The NeverEnding Story III (1994) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
112 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
An insult to the series
Wizard-87 March 1999
The first movie was great. The second wasn't so great, though it's not quite as bad as you've heard. Especially with there now being an even WORSE entry to this series - this being it!

Someone questioned why Warner Bros. didn't have the distribution rights to this entry. Well, at first they did. I remember reading a (very negative) review of this movie in "Variety" magazine, and Warner Bros. was set to distribute. It's quite obvious now that Warner Bros. threw away its distribution option (probably after seeing how horrible this movie is), and Miramax picked it up for a tiny release that lasted 5 minutes. (In my city, it only played for a few weekend matinees).

Oh yeah, what did I think of this movie? Quite frankly, it sucked. What were they thinking when they decided to jazz up the movie with contemporary rock 'n roll???? And most of the movie actually takes place not in the fantasy world, but in this world. The characters are especially obnoxious (especially the rock baby), and suffer from stereotypes. Plus, the movie seems to have forgotten a lot of what happened previously - the hero's dad knew about Fantasia, so the hero didn't have to hide anything from him - but for some reason, the hero keeps the incidents he was involved in a secret. The low point comes where the climax is not solved with magic or intelligence - but with karate. Yes, karate.
78 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wow, and I thought Home Alone 4 was bad!
TheLittleSongbird31 August 2009
This movie was awful, easily one of the worst movies I have ever seen, though not quite as abysmal as Home Alone 4, honestly that film is blasphemy. I love the first NeverEnding Story and consider one of the all time great fantasy films, and the second one while disappointing was pretty good, but this one was garbage. Sorry I hated it, it has none of the magic of the first film, none of the sense of wonder that enthralled me when I first saw NeverEnding Story as a child. The scenery was not at all good, dull and rather tacky, I just wonder whether the producers saw the first film for their inspiration, because actually in the first film, the sumptuous set design should've got an award, for it was fantastic. The script here was dreadful, and the plot was uninspired, and had many inconsistencies with the first film(ie. the omission of Atreyu and anything to do with Bastian's family). Not to mention the rushed ending and the rather cartoonish design of Falcor and his voice(ugh!). Even the acting was poor, Jason James Richter has little of the innocence and heroism and even the likability of Bastian, no matter how hard he tried. Jack Black, who I usually find entertaining was wasted and it doesn't help his character was such an unlikeable jerk, as was the usually brilliant Freddie Jones. All in all, awful, awful, awful! See the first film instead. 1/10 Bethany Cox
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad it's bad
kylopod4 December 2005
When this film showed up on the cable listing, I had a sudden urge to see it even though I knew it was probably going to be terrible. The original was such a staple of my childhood, yet had such an incomplete ending, that I was intensely curious to see what they would do with another sequel. Besides, I knew that it could not possibly be worse than "The NeverEnding Story II."

Boy, was I wrong.

"The NeverEnding Story III" has rightly earned its place among IMDb voters as the 79th worst movie of all time. It is so bad that, in writing this review, I risk making it sound like it's worth watching, sort of like "Plan Nine from Outer Space." I assure you, this film is in no way in the Ed Wood category of being so incompetently done that it becomes enjoyable to watch. Those moviegoers who take pleasure in seeing cinematic disasters should be forewarned about this one, lest they never again be able to erase from their memory Rockbiter's gravelly-voiced version of "Born to be Wild," played in a video sequence early in the film and again during the end credits.

No, I am not joking.

The second film does have its admirers, and as much as I hated it, I sort of understand where they're coming from. At least that film had a legitimate purpose, to tell the second half of the novel which the first film had neglected to do. But now the story is finished, so the third film has to make up its own reason for being, with an even shabbier budget than that of the second film. So it concocts a story that allows us to see as little of Fantasia as possible. Here, a series of magical mishaps causes a bunch of creatures from Fantasia to be transported into the real world. These include Falkor the luck dragon, a baby rockbiter about the size of a fountain statue, and a talking tree. (Falkor, who must have gotten a lobotomy sometime between the second and third film, will chase after a "dragon" at a Chinese festival.) What we do see of Fantasia makes the place seem a lot smaller than I had ever imagined. Almost all of the scenes there take place in the empress's chamber in the Ivory Tower, though there is also one sequence where we get to see Rockbiter's home (just what I've always wanted to do!) with Mama Rockbiter and of course the previously mentioned Baby Rockbiter sitting in front of a large stone TV set. Needless to say, the inhabitants of Fantasia seem to possess quite a bit more knowledge of Earth than they did in the first film. When the gnome describes Bastian as "not exactly Arnold Schwarzenegger in the muscle department," we're reminded how much more enjoyable the film would probably be if Schwarzenegger were actually in it.

