent, engaged to her cousin, a military captain since childhood. She also publishes a magazine. She employed Francesco(Banderas) who is now out of job as the photographer. Francesco and his family are totally against the human rights violation that occurs. His brother is a priest in church who tries to prevent things.
When the magazine crew went to interview Evangelina, a magical woman, military comes and interferes. Evangelina with superhuman strength picks up military commander Ramirez and throws him away. They left. Shortly after, Evangelina is taken by military and she has disappeared.
Irene and Francesco tried to find out where Evangelina is. In the process, their lives and others take a complete turn-oil. And expectedly they fall in love.
The scenes of military regime is very well depicted. The arrogance of their police, the fear among civilians are very real and touching. Of memorable scenes are Evangelina's friend in military who is torn between his job needs and the human ways.
Isabel Allende is not the greatest writer of all time, still she has a magic touch, of that there is no doubt..A woman that has fought all of her life, gives us the pleasure to enjoy her experience in this beautiful story (as are all of her stories), that brings together two great actors (Antonio and Jennifer), and almost makes us want to be part of it,despite the danger..these were the true heroes of our time, i think that's what she's really stating, by using simplicity as a way of being, a way of life, and showing us that it can also be beautiful.. A true love story.
This was a great film!
Granted, the acting may not be tip-top and the casting may have its flaws, but I thought that this was a great film, and it's about time we have more films bring to life the atrocities that occurred in Chile. By acquiring more knowledge about the world around us, we can try to ensure that we don't repeat the same mistakes over and over.
I really thought the film was great!
So after a Greek director tells us about Chile coup in « missing », a Chilean actress tells us about El Salvador in « Voces », now we have a Spanish actor back to Chile, bringing along the most delicious American actress, Jennifer Connelly ! I thought it would be a stinker but i was wrong as it's an excellent politic and romance thriller and surely one of the best part for Jennifer ! Unlike a lot of her Hollywood friends, she gets an inspired hand to pick movies that have something to tell : here, it's about liberty, democracy, being dissident and making moral choices. Banderas is also deeply focused and concerned and the production is really well-done. This movie has a real emotional and educative content as it explains why human rights and liberty begin and end in the hands of individuals and not elected or tyrannic representatives.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
In this movie a young (24) Jennifer Connelly plays a Spanish speaking
lady, Irene, in Chile, working as a magazine reporter, during the time
when the country was being ruled by a military dictatorship. A
perpetual "state of emergency" has been declared, and opposition are
hunted down, killed, and the bodies hidden. Irene has been engaged
since they were children to her cousin, Gustavo. While they carry on
erotically like young lovers anywhere, there does not appear to be the
mystery and passion of "discovered" love. Along comes Irene's
discovery, Francisco (Antonio Banderas, 34), trained as a Psychologist
but now trying to get a legitimate job as a photographer. Irene hires
Francisco and his family, which includes a priest, are out to expose the crimes of the military regime, and is able to get Irene involved in an investigation. Breaking out of her thus-far sheltered life, she is anxious to help get to the bottom of all this, while she is realizing that she doesn't love Gustavo.
SPOILERS. As crimes are being exposed and it becomes known that Irene is involved, she is gunned down in the street, but manages to survive. Military is watching the hospital, but after she has shown some improvement she is sneaked out, she and Francisco manage to stay for 10 days at a spa in the mountains where she can gain strength, and they leave on horseback as the military show up looking for them. They eventually get to Spain, where they live for 15 years, and are able to return to Chile in 1989, after a democracy is restored.
Having read the novel, I was curious to see how it would be made into a
film. I had high hopes, because the book was extremely poignant and
well-written. However, these hopes were dashed within the first five
minutes of this truly awful movie.
Now, I'm a fan of both Antonio Banderas and Jennifer Connelly. I think they're great actors. However, Of Love and Shadows brought out the worst in both. The acting was hideous and essentially consisted of Jennifer Connelly using an awful accent while making bedroom eyes at Antionio Banderas, who did the same (but with a much better accent).
Aside from the terrible performances, the real flaw of this film was that it tried to incorporate too much of the book into too small a time frame. There is a good deal of fantastic material in the book, but there is simply too much to be done on screen. What seems to have happened is that the makes didn't exactly realize this and consequently tried to hold on to too many secondary characters and too many story lines. The result was less than satisfactory. I was entirely convinced that anyone who hadn't read the book before seeing the movie would have been completely lost.
In short, I seriously pity Isabel Allende for this horribly botched movie which is entirely unrepresentative of the excellent book she wrote. Do not watch this movie. Read the book.
|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|External reviews||Parents Guide||Official site|
|Plot keywords||Main details||Your user reviews|
|Your vote history|