IMDb > Bare Exposure (1993) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
Bare Exposure More at IMDbPro »

Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 5 reviews in total 

14 out of 16 people found the following review useful:

Cheesy Stuff

Author: wilss888 from Leeds, England
13 April 2005

I watched this when I was about 12 with my cousin who was about 16. I thought it was the rudest thing in the world and got all flustered when I watched it. I see it today 9 years later and it's just some soft porn movie. But it can be quite amusing and fun at times, and the wet T-Shirt competition can never be a bad thing. None of the actors can act, but then again when did you see a film like this where they could. If your trying to find this film, it would probably be quite hard to get hold of. You'd probably have to just keep trying the movie channels at 2 in the morning.

I rate this film a solid 5 for the nudity!!

Was the above review useful to you?

Well, I Suppose That's One Way to Pay Off a Debt

Author: Uriah43 from Amarillo, Texas
8 June 2017

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

After catching her roommate, "Brittany" (Tammy Parks) making love in her apartment for the second time that week, "Rachel" (Stephanie Carlisle) decides to move out which leaves both Brittany and her other roommate Megan (Ashley Raye) in dire straits and force them to find another person to help share the rent. Unfortunately, their troubles don't end there as they are soon told that a friend by the name of "Clancy" (Westley Scott) owes $5,000 to the mob and he desperately needs it soon to avoid being seriously hurt. So with no other resources other than their beautiful bodies they decide to redecorate an old building and charge admission for a wet T-shirt contest with the proceeds going to pay off Clancy's debt. What they don't count on, however, is that Rachel isn't finished trying to ruin their lives and neither the police nor the mob are willing to leave them alone either. Now rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this was a rather weak comedy which lacked the necessary humor to amount to anything special. Likewise, although both Tammy Parks and Ashley Raye were certainly attractive enough, the scenes involving sex or romance lacked the necessary passion and eroticism as well. That being said, this movie was essentially substandard in every way and I have rated it accordingly. Below average.

Was the above review useful to you?


Author: ( from United States
20 December 2005

I never thought I'd say this, but sometimes even T & A aren't enough to save a movie. If this had been made back in the 1980's during the heyday of the Teen Sex Comedies, I MIGHT have made some allowances for how bad this was. But today, there is no excuse. I mainly rented this because Ashley Rhey is in it, and she's quite pretty, but if one word could sum of this film, it is "lame." Whoever thought nudity could be so dull? There was no life in the acting, photography, ANYTHING! I've seen a lot of bad films and still managed to find some enjoyment in most of them, but this to me was a total waste. If you want a teen sex comedy with some spark, rent "Rosebud Beach Hotel."

Was the above review useful to you?

1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:

Yeah okay, whatever

Author: Red-Barracuda from Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
2 January 2015

This 90's sex comedy is about a nerdy guy who gets into trouble with gangsters and ends up owing them $5,000. He is introduced to three girls whom he has never met before and tells them his predicament. In turn they suggest he organises a wet T-Shirt competition to make the necessary funds to pay off his debt. If only real life was like the movies eh?

Bare Exposure is a comedy with essentially no funny bits and a fair amount of very bad acting. Worst in this regard is Tammy Parks, who conversely is the best reason to actually watch this. She may not be able to act her way out of a wet paper bag, delivering her lines in a remarkably poor manner, yet she does possess a trashy sex appeal that makes her kind of watchable, particularly as she is not shy at getting her kit off on a regular basis. Aside from her, though, the film is basically struggling. There is a plot of sorts but let's face it, in movies such as this the story is no more than an afterthought. The film ultimately amounts to a few erotic moments and no more; not enough good stuff to make it very interesting however.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

Only for Tammy Parks fans, please!.

Author: insomniac_rod from Noctropolis
31 August 2008

The movie starts pretty good with a sex scene where the always hot, sensual Tammy Parks is taken from behind by some guy. The scene is hot and steamy because of Tammy's moves and faces. Suddenly her nerdy secretary enters the bedroom and while watching, interrupts her with some stupid problem. After that scene, you can expect some major cheese.

There are other sex scenes that are really dull except when Tammy Parks appears. She's the main reason to watch the movie.

There's another good sex sequence where Mrs. Parks has sex on a table by some of her workers. She has a spectacular body and she's not envy about showing it.

So I would only recommend this one for Tammy Parks fans. Otherwise, stay away from it. It's a poorly done early 90's soft core.

Was the above review useful to you?

Add another review

Related Links

Plot summary Ratings External reviews
Plot keywords Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history