The cause of these events is that a gang of school bullies steals the book and discovers that it gives them the power to wreak havoc on the inhabitants of Fantasia. Strangely, these modern kids never seem surprised that magic exists. Think how long it took in the first film for even imaginative, ten-year-old Bastian to become convinced of the book's supernatural qualities. These bullies, much older and more concrete, never go through such a skeptical period. And later, when the Auryn falls into the hands of a teenage girl, she treats it with about the same level of awe as if she got hold of her parents' credit card.

There are actually some familiar actors in this mess. Mr. Koreander is played by the British character actor Freddie Jones, Bastian is played by the kid from "Free Willy," and the main bully is played by a relatively young Jack Black, who now probably would like to do with this film what George Lucas wants to do with the "Star Wars Holiday Special."
119 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not one of the finer kids' movies, that's for sure.
planktonrules30 May 2019
I have watched many, many more movies than the average normal person. My tastes are varied...classic films, foreign films, silents and more. But one of my odder pursuits is my weird desire to watch all 100 of IMDB's Bottom 100 List....the 100 lowest rated major release movies. It's important to point out that I have never seen any of the "Neverending Story" films and I started with #3. And, since it made the list I thought I'd give it a watch.

In this film, Bastian is a kid who appears to be about 10 or 11 year-old. Oddly, he's begun at a new school...one that allows 'kids' there who are nearing retirement age (or so it seems). This small kid is chased and assaulted by a group of 20-something punks (led by 25 year-old Jack Black) and they're going to beat the stuffing out of him. To escape, he uses his magical book to enter the land of Fantasia. The problem is that the punks find the book and keep it...somehow realizing that will keep him stuck in Fantasia forever. But apparently there is another way out....and it's long and complicated and boring. And, somehow, some creatures from Fantasia were accidentally brought to the real world with Bastian...and he needs to find and return them.

The Henson creatures vary. A few look really nice. A couple seem rather dated and creepy. What's REALLY dated is the introduction, where you see some very early CGI which looks horrid today. Perhaps in 1994 folks were impressed by it.

What doesn't vary much is the writing and acting. The story seemed tired and the characters were often annoying. I particularly hated the rock creature who sang Steppinwolf's "Born to Be Wild" sequence and I assume a lot of folks in theaters felt the same way. I also thoroughly hated the bullies...who were old enough that they should have known how to act...but didn't. At least Black landed on his feet and eventually learned to act.

So do I recommend it? No...there are much better kid's films out there that WON'T make parents watching along bored. Plus, smaller kids probably shouldn't see it because the bullies are pretty frightening. And who should see it? Probably no one.

In spite of this, I don't think the movie deserves to be on the Bottom 100 and think mostly this was the result of folks who loved the original being so angry about the poor quality of this third film.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Simply Put? Bad.
Sparrow_in_flight11 February 2004
Sadly, the running joke of Engywook and Urgl having to go to the bathroom, but being unable to do so, is one of the entertaining things about this film. But it does get tiresome. And the baby rock-biter is cute, if incredibly stupid. But if you have ever seen the first movie, or read the book, you will most likely not care for this movie at all. The plot is poor, Falcore looks extremely cartoonish as do the Rockbiters, and the Nasties...well, they just aren't that scary. Give me Gmork any day, please!

This is a tolerable children's movie ONLY if you have no other knowledge of The Neverending Story.
28 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
In A Class By Itself
KingAtor424 June 2005
This movie does belong in a class by itself: Even worse than utterly terrible. I have been an aficionado of 'bad' movies for quite a long time, adoring those movies which only a group of friends and many drinks makes enjoyable. This movie was in fact so amazingly bad that I could not watch it past the first half hour or so. I only watched the rest via fast-forward the next morning. I've seen many films worse considered classically bad, this one beat them all hands down. I even had to start referring to possibly similar bad movies by saying "They may be in the NS3 category". There are those bad movies that are MST3K fun and then there are those that make you wish you had a sharp object to commit suicide with, this one is the latter.

This franchise went from excellent original fantasy, special effects for the genre, and well written characters to bad acting and writing in part 2, to movie of the week actors and rubber puppets in part 3. It's amazing how a film franchise that had such good promise sank faster than Lips Manless after taking "the bath". Especially if you're considering getting this for the kids, at least treat them to the original movie or something like the Peter Barnes inspired fantasy miniseries' from the late 90s.
33 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
We must not give into the Nasty!
Smells_Like_Cheese27 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
OK, a few years ago I found at Target a package with all three Neverending Story films, also really cheap, so I picked them up. The first film is one of my childhood favorites and still holds up to this day. I'm not alone in this either, I didn't realize what kind of a following the film had and that others watched it as children too. I watched the second one when I got the package and thought it was alright, I also thought the title was pretty funny. Wouldn't it be hilarious if some person got a lawyer for "false advertising" because of the title of the Neverending Story? Anyways, the second one is just an alright film, a little below average but not terrible. Now, something about the third on gave me chills when I grabbed it, I think I should have listened to my instincts. I don't even know where to start with the badness. Now everything that was charming about the first film, throw it out! Everything that was trying to continue the story in the second film, throw it out! This is what was puked up from the two films and it's terrifying.

Bastian Balthazar has begun a new chapter in his life. His father has re-married, and now Bastian has a new step mother, Jane, whose daughter Nicole is displeased at having a new family. Bastian has also started high school, where he has become victim to the Nasties, a quintet of bullies led by Slip. He manages to get them expelled by the janitor after they trap him in the boiler room. He flees to the library where he is surprised to find Mr. Koreander and The Neverending Story. The Nasties locate him, but he uses the book to escape to Fantasia. Bastian arrives in Fantasia, where he is reunited with old friends. However, the Nasties find the Neverending Story and use their cruelty to bombard the land with fireballs and a storm and now plan to steal the amulet to grant their own nasty wishes.

See, normally I like bad films, however this was just bad. For God's sake, Valcor was this beautiful majestic wise dragon who spoke so wonderfully and made you feel special, this Valcor looks like a thrown out in the dumpster Chuck-E-Cheese costume. Not to mention the voice is completely different and sounds like some kind of ridicules Gilligan mook. Then the rock monster, who in the first film was the saddest figure, a giant who lost his friends to the Nothing and felt sorrow and spoke so beautiful now has a family, his wife talks like Arnold Schwartzenegger, he's now 1/5 his size and his kid wants to go on a motorcycle ride with him while he sings "Born to be Wild". The villain is no longer an entity; it's a group of bullies called The Nasties being led by Jack Black (LOL).

There is nothing redeeming about this film. The acting is terrible and the only decent enough performance is Jack Black who you can understand why he was successful because as much of a bad story as this is, he looked like he was having fun. The costumes are just terrible and don't resemble the first film by a long shot. In short, the story is just horrendous and the magic is taken away in this film. Please take my advice, stick to the first film, it's a wonderful fantasy film that is filled with beauty and wonder. The second film isn't bad either, it's worth checking out in some ways. Take the advice of the movie: We must not give into the Nasty!

1/10
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Easily One of the Worst Sequels Ever Made
D_Burke18 September 2010
Imagine that you are reading an entertainment magazine like "Entertainment Weekly" or "Rolling Stone", and you happen to look in the news section where they give you information about a movie that is in production. It is a children's movie distributed by Miramax, who has made dozens of Oscar-winning films over the last 30 years. It has special effects by Cinemagic and the Jim Henson Creature Shop, and Jack Black stars in it. You would want to see it, right? Well, not if it's "The NeverEnding Story III".

"The NeverEnding Story III" is disappointing in every sense of the word. It is by far one of the worst sequels ever made, and it does a disservice to the book by Michael Ende and the original 1984 film on which it is based (My review: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088323/usercomments-250).

This movie takes characters from the book and creates a new story that is full of plot holes, bad puns, and very little logic whatsoever. It helps very little that none of the cast members from either of the first two movies were involved in this film.

This time, Bastian is played by Jason James Richter ("Free Willy" (1993)). Although Richter looks like a preteen model, he is still harassed by a gang at his new school known as the Nasties (or the Nastys) whose leader is Slip, played by a then-unknown Jack Black.

As it turns out, Bastian's new school also happens to be where Coreander, the owner of the book store in the original story, works as a librarian. British actor Freddie Jones plays Coreander in this movie, and fans of the original may be disappointed not to see Thomas Hill reprise his role. I don't blame them.

Anyway, Coreander happened to bring the NeverEnding Story with him to this school library. It's a pretty contrived way to bring the book back into the story after the main character has moved away if you ask me.

What's even more contrived is when Bastian, hiding from the Nastys, retreats into the world of Fantasia, only to have Slip retrieve the book, realize its powers, and try to destroy the world and Bastian. In the book and the first two movies, the reader had little to no control over how the NeverEnding Story would be told. How the Nastys get control is never explained anywhere in the movie. The NeverEnding Story being an enchanted book is no excuse to cover up such plot holes.

When Bastian realizes he has to re-enter the real world to obtain the book and save Fantasia, the movie just gets worse. Even with the Oren (the token worn around the neck that resembles two snakes), Bastian alone can't make it back home. So a number of creatures from Fantasia have to wish with him, and be transported into his world, for him to save Fantasia.

Such a subplot wouldn't be so bad if the supporting characters weren't so annoying and intelligence insulting. There's the Rock-Biter's baby boy who talks in annoying "baby talk" that real children under 3 don't use as vernacular, an anthropomorphic tree who talks like an old Jewish comedian except not as funny, and two gnomes (Urgl and Engywook, featured in the first movie but played by different actors) who have a tired running joke about needing to use the bathroom.

Oh yes, and who could forget Falcor, the luck dragon? In the first two movies, Falcor was a hero to Atreyu and Bastian, and was the voice of reason in many situations. He also had a voice like Walter Cronkite, which made him ever cooler. Here, he not only looks different from the previous two films, but he's whinier and dumber. When, in the real world, he mistakes an airplane for a female luck dragon, I could only hang my head and wonder, "Why?".

To make matters worse, Bastian can't wish the book back after the Nastys stole it because he can't use the Oren to make wishes in the real world. That plot point is well and good, and makes a setup for a great conflict that adds to the story. Unfortunately, the people who wrote this screenplay forget that plot point and failed to explain why Bastian's stepsister Nicole (Melody Kay) could make wishes when she had possession of the Oren. Any script reviser could point out these plot holes, and it most especially amazes me that filming progressed despite these inconsistencies.

It is even more amazing that no one in this movie actually acts poorly. Richter does well in his role, despite his voice obviously cracking and no one noticing. I don't bring that point up to be mean. It's just that the filmmakers could have used his voice changing as a good subplot to explain why he's being picked on. But I digress.

The point is that everyone involved in this film just could not save the story having so many inconsistencies. By the end, the story bears no resemblance to Ende's original book at all. The Fantasia creatures are also too annoying, trying too hard to be comic relief and inundating their dialogue with uncharacteristic pop culture references. Case in point: the Rock Biter rides his bike while singing "Born To Be Wild" by Steppenwolf. What were these filmmakers thinking?

And you would think that the Jim Henson Creature Shop working on your side would be a valuable asset in this film. In this case, none of the recurring characters look like they did in the first two movies (the Rock Biter, looking like a pint-size version of his predecessor, was the biggest disappointment), and they weren't strong characters either. They did not live up to Henson's high standards of storytelling and development. If you don't believe me, try finding this movie on Muppet Central. You would have had better luck finding this film in a theater that ran it for two weeks back when it was released.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why?
iriegirl2 January 2005
I don't understand why they bothered to make this one. The first Neverending Story really put you in the feeling of a fantasy world. The second was not quite as good. This one? Good Lord! Super trendy, with people in Fantasia watching MTV type television. Falcor wasn't the same voice or personality. It always ruins a good children's movie that is attempting to take you to "another world" when they try to make it hip. The beauty of these films was that they weren't "hip"; they were a true departure from the everyday. Isn't that what going into the book in the first place was supposed to represent? When will film makers learn to leave well enough alone?
64 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
NES III is a movie I really want to like...
I first saw the first movie a few years ago. I loved it and still love it. I saw the second movie a while later. It was okay then. After two or three viewings I saw Michael Ende's name in the opening credits, and decided to find the book and read it. I can't remember whether I saw NES III before or after I read the book.

The book was AMAZING. Probably the best stand-alone novel I have ever read. But the problem is: After you read the book, the movies always look worse because it's not like the book. The first movie is basically based on the first half of the book. A few things were changed and/or left out, but it's still a great movie overall.

The second movie is basically based on the second half of the book. A lot of things were changed and a lot of things were left out. This decreased NES II's score a lot, but it's still barely an okay movie.

Now NES III is based only on the characters of the book. There's Bastian, of course, but in the book and the previous two movies, he doesn't have the attitude anyhow close to getting wild hair. No Atreyu, of course, which was probably one of the worst decisions made in the making of the movie. According to the first movie, Mr. Koreander doesn't like kids. But now he's school librarian, which doesn't make sense. Engywook and Urgl returning was probably a good decision, but their characterization was ruined when they were reduced to complaining about having to go to the bathroom the whole second half of the movie. The Bark Troll (there were bark trolls in the book) is not supposed to know enough about the human world to mention Vegas and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bastian should not have been allowed to keep Junior at his house. Either Bastian would have said, "No way! I'm not taking him to my house!" or Junior would have wrecked his house down. Even the Childlike Empress was reduced to an idiot towards the end of the movie. NES III just doesn't have the feel that The Neverending Story was originally designed to have.

Positive notes on NES III: Well, the story was actually okay in my opinion. Jack Black is a likable actor. Mr. Koreander's line: "The story's not over yet, young man" is the only time in any of the three movies where it talks about the NeverEnding Story's "unendingness." I like seeing the Old Man of Wandering Mountain, but it's not the same part as the book. And the biggest positive note: I liked it a lot better a few years ago, when I wasn't as much of a movie critic as I am now.

5/10
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why was this movie made?
ericstevenson2 September 2018
I was so interested in seeing this movie because it was featured in my favorite review of the Nostalgia Critic ever. It's hard to say that I really suffered while watching this because it's so much fun to learn more about it from the Critic's review. I loved hearing the commentary from them saying it was so bad we should all just make our own reviews and I am now! The basic plot is that Bastian uses the book from the first two movies and is pursued by a group of bullies called the Nasties. I remember watching the second movie and being amazed at how bad it was. I'm so glad the awfulness of this film puts that one to shame.

The Critic didn't even mention the fact that the secondary character from the first two movies, Atreyu wasn't in this film for no reason. Okay, the reason was that he didn't to be associated with this horrendous film. We get a lot of characters like the Rockbiter's son, a talking tree, and gnomes and you know what? Every single one of these characters is completely and utterly useless. They only make things worse, make stupid jokes like referencing Arnold Schwarzeneggar and making jokes about barking up the wrong tree. The designs, especially the Rockbiter are terrible and stupid looking.

The childlike empress and the people she works with are also completely useless, boring and dumb. She never even explains why Bastian can't just wish everything to go back to normal. The second film at least had purpose in that it adapted the second half of the book, although loosely I heard. Falcor is now an idiot who thinks airplanes and paper dragons are living things as opposed to his wisdom from the first movie. We get toilet jokes and a story that really does seem to have no end. There's sort of a sequel hook but thank God this film was so awful it killed off the franchise forever. Zero stars
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
do not ever watch this horrible film
EmpressEmily10 July 2005
In the beginning, there was The Neverending Story. It is the best film ever made.

Then, there was The Neverending Story II. I'll vent my spleen over that mess later.

And then, there came this waste of film and effort. Hold on a minute while I go throw up.

While it is a clean, safe film in terms of subject matter, the third NES should never have been made. And I mean NEVER. The first two movies covered all the wondrous things within the original book, so I don't understand why this film was made at all. It is just cheesy, stupid, abysmal, and an absolute disgrace to the idea of The Neverending Story.

First of all, what's going on with this stepsister of Bastian's that has somehow appeared? Wrong, wrong. . . Then, what happened to good old Falkor? And most of all, where is Atreyu? If you are bold enough to see this film, that is the one thing you will distinctly notice if you've seen the other two- no Atreyu.The boy who played Bastian was not nearly as obnoxious as the actor from the second film, but he just doesn't hold a candle to the original actor, Barret Oliver.

I have only seen this movie once, because I was informed of how awful it was, and just had to see for myself. It was a waste of my precious time. I hardly remember the plot line or anything important like that because it just didn't stick with me. One gets the impression that this was made as a sort of kid/family-friendly approach to The Neverending Story, because it is just so simplistic, and sacrifices the charm of the original characters and settings for the sake of being funny and entertaining. But trust me, it is NOT funny and it is NOT entertaining. Any NES fan worth their salt would be appalled by this film. If however you are not familiar with the Neverending Story, see the original 1984 movie and read the book and be contented with that.

Do not subject yourself to the torturous nightmare that is the Neverending Story 3, I implore you.

As for a star rating out of ten, I give this film nothing. Nil. Zip. Nichts.
57 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst movies I've ever seen
Atreyu_II8 July 2009
Without surprises, I was expecting this to be very bad. On one hand, I saw no reason to watch this at all. On the other hand, I had nothing to do, so I decided to watch this just to see how bad it would be.

My oh my, the many negative comments I read about this movie have all the reason to be. This movie is garbage, capable of making any fan of the original blush of shame. Seriously, I don't get how in the world did this movie lost its place in the IMDb Bottom 100 because that's where it belongs.

This terrible film should have never seen the light of the day. What did they think they were doing? This is not even a shadow of the original. Frankly, this is an offense and mockery on the original and a strong one to win a place of "honor" at the Razzies, being the worst of the trilogy.

If the 2nd one is already quite bad and a huge mess, this one is even worse. It's a movie without reason to exist. Everything is bad in this movie: the crude puppets and sceneries, the very poor plot, all of the characters (especially the more than annoying bullies, the Nasties) and the crappy lines (such as a reference to Arnold Schwarzenneger and Jean Claude Van Damme).

But that's far from being all. The bullies here are really nasty and way more annoying than the bullies from the original film. Just as bad as this or even worse is that here the bullies have the power over Fantasia!

Plus, what have they done to good old Falkor? Here he is so ugly and has no personality at all. Here he has nothing to do with the beautiful and happy creature from the 1st film we all love so much. And what's the point of putting Falkor flying next to a Lufthansa plane? Other annoying things are, without a doubt, the walking tree that also talks... bah, I hate that kind of thing! The Rockbiter here is slim and small, so much that I didn't realize it was him until the 2nd half of the movie. Here he's got a wife and a son, Junior. Can't describe how annoying is the Rockbiter and his family here. And now they've got a television? My goodness, what a silly nonsense!

The soundtrack is a mistake. I mean, the songs themselves are great, such as "Born to be wild", "Crash! Boom! Bang!", "Kiss From a Rose" and "Games People Play". But these songs aren't for a fantasy movie. As for Fantasia, as one can (and should) expect, it hasn't got the magic, enchantment and beauty of the original.

Jason James Richter, although he was a competent actor, can't be compared to the charismatic Barret Oliver. Once again, the cast is entirely different. None of the characters feel like those of the original at all. They're a joke instead of captivating. Yet there is nothing funny about them or the movie itself. And that thing of Bastian's new family and lifestyle... no comments.

The cast, the director and all the artists involved in the 1st movie must have had quite a shock with this joke of a movie. This has nothing to do with their masterpiece. They must have laughed out loud about how ridiculous this movie is...
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Did the producers even pay attention to basic points?
heichers4 December 2003
I thought Bastian's real mom died? Now his real mom is alive and his dad (except his new stepdad) is gone. Did I miss a step between NES 2 and 3? Then, all the fantasy characters (Falcor, Rock Biter, etc.) change looks (and in some cases, even names)!

If I could rate this negative #'s, I'd rate this a -10. However, Jack Black showed how he could actually act (in a rather early appearance before he became the likable guy he is/plays now), so I think I'll give it a -5.
32 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Huge disappointment
starcat50021 August 2007
I cannot begin to describe how awful this movie is. I watched the first Neverending Story when I was 7 or 8 or so, it came out in 1984, the year I was born, and I was absolutely fascinated with it. A few years later I had the pleasure of watching the second one, and although not as good as the first one, I have to say it is one of the better movie sequels I have seen (the people who comment on it give it too harsh criticism) It was still as imaginative and beautiful as the first one, and kept all the main characters. I saw the third one in the movie rental part of our grocery store when I was 14, and I got exited. I immediately rented it and brought it home and popped it in our VCR (you remember VCR's don't you?). It was not much longer after that that I was popping it out again. NES3, for lack of a better term,... sucks. The storyline was as unimaginative and vapid as you could hope for, it takes place in the real world, and not(as the title would have you believe)in Fantasia, and I get the feeling that it is because creating a fantasy world was a little out of their budget. This movie has "low budget" written all over it. The childlike empress isn't even blond! they get some brunette chick who looks nothing like her to play the role. After the fart jokes and potty humor commenced, I just couldn't take it any longer. My advice is don't wast your time and ruin your childhood memories with this piece of refuse.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Sequels are usually worse, but this is just TERRIBLE
kiawa771 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is AWFUL. It can't be stated more clearly than that.

Like many others, the first Neverending Story movie was a much-loved, magical part of my childhood. The second one wasn't so great, and I didn't see the third one until today.

Children tend to remember things bigger and more grand than they actually were, so maybe that's what happened. But I don't recall Falcor being so... ditsy. Honestly, do they have to water him twice a week? All the characters are just plain hokey. I remember the rock monsters being proud, huge, and majestic. After seeing the grumbly rendition of "Born To Be Wild" on a Flintstone-esquire motorcycle, I really wanted to turn it off. The movie, at the point, was more painful than my kidney stone.

I found this movie to be without much purpose, without much of a solid story, and without intelligent characters. The humor is lame and stupid, too banal for even kids. What a sore disappointment that killed some of the magic 23 years after it started. How sad...
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Please shoot me
princessstrickland2120 January 2019
I'm serious, what the chocolate coated hell is this.

The first one was a master piece, the second one was ok and this.....

Should not be seen by a living soul.

The rock biter is different looking, falkour looks and sounds like Patrick Star as well as being wrong.

Jack Black, who plays a cillian HATED how the movie turned out. I dont blame him one bit.

Even the kid saying Bastin sucks! His dad marries a widow and gets a sister. I'm sorry, it's just not worth the watch AT ALL!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
neverending reputation? Ended!!
aleclemlij26 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Neverending story 1 was my favourite movie as a kid. But a lot came while growing up and in the process, I confess I completely missed parts 2 and 3. Now I discovered them by chance and was really curious.. OK, part 2 is not bad but failed to impress me as the first one. Part 3, for god sake what a disappointment. Why did they even bother? Why is Rockbiter so small? What happened to Atreyu? even the known characters as Falcor are completely changed (Lucky Dragon? More like "GRUMPY dragon" here) Also the book cover is green? What happened to the normal red cover? They TRIED to respect the original story, but they failed. Miserably. As a kid I imagined Fantasia as this wonderful imaginary world, full of dreams and illusion. Thanks to this movie, my image of Fantasia has been reduced to Rockbiter buying an electric guitar and joining a Rock band and also Childlike Empress using Aurin for her shopping sprees. Don't ask, just don't watch it. If you want to keep your childhood memories intact, stay at Neverending story 2. Story ends there anyways, this was completely unnecessary. Avoid.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
B(l)ack again
kosmasp24 May 2019
Who knew, that Jack Black was in this? Well I reckon those who had watched it and remember of course. Now we get new actors again - in the same roles/characters. But the father seems to move and so is the audience. Well we are supposed to. This is quite the mess - and while small children may find redeemable comedy in it, overall this never achieves any heights the second movie had, never mind the first one.

So if you can get behind a story that is so simple and characters doing terrible things for no apparent reason and cliches abound ... well do I need to tell more? Still the flavor of the Never Ending Story does a bit of magic (no pun intended) and the puppet work still works ...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
THE worst film. Ever. (Small SPOILERS.)
DesertHedgehog31 August 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Rarely do I see a film that I can honestly say I absolutely do NOT like. This film, bar none, is THE WORST.

Character rape abounds. Falkor, the wise, soft-spoken luck dragon we know and love, is transformed into a whiney, neurotic character who frequently makes lame complaints, a few concerning his back. Yeccchhh.

Then, there's the tree-like character. HIS wisecracks are often related to the human world. ("Call the fire department!") If there's one thing I despise, it's modern-Earth humor where it doesn't belong.

And the Child-like Empress. This lovely, polite, wise young lady has been mysteriously transformed into the Pre-Teen Empress. At one point, she even referred to someone as "old man." Can you imagine our beloved Stronach-version Empress doing that? Never!

The ONLY characters who had anything done right with them were the gnomes. These were actually played fairly well.

The story was horrendous. It didn't even feel like a Neverending Story movie at all. It didn't help that most of it took place in the "human world."

My rating? I big, fat, flat zero. >_<
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Almost makes me want to watch football
tsnake14 October 2007
Football is nearly all that is on right now and I caught up on TV shows, this movie is on and I figure to give it a shot.

1994!?!?! This movie reminds me of the worst of 80's low budget fantasy. Even how the characters dress, with their preppy plastic clothes or stereotypical "punks" outfits.

As another commenter pointed out, the references from Fantasia characters to real world people and places is insulting.

This movie kills fantasy.

The contemporary soundtrack also destroys whatever potential there could ever be for a lasting (positive) impression.

Everything about this is horrible. I gave it a 2 because it's better than watching football.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
DUMB
DoctorSkyTower20 July 2000
Saw the original Never ending Story years ago, I loved it! Adults as well as kids will enjoy this first film. There were all manner of strange and wondrous beasts to keep the audience interested. It also had a great story line.

Sequel to first film.... Ahhhm....

This Third installment... Oh Dear.

The set has moved to the modern day 'human world' of earth. Climax of movie is at the local shopping mall (during Halloween!). We have 90's music and mannerisms, and a bunch of pathetic bullies called 'The Nasties' are the antagonists. A motley assortment of Fantasia life forms romping about the boring local shopping mall not only looked cheesy, it reeked of the standard, well-used cliche. 'Non-human' characters were very poorly designed, they looked exactly like men in suits, lame-o borrowed from the 70s!

Plot line was a very long, (boring) worn-out cliche, unlikely to hold your attention for long. There have already been countless movies done before with the same story line. One gets the feeling of 'made for the pre-teens only'. Unlike the first film, which appealed to all ages, this is a definite yes.

CONCLUSION: Not impressed. This whole thing should have stayed where it was created - in the fantasy world the book was based on.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pales in comparison to the first and even the lackluster sequel.
TOMNEL18 December 2007
This movie is nothing but a slap in the face to fans of the original film. The second movie was bad enough, but at least they tried....this was just stupid. And the sad part is this movie will probably appeal to young kids more than the other two.

In this atrocity, Bastian Bux's father gets married and Bastian has a new stepsister who doesn't like him for some reason. He goes to a new school and gets picked on by the group of bullies called the Nasties, led by a young Jack Black. He goes into the Neverending Story to escape the bullies, but they find the book and start changing it in their image. Chaos ensues. One thing I can say about this movie, is it's actually somewhat entertaining at times because of it's stupidity, where the second film was just boring. But nonetheless, this is still the worst of the films. It seems as though the writer and director didn't think to use the other two movies as references on how the characters should look or act. Falcor in the first film is an intelligent heroic creature, here Falcor has a deep, dumb voice and he serves as the stupid coward comic relief, similar to the Cowardly Lion. The Rock Eaters have totally changed what they look like from massive and wide to skinny costumed characters. One of the worst scenes involves the Rock Eater singing "Born to Be Wild", which was horrendous. Atreyu, the co-main character of the last 2 films is gone, and everything about Fantasia has changed in this terrible so-called final Neverending Story film.

My rating: BOMB/****. 90 mins. Rated G.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Only Jack Black is Worth Watching!
Sylviastel15 July 2011
Okay, this film is really just for kids with the creatures, the fantasy, and ridiculous storyline about a magical storybook. Anyway, Jack Black is a surprise here in one his earliest films where he plays the leader of the nasties. He and his gang of tattooed high school failures are called the nasties and terrorize the kids in school. This time, they terrorized poor Bastian who is new and has a new family including a stepsister whose not so keen on the new family addition of stepfather and brother in her mother's household. Anyway, the film plot is boring. It never really develops nor do we care too. There is too much in the fantasy world of Fantasia where Bastian goes to escape the Nasties and returns with a couple of them to Earth. When the Nasties get a hold of the special magical book, they are tempted to make changes and alter two worlds. A silly film for kids only. Maybe they'll get it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed