(1992)

Critic Reviews

89

Metascore

Based on 10 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
100
The New York Times
Merchant, Ivory and Jhabvala triumph again with their entertaining, richly textured film. [13 March 1992]
100
Chicago Sun-Times
The splendid cast embodies the characters so fully that the events actually seem to be happening to them, instead of unfolding from a screenplay.
100
Merchant and Ivory have regathered many of the cast and crew from their earlier films to work on this reproduction to exquisite effect.
100
Because it is confident of its story and its powers, “Howards End” takes the time to establish itself, to allow its characters the space to demonstrate subtlety and complexity.
90
Rolling Stone
Incisively witty, provocative and acted to perfection, this sublime entertainment is a career peak for producer Ismail Merchant, director James Ivory and screenwriter Ruth Prawer Jhabvala.
90
Perhaps the best film made during the 30-year partnership of Ismail Merchant and James Ivory.
90
The New Yorker
A handsome and intelligent piece of work: a faithful, well-paced, and carefully crafted dramatization of a very good story.
78
Austin Chronicle
The performances in this costume drama are wonderful.
70
The filmmakers have allowed themselves an overlong 140 minutes in order to preserve as much of the plot as possible, but they have bypassed many of the novel's key ideas and ironies.
70
The filmmakers have allowed themselves an overlong 140 minutes in order to preserve as much of the plot as possible, but they have bypassed many of the novel's key ideas and ironies.
60
Chicago Reader
This is the apotheosis of Classics Illustrated filmmaking, aiming at nothing more than tasteful reduction, and the fact that it's done so well here doesn't mean that it's necessarily worth doing.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Howards End (1992) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews | Message Board