| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 18 reviews in total |
10 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
Basic but good direction from Cannon and good performances from many of the cast, 18 July 2002
Author:
bob the moo from Birmingham, UK
Youth crime and drugs are rife in London. Scotland Yard call in an advisor
from the DEA because they believe a new force is in play within the
underworld. Harris arrives in London to find nothing different from the LA
he just left and begins to make links with Chris who seems to offer the only
way into the gangs.
The story may not be anything to write home about, but this film was a good
introduction to the ability (if questionable script judgement) of Danny
Cannon. The story makes a lot of leaps as Harris tries to shut down the
American influence in the drug game. However many subplots are weak or
totally incidental and just seem there to make up the time. The main story
itself is a little too glossy and is a times just an excuse for Cannon's
direction.
Cannon directs well here London looks good, whether it's the dark alleys
or the sun setting over the cityscape. He can't really work well with
character but he can do visuals pretty well.
Another reviewer has commented on the `unknown' cast however there are no
more `unknowns' in this than in anything else. Keitel is good despite
having the whole family subplot that he clearly doesn't know what to do with
and he doesn't do as much with his exploitation of Chris as he could have
but he's always watchable. Kelly is good as the young Chris but the
emotion towards the end is a little beyond him. The rest of the cast is
fully of unknowns is it? Thandie Newton? Viggo Mortensen? Keith Allen? A
host of faces from British TV and films? All are pretty good although some
have more to do than others.
Overall the plot may not be totally together but a good strong lead by
Keitel and a good bit of direction by Cannon makes this feel better than it
actually is.
13 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
Don`t Believe The Hype, 12 July 2002
![]()
Author:
Theo Robertson from Isle Of Bute, Scotland
When THE YOUNG AMERICANS was released it was marketed as a cool , tough British thriller . But after watching it the reality is that it`s average at best and is disappointing in many ways , especially its casting , Harvey Keitel as a tough NY cop , Keith Allen as a violent London gangster , wow get ready for some on screen fireworks ! Or rather don`t because these two characters become sidelined halfway through and Chris O`Neill becomes the film`s focus . In truth THE YOUNG AMERICANS is more of a drama with some subtle political comment about the Americanisation of Britain rather than a tough action thriller as it was marketed
9 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
A powerful dark drama with millieu and mood first and story second., 10 December 2001
![]()
Author:
George Parker from Orange County, CA USA
There's hardly a smile to be found in this dark, brooding, oppressively heavy drama which tells of an American DEA agent (Keitel) who comes to London to assist in the capture of a drug trafficker as the UK bends under the strain of a virulent drug trade. The camera spends most of the time examining the bleak, grim, and sad expressions of police, innocents, and others caught up in the drug war leaving the plot muddled and somewhat buried in its attempt to show that where drugs are involved there are no winners. A powerfully compelling drama for those who can appreciate the reality of the lose-lose nature of crime.
5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
great photography, 6 March 2002
Author:
ben ives (flexedinertia)
I am a tad biased here when writing regarding this film, because I live in
London myself.
I thought that TYA lacked a little in as far as character depth, but never
the less I thought the acting was slick and to the point. The photography in
this flick really captures parts of London that are rarely seen on film. The
underground. The rave at the beginning. The market seen where christian is
collecting his wages are so familiar. Keitel again was very good. I
especially liked the way he acted around the London police - cool, calm with
lack of visual emotion. I guess that at present TYA is quite ironic in some
ways as london police are using NY methods to battle crime.
I liked this film alot, and would give it an eight out of ten based on
photography, soundtrack and a cool storyline,
6 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
A fine debut for Danny Cannon - but what happened . . . ?, 12 August 2005
![]()
Author:
pagangod from United Kingdom
There's a couple of stories (possibly apocryphal) about how Cannon's
career was launched, one story is that respected film Director Alan
Parker, saw a short film he made on a BBC amateur film-making programme
and, impressed with what he saw, immediately phoned the BBC so he could
get in touch with Cannon - which he apparently did, Parker then
supposedly recommended him to a prestigious film school...
The other story is that Danny Cannon's father is a top studio executive
and that nepotism was the way he started.
Either way, Cannon's debut film was an interesting little movie with
big aspirations - at the time British films tended to be almost always
socio-political, so-called worthy films, usually about the social
underclass - remember this was 1993 and just before Richard Curtis
invented the Britsh Rom-Com...
What the film lacks in terms of story (Cannon was Co-Writer) it makes
up for in sheer film-making skill - The Young Americans is a
beautiful-looking movie.
It's a film that belies it's VERY low-budget, and looks like a much
more expensive piece.
Danny Cannon displays an almost Ridley Scott like style in the care he
takes with the look of the film, and the careful, unhurried pacing, he
is aided in his efforts by excellent Anamorphic 2.35:1 photography from
D.P. Vernon Layton - giving The Young Americans a rich, almost
sumptuous look, for what, on the surface, is a gritty urban crime
thriller.
A special mention should be made for Composer David Arnold and his
beautiful, almost tragic Music Score - of course he went on to bigger
things: Stargate, Independence Day, the Bond movies - Tomorrow Never
Dies, The World Is Not Enough, Die Another Day, plus Zoolander,
Changing Lanes, The Stepford Wives and the upcoming Ghost Rider, and
another Bond - Casino Royale.
Personally, I thought Danny Cannon's career might have amounted to
something more substantial that just 3 feature films.
These films include the badly mis-judged(!) Stallone vehicle Judge
Dredd and the horror sequel I Still Know What You Did Last Summer - not
sure how the latter film fared at the box-office (though I suspect not
good!)
I DO know that Judge Dredd was a BIG financial and critical failure -
Cannon got the film right after The Young Americans, tiny budget to
mega budget - could this be a case of Cannon running before he could
walk?
Of course Danny Cannon has found considerable success as an
Executive/Supervising Producer, occasional Writer and sometimes
Director on the 3 hit CSI TV series from Jerry Bruckhiemer - this in
itself is no mean feat, but I do feel Cannon's potential as a Director
of Feature Films has gone largely untapped and that he could have made
a more substantial career if he'd stayed in Movies.
Hear he's got a Soccer movie in the works, let's hopes that this is a
return to features for an underrated and talented Director.
Lata.
9 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
badly aging thriller drama, 13 July 2005
![]()
Author:
dromasca from Herzlya, Israel
'The Young Americans' was made in the 90s - a quite routine thriller story about an American cop sent to London to follow a drug baron. The theme of cops in foreign territory was largely dealt with before and after this movie, and allowed for some good films to be made. Detective stories, and stories about detectives are a good ground to present culture clash in the context of tense situations. Not here, where the only difference is in the hard spoken accents of the characters, and no real tension or relationship develops around the main character or with respect to his Brit counterparts. Some good acting from Harvey Keitel and the two young actors trying to describe a pure relationship in the trash of the underground world cannot save the day in this rather boring movie, where nothing special happens, not more than in an average BBC police drama.
Correction of Sols review, 9 December 2011
![]()
Author:
guyboxerdog from United Kingdom
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Sorry SOL but your review is a little inaccurate. First, you call Keith
Allens character homicidal and psychotic. Truly he was just a
pretentious little prick with a Napoleonic complex trying to be a tough
guy. Also, Chris was not a hoodlum. He worked in a bar and hated drugs.
For my end, I love this movie. I know its not amazing but its got some
great lines, so class footage of Arsenal v Man U and as usual Keith
Allen is out of his depth and hams it to get through.
I will agree that there were too many sub plots opened and never
explored (Keitels family etc) and the seemingly rushed downfall to Carl
Frazer was too easy. However, scenes like the police interviewing
Dwayne, and the attempted murder of the old time gangster who proves to
be too wily a fox to be taken out like that, combined with great
cinematography and likable heroes make this one of my old time faves.
Classic London Crime Drama, 1 August 2011
Author:
swamprat_21 from United States
Well, it wasn't that bad of a film. Having collected a dozen or so London crime dramas I must admit while this one had some flaws (low budget)it quite well fits into the genre of the Classic British Crime Drama. The violence and paranoia of the gang leaders, including the American (when he hurts the young women at the party) captures the character of these types (as far as the scene in concerned). I thought the acting was good, the camera work was also interesting and the film kept moving forward to the climax which was still unknown 5 minutes before it took place. The scene with the wedding of Chris's father, where he is drunk and is overheard by the "goon" who immediately "rats" him out was well done. The scenes of the seedier sides of London was also well photographed, the smoke, grim, and age. All in all it was worth watching if you are not expecting something "great" like "Get Carter" or "Snatch".
1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Effective, decent action thriller, 22 July 2009
![]()
Author:
davideo-2 from United Kingdom
STAR RATING: ***** Saturday Night **** Friday Night *** Friday Morning
** Sunday Night * Monday Morning
With everyone talking about how youth crime and violence has
skyrocketed almost to the same level as the States in Britain, this
action thriller from over fifteen years ago now looks like a grim
prediction from back then, with Harvey Keitel's hardened detective
flying over to help stem the drugs/murder problem whilst pursuing a
villain he was originally after in the States who he now believes has
started to prowl around Europe.
The film manages a consistently gritty, raw atmosphere, fitting in tone
with the story it's telling. Keitel is perfectly cast in the lead role,
whilst as the villain in an early role Viggo Mortensen shows potential.
Unfortunately, a melodramatic, hammy tendency in parts of the script,
as well as an unconvincing turn from Keith Allen as a shady club owner,
stop it achieving it's full potential. Still, it's a decent enough
effort, forgettable but effective while it lasts. ***
1 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
London after dark, 4 April 2008
![]()
Author:
sol from Brooklyn NY USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
***SPOILER ALERT*** With a number of London's top hoodlums knocked off
it's become apparent that a new element of crime is sweeping the city.
Young thugs barley out of their teens are being recruited by American
drug kingpin Carl Frazer, Viggo Morterser,to enforce his now expanding
crime empire.
After having US government DEA agent John Harris, Harvey Keitel, sent
to help the London Police and Scotland Yard in getting to the bottom of
the crime wave things go from bad to worse. The two policemen Carver &
Carnegie, Geoffrey McGivern & Dave Duffy, that are to work with Harris
end up getting themselves killed. It turned that both cops were in the
pay of the London underworld and, together with their fellow criminals,
were offed by the young hoods working for Frazer.
Looking for a hook, or inside man, to infiltrate Frazer's drug empire
Harris together with his British police partner inspector Glen,Edward
Foster, zero in on petty hoodlum Christain O'Nell, Craig Kelly. Chis
has been going through a deep depression over the shooting of his
friend Lionel Stevens, Nigel Clavzel, at the notorious Temple Nightclub
run by homicidal psycho and Frazer front man Jack Doyle, Keith Allen.
Lionel's grief stricken sister Rachael, Thandle Norton, who met Chris
at the hospital where he brother was being treated soon fall in love
with him. This makes Chris even more depressed in not keeping Rachael's
brother Lionel away from Doyle, whom he was mouthing off to, who ended
up shooting him.
Keeping his mouth shut about who shot his friend Lionel , so he
wouldn't get killed by members of Frazer's "youth squad", Chris' slight
involvement, by his being friendly with with some of Frazer's young
hoodlums, with the city's illegal drug trade has his father and old
time London gangster Dermot, James Duggan, very upset. Dermot starts to
make threats against Frazer in that if his son Chris ever ends up
working for him he'll do a job on Frazer himself! Not realizing that
Frazer means business Dermot's bullet riddled body ends up floating in
the River Thames.
Chris now having his best friend and father ending up victims, together
with about two dozen London mobsters, of Frazer's reign of terror
decides to go undercover, with a wire, to get the goods on Frazer & Co.
for the London Police Department.
A very subdued looking Harvey Keitel, probably suffering of jet lag, is
mostly reduced to a supporting role to who's really the star of the
movie young Carig Kelly. Kelly as the misguided and very confused Chris
O'Neill has his eyes opened to just how destructive the American
gangster Frazer is not only to him but his fellow Londoners in bringing
drugs into the city. It soon turned out that Chris going undercover
with a recording device wasn't exactly the best way to get Frazer
caught with his guard down.
Being as both slick and slippery as a eel Frazer didn't expose his real
intentions knowing, even though he trusted Chris, the tactics that the
police, at least back in the states, use to catch hoodlums like himself
saying something that will put them behind bars. What struck me a bit
odd about the very cautious Frazer was that he used his very base of
operations, Doyle's Temple Nightclub, to have his sh*t, or drugs,
delivered! This more then anything else that the police and DEA Agent
Harris did, unsuccessfully, to catch him turned out to be Frazer's
fatal flaw and lead to his, and his criminal youth movement, ultimate
downfall.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Newsgroup reviews |
| External reviews | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |