| Page 1 of 4: | [1] [2] [3] [4] |
| Index | 36 reviews in total |
32 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
Ang Lee's best movie so far, 4 April 2000
![]()
Author:
shrine-2
The central character of "The Wedding Banquet" looks
sullen through almost the entire movie. He knits
his brow and ponders as if there were something
troubling him to no end. At the very outset, it's
quite clear what that is. Wai-Tung is gay, and he
hasn't told his Taiwanese parents. He's annoyed
with his mother's unwelcome attempts to match him
with someone, so she can have what she wants: a
grandchild. But he's afraid to tell her or his
father why he is not interested. His mixed emotions
have no place to go; so they sit on his face,
incomplete and unexpressed, except as unresolved
anger, much of it at himself. And it's fun to watch
as he goes through the motions of pleasing family
and lover and acquaintances to take his mind off his
troubles.
The script by director Ang Lee, and associates Neil
Peng and James Schamus have written a crackerjack
story full of things that never have hit the screen
before. The wedding banquet itself is full of such
insightful details about contemporary
Chinese-American life and sentiment that there seems
something accomplished that's new to the movies.
When the wedding party invades the honeymoon suite,
you feel like the writers have a firm grasp on the
people they are presenting us, as if they know them,
inside and out. I have seen five movies directed by
Ang Lee, and this (and maybe his earlier "Pushing
Hands") is the only one in which I felt he had a
deep understanding of the characters, and for that
matter, of human nature and human love.
Filial piety may not be a new thing for the Chinese,
and maybe that is why this movie feels rooted,
grounded. Wai-Tung who is a successful businessman
and landlord commands respect among his colleagues,
but when he's with his parents, he's still their
little boy. You laugh as this grown man walks with
his father, head bowed, keeping exact pace, two
steps back, and you realize the secret of the older
man's hold on his imitator. Wai-Tung loves his
parents, and he knows what they expect. He's
ashamed that he doesn't want to fulfill their
dreams, that he wants a life of his own, that he
didn't turn out as they hoped. But he also cares
about his lover Simon, and you know what has drawn
them together is that they care about other people.
(Simon is a physical therapist who likes lecturing
his clients; Wai-Tung tries to appear in charge, but
he always seems to be taken advantage of by the
people around him.) This concern for others is what
draws us to Wai-Tung, and when his parents appear,
you know exactly why he's going along with deceiving
them.
Winston Chao is handsome and lithe, and he's good at
playing a frazzled, bewildered, well-meaning lump.
Yet he wouldn't be so likable, if it were not for
the propinquity of Mitchell Lichtenstein who clearly
has the expressiveness the movie needs. Although
the movie comes dangerously close to being one about
gay men in love who, in their most private moments,
look like the most they do is shake hands,
Lichtenstein ("Streamers") manages with the subtlest
means to convey a sexual connection. The scene in
which Simon presents a cell phone as a gift and
carries on a conversation to test it affords
Lichtenstein the chance to show what heat he can
generate on the screen when he's called to do so.
It makes evident how lucky a man Wai-Tung is, and
why he'd allow himself to be emotionally torn for so
long.
But the most compelling performances here come from
Sihung Lung (who played the unwanted father-in-law
in "Pushing Hands") and Ah Lei Gua as Mr. and Mrs.
Gao. Lung conveys Old-World benevolence that pretty
much dictates where this movie goes. He more than
fills the shoes of the aging warrior, taking the
last few steps that will make his life complete. He
grants Mr. Gao a share of dignity his work here
rightly deserves. Yet it is Ah Lei Gua who
convinces me that she is fully in character.
Whether she is bursting into tears over the
shabbiness of the civil wedding, or trying to
overlook her daughter-in-law's clumsiness in the
kitchen, or keeping Simon at a distance when she
learns his real position in her son's life, you
sense an actress of the highest rank who knows
intuitively the character she has been given to
play.
With May Chin who, I hear, is very popular in
Taiwan, and here carries herself with porcelain
elegance. Her Wei-Wei is an enigma, a woman with a
penchant for handsome gay men, and the movie is
content with leaving her that way. You come away as uneasy about the
arrangement she struck with Simon
and Wai-Tung as Mrs. Gao is, who exits weeping.
When Ang Lee slows down the camera at the end, as
Mr. Gao raises his arms to be inspected at the
airport gate, the director in spite of himself belies the thought that the
old soldier has surrendered to a new enemy--the craziness and the
self-indulgence of the next generation. The plangency of that last shot
remains with you for a long time.
25 out of 26 people found the following review useful:
A GREAT LAIDBACK MOVIE!, 9 May 2002
Author:
Blue Banana
I really loved this film, I knew nothing about it before I saw it and so
was
really surprised.
It's a great example of modern day life and combines so many issues of
today
- sexuality, cross-cultural life, tradition/modernity etc. But it's not a
"gay" film and it's not a "foreign" film, it mixes these elements really
well into a very typically Hollywood story. But it is also able to use
them
to comment on social stereotypes and grouping, but without blatantly doing
so.
The characters are all very likeable and I really felt sympathy for the
positions they were all in - a young man (Wai-tung) trying to please both
his parents and his partner Simon, an illegal immigrant (Wei-wei) who
wants
to stay in America, and Wai-tung's boyfriend Simon trying his best to be
accommodating and patient though feeling pushed out of the
family.
The messages of this film about tolerance and honesty are not pushed in
your
face. It's a very easygoing film that is very funny in some places and sad
in others. There are some subtitles and some is in English because we, the
audience, must learn to integrate our own way of life with others, just
like
the people in the film.
21 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
One of the most beautiful endings of any comedy ever., 2 January 2004
![]()
Author:
xavrush89 from Illinois, U.S.A.
Ang Lee already was a masterful director before his three triumphs
Sense and Sensibility, The Ice Storm, and Crouching Tiger, Hidden
Dragon (for which he was ROBBED of Oscars by the likes of Mel Gibson
and Steven Soderburg). Maybe children might be a little young for this,
but it is indeed a "family film" like no other. And the new
"daughter-in-law" is hilarious (although you might think she goes too
far in one important-to-the-plot scene). The funniest scene is the
courthouse nuptials, and the banquet itself makes you wish you were
there.
After ten years, this film still does not seem dated at all, which I
thought it would. The only thing missing is a HOT love scene with
Winston Chao and Mitchell Lichtenstein, who looks far younger than his
age. I know if I was in that situation, I'd want to blow off some
steam! The best part is the just before finale, the father has a great
quiet scene with one of the other cast members. Have some tissues on
hand for the ending.
It's best to own a copy of this film, that way you won't be tempted to
watch it every time it comes on "Bravo". It's an absolute delight, one
of the best of the decade, definitely in the Top 50 of best comedies of
all time, at least.
15 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
Ang lee's The Wedding Banquet is a great addition to gay film, 15 May 2004
![]()
Author:
mambo3003 (mambo3003@yahoo.com) from San Diego, CA
The Wedding Banquet is a truly inspiring and cross-culturally
challenging film. It touches on many issues/themes which have never
been combined before in one movie: Taiwanese Americans vs. Chinese
Americans, Asian American families, old school parents vs. younger
generation(s), multi-racial couples, gay couples, gay Asian Americans,
immigrants, pride, family values and love.
And
while I found the ending of this movie somewhat unrealistic (I'll
let other viewers decide) I also found the film challenging and
optimistic (which is where my realism takes over).
You should watch this movie if you are
Asian
gay
Asian AND gay
or
simply want to learn something about another culture. You might be
surprised!
Props to Ang Lee for creating a unique opportunity to look into two
very distinct and different cultures at the same time: Asian American
and gays in the early 90s.
11 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
More Than Just a Comedy, 20 February 1999
![]()
Author:
gbheron from Washington, DC
The Wedding Banquet is marketed as a comedy, but it is more than that.
Closer in plot and style to Green Card than The Birdcage it examines the
personal consequences of deceit. The comedy is there of course, but so is
much tenderness and pain as a marriage of convenience between a gay man and a
woman deportee unravels. Like Green Card which had similar plotlines, the
"obvious" resolutions do not appear so likely as the film progresses which
adds to its attractiveness.
I recommend it highly.
8 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
A must watch!, 8 August 2007
![]()
Author:
Gordon-11 from Hong Kong
This film is about a gay Chinese man having to bow down to parental
pressure and marry a woman.
IMDb lists this film as comedy. There are comedic scenes such as the
post wedding party. Yes, the party is hardly an exaggeration, it is
actually done according to the Chinese culture! However, I think The
Wedding banquet is better be viewed as a drama. The plot of this film
is probably the life story of many gay men of Chinese descent. It is
simple, and yet truthful, realistic, touching and affecting.
The main character, Wai-Tung, faces enormous pressure to get married.
However, he is actually in love with a Westerner called Andrew. The
film fully portrays the pressure Wai-Tung faces because of parental and
societal pressure. It also displays how preaches acceptance and
tolerance. The ending is so touching, and even months after watching
the film, I can still remember the ending.
This is an excellent film. For men who are in situations similar to
Wai-Tung, The Wedding Banquet will resonate with them forever. Even if
you are not in a similar situation, this film is so touching that it is
a must watch!
8 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
perfection, 5 October 1999
Author:
Matthew Longo (m_ryan@uclink4.berkeley.edu) from California
I suppose The Wedding Banquet could be considered a romantic comedy. It is so in the best senses of both words: romantic without being sappy, and comedic without being ridiculous. The characters are vibrant and interesting without being cliches. Ang Lee has not created a great movie, simply a perfect one.
10 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Understanding of people., 29 December 2001
Author:
cmyklefty from Philadelphia
Hsi yen (The Wedding Banquet) is an enjoyable movie to watch. It does not matter if you are acquainted with Ang Lee's work. The film is about a woman wants to stay in the country gets married to a gay man. The man tries to hide being gay when his parents visit from out of the country. All of the performances are excellent in this picture.
8 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Father knows best, 2 August 2004
![]()
Author:
jotix100 from New York
Ang Lee with infinite wisdom seems to be saving the best part of this film
for last. Acceptance is the underlying theme of this movie, which I recently
watched for the second time. I saw the film when it was originally released
in 1993. At that time, it seemed to have been breaking ground for tolerance
from the straight world toward gays, in general.
Ang Lee is one of the best film directors working these days. This is a
small film in comparison to what came afterward. The story of how parents in
a conservative society view their children that are "different" is always an
interesting idea. Those same parents produced that child; the mere idea they
will turn their backs to a son who is living openly as a gay man is a
complex problem, at best.
Different cultures react differently, as is the case in this film. While the
parents are not completely taken over by the way they discover their son has
turned out to be, they go along with the flow, never condemning the son, his
partner, or the young woman who is pretending to be, what she is
not.
The acting is good in general, but it has to be the actor who plays the
father, who ultimately wins one's heart. His culture goes back for centuries
and he is won by his son's lover because he sees how kind, decent and honest
he really is.
It's better never to judge, or so it seems that Ang Lee is telling
us.
8 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Superb performances, very discreet the scenes, real touching movie, 24 November 2002
![]()
Author:
Eduardo (alteknochen@yahoo.com) from Berlin - Buenos Aires
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I saw the movie I Berlin, Germany, and I cherished it, the acting perfomance of each actor was superb, the father that deep in his soul knew all, and for him was more important the family line was not broken. The only difficult moment, maybe a doubt from the director or the writer of the play, was when she decided to have the baby, it seemed that they didn't really know what to do, myself I'll adopt him/her as my own child. It reminded me the argentinian way, first is the family, then you.
| Page 1 of 4: | [1] [2] [3] [4] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |