| Page 1 of 16: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 151 reviews in total |
86 out of 119 people found the following review useful:
A Beautiful Film, 28 October 2004
Author:
John Pearce (johnpearce48@aol.com) from England
This is truly a beautiful film.
Well written and superbly acted it tugs at the heartstrings harder than
almost any other movie. The way it sets up an obvious story line and
then like a gentle roller-coaster suddenly takes you in another
direction is unequalled in this type of film.
There are so many points of genuine sadness and whenever you think you
have guessed the story you suddenly turn to find an outcome more
surprising than you thought.
Major characters die, major characters do not "fall in love" and major
characters are not allowed to cop-out; it is as a film should be.
Remarkable well written, produced with care and acted with
understatement and love - it is a beautiful film.
Watch it.
80 out of 111 people found the following review useful:
An Excellent Story Within A Story, 9 July 2004
![]()
Author:
azifucare from Texas, USA
I must admit. When I first heard of this movie many years ago, the
title didn't sound that appealing and the few scenes that I saw didn't
look very interesting. But what can I say? I was little then and didn't
know what I was missing. My mother kept telling me how good of a movie
this was, but I was just too stubborn and didn't pay attention. It was
only a few months ago that I decided to watch it when it appeared on TV
and boy was I surprised!!
This movie is beyond anything that I have ever viewed in my entire
life. Usually, this sort of movie isn't the kind that I look at, but I
fell in love with the story and the characters, as well as the
wonderful actresses (Kathy Bates, Jessica Tandy, Mary Stuart Masterson,
and Mary-Louise Parker) who did an outstanding job portraying their
characters in a unique and unforgettable way.
Since I don't want to spoil anything for those who haven't seen it, let
me just say that it's an astounding tale of a special friendship that
goes way beyond what we would call a "regular" one. It will make you
thankful for the friends you have and even give women a sense to stand
up for their own rights. All in all, I give this movie a 10 out of 10.
If you haven't seen it, what are you doing reading this?! Go out and
rent it!
74 out of 102 people found the following review useful:
Storytelling at Its Best, 25 March 2001
![]()
Author:
Gary Murphy (glm@hilbertinc.com) from Olathe, KS, USA
I enjoyed this movie immensely. This is one of the best examples of
storytelling that I have seen. The structure of the movie - alternating
between the past and present, with multiple intertwining plots - keeps the
viewer hooked on how the story will unfold. It unfolds gracefully and is
enjoyable throughout.
The acting is exceptional. Mary Stuart Masterson and Mary Louise Parker
carry the bulk of the acting load. They are fantastic. The relationship
between these very different young women is complex and
satisfying.
Since the movie is about women and the female roles are so strong, this
movie has been dubbed a "chick flick", but that pejorative is unfair. This
is good film making and those who like plot-driven cinema will enjoy this
immensely. This one is in my DVD collection.
53 out of 84 people found the following review useful:
Consummate story-telling, served well by superlative performances, 22 February 1999
![]()
Author:
Vijay Ramanujan (vijayr@cybernex.net) from New York, USA
Fannie Flagg's novel of immense complexity (huge cast and innumerable
separate stories) could have been impossible to film. However, it is made
possible, in large part, by the performances of Mary Stuart Masterson and
Mary Louise Parker in what should have been billed as the lead roles. They
play the two southern women who's joint story this movie revolves around.
Jessica Tandy's role is to relate the story to a lost and longing Kathy
Bates (in modern times). Director Jon Avnet ties the two together nicely at
times, awkwardly at times, but always (except the end) without doing damage
to either. He (and the production crew) bring to life a 'peaceful' southern
town very nicely.
The two Marys manage to convey the fullness of a complex relationship with
apparent ease. There on-screen chemistry is nothing short of dazzling, and
one is left wondering when and how these two actresses carved out such
detailed characters without giving voice to their motivations and feelings.
While it is rare that dialogue directly addresses the heart and nature of
their relationship, what that is becomes clear quickly and transcends the
plot of the story to become the real unifying element in this movie. That
neither was recognized (in the conventional way) for their performances is
unfortunate (which is an understatement).
40 out of 62 people found the following review useful:
The Story Stays With You Long After the Movie Ends, 3 July 2003
![]()
Author:
Ouarda from New York, NY
This is one of my top five films of all time. I was somewhat skeptical the
first time I saw it because I adored the book and I knew there were some
changes, but I found the essence of Fannie Flagg's fabulous novel in tact.
This is a story that burrows into your heart and mind and stays there. It
is absolutely magical storytelling with a stellar cast and beautifully
written characters that never fade from memory.
A time and place in America, filled with the best and the worst of our life
and history, is impeccably captured. The flashbacks take us to the time of
an Alabama whistle stop town that was a bustling hub when the railroad was
the center of all movement. This was the era of hobos and simple pleasures.
The scenes from the past become more powerful by the juxtaposition to
modern times, where the story begins and returns at intervals.
Kathy Bates plays Evelyn Couch, an unhappy middle-aged housewife who
stumbles on Ninny Threadgoode (the superb Jessica Tandy) one day by accident
at the nursing home where she is visiting one of her husband's relatives.
The two have an instant chemistry and a deep friendship begins. Ninny
proceeds to tell Evelyn the story of Idgie and Ruth, two young women who
shared an amazing friendship and love 50 years earlier.
This movie has to be experienced, as mere descriptions might sound like
another southern-flavored movie about women or a weepy nostalgic tale. It
is much more than that, and more than the most glowing review can ever
convey. If you are reading this and haven't seen it, please make a point
to. The actors are nothing short of magical. All four actresses (Jessica
Tandy, Kathy Bates, Mary Stuart Masterson and Mary-Louise Parker) are at the
top of their craft.
I will borrow a line from Ninny Threadgoode to describe how I always feel
after seeing this film. "I may be sitting here in this nursing home but in
my mind I'm over at the Whistle Stop Cafe having a plate of Fried Green
Tomatoes".
I may be sitting here finishing this comment but in my mind I'm at the
Whistle Stop Cafe. That's how powerful this story is for
me.
45 out of 74 people found the following review useful:
The Ultimate, 17 May 2004
![]()
Author:
chickskickass from Houston, TX
This is such an awesome movie. I remember watching it as a girl, and when I
found it in a clearance bin a few months ago, I jumped on it. I watched it
then, and now, having watched it again... Mary Stuart Masterson is AMAZING.
Tears fall unwittingly down my cheeks during her performance. I was also
enchanted by Mary-Louise Parker, and I always always LOVE Kathy Bates.
Jessica Tandy is also her usual fit self, and Cecily Tyson was great ("Shoo!
I ain't scared of you!") and I could go on for ages about all of
them.
I will admit that this is the Ultimate Chick Flick. That title, however,
does not detract from its overall quality. The men are more than just
caricatures, and the nostalgia and love of the book made its way into the
movie. I have to commend Avnet for his efforts.
And now that I am out of intelligent things to say, THIS MOVIE ROCKS MY
SOCKS! It's re-watchability and great everything make this the movie (along
with Love and Basketball and my Buffy DVDs) that I take with me to college
and suggest we watch at every opportunity.
45 out of 80 people found the following review useful:
A warm, well acted film with sexual overtones, 5 July 2002
![]()
Author:
tanya_lamb from Atlanta, GA
While I love this film, and have seen it a dozen times at least, the
maturing of my mind since the first time I saw it as a teen in 1991,
have
made me take a second look at this stunningly acted film about love,
friendship, devotion and racial issues in a multiple decade look at
women's
roles in society.
Anyone who went to college where I did would see that Idgy from her
childhood is the sterotypical Lesbian. She does not like to wear
dresses
and prefers a man's dress even as a youngster. As she ages, and as Ruth
befriends her, she is tantalized by a kiss Ruth gives her on the cheek
at
the swimming hole and so devastated by Ruth's wedding that she does not
even
attend but instead drives hours to Valdosta, Georgia to look on
hurtfully
from the woods at Ruth carried in her new home in her wedding dress.
As the film progresses and Ruth is rescued from her abusive relationship
the
two start a cafe called Whistle Stop Cafe in Whistle Stop, Alabama. If
one
watches carefully they'll see that the two live together in a house near
the
cafe. In one poignant moment, the two women are talking over coffee
late at
night in the cafe when Ruth says that she feels bad that Idgy may feel
she
needs to stay and care for Ruth and Buddy Threadgoode Jr. (Buddy is
Ruth's
son but has Idgy's last name?!) Ruth says that if it weren't for she
and
Buddy, Idgy may "settle down" Idgy dramatically replies "I am as settled
as
I am ever going to be" and "I don't want you to move out" The clincher
was
the image they showed shortly after that scene of Ruth in a feminine
dress
and Idgy in shorts and a shirt and tie, holding each other and smiling.
Idgy never married or dated and Ruth never remarried.
Everyone must come to their own conclusion but mine is two women in the
1930's who enjoy a healthy, loving lesbian relationship with the
disguise of
business partners in a time and place when different anything race,
religion
or creed, was just not tolerated or accepted.
17 out of 25 people found the following review useful:
Cannibalism And Gendercidal Hatred, 4 October 2012
![]()
Author:
Louis B Maybe from United Kingdom
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
OK, so here's why this film is the opposite of everything you've ever
been told it is: It's not a wonderful feel-good movie for the girls,
it's an ugly, violent fantasy in which justice is confused with
revenge.
Let's break it down: There are no primary male characters in this
movie. Of the secondary and tertiary ones, it could be said that all
the (white) males are evil or inadequate. Buddy is good, of course, but
inadequate. His own foolishness destroys him. Buddy Junior is equally
good but equally inadequate.
Frank, on the other hand is just plain evil, and in between are more
ambiguous male characters. The police chief is willing to help Idgie,
it's true, but only because of his lecherous interest in her, and his
mentality is thoroughly racist.
Of the male characters, only Big George is unambiguously both good and
adequate. But Big George is a black man. And black men are oppressed
men. In effect, they are not men at all: exempt on political grounds
from the critique levelled at white men, they are honorary women.
This movie, couched in soft colours and sweet music, is one of the most
casually misandric movies ever made. First of all, & most obviously,
there is the EATING of her Evelyn's murdered husband. But it happens
throughout the movie, as well, such as when Evelyn tells Frank "if I
was going to kill you, I'd use my fists". She fantasizes about putting
bombs in copies of Playboy and Hustler. "I'll take all the
wife-beaters," she says, "and I'll machine gun their genitals!" "You
didn't kill Ed, did you?" asks Ninny when Evelyn turns up late. "Not
yet," answers Evelyn with a smile.
The problem here is not that women will leave theatres and go on
killing sprees. The problem is simply the convincing presentation of a
cinematic world in which only women have a 'right' to be angry, in
which all women are victims, & all men - all white men,anyway - are
evil oppressors or inadequate burdens. To the extent that both women
and men consciously or subconsciously adopt this worldview, the mutual
hostility that now characterizes relations between the sexes will be
exacerbated instead of questioned or healed.
19 out of 29 people found the following review useful:
Huge disappointment, 23 August 2009
![]()
Author:
Superlove999
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I finally saw this movie. After all the great reviews I've read/heard,
I must say I'm unbelievably disappointed.
First of all, I couldn't believe how one-dimensional the characters
were - they seemed like plot points rather than actual people. Wild and
Crazy Idgy is wild and crazy, Shy and Submissive Ruth is shy and
submissive, Mean Abusive Husband is mean and abusive. The
characterizations seemed to go no further than that...how am I supposed
to sympathize/identify with these people when they have no depth at
all? What's worse, this movie was so predictable and contrived, and I
feel like I knew exactly what was going to happen as soon as each scene
began. The way they kept getting that shot of the cauldron and everyone
kept mentioning how good the barbecue was after Mean Abusive Husband
was missing? Come ON, a post-it note could figure out what was going
on. And is it wrong that I almost laughed at the cliché, tear-jerky,
practically-required-by-law death toward the end?
I'm not here to only complain - I must say that I found the segments
with Evelyn to be very engaging, much more interesting than the
flashbacks. Maybe this would have been better if it were two different
movies?
No, it wasn't the worst movie I've ever seen, but I really don't think
it deserves all the rave reviews it has on this site. Plus I think I'm
extra resentful of the fact that, just because I'm a woman, I'm
expected to fall hook line and sinker for this kind of dull mediocrity.
31 out of 53 people found the following review useful:
Sweet, Bittersweet, and Intense, 18 July 2005
![]()
Author:
aharmas from United States
This is a film you are bound to fall in love with. All of its
characters feel real, intense, reaching out to touch with their passion
and the film's nostalgic feel.
It contains some of my favorite performances of all time: Masterson,
Parker, Tandy, and Bates give their very best, bringing two life
fictional women who feel real, strong, and powerful. The film is very
emotional, never maudlin, never disrespecting any of its components or
the audience. It allows us to feel we are part of a world that might
not exist anymore. What I like most about the film is how it embraces a
passion for living.
There is much to be admired about the technical aspects of the film as
well. It travels back and forth in time, with a structure that is hard
to describe but a joy to watch as it shows how the main relationships
were born, developed, and eventually were transformed into something
more spiritual. The music is haunting and quite suitable to the
delicate relationships, and the photography makes everyone and
everything lovely, dreamlike at times.
The film will live on and will eventually be regarded as a classic. It
deserves it so.
| Page 1 of 16: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |