IMDb > Night Eyes Three (1993) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
Night Eyes Three More at IMDbPro »

Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 5 reviews in total 

3 out of 5 people found the following review useful:

I worked on this film...

Author: MrEguy from West Hollywood, CA
29 January 2000

back when I didn't have an agent and I needed the money. I was a glorified extra, playing the "sound man." This film is a terrible example of an obvious sell-out to foreign investors, who demand lots of exploitative tits and ass for their investment money to get it done. Surprisingly, I was more than impressed by Shannon Tweed as a quality actor. She has the "chops" to rise above this very limiting, stigmatized genre. She's quite good. Engaging, intelligent, and alluring. Worth much more than the object of lust she is presented as. I wonder why she hasn't broken out by now. This is a lame, predictable film with all the expected shower and makeout scenes intact. If you like that alone, it's for you! Otherwise, don't waste your time.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

A mighty good rise-up from 2. Andrew and Shannon together make a better pair.

Author: Matt Carr from Wallback, West Virginia
25 December 1998

This movie was great!!!! It's a gem to the erotic thriller market. Andrew, what can I say, bud, you did a great job!!! Will Griffith is back, this time providing security for Zoe Clairmont, a TV actress on TV's hottest cop show, "Sweet Justice." Anyway, he falls in love, the usual drill...

But, there are a few twists in this one...

I loved this movie for so many reasons. The sex scenes were great (no joking). And the part with the wine, was very, very sensual. And the acting was a lot better. I think Shannon (who is a veteran of these types of movies) does a better job in this one because she, well, I don't know, has more spunk. Great direction by Stevens. He really outdid himself. As for errors, well, not many, except I don't like MONO sound too well. Great movie!!!!

**Review based on UNRATED version**

Contains:

Not much nudity, sex, or violence. Although when they pop up, they're orchestrated and,um, executed very well.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 5 people found the following review useful:

A tired Stevens-Tweed effort.

3/10
Author: gridoon
13 September 2001

Another typical outing from the prolific team of Andrew Stevens and Shannon Tweed. He plays the same character in all three "Night Eyes" films, but Tweed, who was the wife of a diplomat in "II", is a famous TV action star in "III". A definite sense of deja vu dominates this run-of-the-mill "thriller", which has less sex, nudity and violence than the previous installments, but no more interest. Not worth seeing....and the luscious Tracy Tweed is criminally underused. (*1/2)

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 6 people found the following review useful:

My lord....

Author: Lori Ingham (scullytoo@yahoo.com) from Manchester, NH
27 May 2002

Talk about your bad, bad B-movies! My boyfriend rented this one for us to watch, and I spent most of the movie either making fun of it (When Tweed says the line "I'm not even Zoe Clairmont", I replied with, "No, you're Shannon Tweed!") or pointing out the huge plotholes. I didn't even think the sex scenes were that erotic. They were just....there. Overall, a really, REALLY bad movie.

Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

JUICY EYE CANDY.

5/10
Author: seth steenerson (xldbd@hotmail.com) from southern california
16 November 1998

Boy I just love it when titty movies try to take themselves seriously, just like every shanan tweed movie does. And they sure are fun. This movie could have used a little more spice and perhaps some more suger. Overall this was a boring pillow hug with rosy smells and bunny's named Cheechee. -*1/2 stars

Was the above review useful to you?


Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Ratings External reviews
Plot keywords Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history