Edit
Storyline
Sir Anthony Blunt, who was a Soviet agent for 25 years, is routinely questioned and gives no answers, but is knighted and works as Director of the Courtauld Institute, and presents his interrogator with a puzzle in the shape of a doubtful Titian painting. He also does art restoration work in Buckingham Palace, where he gets into an interesting conversation with HMQ. Written by
Kathy Li
Plot Summary
|
Add Synopsis
Edit
Did You Know?
Quotes
[
the Queen knows that Sir Anthony Blunt is a traitor and Blunt knows that the Queen knows this, but both maintain a facade of innocence as they discuss the Queen's art collection, amid many coded references]
H.M.Q.:
Portraits are supposed to be frightfully self-revealing, aren't they? Show what one's really like - the secret self. Either that or else the eyes are supposed to follow you round the room. Have you had your portrait painted?
Sir Anthony Blunt:
No, Ma'am.
H.M.Q.:
So we don't know whether you have a secret self?
[
later]
H.M.Q.:
...
[...]
See more »
Connections
Featured in
Zomergasten: Episode #6.1 (1993)
See more »
Alan Bennett's plays are strongly character driven and A Question of Attribution is no exception.
Like his earlier An Englishman Abroad, this focuses on spies, in this case Anthony Blunt, brilliantly played by James Fox, and his work as keeper of the Queen's pictures. The Queen herself is played by Prunella Scales who stays on the right side of caricature but makes HMQ warm and funny.
The play centres on the topic of fakes, of course mirroring the police investigation searching for the fifth man who worked alongside Blunt, Burgess, Philby and Maclean. Blunt is also investigating a Titian painting which isn't all it seems.
A good play, and typical Bennett.