| Photos (See all 11 | slideshow) |
Directed by | |||
| Denys Arcand | |||
Writing credits(in alphabetical order) | ||
| Denys Arcand | writer | |
Produced by | |||
| Roger Frappier | .... | producer | |
| Pierre Gendron | .... | producer | |
| Doris Girard | .... | delegate producer | |
| Monique Létourneau | .... | producer | |
| Gérard Mital | .... | delegate producer | |
| Jacques-Eric Strauss | .... | delegate producer | |
Original Music by | |||
| Jean-Marie Benoît | |||
| François Dompierre | |||
| Yves Laferrière | |||
Cinematography by | |||
| Guy Dufaux | |||
Film Editing by | |||
| Isabelle Dedieu | |||
Casting by | |||
| Lucie Robitaille | |||
Production Design by | |||
| François Séguin | |||
Art Direction by | |||
| François Séguin | |||
Set Decoration by | |||
| Frances Calder | |||
| Simon La Haye | |||
Costume Design by | |||
| Louise Jobin | |||
Makeup Department | |||
| Cécile Rigault | .... | makeup artist | |
| Micheline Trépanier | .... | makeup artist | |
| Nathalie Trépanier | .... | assistant makeup artist | |
Production Management | |||
| Lyse Lafontaine | .... | production director | |
Second Unit Director or Assistant Director | |||
| Mireille Goulet | .... | assistant director | |
Art Department | |||
| Pierre L'Heureux | .... | carpenter | |
| Tristan Tondino | .... | lead scenic artist | |
Special Effects by | |||
| Louis Craig | .... | special effects supervisor | |
| Mario Dumont | .... | special effects technician | |
Visual Effects by | |||
| François Aubry | .... | visual effects supervisor | |
Camera and Electrical Department | |||
| Sylvaine Dufaux | .... | second assistant camera | |
| Luc Laflamme | .... | electrician | |
| Nathalie Moliavko-Visotzky | .... | first assistant camera | |
Animation Department | |||
| François Aubry | .... | animation director | |
Costume and Wardrobe Department | |||
| Mariane Carter | .... | set costumer (as Marianne Carter) | |
Editorial Department | |||
| Claudette Duff | .... | first assistant editor | |
Music Department | |||
| Robert Stanley | .... | musician: guitar | |
Transportation Department | |||
| Benoît Mathieu | .... | driver: bus | |
Other crew | |||
| François Aubry | .... | title designer | |
| Marie La Haye | .... | continuity | |
| Marie La Haye | .... | script girl | |
| Bernard Lamy | .... | production accountant | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Atonement | The Name of the Rose | The Barbarian Invasions | Jesus Camp | Amen. |
|
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
IMDb User Rating: |
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Drama section | IMDb Canada section |
What if Jesus had been born in the year 1970 instead of year 1, and as unheralded now as He was then- how would our society have dealt with Him?
And if people can get possessed by the Devil, can a regular guy -- not a nut or a fraud -- become gradually and genuinely possessed by Jesus?
Denys Arcand answers both questions in clever and entertaining fashion. With actual events, people, words and thoughts from Jesus' life being transposed to our modern times. Of course a movie like this is aimed at people who don't turn both their brain cells off as they enter the movie house, and won't be happy with 90 minutes of gunshots, car chases, or Jesus being whipped.
And yet this highly hypothetical parable still comes off as a plausible dramatic tale, with the usual Arcand mix of tragedy and comedy. You could have never heard of Jesus and still enjoy this movie.
The cinematography is gorgeous and the main actors are uniformly excellent. Some of the minor characters bother me intensely, which they are meant to do -- they're just too darn good at it.
The script and direction are nicely conventional - in the sense that at no time does the viewer wonder who that guy is or what the heck is going on. Jarring "artsy" cuts, unannounced flashbacks and weird camera angles are many critics' cup of tea but not mine, and thankfully, not Arcand's either.
There is quite a bit of tension-relieving slapstick in this story; some viewers may like it- it *is* funny, but it makes me uncomfortable at times. And the ending is a bit of an anticlimax, although at the second viewing I think I began to see the light.
I originally rated this movie 8/10, but after seeing it again I got more in tune with it and also noticed a few very clever details, so I'm upping it to 9/10. Maybe 10/10 when I see it next.