IMDb > Van Gogh (1991)

Overview

User Rating:
7.6/10   742 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 4% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Director:
Writer:
Maurice Pialat (writer)
Contact:
View company contact information for Van Gogh on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
30 October 1992 (USA) more
Genre:
Plot:
The final 67 days of Van Gogh's life is examined. full summary | add synopsis
Plot Keywords:
Awards:
2 wins & 12 nominations more
NewsDesk:
Film review: Séraphine
 (From The Guardian - Film News. 26 November 2009, 4:05 PM, PST)

User Comments:
Gogh see another movie. This one's lame. more (15 total)

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)
Jacques Dutronc ... Van Gogh
Alexandra London ... Marguerite (Gachet)
Bernard Le Coq ... Théo
Gérard Séty ... Gachet
Corinne Bourdon ... Jo
Elsa Zylberstein ... Cathy
Leslie Azzoulai ... Adeline (as Leslie Azoulai)
Jacques Vidal ... Ravoux
Chantal Barbarit ... Madame Chevalier
Claudine Ducret ... Professeur de Piano
Frédéric Bonpart ... La Mouche
Maurice Coussonneau ... Chaponval
Didier Barbier ... L'Idiot
Gilbert Pignol ... Gilbert
André Bernot ... La Butte Rouge
more
Create a character page for: ?

Additional Details

Runtime:
158 min
Country:
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
1.66 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Company:

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
8 out of 20 people found the following comment useful.
Gogh see another movie. This one's lame., 24 April 2007
3/10
Author: rooprect from New York City

Perhaps if the movie had been called "Joe Smith" and if it were about an ordinary average schlep who dies, I would consider it impressive. There are many great films which deal with the tragic irony of a tedious and banal death.

But in this case, the director takes an inherently powerful story and reduces it to the mundane. Van Gogh? Who was he? He certainly wasn't the guy they showed in this movie. I have to strongly agree with the other reviewer who said that the title of this movie kills it. It's not about Van Gogh; not even close.

So next I considered that perhaps the director purposely chose a famous subject and purposely wove a creative retelling of history, much like Forman's masterpiece AMADEUS. The funny thing is, this technique only works if you have something creative to depict. But if your intent is to beat history into dullness, there's nothing creative, impressive or even interesting about it.

I watched this movie because I was expecting to see an insightful peek into the final days of one of the world's most passionate and cryptic artists. Instead I found a boring showcase of some pretentious French director's visually masturbatory work. Film school nerds may be impressed, but not me. And I doubt any painters, historians or poets were impressed either. Chalk this one up as another esoteric little waste of film.

PLEASE skip this movie and go watch BALLADE O SOLDATE (1959) instead. Now there's a fantastic film depicting the final, realistic days of an anonymous young man. And it didn't step on any history books, either.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more (15 total)

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Van Gogh (1991)

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Laissez-passer Edvard Munch Sans toit ni loi Como agua para chocolate Viridiana
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Biography section IMDb France section
Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.