| Page 1 of 16: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 152 reviews in total |
76 out of 83 people found the following review useful:
Beautifully done!, 30 November 1999
![]()
Author:
tesscat from Ventura, Ca.
How often are we forced to endure the uninsightful changes that are made to
American classics in the process of turning them into feature films? The
1939 version of this movie is a prime example. It, very simply, was not
the
story that Steinbeck wrote. The changes that were made were too sweeping
to
be seen as anything other than some ego thinking that Steinbeck could be
improved upon.
Now, anyone who is truly familiar with Steinbeck knows that this is just
not
true. Gary Sinise has proven this familiarity. I have rarely had the
pleasure of watching a movie that stayed so completely true to the original
text. Not only does this movie not add or subtract from the book, the
characters themselves are almost exactly how I had pictured them when I
read
this story for the first time.
If you are looking for overblown sex and violence, for spectacular special
effects, or for unbelievable demonstrations raw physical strength, move on.
This movie will not interest you in the slightest. However, if you are
looking for a story of true love and true courage, if you are looking for a
movie whose beauty stems from a raw sense of humanity, then find yourself a
quiet place, where you won't be interrupted and watch this. You won't be
let down.
56 out of 64 people found the following review useful:
Tell me about the rabbits, George..., 25 March 2000
![]()
Author:
Junker-2 from Wisconsin
I put off watching this movie for many years. I figured, what was the point?
I had read the book "Of Mice and Men", watched earlier movie versions and
seen it performed on stage. Why sit through yet another version? Finally one
day at the video rental store I decided to take a chance and rent it. I am
very, very glad I did.
So why sit through another version? Because it is extremely well done. Gary
Sinise and John Malkovich are powerful in the leads, Sherilyn Fenn has never
been more appealing and Ray Walston will break your heart.
This is just plain good storytelling and good movie making. I guess like
Lennie never getting tired of hearing George talk about the rabbits, I'll
never get tired of seeing a good version of this classic
story.
53 out of 68 people found the following review useful:
Should be shown in EVERY h.s. lit class, 21 May 2000
![]()
Author:
Jim Armstrong (pettyfog) from United States
If ever a movie lived up to a standard of literature for the contemporary
American art form, this is it.
When you watch this you'll be stunned at how easy it should be to adapt a
novel .. but it's seldom done right.
You'll NEVER find a truer adaptation than this.. in fact you'll swear it's
not "adapted" at all.
Everyone else in this group has already given the accolades. I second
them.
41 out of 51 people found the following review useful:
Wonderful, 20 April 2000
![]()
Author:
jamie_71 from Leesburg, GA
It took me forever to get ahold of this movie. I had waited 2 weeks for it to be returned to the movie store. I waited four hours until the man brought it back to make sure I got it. Wow was it worth waiting for! I have not seen any movies lately that were so full of heart and love. Sinise and Malkovich BOTH play amazing roles in this film. I've seen it 5 times and everytime I cried at the dramatic ending. It shows how cruel and yet how loving people can be. This movie has a great mix of everything I think anyone could enjoy. I cannot believe I had never heard of this film before looking up info on Gary Sinise. This film should be a classic. The acting is superb and it holds your attention throughout the whole movie. I LOVE this movie incredibly!! Definitely a 10 out of 10!
31 out of 32 people found the following review useful:
This one will touch you..., 21 January 2002
Author:
joseph t from ohio, usa
This is a masterful and faithful portrayal of Steinbeck's classic novel.
The screenplay brings to life the tragic yet uplifting story of loyalty and
the kind of bond that can grow between men that we are often reluctant to
acknowledge, much less show.
Aside from the story, the cast is what really makes this film. I have
always held a soft spot for Gary Sinise after his role in Forrest Gump,
wherein his character portrayed another facet of the bonding between men
made brothers by cruel circumstance, yet can grow and flourish as the years
and other circumstances come to pass. Here, as Lenny's friend and protector
against a world that baffles and confuses him, he shows the kind of
rough-edged tenderness and affection that both endears us to his plight, and
fills us with the dread of what we know must come between the men. John
Malkovich shows his depth as an actor by bringing to life the dull-witted
but pure-hearted Lenny, in a way that will tug at your heartstrings. I
found myself both laughing (in a sad way) at Lenny's ineptness in dealing
with a world clearly more confusing than his limited wits can manage, and
crying over his being targeted for taunting and abuse by cruel and crude
men, and ultimately done in by his brute strength when it was lacking the
direction and temper given by his friend George.
A pleasant surprise was Ray Walston as the aged but gentle and good-hearted
ranch hand Candy, who has no one in life to love but his old sheepdog, who,
like him, he knows, must ultimately be "put down" because of age and the
wear and tear that a life of hard labor has worn down. The scene of his
finally surrendering his faithful canine companion to be euthanized by a
gunshot to the back of the head by another well-meaning field hand is very
heartbreaking. Having grown up with the "Uncle Martin" of "My Favorite
Martian" Walston, seeing his adept performance in a dramatic role gave me a
new appreciation for his versatility as a character actor.
Those who watch this film should allow plenty of time alone to view it
straight through with no interruptions. Swallow your pride and keep a box
of tissues handy, and some time afterwards for quiet contemplation and
"recovery".
26 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
...and a hutch full of rabbits, 10 September 2004
![]()
Author:
dbdumonteil
"Of mice and men" is one of these movies we definitely need in our
times.Gary Sinise 's directing is classic in the noblest sense of the
term.The cinematography recalls some of those Ford (who adapted "Grapes
of wrath",another Steinbeck's novel for the screen) gems of the forties
or fifties.It is heart-rending to see Malkovich and his portrayal of
the half-wit is one of the finest you can see in a nineties movies and
leaves,for instance Dustin Hoffman's "rain man" character far behind.It
takes a lot of guts to play such demeaning parts !Gary Sinise should
not be forgotten either,in a performance which offers all the
subtleties of the heart.
What moves me in the movie is the loneliness which frightens the
characters .Everyone is searching for someone to rely on.Not only the
two heroes (I think that ,actually, George needs more Lennie than the
other way about)but also the old man -the scene with the old dog is
almost unbearable;it will have an equivalent in a terrifying way at the
end recalling Horace MacCoy's "they shoot horses don't they?"- Curley's
wife;only the black guy has resigned himself to solitude.The scene when
Candy and the two pals are talking of their future house -which we know
from the very start they'll never have- is really heartwarming.At
least,for one precious and fleeting moment,they could dream of a home,a
fireplace and a hutch full of rabbits.
18 out of 24 people found the following review useful:
Better than I expected, 29 January 2001
![]()
Author:
mikemahony from Canada
I simply rented this movie to get a head start in my english class. I
heard
we are reading this book, so I rented the movie to have the edge over my
classmates who know nothing of it yet. "HA HA HA" I thought now I will be
smarter.
However, going into the film thinking this was going to be a dull boring
movie was not what happened. This is a great movie from beginning to
powerful end and I would recommend it to anyone who is willing to give
drama
movies a chance.
Gary Sinise directed John Stienbecks novel perfectly. The story is about
two
men, one not so bright, and their search for work in the depression.
Simple
but wonderful.
7.6 out of ten as an average seems too low for all the good comments about
this movie.
A Must See 9/10
49 out of 86 people found the following review useful:
Great except for Malkovich, 14 September 2003
![]()
Author:
panicwatcher from Arden Hills, MN, USA
This movie has a good script, fine acting, and is beautifully photographed.
Even though I had read the book and knew the plot, I was drawn into story
and moved by the ending. Gary Sinise does a very good job of showing what a
complicated and conflicted character George is. George seems to be a smart
man, but he has not gotten far in life. He feels the need to watch out for
his closest friend, Lenny. But, you sense that George sometimes thinks
Lenny is a burden and George feels guilty about those thoughts. This might
be Gary Sinise's best acting performance.
I was disappointed in John Malkovich's over-the-top portrayal of Lenny. In
the book, I felt that Lenny was just very simple minded, but in the movie
version, Lenny seems to be seriously retarded. The Malkovich Lenny has too
many odd facial expressions and a speaking style that is like a cartoon
parody Lenny. That performance was distracting and irritating and made
Lenny less sympathetic. It also changed the relationship with George. It
makes George more of a nursemaid to seriously ill Lenny, instead of a
helpful friend who watches out for Lenny.
19 out of 27 people found the following review useful:
Great from a cinematic standpoint, Not too shabby from a Literary, 15 September 2005
![]()
Author:
bwianiscool13 from United States
First off, the acting in this movie is incredible. It's funny how
someone as intellectual and bright as Malkovich can pull his role off
so well. Gary Sinese was great too, effectively portraying George.
But if you really get into the book, the movie doesn't follow it too
faithfully. Curely's wife is portrayed to be flirty, and a "tart," when
in the book, she was just as lonely as everyone else on the ranch. She
wasn't looking for sex, she was looking for companionship. The
screenwriter didn't interpret the book quite as well as I had hoped.
Now I'm just nitpicking, but when when Lennie pulls the stunt by faking
the puppy, it's just not like him. Lennie is not clever at all, and
wouldn't think to do that.
But all in all, great movie, definitely great for comparing to the book
in a lit. class or anywhere.
8/10
8 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
A gentle hand makes a powerful punch., 2 December 2001
![]()
Author:
ellusion
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
A gentle hand makes a powerful punch. And I'm not talking about
Lenny, but Gary Sinise. I'm not quite sure why this one of the most
powerful adaptations from a book. Perhaps the steps from book
to play to screenplay gave it enough time to find it's pace and voice.
I would have loved to have seen it on the stage with the same cast.
Absolutely wonderful. I even have a new found respect for Ms.
Finn. The two leads are exceptional, but I expected that, it was the
easy grace of all the characters becoming alive that moved me.
The book is a great book, but I always thought the other characters
were just too shallow. Gary Sinise and the supporting cast
breathe a life into these people. You've met them before. Been
fishing with them. Fought with them. Just a Wonderful film. I hear
a lot of talk about "chick flicks". Well, this very much may be a "dick
flick" if they exist. Every real man should see this movie.
Fantastic.
| Page 1 of 16: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |