| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Index | 79 reviews in total |
74 out of 96 people found the following review useful:
"MB" nay-sayers: ever been a bomber pilot at age 21?, 13 November 2005
Author:
Missileman1 from United States
No??
then shut up.
My dad was. Didn't fly B-17s, but he was the PIC (pilot-in-command) of
a crew of seven, all younger than he, of a B-26 Martin Marauder medium
bomber (the Flying Prostitute 'no visible means of support'; referred
to the short wingspan and hot landing speeds) in the Mediterranean
Campaign out of Corsica and Sardinia, bombing German-controlled
ball-bearing factories in northern Italy at 10,000 ft. Lost his
nose-gunner from "fright" - frozen to the gun wouldn't bail out when
they were shot down right after 'delivering the pizza' over
Bergamo-Seriate airfield on my mom's birthday, Aug 08th, 1944
about 9
weeks before I was born. His story about getting out of that B-26
before it crashed would raise the hair on your young necks. Survived
Stalag Luft III and the 500 mile foot-march yes, in January, through
snow to Stalag Luft VII (Steve McQueen "The Great Escape"). Gen'l
Patton liberated all in April, 1945 including my dad and five of his
crew.
Dad didn't make furniture like Matthew Modine's character in "Memphis
Belle". But he did pick and truck-haul tomatoes on HIS dad's farm in
the Ohio River Valley around Racine, right out of the black
river-bottom soil just above the banks; became a basketball hero in
high school; then entered the Army Air Force at 19. Pilot training in
Texas and Florida. I have the letters from him to my mom during all
that...
And the dialog in the film? Pretty true-to-life, he said everybody
was young and talked and acted JUST LIKE THAT
This review isn't meant to be about my dad. But I hope it says a little
something about the producer's efforts for "Memphis Belle." Very young
kids normal Americans tough (even impossible) duty in advanced
machines (then) in hard times in a country far from home doing
what they were trained for. Sound familiar even today?...
And don't be too hard on the details. Remember, this is a
'representative film' of what happened to many, many bomber crews in
many, many different bombers during WWII. Many thousands of very young
American air crews were lost in this effort to help keep America and
our Allies 'free.' Think about that whole image, listen to the music
score, cherish the action from a fresh perspective. TRY to put yourself
in their shoes.
Then watch the film again
39 out of 42 people found the following review useful:
A Worthy Addition to the Corpus of War Films, 25 June 2004
![]()
Author:
James Hitchcock from Tunbridge Wells, England
The traditional, patriotic World War 2 film was popular in both America
and Britain throughout the fifties and sixties, long after the war
itself was over. In the late seventies, eighties and early nineties,
however, it went into something of a decline in both countries. In
Britain, this was connected to a decline in the British cinema itself,
which only occasionally had the financial resources and self-confidence
to make pictures on a large scale. (The best British war film of the
period was 'Hope and Glory', which concentrated on the Home Front
rather than on actual combat).
In America, the decline of the war film probably had more to do with
post-Vietnam syndrome which led to patriotic sentiment and the military
being viewed for a time with some suspicion. There were a few disguised
war films, such as 'Top Gun', which had modern American fighter pilots
battling an unidentified enemy in a fictitious war, or the 'Star Wars'
trilogy which, even if George Lucas disliked the analogy, was widely
seen as either World War Two or the Cold War translated into outer
space. Genuine war films, however, were few and far between, although
there were a number of exceptions, and TCM recently broadcast two of
these as part of the D-Day sixtieth anniversary celebrations, 'The Big
Red One' from 1980 and 'Memphis Belle' from ten years later.
Of these two, 'Memphis Belle' is closer in style and in spirit to the
traditional war film. Like many other war films it follows the fortunes
of a small, tightly-knit group of fighting men. The group in this case
is the crew of an American B-17 bomber based in England in 1943; the
producer David Puttnam originally wanted to make the film about a RAF
Lancaster bomber, but no British studio was interested and Hollywood
has never taken much interest in the British war effort. The crew of
the 'Memphis Belle' have already flown twenty-four successful missions;
one more, and they will have completed their tour of duty (the first
American crew to do so) and will be able to return home. (The name
'Memphis Belle' was taken from that of the first aircraft which
completed twenty-five missions in real life).
The film follows the men on their twenty-fifth mission, an attack on
the German city of Bremen. The raid is a difficult one; the bombers
meet strong opposition from German fighters and anti-aircraft gunners,
the plane is damaged and one of the crew is seriously injured. This
leads to a tense finale which leaves the audience wondering whether the
crew will be able to make it back to base. The main glory of the film
lies in its exciting depictions of aerial combat, among the best ever
filmed (although those in 'The Battle of Britain' made over twenty
years earlier are also excellent). As in that film, the combat
sequences in 'Memphis Belle' were achieved by the use of real aircraft
and models rather than by computer-generated special effects.
We are introduced to each of the crew, each of whom is presented as a
distinct and different personality- Dennis, the conscientious pilot and
captain, the depressive Phil, Val the medical student who pretends to
be far more knowledgeable than he really is, the poetic intellectual
Danny, and so on. Trying to make each crew member an individual
character in his own right was perhaps a mistake, as this meant that
there are too many actors in leading roles for the viewer to
concentrate on. The crewmen all emerge as half-formed characters with
no fully-formed ones; it might have been better to concentrate on, say,
four or five crew members and to tell their stories fully, with the
others only playing supporting roles.
The film touches on the moral dilemmas of the bombing campaign rather
more than earlier films on this subject might have done. Rather than
take the risk of hitting a nearby school, Dennis insists on flying
round (thereby increasing the risk of his aircraft being shot down)
until he has a clear view of the intended target, a German aircraft
factory. There is also a sub-plot involving a rather unpleasant Air
Force officer who is eager to exploit the Memphis Belle and her crew
for propaganda purposes, and his clashes with the base commander, who
finds this distasteful and who is more concerned about the heavy
casualties his unit is suffering.
These elements aside, there is little in the film that could not also
be found in earlier films about the World War Two bombing campaign,
such as 'The Dambusters' or '633 Squadron'. That does not, however,
necessarily mean that the film is anachronistic, as some have
complained. Fashions in film-making may come and go, but this cannot
alter the fact that the Second World War provides innumerable examples
of heroism and drama which are capable of being made the subject of a
good film. That was as true in 1990 as it was in 1950 or 1960, and
remains true even today. I myself found 'Memphis Belle' to be both
exciting and, at times, moving; a fine tribute to the men whose bravery
inspired it and a worthy addition to the corpus of war films. 8/10
36 out of 44 people found the following review useful:
Bandit's At Five O'clock, 29 September 2004
![]()
Author:
sol1218 from brooklyn NY
True story of the valiant B-17 bomber "Memphis Belle's" 25th and last
bombing run over the German port city of Bremen on May 17, 1943. Having
flown 24 bombing missions over Nazi occupied Europe since it's first
bombing run on November 7, 1942 over the city of Brest France this if
successful, it's 25th bombing run, would be the planes and crews ticket
out of WWII.
It had been determined by the US general staff that 25 bombing and
combat missions over Europe were the limit that a bomber crew, in order
to keep casualties down, can take before they start to fall apart from
the stress and cease to be effective. The crew of the "Memphis Belle"
are the first to almost reach that goal, 25 successful bombing
missions.
The unbelievably ferocious German resistance from it vaunted Luftwaffa
and ground anti-aircraft batteries over the skies of Europe cost the
USAAF and RAF some 35,000 planes, fighters and bombers, and their
crews, over 150,000 airmen, during the bombing of Germany and German
controlled Europe from 1942 to 1945. Thats just how savage and bitter
the fighting was for air supremacy over that war-torn continent.
Stirring story with fine performances from the "Memphis Belle's"
Captain Dennis Dearborn, Matthew Modine, on down. As the legendary
bomber weathers wave after wave of deadly German ME 109 Messershmitt
fighter planes from the sky and massive and murderous German AK AK
anti-aircraft fire from the ground. As the "Memphis Belle" flies over
Bremen and drops it's bomb payload and then limps back to England. With
it's crew battered and bloody but safe and alive to be the first bomber
crew to survive 25 missions over German controlled Europe.
The spectacular air combat photography was the best I've ever seen in a
war movie and the cast was on par with the "Memphis Belle" with no one
outshining the others but all equal up to their task just like the
famed bomber was.
Back on the ground there was another drama played out with officer Col.
Harriman, David Strathaim, who sent out the "Memphis Belle" and the
other 23 B-17's of his bomber squadron on their mission over Bremen
Germany. Col. Harriman didn't go along with Col. Derringer, John
Lithgow, the US public relation officer who seemed too eager to reward
the "Memphis Belle" crew with honors and glory even before they
successfully finished their 25th mission. Not realizing that he was
making the bombers crew and Col. Harriman very nervous with his not
understanding how dangerous their mission was and even possibly jinxing
them.
Tense and terrific the movie has already become a war classic without
the false heroics that was so common in war movies made during WWII by
Hollywood in order to boost the US morale at home and on the
battlefield. The crew of the "Memphis Belle" were just as normal and
scared as anyone of us would be if we were in the same situation that
they were in. But it was that very fear that brought the best in
strength and courage out of them and made them the hero's that they
eventually became.
30 out of 42 people found the following review useful:
A Fabulous Movie, 4 September 2004
Author:
MissyBaby from Scottsville, Kentucky
I first came across this masterpiece when I did a search for Eric
Stoltz on the Netflix website. Much to my surprise I discoverd this
film had an all star cast, and I adored them all! Tate Donovan, Matthew
Modine, Eric Stoltz, Billy Zane, Harry Connick Jr., D.B. Sweeney, Reed
Diamond, Courntey Gains, Neil Giuntoli and John Lithgow all give
amazing performances in this true story.
Even my Dad, who sleeps through every movie we watch, no matter how
enthralling, stayed awake and watched this. (Allbeit the second time I
popped this in the DVD player, but nevertheless hello.)
I would give this movie 20 stars if I could. It was one of the best war
movies I'd seen in a long time. Plus, being a teenage girl, I loved
seeing all the boys in Uniform. Oh my God, don't get me started.
When my mom asked me if I was ready to send it back to Netflix, I said
no and kept it a pretty good long while. But when we finally did send
it back, I cried, yes I cried, because I had fallen in love with this
movie. I'd watch it everyday if I could. I have yet to buy it yet, but
trust me, I'll find a way.
If you have had family that was in WWII, my grandfather was, then this
movie will have an impact on you. It did on me. I found my self
thinking that my grandpa was young like that right around that time.
This film was set in 1942 and that means that my grandfather had yet to
marry my grandmother, but he was in his prime. My mom and I both
thought that.
But you don't have to like war movies to love Memphis Belle. Because
it's not really like a war movie. It's about the close relationship of
these ten soldiers and how they work together to stay alive in the
worst of a situation. (I mean they're not having to eat rats to stay
alive, which my grandfather had to do in occupied France, or anything.)
The first time you see Memphis Belle anywhere, to rent or to buy, grab
it and take it home with you. YOU WILL NOT REGRET IT! Take my word on
that.
Missy
17 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
Credit given where credit is due, 20 August 2005
![]()
Author:
lancej86 from santa barbara, CA
Memphis Belle is an amazing movie that has an amazing cast where each
man fits his character perfectly as you are thrown back into May 17,
1943 as the crew of the Memphis Belle has completed 24 missions and is
about to become the first crew of the Eighth Airfore to complete its
25th and final bombing mission over Bremen to bomb a factory.
The movie accurately depicts a mission of a B-17 bomber and all the
treacheries the crew of 10 men must face while in the sky. From take
off and grouping for formation to the flight across the channel the
movie builds excitement as the men head into enemy skies where they
will have to face multiple attacks from ME-109 Messershmitt fighters as
well as brutal barrages of flak (anti aircraft)attacks, all while
trying to maneuver through the skies to make it over the target and
drop its payload of bombs. At that point, only half the battle is done,
the plane, crew of 10, and all other bombers in the formation must
struggle to make it back to their bases and land safely in England to
live to fight another day, or if they are lucky enough such as the crew
of the Memphis Belle, they will complete their tour of duty (25
missions) and return home to their families or continue on and complete
more tours.
The movie really gives the viewer a great understanding for how the
American airmen fought bravely over enemy skies of Germany during the
daylight bombing raids during WWII.
This movie is by far my favorite movie. I was introduced to this movie
one year after it came out in theaters. I was only 5 years old but I
already had a growing fascination for the war and especially for the
B-17s because of my grandfather. My dad knew about the movie because
local actor Eric Stoltz lives here in Santa Barbara, so he gave me the
movie in hopes of fulfilling my ever growing curiosities of B-17s.
21 out of 31 people found the following review useful:
Too bad about the first part, 20 July 2005
![]()
Author:
Philip Van der Veken from Tessenderlo, Belgium
I was glad to finally see a World War II movie that wasn't situated on
the ground, but in the air. Don't get me wrong, I'm still an absolute
fan of the 'infantry and tank' war movies, but from time to time I want
to see something new, something different. And let's be honest, there
just doesn't seem to be any interest from Hollywood for the air fights
over Europe or Asia in WWII. I only know of two other movies of this
kind and that is "Battle of Britain", made in 1969 (WWII) and "The Blue
Max" from 1966 (WWI).
The "Memphis Belle" is a B-17 bomber that is about to fly its 25th and
final mission. After this mission, the crew of ten men will have
fulfilled its tour of duty and will finally be able to go home. Since
they would be the first crew to finish all 25 missions in the 8th
Airforce, plans are made to celebrate their coming home party, even
before they have taken off. But before there can be any party, they
first have to fly their final mission to one of the worst targets
imaginable. They will have to fly over German territory, all the way to
the heavily defended Bremen, where they will have to bomb an airplane
factory in the middle of a residential area. All the men know that
chances are little that they will ever return alive and that one little
mistake will cost the lives of many innocent civilians...
In the beginning I didn't like this movie all that much and there were
a couple of reasons for that. One is the in my opinion badly casted
John Lithgow. His role as Lieutenant Colonel Bruce Derringer just
didn't fit in properly. It felt like he didn't take his role very
serious, although I'm convinced that it also had something to do with
the script. Perhaps no-one had payed enough attention to the
development of his role... And there were a couple more problems to be
found in this movie. Take for instance the crew. The voice-over in the
beginning says it too: There just has to be a virgin, a wise guy, a
cool guy,... in every flight crew. That was so stereotypical that it
bothered me. The last thing that didn't really do it for me - although
it wasn't as bad as my two other points of criticism - was the entire
day before their mission. I just had the feeling that they should have
kept it shorter. I'm not saying that they had to skip that part
completely, but I was waiting for the part in which all the flying and
the action would take place.
Still, I don't want you to think that this isn't a good movie. Once
they are in that bomber, the stereotypes seemed to melt away like snow
for the sun. They started to act as a team, instead of being a bunch of
individuals that didn't seem to fit in. From that moment on I was truly
captivated by this movie. Also the fact that they show so many flight
and fight sequences, including some real-time footage, is wonderful. I
know, I just love to watch those old Messerschmits, B-17's,... flying
and that already was enough for me to like this movie. But than again,
who else would watch such a movie than the people who are interested in
that part of the war? Not that many I suppose.
As a conclusion I would like to say that I liked this movie for many
reasons, but the best one must have been the acting once they were in
that confined space of the airplane. All they had to work with was the
interaction between them, their enemies and their plane and they sure
did a wonderful job from that moment on. So despite the fact that I
didn't like the first part of the movie all that much, I must say that
the second part made me decide to give it a very good final rating. I
give this movie a well deserved 7.5/10.
13 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
A Movie Released 40 years Too Late, 20 July 2009
![]()
Author:
Theo Robertson from Isle Of Bute, Scotland
For people of my generation childhood afternoons were often composed of
spending Sunday afternoons watching Second World War movies where
English speaking heroes gave stupid Germans a lesson in biting off more
than they could chew . This gave a a somewhat erroneous view of history
for the baby boomer generation . Americans were bullet proof apart from
the one bloke who was engaged to get married who'd always snuff it in
the final reel , the entire British military would be composed of John
Mills and that other bloke while the Germans were invariably stupid and
lousy shots . For my own part I became an aficionado of military
history and redeemed myself by studying the war and came to the
conclusion that Nazi Germany ( A regime that waged war as ruthlessly
and effectively as it murdered undesirables ) was defeated by " British
courage , American money and Soviet blood " in the words of Winston
Churchill . Watching MEMPHIS BELLE I'm reminded how old fashioned
everything is
Somewhat typically for a film that was made in Britain by a British
production team and a British director it's financed by American money
and therefore is made for an American market so revolves around an
American aircrew flying a B-17 . Fair enough but couldn't the
characters have mentioned that WW2 was a joint operation ? Watching
this you'll be left thinking America was fighting alone . There's even
a scene where the only British male character , a farmer , needs
rescued by the American airforce
As for the cast they're almost unknown at the time . John Lithgow would
be a recognisable face as would perhaps Matthew Modine . Some of the
cast would become well known but this leads to a problem when the crew
of the aircraft take their places . It's difficult to tell who is
manning which position in the plane and you do feel perhaps that a
better known cast would have improved things . Not to the point of A
BRIDGE TOO FAR or THE LONGEST DAY type star vehicle , but enough to
make you perhaps care a bit more for characters that end up faceless
The crew are on their 25th and final mission over Europe which means if
they survive the flight they can go home . Being their final mission
means all sorts of artistic license is involved to keep the audience on
tenterhooks . Despite being a relatively close target in Bremen their
fighter escort of P-51 Mustangs have to turn back to base for no other
reason than it makes the bomber crews situation more perilous even
though in reality a P-51 can indeed provide escort to Bremen and back
again . Everything else that can go wrong does indeed go wrong but
perhaps the most ridiculous scene is where Captain Dearborn misses the
target and decides to lead the bomber wing towards a second run because
he fears hitting a school . Would it be too callous to state allied
aircrews wouldn't have been too bothered about bombing a school ? After
all the children in a school would be working in a German factory
contributing to the Nazi war machine in a couple of years anyway . All
this makes MEMPHIS BELLE a little bit overdone with western allies
being goodies and Germans being faceless enemies
In conclusion MEMPHIS BELLE is a technically competent war film but not
much else . It does show the courage involved by bomber crews during
the second world war but also feels incredibly old fashioned . So much
so that you'd have no problem believing that the screenplay was written
while the war was still being waged
10 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Actually was an fairly accurate account..., 22 November 2005
![]()
Author:
Dan Wadle from United States
The movie actually was a fairly accurate account of the Belle's experiences except that the movie had everything that actually happened to the plane and crew on its 25 flights happen on the last flight. The one thing missing was that a Belle waist gunner ended up with frost bite on his hands and was replaced. The characters in the movie were fictional. I've seen some comments by people that it was unrealistic for a 21-year old (Matthew Modine's Dennis Dearborn character) to be the pilot. The real Belle pilot, Robert K. Morgan, was only 24 when they began flying missions in late 1942. Some of the movie's dialogue actually was said by crew during the Belle's missions. The government produced a 1944 documentary on the Memphis Belle directed by William Wyler and if you watch it you will recognize some of the scenes and dialogue from this movie.
9 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
" I know you're dying, but if you try that again, I gonna kill you ", 24 July 2009
![]()
Author:
thinker1691 from USA
World War II has many memories in it's huge archives. But the ones which stand out in an audience's mind are the ones which recall family members who actually experienced them. This movie " Memphis Belle " reaches deep into the human Psyche and rekindles a plethora of war time conflicts. The actors chosen for this masterpiece are incredible as they superbly resurrect the dangerous era of the courageous men and their historic aircraft. Matthew Modine plays Capt. Dennis Dearborn, a stern commander who exhibits a tough veiner, but is inwardly aware and concern with every man in his crew. Tate Donovan is Lt. Sinclair, anxious to experience bravery as a necessary element to achieve fame. However when the war touches him, he realizes, it's not as glorious as he imagined. Eric Stoltz, D.B. Sweeney, Billy Zane, Sean Astin, Harry Connick Jr., Reed Diamond, Courtney Gains and Neil Giuntoli play the crew. Rounding out the cast, adding prestige and enhancing the over-all story are David Strathairn and John Lithgow. Together, this superior ensemble and the dramatic talent of the special effects specialists allowed the 'Belle' to rise center stage and display its last wartime flight. The result is nothing short of extraordinary. Behind the men and their plane is the memory of the thousands of brave airmen who gave their lives for their country. In short, their sacrifice becomes the lasting monument which continues to this day as a lasting tribute to our freedom. A great film which is sure to become a military Classic. Highly recommended! ****
13 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
A Hollywoodized version of a true story, 22 June 2002
![]()
Author:
George Parker from Orange County, CA USA
"Memphis Belle" tells of the last combat mission of a legendary WWII B-17 bomber and her crew. The film is Hollywoodized for entertainment value and doesn't square with history on many counts including a fully fictionalized crew. Nonetheless, the film is offers a good cast, good drama, plenty of suspense and action, and imparts some sense of the daring and danger involved in the Belle's mission #25 and daylight Army Air Corps raids over Western Europe. Worth a look for those unfamiliar with the sacrifices of the air combat crews of WWII.
| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | Newsgroup reviews | External reviews |
| Parents Guide | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |