7.7/10
22,226
257 user 21 critic

Gettysburg (1993)

PG | | Drama, History, War | 8 October 1993 (USA)
Trailer
0:31 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

ON DISC
In 1863, the Northern and Southern forces fight at Gettysburg in the decisive battle of the American Civil War.

Director:

(as Ronald F. Maxwell)

Writers:

(novel), (screenplay) (as Ronald F. Maxwell)
Reviews
Popularity
4,400 ( 180)
1 win & 1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Maj. Gen. Isaac R. Trimble / Narrator (as Morgan Sheppard)
...
Maj. G. Moxley Sorrel
...
Col. E. Porter Alexander (as Patrick Stuart)
Tim Ruddy ...
...
Ivan Kane ...
Edit

Storyline

The four and 1/4 hour depiction of the historical and personal events surrounding and including the decisive American civil war battle features thousands of civil war re-enactors marching over the exact ground that the federal army and the army of North Virginia fought on. The defense of the Little Round Top and Pickett's Charge are highlighted in the actual three day battle which is surrounded by the speeches of the commanding officers and the personal reflections of the fighting men. Based upon the novel 'The Killer Angels'. Written by Keith Loh <loh@sfu.ca>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Same Land. Same God. Different Dreams. See more »

Genres:

Drama | History | War

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG for language and epic battle scenes | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

8 October 1993 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

The Killer Angels  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Budget:

$25,000,000 (estimated)

Gross:

$10,769,960 (USA)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(70 mm prints)| (35 mm prints)| (35 mm prints)

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Tom Berenger was so fond of his role as General James Longstreet, he later opened up a restaurant/nightclub in downtown Wilmington NC called "Longstreet's Irish Pub" which is still in business today. See more »

Goofs

Some Confederate generals talk about Charles Darwin. General Pickett states that he refuses to believe that man descended from apes as Darwin has postulated. Darwin's "The Descent of Man" which theorizes on the ape-like origins of the human species was published in 1871 and wouldn't have been debated in 1863. However, Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" was published in 1859 and had engendered considerable scientific and religious debate in the early 1860s. Though Darwin had explicitly avoided dealing with human evolution in the "Origin...", the debate did not avoid the subject. It is quite possible that educated people would have been aware of this controversy in 1863. See more »

Quotes

Maj. Gen. John F. Reynolds: [Has just arrived to reinforce Buford, surveying battlefield] Lovely ground.
Gen. Buford: I thought so, Sir.
Maj. Gen. John F. Reynolds: Now, let's go surprise Harry Heth.
See more »

Connections

Referenced in Sweet Home Alabama (2002) See more »

Soundtracks

My Old Kentucky Home
(uncredited)
Composed by Stephen Foster (1852)
[Played in Union camp when Tom Chamberlain is talking to the Confederate prisoners]
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

Vivid, well worth seeing, faithful to book,heartbreaking ending
22 February 2003 | by (New York, New York) – See all my reviews

This movie picks up steam as it goes along - leading to its wrenching end, as did the battle.

The performance of Richard Jordan as Lo Armistead must be singled out for praise - his anguish was very moving. I'd loved the actor in The Friends of Eddie Coyle and what a job he does. (It helps that he's given the best lines in the movie). Martin Sheen as Robt. E. Lee is not the first name that would come to mind - but I think he gave a fine performance - his accent was entrancing. Sam Elliott is perfectly chosen as (and wonderfully played) the western General John Buford. I also think Jeff Daniels was absolutely wonderful - conveying so well the different manner of someone who until a year before, had been a civilian professor, not a colonel. Unfortunately although I'm generally a fan of Tom Berenger, I wasn't particularly moved by any scene he was in - he kind of walks through it.

The movie is written so well - and its pace just fine. There are so many interesting scenes, touching on many different aspects of life and war - from the nature of man and race to the paradox of a general loving his army yet having to sacrifice it. Jordan brought home so well the closeness of the senior officers to those on the other side.

I loved how well they showed the varied purposes for fighting of the different armies, and the occasional reference to a perceived resentment by the Union soldiers over what they saw as Confederate pretensions to higher social class. ("They're so arrogant", etc.).

The music is first rate - and definitely enhances the drama. The depiction seems quite authentic.

Some niggling criticisms: aside from the map at the start of the movie, there is none. Maps would definitely have helped to undeerstand the overall picture. People commonly refer to directions (from the norht, from the west, etc.) or "we must flank them to the right" and it's hard to understand if you haven't read about the battle.

The scene with the runaway slave is too abbreviated from the book - it doesn't have much impact in the movie.

Kevin Conway's dialogue and accent was a bit over the top, and the English military attache was rather clicheed.

For all that General Hancock is referenced, we see very little of him.

We see the diatribe by General Trimble against General Ewell - but without seeing anything of that battle (or Ewell ever), it just hangs there - rather than being part of any continuous story. (In the book, Ewell's and Early's conduct is more discussed - including a wonderful scene by the two with Lee). If they weren't going to discuss that side of the battle, they should have left Trimble's (well-played) trembling anger out of the story - it doesn't belong in this movie.

Gen. Longstreet is the star of the book and movie - yet I never sensed from Berenger the great brooding quality (and he wasn't given any reference to the fact that his thre children had just died) that he has throughout the battle - according to the book. Similarly, Gen. Lee's health (his heart and headaches, etc.) is a constant factor - not shown in the movie.

Despite the criticisms, this is a wonderfully done movie - from a Pulitzer Prize winning book. It's long - but quite clear, and very deeply moving. I defy anyone to see the last 1/2 hour and not have tears in their eyes. I'd very strongly recommend this.


40 of 48 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Sheen or Duvall; who played Lee better? dcwitzke
So many things to hate about this movie chip92114
Confederacy plan for Day 2 codjohn
Another question about Lee's strategy fountaincap
Any reenactor/background artists still out there? yinduffy
too many speeches!! braun616
Discuss Gettysburg (1993) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?