| Page 1 of 7: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] |
| Index | 63 reviews in total |
51 out of 52 people found the following review useful:
Cross cultural conflict, 5 January 2005
![]()
Author:
wrcong from Durham, NC
This exquisitely photographed film portrays the cultural clash between
Europeans (in this case the Europeans happen to be French) and various
native tribes in seventeenth century North America without
romanticizing either French culture or that of the native peoples.
Perhaps the most striking feature of this film from my perspective was
utter arrogance of the Europeans to come into a wild country presuming
the superiority of their way of life over that of the indigenous
peoples. No character seemed to understand that better than Father
LaForgue, admirably portrayed by Lothaire Bluteau. The good Father
soldiers on despite the evidence that his presence in the vast
wilderness of North America won't make a whit of difference in his life
or in the lives of the people he has vowed to introduce into
"paradise." The Algonquin guides worry about their attachment to the
"demon" LaForgue and wonder whether they shouldn't just kill him. Even
LaForgue's young assistant, Daniel, wonders how the presence of a
French missionary makes the the native people's lives any better. The
Iroquois, who suffer from a harsh depiction in the film, take a more
economically-based view of LaForgue -- he and Daniel are seen by the
Iroquois as currency to be exchanged for guns.
An aside concerning the Iroquois. While the violence depicted in the
film is no doubt accurate, what the film does not reveal is that the
Iroquois likely became decidedly more hostile when the French began to
assist old enemies, such as the Algonquin, in traveling into hunting
grounds that had previously been Iroquois territory.
But back to LaForgue, whose journey is the primary emphasis of the
film. He has journeyed, apparently from a life of some privilege in
France, leaving behind a doting mother and (perhaps) a beautiful young
woman. He has journeyed away from the "pleasures of the flesh,"
lingering on the sight of a couple making love in the communal tipi and
later admitting to Daniel that he, LaForgue, lusts after the young
Alogonquin woman,Annuka, with whom Daniel had already struck up a
sexual relationship. He gets lost on the journey in the cathedral-like
forest and rejoices and being found by Algonquin hunters, who express
some bemusement that the Black Robe got lost in the first place.
Finally, he journeys to the Hurons and a village beset by smallpox,
where baptism has been sold to the natives as a miracle cure as much as
it has a key to salvation.
By avoiding the tendency of films depicting Native American life to
romanticize, Bruce Beresford has captured more profoundly the daily
harsh realities of life for the peoples inhabiting the northeastern
portion of North America at the arrivals of the first trickling of
Europeans. Neither way of life is ultimately depicted as superior to
the other: each simply is. This is not a "feel-good" film. Instead it
is a realistic, thought-provoking tale of a journey of a man, of
cultures, and of life itself. Simply a brilliant film.
36 out of 40 people found the following review useful:
Brutal but beautiful, 7 January 2001
Author:
escoles from rochester ny usa
_Black Robe_ is an under-appreciated gem. With fine acting, a strong,
literate screenplay, beautiful visuals from the spare, cold Canadian
wilderness, and a lyrical, dialogue-light storytelling style, this film is
an absorbing experience. Viewers with less patience for visual storytelling,
or who don't like having to pay attention to details, will probably find it
slow-going.
Be forewarned: _Black Robe_ is a brutal film, by modern western standards.
Gruesome torture is openly referred to; native americans, particularly the
northern Mohawk and Huron peoples, are _not_ substantially idealized.
Nice ethnographic touches are preserved -- for example, the
Alqonkian-speaking group who agree to guide the Black Robe are permitted to
clearly express their perplexity at the Jesuit's rudeness for not sharing
his tobacco. Similarly, a Mohawk war-leader keenly sees opportunity in
permitting the French to live: they can be traded for muskets, and forced to
teach the Mohawk how to use the powerful new weapons. No "simple savages",
after all: The Iroquois did not come to control much of the northeast
through stupidity.
While widely excoriated by some native american advocates for its depiction
of Mohawk and Huron brutality, the film actually soft-pedals the reality (as
noted by other reviewers). The southern, Five-Nations Mohawk may have
abandoned ritual cannibalism by this time, but it's certain that ritual
torture and cannibalism were practiced throughout the Iroquois sphere of
influence up to the early contact period. It was an aspect of their culture,
and really no stranger than similar practices as recorded among
christianized Scandinavians circa 1060 AD.
32 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
Beautifully Filmed, Memorably Told, 29 May 2006
![]()
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 from United States
Wow, what a fascinating movie and different kind of film. One really
can't get the full impact of this through a review. Anyone who has seen
this, I think would agree with me on that.
If I had skipped over the credits and someone had told me Terrence
Malick (Days Of Heaven, The New World, The Thin Red Line and Badlands)
and directed this film, I would have believed it. Visually, this is his
kind of film. I wonder if this movie inspired parts of his latest
effort, The New World? There are a number of similarities. Black Robe
has the same kind of beautiful and haunting images Malick's films
possess but the director in this case is Bruce Bereford, the man who
directed Driving Miss Daisy a couple of years before doing this film.
DMD also is beautifully-filmed.
Black Robe is not just a piece of art. As great as it is visually, this
is a powerful story of a well-intentioned Jesuit priest in the early
17th century who travels to "New France" (upstate New York/French
Canadian territory) attempting to convert a few area tribes to
Christianity. To unbelievers, that seems pushy but Biblically-speaking
it is not. Jesus commanded his followers to do just that (Matt.
28:18-20) , so the priest is only doing what missionaries have done for
centuries. He also is a good man, stays strong in his beliefs
regardless of his own well-being and is a gentle soul. Kudos to the
filmmakers for being fair to him.
The Algonquins and the Hurons are also shown with their beliefs, too,
and their cultures which obviously were in contrast to the white
European-based priest. All sides are shown fairly in this movie, with
both positive and negative traits of all.
I was shocked at a few scenes in here, not expecting them as the film
has such a gentle flow to it before anything dramatic happens. We see a
few sexual scenes and then some brutal violence. The Hurons,
particularly, do not want any invasion of their privacy and culture and
are openly hostile to the priest and the Algonquins. The story
transforms from a quiet Malick-type "New World" poetic piece to a
violent, suspenseful film and the question is, will the "good guys"
make it out alive?
The actors in here, perhaps, are not names most people outside Canada
are familiar with, including me, but Lothaire Blueteau as Father
Laforgue, Aden Young as his assistant "Daniel" and Sandrine Holt as
Daniel's Algonguin lover "Anuuka" are all very, very good. All the
characters in this film are very credible people, steadfast in their
own beliefs and they come across as realistic people. Most films have
unreal people with unrealistic dialog....but not in this movie.
Another big plus was the soundtrack: a lush, haunting score throughout.
Without spoiling the ending, or adding political/theological agendas my
own, let me just add that if you enjoy a beautiful-looking movie which
also has a thoughtful, haunting story with honest characters, you
should check this out. Highly recommended.
34 out of 37 people found the following review useful:
Amazing, 29 July 1999
![]()
Author:
Mario Bergeron (bmario@videotron.ca) from Cap-de-la-Madeleine, Canada
I'm a history student of second grade of a french canadian university. So, in a history point of view, I can assure you that this movie is simply amazing. The story is about a jesuite priest who wants to bring catholic faith to the Indians of the french colony Nouvelle-France (New France, the future Quebec of Canada) in the seventeen century. In fact, there was a lot of jesuite doing that by that time. The priest and his young translator ask the Algonquins natives to guide them to the Hurons natives. That is also exactly correct! But in their quest,they had some problems with the Iroquois natives. And that is exactly right! At the end, the priest reach the Hurons. The chief of the tribe tells that if they accept the god of the priest, they will become weak and their ennemies will kill them. And that's what's gonna happen! In fact, the Hurons were the first Indians of New France to accept catholic religion. I saw the movie with the french dubbing. The Indians of that time didn't knew how to prononce R. So, in the movie, they say : obe noie, instead of Robe Noire (Black Robe). I don't know if they said black obe in the English version. In one scence, the priest tells the Indian sorcerer that he is reading a breviaire (book of prayers). And the sorcerer said: beviaire, witout the R. The way the natives are dressed and wears their hairs is also very exact in an historical view. This is not only a great movie, but an amazing reconstitution. Natives actors are great, with August Schlleberg, the always good Tantoo Cardinal and the charming young Sandrine Holt. Lothaire Blutheau is one of the best french canadian actor (see him in Jesus of Montreal). This is absolutely a superb piece of work ! And some kind of perfect history book.
18 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
Wonderful, Soul-shaking, 13 June 1999
![]()
Author:
jacksflicks from Hollywood
When averaging, extreme scores skew the result. So I wonder at the
motives of those who voted "1" for this film. Sabotage?
"Black Robe" invites comparison with "Aguirre, the Wrath of God,"
another masterpiece. Two great directors project their vision of two
different men who do something we in this "civilized" culture can
hardly imagine: plunge into a vast, unknown, alien world. And
ultimately into oblivion.
The motivation, the source of courage, is faith, on one hand, and
hubris on the other. Watch both examples. Though we can easily discern
the noble from the base, we experience equally powerful stories. Here
is a chance to see juxtaposed two profoundly different outlooks
subjected to a common ordeal. What a wonderful, terrifying,
soul-shaking thing to witness!
22 out of 28 people found the following review useful:
A beautiful but gut wrenching film, 15 September 1999
Author:
Dan Grant (dan.grant@bell.ca) from Toronto, Ontario
I have to applaud Bruce Beresford. After his huge success with Driving Miss Daisy, I believe he could have had his choice to direct any film that he wanted to. To take on a small Canadian/Australian film is not only inspiring but it shows that this must be personal to him in some way. And it shows here as well. His direction shows that he cares for the subject and the people and the landscape. Everything is precise and pristine and immaculate. I am not a huge historian when it comes to colonization in Canada, and that is a shame, perhaps I should be. After all, my elementary school history teacher once told me that there are two things that are given to you when you are born, one is your name and the other is your nationality. Be proud of both. And it is subjects and films like this that he would have been proud of and so am I. Although you can get just as much out of this if you are American, there is just a little more substance to it if you are Canadian. After all, these were jesuits and these are the Iroquois and the Hurons and this is snowy, fridgid Quebec in the winter. These are all very Canadian and it is a film that tries to shed some light on how our country became what it is today. It is films like this that remind us as Canadians that we do have a history. And as silly as that may sound, it is an important statement. Go up to the average Canadian, any Canadian, young or old and ask them to name all the capitals of our 10 provinces and now 3 territories and I'll bet 6 times out of ten that they can't do it. Ask them if the Baffin Islands are a part of Canada or ask them where the Strait of Juan De Fuca is and they won't know. I am not in that category, I know my fair bit about my country, but I am unfortunately one that does not enough about things like Samuel De Champlain and what party Sir Wilfred Laurier was a part of and I certainly don't know much about subjects that Black Robe deals with. And even though it sounds like this film is good and important only because it teaches us about our history, that is not true. It is an interesting film but it is also very well made. I was intriuged and my eyes were wide open during this film. The acting and the direction and of course the photography was superb. But as much as this film was a good cinematic experience, I have to say that all Canadians should see it for it's historical importance. It is a part of history and it is something that should intrigue us all. I am very proud to say that this is at least partly funded, produced and distributed by Canadians and it is something that all of us should see at least once. It is a good film and it will teach us a great deal about out own country, and that is something that all of us need.
22 out of 29 people found the following review useful:
I was truly haunted by this film, 30 June 1999
![]()
Author:
Lamia7609 from Columbus OH
I noted that this movie was being compared to Dances with Wolves and Last of the Mohicans,aside from the fact that they all three involved native Americans there is little comparison.Windwalker would be a better comparison. This movie is more about this character who is being driven by a fierce passion to save a people and culture he doesn't understand and doesn't want to. It's Man vs. Nature. God vs. Nature. It draws a far more fierce and savage picture of Native Americans than most films dare to in an effort to stay PC which sometimes means pretending a victim or minority is without fault. This character,this "Black Robe",is most certainly flawed, but his courage in the face of savagery is inspiring. Also the native Americans in this film seem far more human and less a Hollywood caricature of native Americans. I plead with every movie lover out there SEE THIS FILM. I felt I was truly transported back in time. So, if you are avoiding this film because you hated Dances with Wolves and fell asleep every time you tried to watch Last of the Mohicans, try this film instead.
14 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
One of the Finest Portrayals of American Indians in the Movies, 9 July 2006
![]()
Author:
michael_the_nermal from United States
This film is brilliant, because it defies conventional stereotypes of
European settlers and American Indians. This movie strives and succeeds
in its portrayal of Indians and whites as human beings, rather than as
villains or saints. Those who feel this movie would show the Indians as
noble savages will be gravelly disappointed. The Indians in "Black
Robe" can be cruel, and have sexual mores that would disgust the more
prudish viewers. The affect of the Jesuit missionaries among the
Indians of Quebec is not romanticized or glossed over, nor are the
Jesuits shown as evil white devils. All humans in this movie have their
flaws and weaknesses and all act "morally" according to their own
cultures' expectations. Beresford has crafted a marvelous film that
ought to be required viewing in college history courses across the
country.
The cinematography is beautiful, whether we are watching the gilded
altars of the cathedrals of Renaissance France, the iridescent glow of
a fire at an Indian village, the cramped quarters of an Indian
longhouse, or the awesome and heavenly magnificence of the Canadian
woodlands and what appears to be the St. Lawrance River. This movie
does feature explicit sexual acts and gruesome violence, so I would not
recommend this movie at all for very young children. I think most
teenagers can handle this film. I suppose this film is very hard to
find at your local video rental store, but do yourselves a favor and
find it. Your efforts will be amply rewarded.
13 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
Courage of a different sort, 25 January 2001
![]()
Author:
jrpeet
As a retired Christian minister, I have perhaps a different view of the
movie than some of the other reviewers.
I felt that Laforgue,the Jesuit Priest, showed amazing courage to undertake
his mission under the most difficult of circumstances.
Director Bruce Beresford has addressed the issues of clashing cultures in
several of his other films: Driving Miss Daisy, Mr. Johnson for example.
And
he presents the complexities of culture anew in this film.
I was struck by the absolute beauty of Québec and the film's
cinematography.
Back to Laforgue for a moment: here is a protagonist that accomplishes his
mission with wisdom, intellegence, prayer, dependence upon his faith, lack
of violence, and persverance.
7 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
Significantly softened, 18 December 1998
![]()
Author:
Varlaam from Toronto, Canada
This film made major concessions to political correctness in its portrayal
of the Indians, who are depicted in a considerably more flattering light
here than they are in Brian Moore's novel. This could also be considered the
romanticizing "Dances With Wolves" effect. The novel drew some (unjust)
criticism here in Canada for its uncompromising approach.
The actual history is fairly readily available. "The Jesuits in North
America in the 17th Century" by the great American historian Francis Parkman
is the standard 19th c. work on the proselytizing efforts of the French
Récollet and Jesuit fathers.
Still, if you are not very familiar with the subject, this film is a strong,
and quite gruesome, introduction. I'm not aware of a lot of films about the
colonial period which are as tough. Not "Last of the Mohicans", or the adult
westerns from the '50's, in my opinion. "Little Big Man", perhaps. Or
possibly "A Man Called Horse", which I haven't seen. The priest in the story
is a composite of actual missionaries, and the impact of this historical
adventure thriller is heightened for me knowing that everything in this film
happened, and often a whole lot worse.
The rights and wrongs, the pros and cons, of the cultural collision of
Europeans with the autochthonous peoples are still too contentious, so I
would rather not get into them. There is a lot here to brood about
afterwards, and chances are good that you'll seek out a copy of the novel --
it's not very long, and a lot easier to read than James Fenimore Cooper. If
you're American or Canadian, this is an important part of our shared
past.
"Black Robe" is one of the very best Canadian feature films, with a solid
cast led by Lothaire Bluteau with August Schellenberg and Tantoo Cardinal in
support. The presence of an Australian director, Bruce Beresford, perhaps
kept the film from turning into a well-meaning but dry Canadian history
lesson.
| Page 1 of 7: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Amazon.com summary |
| Ratings | Awards | Newsgroup reviews |
| External reviews | Parents Guide | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |