1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Calling Dr. Giggles! Calling Dr. Giggles to the playroom!!, 3 April 2006
Author:
Coventry from the Draconian Swamp of Unholy Souls
After having seen the gory and over-the-top silly "Dr. Giggles"
hundreds of times and loving it more with every viewing, it's rather
difficult to accept that Manny Coto's debut film "Playroom" is such an
ambitious and serious-minded psycho thriller. I surely wasn't expecting
to see an attempt for intellectual horror, set in Eastern Europe and
focusing on topics like archeology and child-psychology, so "Dr.
Giggles"-fans beware!! It's not even an admirable attempt, as the
screenplay is very uninteresting, tedious and a total bunch of
nonsense. An obtrusive reporter convinces his girlfriend-editor to
travel to Yugoslavia, more particularly to an ancient abbey where he
and his archaeologist-father searched for the tomb of a fella named
Ilok. After a couple of days of digging with no results, Chris goes
completely nuts, has visions of his former imaginary childhood friend
and kills the rest of the expedition crew. Big deal! "Playroom" is
boring, mainly because you never care for Chris or his bad case of
split personality syndrome. This is only the first time I see
Christopher MacDonald in a lead role (he usually plays supportive
characters) and he already fails to convince us of his acting
capabilities. There's absolutely no tension, although Coto seemly tried
hard to create some, and the supportive characters are all
insufferable. Well, except for the great Vincent Schiavelli but his
role is regretfully brief. There also is an irritating lack of gore and
there seemly weren't enough budgets to buy a couple of extra light
bulbs, as entire sequences are filmed in the dark. One final piece of
advise for young scriptwriters: there's NOTHING even remotely scary
about kids' imaginary friends! Especially not if these imaginary
friends are ordinary looking kids as well.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- why?, 25 February 2002
Author:
kyle_793
albeit an interesting start of a story, playhouse is just that, a start.
In horror movies, every question you ask must be answered and playhouse
just
doesn't cut it. On the verge of being a really good horror classic, it
faltered.
and just because it bothers me! Why does the ten year old "prince of evil"
wear modern-day street clothes?! He's supposed to be hundreds of years
old!
It doesn't make any sense!
Started nice, but ended as a disappointment., 7 January 2006
Author:
chrisjan from The Netherlands
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
I bought this movie on VHS a while back and watched it last night. I
was looking forward to seeing this movie, but was kinda disappointed in
the end.
Here's the story (spoiler?):
An archaeologist (Christopher McDonald) has returning nightmares about
his childhood when his family was killed. His father was (also played
by Christopher McDonald) an archaeologist too and wants to finish his
father's work (finding a tomb of an 10- year-old prince who sold his
soul to a demon for eternal life) after he finds the map in a book
cover. He and his girlfriend and 2 other friends (one alcoholic
photographer and an ex-model.....to give the characters some
depth......) go to the same place in Serbia were his family was killed
to find this tomb. Once there, he get's obsessed with finding the
entrance to the tomb and slowly goes insane when his imaginary friend
appears again....
*******SPOILER*********
Turns out he killed his family out of revenge (and being under the
influence of his imaginary friend) for being locked up in the
"playroom" by his father. In there he makes up an imaginary friend.
This imaginary friend turns out to be the prince "who doesn t want to
be alone". Together they plot to kill his family and blame it on a
worker.
There are some huge holes and non-logical things in the story and the
story is also very simplistic. The main character goes insane very
quickly, the ex-model changes from a Buddist to a nymph, the people in
Serbia speak English etc etc.
Also I didn't like Christopher McDonald's acting. A lot of over-acting,
which didn't work for me.
The movie isn't scary at all, nore bloody. But the thing that ruined
the movie were the SE of the prince. First we see a young boy, but then
we get to see his "real appearance": Some plastic dummy with the voice
of that same boy!
2 Things I liked though: The setting off the movie in Serbia. That
looked great. Second: I liked the ending.
But you have check that for yourself!
Playfully sinister, 22 March 2005
Author:
brettkiser80 from north dakota
This film really appealed to me, as I love the lush mountainous Eastern
Europe countryside, and the hospitality of the locals. If you ever have
the chance to visit Eastern Europe or the Balkans, don't hesitate to
go.
Christopher McDonald(Happy Gilmore's Shooter McGavin) gives a
remarkable performance, if not over-the-top, as an archaeologist
determined to find the tomb of an evil child prince who enjoyed public
displays of torture. The site has a history with McDonald as well, his
family was brutally slain here when he was a child. Tagging along is
his girlfriend/boss, former Miss Virgina Lisa Aliff, and his drunk
photographer friend and his annoying yoga obsessed wife. Throw in
character actor Vincent Schiavelli, as his father's assistant and
current mental patient, determined to seek revenge, and you have a
solid involving story.
The torture chamber was brilliantly constructed, and Christopher
McDonald's deranged enthusiasm was classic. Lisa Aliff provides the
skin, and it is rather noteworthy, she is an enchanting beauty. I have
watched this film over and over again, and like it just as much as the
first time I viewed it.
this was okay but not anything special the dialog is often very bad and the
characters are very non amiable and very annoying but it has a decent
premise and some nice gore effects this had the potential to be a decent
little flick but overall it was mediocre and kinda dull too
the directing is average and the killings are passable as is this movie for
a lot of reasons why is he killing his friends yes i know because of that
imaginary boy he played with as a child forced him to do it but still ya can
fight it if ya know what i mean and he is killing them in very gruesome ways
and this was just sorta blah overall and is just average worth a watch on a
boring day but avoid otherwise ** out of 5
Archaeologist finds himself drawn to the site where his parents were
murdered. There he and his friends are haunted by the ghost of an evil ten
year old prince. Acceptable premise and good settings are just not enough
to
save this flick. The characters and acting are annoying and the script
throws out many questions, but never bothers to answer them all. Rated
R.
Good looking movie with (mostly) annoying performances, 31 May 2000
Author:
mjshannon from LaGrange, Illinois
I was surprised to see that the other user reviews for this were so
completely positive. I will say that the look of the film was great, the
direction well observed and the sets and locations effective. The problems
with this film, however, are mainly in the characters--none of them are
really likeable(the main characters girlfriend, played by Lisa Aliff is
alright) with the annoying award going to the lead actor(Christopher
McDonald) who is too over the top for you to have ANY sympathy for him.
The
main character's "playmate" that appears to him at the old monastery is
another annoying character you'd just like to slap. The playmates "real"
self is just as bad coming across as a cheap Yoda clone that spouts
incredibly lame wisecracks that quickly grows stale. Vincent
Schiavelli(who
played the weird biology teacher in Fast Times At Ridgemont High), who has
ties to the past at the monastery, is somewhat amusing in his whacked out
role but when all is said and done this could have been a better movie.
Maybe if the characters were a little more likeable or sympathetic the
other
shortcomings would have been overshadowed but as it stands it's mainly
worth
checking out for the overall look of the monastery, as well as location
shots and a couple of imaginative kills. OK, but not all that special.
"Schizo" or "Playroom" has a close and mystical atmosphere, but it is not
the psychological thriller it claims and wants to be. The story twist is
too
fast moving concerning to what you know about the main character from the
beginning of the movie.
Chris, played by Chris McDonnell of "Happy Gilmore", never has the sympathy
of the viewer. McDonnell's acting is overdone. The other characters, Marcy
(Jamie Rose) and Paul, seem to be only important for being killed by Chris,
who turns into a murderer way to fast. But...nice ways to kill the
others...!
Wonderful landscape, average story.
5 out of 10
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Pretty good..., 1 January 2000
Author:
WritnGuy from New Jersey
I rented this just for the heck of it, hoping for some cheap thrills for the
night. The story seemed pretty good, too. It's about this archaelogist,
Chris, whose family was killed in a cave-like monastery in Serbia when he
was a boy. Now, an adult, he wants to return to seek out the burial place of
those murdered. He brings with him his girlfriend and editor, Jenny, a
photographer, Paul, and Paul's girlfriend, Marcy. But things go awry when
the spirit of the killer begins to haunt Chris, slowly changing him from the
guy he was to someone quite evil....
On a scale of one-to-ten, I give this a seven. The story was quite good, and
developed very well, though I was confused a bit in the middle. Luckily, all
is cleared up and explained, but not too much, so that's good. The
performances are all quite strong. Jenny was a very likable heroine. And the
setting was great. Couldn't have been better. Plus, there are a couple of
genuinely scary scenes, especially during the exciting climax where Jenny is
forced to play their games, and fights to get away.
But there are some downsides. The movie takes a while to get going. It's not
flat-out boring, but it doesn't get very exciting for a bit. And also, the
villain, the spirit of the boy that killed Chris's family, is downright
laughable. To Chris, he appears as a teenaged boy, and that's alright. But
to Jenny--the only other person to see him--he is a very animated zombie,
with a goofy face and constant one-liners. It was tough to be afraid of him.
Chris was the better of the two, almost a reminder of Jack Nicholson's
character in "The Shining," which some could say this film was a bit
inspired by. He was much scarier, coming after Jenny through the monastery
with a pickaxe.
In any event, this is worth seeing. It's actually an impressive film with
some elements that should have boosted its popularity. I recommend it.
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- A very good and thrilling movie, 20 July 1999
Author:
Dino-38 from Moscow, Russia
Well, I really can say only good things about this movie: It's a
high-quality psychological thriller with few holes in the script, good
performances and director's work. I liked the idea of putting the action and
characters in an old mysterious monastery in Serbia, where the tragedy have
happened.
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Playroom (1990) More at IMDbPro »
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

Calling Dr. Giggles! Calling Dr. Giggles to the playroom!!, 3 April 2006
Author: Coventry from the Draconian Swamp of Unholy Souls
After having seen the gory and over-the-top silly "Dr. Giggles" hundreds of times and loving it more with every viewing, it's rather difficult to accept that Manny Coto's debut film "Playroom" is such an ambitious and serious-minded psycho thriller. I surely wasn't expecting to see an attempt for intellectual horror, set in Eastern Europe and focusing on topics like archeology and child-psychology, so "Dr. Giggles"-fans beware!! It's not even an admirable attempt, as the screenplay is very uninteresting, tedious and a total bunch of nonsense. An obtrusive reporter convinces his girlfriend-editor to travel to Yugoslavia, more particularly to an ancient abbey where he and his archaeologist-father searched for the tomb of a fella named Ilok. After a couple of days of digging with no results, Chris goes completely nuts, has visions of his former imaginary childhood friend and kills the rest of the expedition crew. Big deal! "Playroom" is boring, mainly because you never care for Chris or his bad case of split personality syndrome. This is only the first time I see Christopher MacDonald in a lead role (he usually plays supportive characters) and he already fails to convince us of his acting capabilities. There's absolutely no tension, although Coto seemly tried hard to create some, and the supportive characters are all insufferable. Well, except for the great Vincent Schiavelli but his role is regretfully brief. There also is an irritating lack of gore and there seemly weren't enough budgets to buy a couple of extra light bulbs, as entire sequences are filmed in the dark. One final piece of advise for young scriptwriters: there's NOTHING even remotely scary about kids' imaginary friends! Especially not if these imaginary friends are ordinary looking kids as well.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

why?, 25 February 2002
Author: kyle_793
albeit an interesting start of a story, playhouse is just that, a start. In horror movies, every question you ask must be answered and playhouse just doesn't cut it. On the verge of being a really good horror classic, it faltered. and just because it bothers me! Why does the ten year old "prince of evil" wear modern-day street clothes?! He's supposed to be hundreds of years old! It doesn't make any sense!
Started nice, but ended as a disappointment., 7 January 2006

Author: chrisjan from The Netherlands
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
I bought this movie on VHS a while back and watched it last night. I was looking forward to seeing this movie, but was kinda disappointed in the end.
Here's the story (spoiler?):
An archaeologist (Christopher McDonald) has returning nightmares about his childhood when his family was killed. His father was (also played by Christopher McDonald) an archaeologist too and wants to finish his father's work (finding a tomb of an 10- year-old prince who sold his soul to a demon for eternal life) after he finds the map in a book cover. He and his girlfriend and 2 other friends (one alcoholic photographer and an ex-model.....to give the characters some depth......) go to the same place in Serbia were his family was killed to find this tomb. Once there, he get's obsessed with finding the entrance to the tomb and slowly goes insane when his imaginary friend appears again....
*******SPOILER*********
Turns out he killed his family out of revenge (and being under the influence of his imaginary friend) for being locked up in the "playroom" by his father. In there he makes up an imaginary friend. This imaginary friend turns out to be the prince "who doesn t want to be alone". Together they plot to kill his family and blame it on a worker.
There are some huge holes and non-logical things in the story and the story is also very simplistic. The main character goes insane very quickly, the ex-model changes from a Buddist to a nymph, the people in Serbia speak English etc etc.
Also I didn't like Christopher McDonald's acting. A lot of over-acting, which didn't work for me.
The movie isn't scary at all, nore bloody. But the thing that ruined the movie were the SE of the prince. First we see a young boy, but then we get to see his "real appearance": Some plastic dummy with the voice of that same boy!
2 Things I liked though: The setting off the movie in Serbia. That looked great. Second: I liked the ending.
But you have check that for yourself!
Playfully sinister, 22 March 2005

Author: brettkiser80 from north dakota
This film really appealed to me, as I love the lush mountainous Eastern Europe countryside, and the hospitality of the locals. If you ever have the chance to visit Eastern Europe or the Balkans, don't hesitate to go.
Christopher McDonald(Happy Gilmore's Shooter McGavin) gives a remarkable performance, if not over-the-top, as an archaeologist determined to find the tomb of an evil child prince who enjoyed public displays of torture. The site has a history with McDonald as well, his family was brutally slain here when he was a child. Tagging along is his girlfriend/boss, former Miss Virgina Lisa Aliff, and his drunk photographer friend and his annoying yoga obsessed wife. Throw in character actor Vincent Schiavelli, as his father's assistant and current mental patient, determined to seek revenge, and you have a solid involving story.
The torture chamber was brilliantly constructed, and Christopher McDonald's deranged enthusiasm was classic. Lisa Aliff provides the skin, and it is rather noteworthy, she is an enchanting beauty. I have watched this film over and over again, and like it just as much as the first time I viewed it.
it was okay, 2 April 2004
Author: (callanvass@hotmail.com) from victoria b.c canada
this was okay but not anything special the dialog is often very bad and the characters are very non amiable and very annoying but it has a decent premise and some nice gore effects this had the potential to be a decent little flick but overall it was mediocre and kinda dull too
the directing is average and the killings are passable as is this movie for a lot of reasons why is he killing his friends yes i know because of that imaginary boy he played with as a child forced him to do it but still ya can fight it if ya know what i mean and he is killing them in very gruesome ways and this was just sorta blah overall and is just average worth a watch on a boring day but avoid otherwise ** out of 5
* * out of 4., 19 August 2002
Author: Brandon L. Sites (brandonsites1981@yahoo.com) from USA
Archaeologist finds himself drawn to the site where his parents were murdered. There he and his friends are haunted by the ghost of an evil ten year old prince. Acceptable premise and good settings are just not enough to save this flick. The characters and acting are annoying and the script throws out many questions, but never bothers to answer them all. Rated R.
Good looking movie with (mostly) annoying performances, 31 May 2000

Author: mjshannon from LaGrange, Illinois
I was surprised to see that the other user reviews for this were so completely positive. I will say that the look of the film was great, the direction well observed and the sets and locations effective. The problems with this film, however, are mainly in the characters--none of them are really likeable(the main characters girlfriend, played by Lisa Aliff is alright) with the annoying award going to the lead actor(Christopher McDonald) who is too over the top for you to have ANY sympathy for him. The main character's "playmate" that appears to him at the old monastery is another annoying character you'd just like to slap. The playmates "real" self is just as bad coming across as a cheap Yoda clone that spouts incredibly lame wisecracks that quickly grows stale. Vincent Schiavelli(who played the weird biology teacher in Fast Times At Ridgemont High), who has ties to the past at the monastery, is somewhat amusing in his whacked out role but when all is said and done this could have been a better movie. Maybe if the characters were a little more likeable or sympathetic the other shortcomings would have been overshadowed but as it stands it's mainly worth checking out for the overall look of the monastery, as well as location shots and a couple of imaginative kills. OK, but not all that special.
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

average, 30 November 2001
Author: knowing-all-answers (schrumpelhaut@uboot.com)
"Schizo" or "Playroom" has a close and mystical atmosphere, but it is not the psychological thriller it claims and wants to be. The story twist is too fast moving concerning to what you know about the main character from the beginning of the movie.
Chris, played by Chris McDonnell of "Happy Gilmore", never has the sympathy of the viewer. McDonnell's acting is overdone. The other characters, Marcy (Jamie Rose) and Paul, seem to be only important for being killed by Chris, who turns into a murderer way to fast. But...nice ways to kill the others...!
Wonderful landscape, average story.
5 out of 10
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-
Pretty good..., 1 January 2000
Author: WritnGuy from New Jersey
I rented this just for the heck of it, hoping for some cheap thrills for the night. The story seemed pretty good, too. It's about this archaelogist, Chris, whose family was killed in a cave-like monastery in Serbia when he was a boy. Now, an adult, he wants to return to seek out the burial place of those murdered. He brings with him his girlfriend and editor, Jenny, a photographer, Paul, and Paul's girlfriend, Marcy. But things go awry when the spirit of the killer begins to haunt Chris, slowly changing him from the guy he was to someone quite evil....
On a scale of one-to-ten, I give this a seven. The story was quite good, and developed very well, though I was confused a bit in the middle. Luckily, all is cleared up and explained, but not too much, so that's good. The performances are all quite strong. Jenny was a very likable heroine. And the setting was great. Couldn't have been better. Plus, there are a couple of genuinely scary scenes, especially during the exciting climax where Jenny is forced to play their games, and fights to get away.
But there are some downsides. The movie takes a while to get going. It's not flat-out boring, but it doesn't get very exciting for a bit. And also, the villain, the spirit of the boy that killed Chris's family, is downright laughable. To Chris, he appears as a teenaged boy, and that's alright. But to Jenny--the only other person to see him--he is a very animated zombie, with a goofy face and constant one-liners. It was tough to be afraid of him. Chris was the better of the two, almost a reminder of Jack Nicholson's character in "The Shining," which some could say this film was a bit inspired by. He was much scarier, coming after Jenny through the monastery with a pickaxe.
In any event, this is worth seeing. It's actually an impressive film with some elements that should have boosted its popularity. I recommend it.
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-
A very good and thrilling movie, 20 July 1999
Author: Dino-38 from Moscow, Russia
Well, I really can say only good things about this movie: It's a high-quality psychological thriller with few holes in the script, good performances and director's work. I liked the idea of putting the action and characters in an old mysterious monastery in Serbia, where the tragedy have happened.
Add another comment
Related Links