6.8/10
13,794
25 user 17 critic

The Gods Must Be Crazy II (1989)

PG | | Comedy | 13 April 1990 (USA)
Xixo is back again. This time, his children accidentally stow away on a fast-moving poachers' truck, unable to get off, and Xixo sets out to rescue them. Along the way, he encounters a ... See full summary »

Director:

Writer:

(written and devised by)
Reviews

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

ON DISC
1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

A comic allegory about a traveling Bushman who encounters modern civilization and its stranger aspects, including a clumsy scientist and a band of revolutionaries.

Director: Jamie Uys
Stars: N!xau, Marius Weyers, Sandra Prinsloo
Comedy | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

Two guys, one of them a magician, are transporting an ancient chinese vampire who can only be controlled by a series of yellow tapes, and is the ancestor of the other guy. On the way, while... See full summary »

Director: Billy Chan
Stars: N!xau, Ching-Ying Lam, Sam Christopher Chow
Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4/10 X  

Hijinx ensue when N!xau the Bushman travels to Beijing where he's recruited to accompany a track team on a week long survival race through the Chinese wilderness.

Director: Kin-Nam Cho
Stars: N!xau, Kent Cheng, Pei-Pei Cheng
Adventure | Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.3/10 X  

The gods are still crazy after all these years! "Crazy Hong Kong" (1993), also known as "The Gods Must Be Crazy IV", finds N!xau, the bushman star of the classic comedy "The Gods Must Be ... See full summary »

Director: Wellson Chin
Stars: N!xau, Carina Lau, Cecilia Yip
Comedy | Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.3/10 X  

Hilarious documentary on the wildlife of the Namib Desert.

Director: Jamie Uys
Stars: Paddy O'Byrne
Funny People (1976)
Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  
Directors: Jamie Uys, Kobus Kruger
Stars: Joe Stewardson, Bill Brewer, Stuart Brown
Short | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9.1/10 X  

Ebrahim alhasan, a guy who try to prove that god exists in many ways with his coworker Khalid here's.

Director: Jayashankarr
Stars: Kumar Madan, Shashank Mouli, Vinod Varma
Dirkie (1969)
Adventure | Drama | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

After a plane crash a young boy and his dog wander through the Kalahari desert.

Director: Jamie Uys
Stars: Wynand Uys, Jamie Uys, Lady Frolic of Belvedale
Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  
Director: Jamie Uys
Stars: Joe Stewardson, Tani de Lange, Bill Flynn
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Lena Farugia ...
Hans Strydom ...
...
Nadies ...
Erick Bowen ...
Treasure Tshabalala ...
Pierre van Pletzen ...
Lourens Swanepoel ...
Richard Loring ...
Lesley Fox ...
Simon Sabela ...
Ken Marshall ...
Peter Tunstall ...
Andrew Dibb ...
Edit

Storyline

Xixo is back again. This time, his children accidentally stow away on a fast-moving poachers' truck, unable to get off, and Xixo sets out to rescue them. Along the way, he encounters a couple of soldiers trying to capture each other and a pilot and passenger of a small plane, who are each having a few problems of their own. Written by Brian W Martz <B.Martz@Genie.com>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

A comedy of even more absurd proportions See more »

Genres:

Comedy

Certificate:

PG | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

| |

Language:

| |

Release Date:

13 April 1990 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Die Götter müssen verrückt sein II  »

Filming Locations:


Box Office

Gross:

$6,291,444 (USA)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.66 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The scene with Xixo's son being run over by the truck was done using blue screen work by the child actor. A studio shot of the boy falling to the ground was chroma keyed over a ground level shot of the truck passing over the camera lens. See more »

Goofs

The small aircraft goes from about 2000 feet in the mountain areas (with wires visible) to 25,000 feet very quickly, a physical impossibility. See more »

Quotes

Xixo: [speaking in his own dialect to Dr. Ann Taylor and the two soldiers]
Dr. Ann Taylor: Follow him.
Timi: We low on gas.
Dr. Ann Taylor: Follow him.
Mateo: We low on gas.
Dr. Ann Taylor: [enunciating] Follow him.
Timi: [sighs, and follows Xixo]
See more »

Connections

References Beautiful People (1974) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A worthwhile sequel that's a microcosm of South Africa
15 May 2005 | by (New York City) – See all my reviews

Series note: While it's not imperative to watch The Gods Must be Crazy (1980) first, it's recommendable. If you watch II before seeing "I", it might act as a slight spoiler to I for you.

Set an unspecified amount of time after the first film, Part II has Xixo (N!xau) living back with his tribe of bushmen in the Kalahari. His children ask to go with him on a murula-collecting trip. He's reluctant to take his small son, because he says that if his small son is not as tall as his bow, it's too dangerous. His small son talks him into it anyway. But not too long into the trip, Xixo and another bushman find signs of an injured elephant. He sends his kids back home, but a large truck driven by poachers sidetracks them. Xixo's kids end up in the back of the truck, unable to jump off once it starts rolling.

Meanwhile, Ann Taylor (Lena Faugia), a lawyer from New York, has traveled to Africa for a convention where she is supposed to deliver a lecture. Her group is staying at a safari lodge. While there, a ranger hits on her and talks her into going for a short safari flight in a two-seater airplane/glider. While away, they run into Stephen Marshall (Hans Strydom), who ends up hooking up with Ann instead. In another thread, there are a number of military vehicles riding along the edge of the Kalahari. We eventually meet two men on opposing sides of the intermittent skirmishes that have been occurring in the area.

Like the first Gods Must be Crazy, Part II's plot sounds over-complicated on paper. But also like the first film, writer/director Jamie Uys shows himself to be a master of handling a number of concurrent threads that gradually merge. The film is never confusing or incoherent as it would be in less capable hands.

The bad news, however, is that part of the reason for the above is that Uys used the first film as something of a template for this one. The threads--bushmen, military guys, and experienced ranger/Dr. guy with an attractive fish-out-of-water woman with whom there is a budding romance, are direct parallels to the first film, as are the way they develop and merge, as well as some specific comic scenarios. The bushman is searching for something that brings him into contact with the others. There is a wreck of sorts that leaves the fish-out-of-water woman and the ranger stranded in the bush. The woman gets her dress caught on something so that she shows some skin and it emphasizes the building romantic/erotic tensions, the military guys and poachers are bumblers who can't shoot straight, and so on. It's not that any of this material is bad (most of it is quite good, actually) or that I subtract points for formula. It's more that the film is bound to remind you of Part I's similar scenes, and Part I is a work of sublime genius.

However, there is a major thematic/subtextual difference from Part I. The first film was a parable-like satire of culture/society/civilization that suggested that maybe we'd made some missteps and should reconsider where we'd ended up culturally. Although there are hints of the same ideas here, Part II's most prominent themes/subtexts are much less ambitious, and maybe less universal, but no less enjoyable.

Uys sets Part II almost exclusively in the bush. There are neither the cities nor villages of Part I. Instead, Uys seems to present something of a microcosm of South African culture circa 1989 against a functionally "abstract" backdrop.

Ann (and the other characters in her "group", whom we only see very briefly) represents both suave urbanites and the plethora of tourists who head to the area for eco-tourism. Xixo and his fellow bushmen represent the various native groups who have tried to go about business as usual as much as possible while having to adapt to the ways of non-indigenous (per more current anthropological history, at least) peoples who have come to occupy and often control the natives' land. Stephen represents the non-indigenous who have tried to also adapt themselves to their adopted country and its environment, to live in "harmony" with both the natives and the land. The two poachers represent all of the opportunists who have tried to exploit the area and its resources--not intending to do it harm, exactly, but not caring if they do, either, as long as it doesn't affect their profit/comfort margin. And the military guys represent regimentation, political control, and the constant armed conflicts in the area, whether official or not, engaged in by natives and the non-indigenous alike, who have all chosen a non-native lifestyle dictated by ideas of possession, laws/rules, control, force, and so on. While these are not the only groups in the region, they represent the primary conflicting interests that underlie much of the tension the area has experienced in the past (and continues to experience even now, if in a less formal and violent way).

While Uys doesn't employ the unusual editing of Part I (with its extreme time/action manipulations during the course of scenes and single shots) to the same extent (there is a bit of it here, but it is very subtle), and he doesn't amp up the spoof nature of the film as much (the bushmen speech isn't so comically exaggerated via overdubs, for example), he present even more beautiful cinematography, with a lot of fantastic desert shots, plus more suspense utilizing native fauna. I think I prefer the score in this film, also.

Part II is funny, but the tone isn't quite as "madcap", and there isn't quite as much slapstick (although there still is plenty to be had) as Part I. However, this is still a more than worthwhile sequel to a masterpiece.


21 of 24 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page