MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 4,837 this week

Archangel (1991)

6.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.6/10 from 676 users  
Reviews: 7 user | 13 critic

A surrealistic film in which a strangely assorted group of people come together in the Russian Arctic at the height of the revolution and World War One.

Director:

Writers:

(story), (screenplay), 1 more credit »
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1006 titles created 7 months ago
 
a list of 1042 titles created 1 month ago
 
a list of 1001 titles created 31 Dec 2011
 
a list of 1496 titles created 1 month ago
 
a list of 60 titles created 7 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Archangel (1991)

Archangel (1991) on IMDb 6.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Archangel.
1 win. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Michael Gottli ...
Jannings
David Falkenburg ...
Geza
Michael O'Sullivan ...
Doctor
Margaret Anne MacLeod ...
Baba
...
Philbin
Sarah Neville ...
Danchuk
Kathy Marykuca ...
Veronkha
Kyle McCulloch ...
Lt. John Boles
Victor Cowie ...
Sea Captain
Ihor Procak ...
Monk
Robert Lougheed ...
Stephen Snyder ...
Stage Kaiser Wilhelm II (as Snyder)
Michael Powell ...
Red Cross Nurse
Sam Toles ...
Young Philbin
Lloyd Weinberg ...
Priest
Edit

Storyline

Lt. John Boles, a one-legged soldier, is assisting the White Russians in the Russian Arctic during World War I. He finds himself in Archangel, a crystalline city of spires and domes, inhabited by some very confused people. Boles loves Iris, who is dead, and meets Veronkha, whom he mistakes for Iris. But Veronkha is already married to Philbin, who forgets he is married to Veronkha. Veronkha thinks Boles is Philbin... Written by L.H. Wong <lhw@sfs.org.sg>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

russian | arctic | revolution | love | soldier | See more »

Taglines:

A Tragedy of the Great War

Genres:

Comedy | Romance | War

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

25 April 1991 (Germany)  »

Also Known As:

Arcángel  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Budget:

CAD 500,000 (estimated)
 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

,  »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

In the original script, Boles' false leg was lost before he arrives at the cottage in Archangel, and the leg was to be replaced by a harpoon. The harpoon would then be thrown at the life-size statue of the Holy Virgin (outside the cottage), piercing its eye. None of this made it into the final film, though the large "One-Eyed Virgin" statue does appear. See more »

Quotes

[first lines]
Lt. John Boles: Goodbye Iris.
See more »

Connections

Featured in Guy Maddin: Waiting for Twilight (1997) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
The more Maddin I see, the more addicted I am to his unique style
25 July 2008 | by (Worcester, MA) – See all my reviews

Guy Maddin makes surrealist films in the style of classic movies. Here, he chooses vintage Russian agitprop cinema as his main point of reference (if you've seen "Potemkin" or "Man With a Movie Camera", you'll pick up on the similarities). While its nowhere near as successful as his later short film "The Heart of the World", "Archangel" is an interesting cross between "Eraserhead" and Sergei Eisenstein. The result is a film with a few visual cues which may recall earlier works by other filmmakers, but the mood, atmosphere, and mindset of the whole project is entirely Maddin's. Like any good experimental filmmaker, its obvious he only makes his films for himself.

"Archangel" isn't one of Maddin's more successful projects. For me, it lacks the rich psychological core he began exploring with his next film (and his masterpiece) "Careful". Also, there are moments when it begins to drag badly. It could've been cut by ten or so minutes and been much better paced. Maddin already had his vision, but his skills as a filmmaker had yet to be fully developed. Still, there are so many memorable visual sequences and the film is completely unique its worth watching in spite of these flaws. It has a certain authentic nature to both fever dreams and classic cinema which makes Maddin much more than just another filmmaker who continually references better works. "Archangel" isn't the best place to start, but its certainly recommended. (7/10)


3 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Where is this movie? jakethegoldfish
wrong movie BigDogDeflores
Learning to love Guy clauded
Discuss Archangel (1991) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?