Dead Center (1993) Poster

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
It's not too bad, so if you see it at Goodwill or someplace like that for 99 cents, you could do a lot worse.
tarbosh220004 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Joe (Lazard) is one bad dude. He's a career criminal with a bad temper. He pretty much fights or shoots everyone he sees. After an illegal art deal gone wrong (as opposed to the usual drug deal gone wrong), Joe is facing death row after he shoots some police officers. That's when the shadowy figures of Mary (York) and Sanders (Lottimer) enter the picture. They offer to mold this criminal lump of clay into a lean, mean fighting machine that pulls off secret assassinations for them. This may be starting to sound a little familiar to you at this point. So, after a period of extensive training, Joe is ready for the world. But after some conspiracies and some double or perhaps triple crosses occur, Joe doesn't know who to trust. Is it Mary? Is it Sanders? Could it be someone else? Looks like Crazy Joe may just have to hit his target DEAD CENTER if he wants to get out of this jam alive...

It has been noted before that Dead Center is pretty much the male version of La Femme Nikita (1990) or Point of No Return (1993). That is true, so that saves a lot of time in describing what the movie is. If you've seen those films, and want to see Justin Lazard in the main role, well, here ya go. He does a competent job and he looks like a lost Estevez brother.

The main problem, however, is that the central character of Joe is not likable. The audience doesn't like him from the jump and that never changes. Despite all of his training and supposed transformation, he remains an unlikable jerk. There are also no other likable characters throughout the course of the film. So that made things tough going as far as the enjoyment factor is concerned, never mind trying to ferret out who to root for in all this. We would put in a vote for Ambassador Chavez (Carradine) but he's only on screen for maybe a minute or two. It's definitely a Carradine cameo. He gets slightly more screen time than Charles Napier in Center of the Web (1992). Carradine fans looking for a meaty role from the man will come away disappointed.

There are some beat-ups, some shooting, an abandoned warehouse/factory, and when the rollerblade girl appears in Joe's life, the time-honored sax duly appears on the soundtrack. The whole thing reminded us somewhat of The Contract (1999). Of course, for this movie some Cannon people are involved, such as Menachem Golan, and director Steve Carver, known to action fans for his Chuck movies An Eye For an Eye (1981) and Lone Wolf McQuade (1983), plus Dudikoff outing River of Death (1989). At least here in the U. S., the VHS was released on the Vidmark label.

Dead Center is a decent enough entry in the "let's take a bad person and train them so they become an assassin and then things go wrong" sub-sub-subgenre of action movies. However, nothing really stands out about it either, so we can't give it a wholehearted recommendation. But it's not too bad, so if you see it at Goodwill or someplace like that for 99 cents, you could do a lot worse.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dead Center
BandSAboutMovies15 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Steve Carver has a pretty good track record. I mean, if he only made Lone Wolf McQuade, An Eye for an Eye, Steel, Jocks, The Arena, Big Bad Mama, Capone, Fast Charlie...the Moonbeam Rider and River of Death are all pretty fun or weird or at least have a moment that entertains you.

Joe (Justin Lazard) is a killer. He's not elegant, but he's ruthless. But the law has finally caught up with him and he's facing the chair.

Or maybe not. Mary (Rachel York) makes him an offer on behalf of the U. S. government: train to be an elite hitman or die. Under the watchful eye of Saunders (Eb Lottimer), Mary trains him to be an unstoppable assassin.

His first mission is to kill Ambassador Chavez (David Carradine) at a Washington, D. C. art gallery. He easily pulls it off, but angers Saunders when he leaves a loose end: an innocent tourist who photographed the crime scene. That woman is killed in a fire.

So yeah. El Butch Nikita.

Mary gets suspicious of her boss and learns that he's really working not for the interests of the U.s. But instead using his killing machines to commit legal murders for crime boss Emilio Cordoba (Frank McCarthy). Saunders next commands Joe to kill Congressman Clark (Joe Strader) and also tells Mary to erase him afterward. Of course, Joe is in love with Mary, so they run off together, pulling off their own killings, like wiping Cordoba off the map.

Then, the two infiltrate the toxic chemical lab that is Saunders' base. Joe blows it up real good and heads off to sleep with a blonde, just like James Bond would, but Mary ends up saving him from her, as his love interest - for the evening - ends up being a killer.

After having his books The Park Is Mine and The Fourth War into movies, Stephen Peters started writing movies of his own. He got set for life when he wrote Wild Things. For this one, he had Menahem Golan giving him the initial story, which for all we know was a few words, as his story for Ninja 3: The Domination was "Female ninja."
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Much like a male perspective on `LA FEMME NAKITA'
junkySTL29 May 2001
I gathered from this film, when seeing a preview for it, that it looked much like a male perspective on Luc Besson's `LA FEMME NAKITA' or John Badham's `POINT OF NO RETURN.' On viewing, I found that I was right. It's the story of Joe (Justin Lazard, who would later rise to notoriety in `big' films like `SPECIES II' and `UNIVERSAL SOLDIER: THE RETURN') who is a criminal, and gets busted by the cops on some kind of illegal transaction. He is then recruited to work for the government as a hit man by a woman named Mary (Rachel York), whom Joe hates/falls for. In the end Joe tried killing his government companions and attempts to `get out' of the system. Though the action scenes are impressive, and the action is constant, the film lacks substance, and looks very much like a made for T.V. film. However, the end of the film is original, and good. If you want to see what `POINT OF NO RETURN' would've looked like with a man instead of Bridget Fonda, then this is your movie!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
mindless piece of boring crap
trudylyn4 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
It kind of sits there, quivering. It lacks editing, acting or purpose. A rather typical piece of straight to cable low rotation trash from the 90s, it is long at 90 minutes. The production gave a lot of union personnel a paycheck. Terrible by even Menahem Golan's lax production standards, most of the actors involved probably paid to keep this off their resumes. The R rating is about the only reason a bored person would watch this thing, as there are dozens of unnecessary sexual situations. Any suggestion of a plot is destroyed by tons of foreshadowing. Any suggestion that this collection of of images has any relation to La Femme Nakita or the American version, whose title I forgets, is like saying that Kurt Russell movies and Lawrence Olivier movies were made on the same planet. Do yourself a favor. If you find it on tape, use it for a blank.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dead End
blurnieghey12 June 2023
At about the 20-minute point it dawned on me that I had tried watching this movie before years ago and wound up falling asleep about 30 minutes into it but, unfortunately, I was wide awake this time around. To put it bluntly, I don't like action films like this and I'm being generous with two stars, as I didn't care for this movie at all. The film starts out OK with some decent violence and we are introduced to our reprobate protagonist who has all of the qualities to make him a decent action hero, but the film quickly goes down the tubes from that point and stays there.

So, the guy (for reasons not fully explained) is selected to be an elite government agent so, of course, no expense is spared in whisking him off to a secluded military base and hooking him up with all of the best combat simulators and expert brainwashing....er....training, right? Well, all that stuff is OK, but what's even better is just sticking him in some beach house with a skeleton crew of trainers where he gets his own room and his boss struts around in a bikini. You get the picture. Action? Yeah, there's a bit, but not that great. To give you an idea of where I'm coming from, they have a scene where the hero gets his own place, and they use an extended time-lapse detailing him eating Chinese food and buying new furniture. Let me tell you, I was on the edge of my seat wondering what type of floor lamp the guy would buy! I want to accuse the film of putting style over substance, but the style is pretty weak, despite all the fluff, and I just write this mess off as Hollywood hogwash of the most annoying and pretentious variety. It served its purpose by putting me to sleep the first time around and fails at everything else.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not bad At All
Johnboy122130 December 2008
It helps me perhaps that I really like films such as this gritty, action packed film.

Sure, it's no classic, by any means, but I liked enough to buy the VHS tape, and I would buy the film on DVD, but it's never been released that way.

The main attraction for me is Justin Lazard, an actor who has never gotten the respect he deserves, or the roles either, for that matter. He's just perfect for this type of film, and his charisma and sex appeal shine here.

Too bad he's never been featured in more mainstream films (Species 2 being the exception).

I believe the film is well worth the visit, and I believe I'll go watch it again right now.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed