Did You Know?
Anachronisms
Share this
Continuity
Share this
Share this
Share this
Share this
Share this
Share this
Share this
Share this
Share this
Share this
Share this
Crew or equipment visible
Share this
Share this
Incorrectly regarded as goofs
Share this
Plot holes
Share this
Revealing mistakes
Share this
Spoilers
Continuity
When Nick arrives at his apartment after Nilsen is killed and Catherine is waiting for him. They go upstairs and have drinks. Nick starts chopping the ice into a few chunks then Catherine destroys the entire block of ice. Now the ice in their "Rocks" glasses are quite large until Catherine walks across the room and the ice is all gone (ice doesn't melt that fast, even if the bourbon was heated). Plus the liquid in the glasses got much darker, this would never happen because the water would have lighten the liquid in the glass, not darken it.Share this
Plot holes
In reality the police would have simply got the court to request that Catherine Trammell provide a DNA sample, since she was the last person seen with Johnny Boz. Since her bodily fluids and skin fragments would have been all over the bed this would have been enough to convict her for his murder.Share this
Plot holes
When Lt. Nilsen is found dead of a close contact gunshot wound to the head, Gus opines that the weapon used was a .38 caliber revolver. Lt. Walker then demands that Nick turn over his weapon. Nick produces a Glock semi-automatic pistol and Lt. Walker smells it, presumably to see if it had recently been fired. Although the bullet diameter could be said to be similar and thus produce similar bullet holes (a point much too esoteric for this film), Nick's pistol is definitely not a revolver.Share this
Revealing mistakes
The blonde woman murderer in the opening scene has a clearly visible scar on her left shoulder. Later in the film, the same scar can be seen on Catherine Tramell's left shoulder. This gives away the whole story, since the point of the film is to figure out who the killer is.Share this




