| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Cheech Marin | ... |
Jesus Montea
|
|
| Eric Roberts | ... |
Fred Wook
|
|
| Julie Hagerty | ... |
Petra Black
|
|
| Robert Carradine | ... |
Sammy Margolin
|
|
| Buck Henry | ... |
Lloyd Stool
|
|
| Louise Lasser | ... |
Ronnie Summers
|
|
| Cindy Williams | ... |
June Margolin
|
|
| Andrea Martin | ... |
April Stool
|
|
| Cliff De Young | ... |
Agent Brubaker
|
|
| Dion Anderson | ... |
Dr. Binibon
|
|
|
|
Peter Boyden | ... |
Dr. Childs
|
|
|
Nicholas Wyman | ... |
Dr. Abbott
|
|
|
Michael Luciano | ... |
Martin
|
|
|
Amy Glass | ... |
1st Twin
|
|
|
Becky Glass | ... |
2nd Twin
|
In the late 1960s, two hippies are forced to leave their friends as they are wanted by the FBI, who see them as criminals. They hide in the jungle for 20 years, secluded from the outside war. In the late 1980s, they find out that a secret war is about to start in the US, and decided to return to New York to tell someone about it. What they find when they return is that all of their fellow hippies have become rich yuppies, like everyone else, and that no one wants to save the world anymore -- they just want to buy it. Written by Anonymous
This appeared at a convenient point in time for pop culture self-examination through the movies; the narrative intent is that we can review the 1980s through the lens of 1960s thinking.
It starts off with a 'reprogramming' of a dropout via LSD and movie indoctrination. This could have been something clever...instead it deteriorates by hallucinating through "Up In Smoke" and Leone westerns.
The 'ideal world' is depicted as "Woodstock", with the main characters stolen out of "Easy Rider". They take an excursion through "Salvador" and "The Mosquito Coast".
The whole thing, production-wise, staggers about in a manner as clumsy as "Where the Buffalo Roam" and "Animal House". It resolves through "Deer Hunter", "Stripes" and the Beatles' 'Revolution'.
The point of all this is to tear down the detached, colorless, sexless, 'boozh-wa' 1980s and reindoctrinate the audience to 'the truth' with the 'romantic' drug of the movie. An audience is assembled in the movie to first provoke (in us)the intended feeling of 'guilt', and the second time to sublimate into 'activism'.
As I wrote earlier, it's just not clever. The problem is, it doesn't know how to target the comedic center. Everything ends up as a target, including Roberts because he doesn't know how to play this in a smart way -- there's no winking at the viewer. The producers thought this was 'affirming', oblivious to the joke on themselves.