Guinevere (TV 1994)The legend of King Arthur, Sir Lancelot and Guinevere, told from a somewhat more feminist perspective. Director:Jud Taylor |
|
| 0Share... |
Guinevere (TV 1994)The legend of King Arthur, Sir Lancelot and Guinevere, told from a somewhat more feminist perspective. Director:Jud Taylor |
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Sheryl Lee | ... | ||
| Sean Patrick Flanery | ... | ||
| Noah Wyle | ... | ||
|
|
Brid Brennan | ... | |
| James Faulkner |
|
||
| Donald Pleasence | ... | ||
| Constantine Gregory | ... | ||
|
|
Martin East | ... | |
| Ben Pullen | ... |
Kei
|
|
|
|
Andrius Bobrovas | ... | |
|
|
Kestas Jakstas | ... |
Yvain
|
| Anton Lesser | ... |
Envoy
|
|
|
|
Bruce Lidington | ... |
Swordsmith
(as Bruce Liddington)
|
| James Greene | ... |
Bishop
|
|
|
|
Regina Share | ... |
Kaethi
|
The legend of King Arthur, Sir Lancelot and Guinevere, told from a somewhat more feminist perspective.
I was excited when looking on this site I saw that there was a movie made based on the books by Persia Woolley, I have been a fan for a long time. However, this movie in no way reflects Persia's wonderful books, not even close. Guinevere is some tomboy out fighting, Arthur is some frat boy idiot and Lancelot is some angry boy. They leave out almost all of the story and barely have the other characters. The acting is boring and not that great. The only thing I can say that was good was the scenery was nice and the overall feel of the time. There is nothing that fits the books or even a decent view of the Arthurian legend. The story doesn't showcase the wonderful character Persia wrote and that is a shame, they had great source material. The movie is boring and forgettable. My advise is to read the three books Persia Woolley wrote, they are great and much more entertaining.