Down 44,314 this week

With Murder in Mind (1992)

TV Movie  -   -  Drama  -  12 May 1992 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.4/10 from 79 users  
Reviews: 7 user | 1 critic

After being shot while trying to arrange the sale of a rural farm, a real estate agent desperately tries to bring the shooter to justice.


0Check in

Editors' Spotlight

Fall TV Premiere Week

Many of your favorite shows are coming back, along with plenty of series premieres. Here's a list of the shows premiering between Sunday, September 21 and Friday, September 26.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: With Murder in Mind (TV Movie 1992)

With Murder in Mind (TV Movie 1992) on IMDb 6.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of With Murder in Mind.
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Murder in Mind (2001–2003)
Crime | Drama | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

An anthology series of self contained plays with a murderous theme, the twist being that the action is followed from the point of view of the killer.

Stars: Jackie Fielding, Tim Healy, David Suchet
Drama | Thriller | Crime
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.3/10 X  

A woman undergoes hypnosis to determine who murdered her husband, a crime for which she is the chief suspect.

Director: Andrew Morahan
Stars: Nigel Hawthorne, Mary-Louise Parker, Jimmy Smits
The Awakening Land (TV Mini-Series 1978)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

Frontierswoman Sayward Luckett's struggles in Ohio during the late 18th-century and early 19th-century.

Stars: Elizabeth Montgomery, Hal Holbrook, Jane Seymour
When We Were Young (TV Movie 1989)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.7/10 X  

A group of young people in 1959 get ready to set out on their journey to adulthood.

Director: Daryl Duke
Stars: Ronny Cox, Jace Alexander, Lindsay Frost
Amos (TV Movie 1985)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Amos Lasher loses his wife and home in an accident, finding himself in the care of the state, or specifically speaking, the Sunset Nursing Home. Here he finds the head nurse, Daisy Daws, ... See full summary »

Director: Michael Tuchner
Stars: Kirk Douglas, Elizabeth Montgomery, Dorothy McGuire
A Killing Affair (TV Movie 1977)
Drama | Crime
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6/10 X  

A white female detective is partnered with a black male detective to find the person who is committing a series of particularly vicious murders. During the course of the investigation the ... See full summary »

Director: Richard C. Sarafian
Stars: Elizabeth Montgomery, O.J. Simpson, Rosalind Cash
The Rules of Marriage (TV Movie 1982)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

A seemingly perfect marriage disintegrates, as both husband and wife become involved in a series of affairs.

Director: Milton Katselas
Stars: Elizabeth Montgomery, Elliott Gould, Michael Murphy
Murder in Mind (TV Movie 1994)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

A detective investigates a suicide at a controversial therapy centre.

Director: Robert Bierman
Stars: Juliette Caton, Trevor Eve, Cathryn Harrison
Belle Starr (TV Movie 1980)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Belle Star is a bandit with an itch to ride with the outlaw legends, the James gang, the Youngers and the Dalton boys.

Director: John A. Alonzo
Stars: Elizabeth Montgomery, Cliff Potts, Michael Cavanaugh
On the Run (TV Movie 1965)
Comedy | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Director: William Asher
Stars: Jan Berry, Dean Torrence, Hal Blaine
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  
Director: Justin McArdle
Stars: Paul Kaye, Collette Cooper, Seamus O'Neill
The Comeback (TV Movie 1989)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

Scotty Malloy is a former NFL football player who travels around the world without a care. He decides to come back to Minneapolis to settle down and start a life for himself. He pays a ... See full summary »

Director: Jerrold Freedman
Stars: Robert Urich, Chynna Phillips, Mitchell Anderson


Cast overview, first billed only:
Gayle Wolfer
Bob Sprague
Samuel Carver (as Howard Rollins)
Aunt Mildred
Lee Richardson ...
John Condon
Danton Stone ...
Benny Lazarra
Susan Claridge
Roger McBain
Ted Sloan
Seret Scott ...
Sarah Bendix
Tom Even ...
Judge Kubiniec


Fact based story about real estate agent Gayle Wolfer who was shot and nearly killed by a man whom she was showing a house to. Even though she is physically and emotionally scarred from the incident, Gayle is determined to find her attacker. One day while she is at a county fair she recognizes the man who attacked her but she is shocked to find out he is a policeman. No one believes Gayle at first because the man is such an upstanding citizen but the case eventually goes to trial. Written by mts77

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis







Release Date:

12 May 1992 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

With Savage Intent  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:


Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Stars Elizabeth Montgomery, Howard E. Rollins Jr., Maureen O'Sullivan and Lee Richardson all died within seven years of the film's release. See more »


Gayle's and Susan's gags alternate back and forth from between their teeth and over their mouths between long shots and close-ups. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Verdict: Well, ummm....
29 July 2005 | by (Deming, New Mexico, USA) – See all my reviews

Elizabeth Montgomery as a real estate agent is robbed and shot while showing a house. She later spots the guy, Howard Rollins, at a fairground, where he's a volunteer mounted police officer. She reports him to the police, he's arrested and convicted, and is now serving a long sentence in Attica.

It's hard to know how to assess this movie. Not because of the execution, which is routine, and not because of the acting. The principals -- Montgomery, Rollins, and Foxworth are fine. In fact Montgomery looks rather better than "fine" despite her age and impending terminal illness.

It's that the movie seems to be self contradictory. It wants to assure us that justice has been carried out but what we are shown leaves us with too many doubts.

It is all shown from the victim's point of view, which is okay in itself, except that we must realize that the living victim (this is based on a real incident) is liable to have a bit more weight when it comes to shaping the material than is the convicted black criminal who is now somebody's bitch upstate. We don't get to hear very much from Rollins.

Could Montgomery have been mistaken when she just happened to spot Rollins astride his horse at the fair? Well, she is absolutely certain. But another woman who was a witness says that Rollins resembles the perpetrator, but "on a scale of 10, he's a 7 or 8." (How do you measure something like "reasonable doubt"? What's the scale, and where's the threshold?) And why did Montgomery, having stumbled across the perp by accident and having immediately identified him to her own satisfaction, wait around until the next day to inform the police over a casual lunch about the event?

The trial itself doesn't seem to resolve any of these issues. Montgomery identifies Rollins' voice through a closed door but that's a notoriously poor means of identification. Out of three speakers in the line up, she had one chance in three of guessing Rollins even if he'd been innocent. Rollins may or may not have had some connection with drugs. But he's well spoken and is a prosperous upright citizen. He runs a security business that protects dozens of shopping centers, he goes to church regularly, has a family (which we don't get to see), is a part-time volunteer policeman with a good military record, has never had any run-ins with the law, and spends time working for United Way or something. No physical evidence links Rollins to the crime. Why should a paragon of citizenship like this rob someone of a couple of thousand dollars and shoot people unnecessarily?

On the other hand, why should someone in Elizabeth Montgomery's position lie? An interesting question, to which there are several reasonable replies. One is that she may not have been lying. After all a considerable time had passed since the crime. Maybe she was just mistaken.

Another answer, far more conjectural, is that she was acting out a fantasy of victimhood. There seem to be two favorite human fantasies -- the conquering hero and the suffering victim. The former is mostly a male fantasy and the second a feminine one. I don't mean to sound in any way anti-feminist about this. A moment's thought will do to support the idea. Who watches The Action Movie Channel more -- men or women? And for which gender is Lifetime Movies for Women designed? I just watched "With Murder in Mind" on the Lifetime Movies channel. During one of the commercial breaks, an ad asked the audience, "Who would you like to play YOU in a movie about YOUR life????" (The informant's choice was Angelina Jolie. She'd be my choice too but it would be a different kind of movie.)

In a way, this is a movie about the life of Elizabeth Montgomery's character's life and she plays the role of victim to the hilt. After her partial recovery from her wounds she becomes a demanding nervous wreck. She gets to drink too much. She doesn't have to work. She calls 911 every time a car pulls into the driveway. She makes a general nuisance of herself and at the same time gets people to feel sorry for her, which is having your cake and eating it too. Then she gets to be the central figure in a dramatic trial. She winds up seeing someone sent away for a long time based on her testimony and her moral authority as an innocent victim (which she undoubtedly was).

And now there's even a MOVIE about her life -- and she is played by Elizabeth Montgomery! Now, all of that constitutes a lot of reward, which Freud dismissed too easily as unimportant "secondary gains." But Freud was a psychologist, not a sociologist, and he probably never saw a movie in his life. And he certainly never heard of Andy Warhol.

I don't mean to say that the Montgomery character was a fraud, that she dreamed the whole thing up in order to become famous. Lots of times we do things without knowing the real reasons why we're doing them. But I do mean that although she was certain Rollins was the man, I wasn't convinced. And I suspect the writers and producers must have felt ambivalent about the justice of the conviction too, because they seem to hint that the whole case may have been a terrible mistake.

Sometimes it's good to be the suffering victim. I think I might enjoy having a painless and not-disfiguring temporary illness so that a doctor could examine me and tell me, "Spend the next three years in bed. And be sure to drink plenty of fluids."

5 of 11 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Reviewer of This Movie says That 25-79 years is too much and lacks compa clow987
Discuss With Murder in Mind (1992) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: