From cult director Alex Cox (Repo Man; Sid and Nancy) comes this modernised adaptation of Thomas Middleton's celebrated play from 1607. It tells the story of a man whose wife is murdered on... See full summary »
Morbid biographical story of Sid Vicious, bassist with British punk group the Sex Pistols, and his girlfriend Nancy Spungen. When the Sex Pistols break up after their fateful US tour, ... See full summary »
A criminal defense attorney is seduced by a beautiful woman and reluctantly takes on the defense of her estranged husband who is charged with murder, but finds his career threatened because... See full summary »
In april 1944, an allied agent is sent to France in order to rescue an "overlord" captured by the Germans. (An "overlord" is one of the few men who knew the date and place of the "D" day). ... See full summary »
William Walker and his mercenary corps enter Nicaragua in the middle of the 19th century in order to install a new government by a coup d'etat. All is being financed by an American multimillionaire who has his own interest in this country. Written by
This film is littered with anachronisms (for example: modern cars, color printed magazines and coca cola bottles). However, these are clearly an artistic choice by the film-maker and cannot be considered true 'goofs'. See more »
Alex Cox effectively destroyed his career with this interesting film
"Walker" is an unique film, but its easy to see why it flopped commercially and critically when originally released. The film tells the tale of a 19th century mercenary soldier who invades Nicaragua to install democracy and winds up making a tyrannical government. The central character, Walker, is a completely insane man, which makes Alex Cox's over-the-top style of storytelling rather effective. The film, along with the equally berserk but not nearly as interesting "Straight to Hell", completely destroyed Cox's career after the promise of his first two films "Repo Man" and "Sid and Nancy". Its easy to see why. Not because this film is bad or anything, but its sledgehammer style really nails the point home and was probably uncomfortable for audience members.
That isn't to say its a masterpiece. Cox is a bit too sledgehammer in his style, meaning he often sacrifices character development or a compelling storyline in order to get the point across. Plus, the satire is often a bit too over-the-top and comes across as juvenile (espescially for the first twenty minutes or so). Still, Cox is clearly a passionate man and one has to admire him for making such an uncompromising picture. Its still unique and entertaining in how surreal it often is. (7/10)
5 of 6 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?