MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 43,896 this week

Curse III: Blood Sacrifice (1991)

 -  Horror  -  10 May 1991 (USA)
3.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 3.6/10 from 173 users  
Reviews: 9 user | 6 critic

In 1950s Africa, a tribal magician calls up a demon to kill Europeans.

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

Related News

100 + Greatest Horror Movies (Pt.1)
| SoundOnSight
Tmp Reviews: Season of the Witch
| Cinelinx

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 33 titles created 22 Apr 2011
 
a list of 117 titles created 11 Apr 2011
 
a list of 20 titles created 25 Sep 2011
 
a list of 1280 titles created 10 months ago
 
a list of 1658 titles created 11 Jul 2011
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Curse III: Blood Sacrifice (1991)

Curse III: Blood Sacrifice (1991) on IMDb 3.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Curse III: Blood Sacrifice.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
Doctor Pearson
...
Elizabeth Armstrong
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Henry Cele ...
Mletch
Olivia Dyer ...
Olivia Steed
...
Robert
...
Geoff Armstrong (as André Jacobs)
Pepsi Mabizela
John Madiala
Max Mkwanzi
Gowrie Naidoo
Zanelle Negide
Charles Ngcoya
Gugu Nhlanga
Lorraine Nyathikazi
Zoe Randall ...
Anthea Steed
Edit

Storyline

In 1950s Africa, a tribal magician calls up a demon to kill Europeans.

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Horror

Certificate:

R | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

Release Date:

10 May 1991 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Panga  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Follows The Bite (1989) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Time for the curse to be laid to rest
10 January 2011 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

Greed and Hollywood seem to go together very well, something that hasn't changed to this day. Sure we all want to have money so we can have a roof over our heads and food on our tables, but some people let it go to their heads. There's a lot of money to be made in sequels, which is of course why there are so many. Not that all sequels made out of greed are bad, but a lot of times the opposite is the case. And when a film that was intended to stand on it's own is labeled a sequel you know someone is trying to make some extra bucks. The first 'Curse' sequel is an example of this, but if not taken too seriously it can be enjoyed in a so-bad-it's-good way. It must have done well on video because two years later we got this film, which also was a standalone that became a sequel. The difference is that no matter what frame of mind you're in while watching it, it still pretty much sucks.

Pros: Cast does it's best, especially Christopher Lee who deserves better. Lots of beautiful South African scenery. Moves a decent pace for such an uneventful movie. Pretty impressive monster suit. A few OK shocks.

Cons: Too talky and uneventful. Aside from Elizabeth and the doctor the rest of the characters are way underdeveloped. Bland and repetitive score. Forgettable. Flat direction. Not much of a plot.

Final thoughts: Whoever thought it would be a good idea to make this part of the 'Curse' series was out of their mind. Sure neither of those are good films by conventional standards, but at least they're entertaining and deliver decent thrills. This 'sequel' is just bland and lacking in what makes a successful Horror film. It's not the worst you'll ever find, but unless you're a completeist don't bother.

My rating: 2/5


1 of 5 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Curse III: Blood Sacrifice (1991) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?