Inherit the Wind (TV 1988)Based on a real-life case in 1925, two great lawyers argue the case for and against a science teacher accused of the crime of teaching evolution. Director:David Greene |
|
| 0Share... |
Inherit the Wind (TV 1988)Based on a real-life case in 1925, two great lawyers argue the case for and against a science teacher accused of the crime of teaching evolution. Director:David Greene |
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Kirk Douglas | ... | ||
| Jason Robards | ... | ||
| Darren McGavin | ... | ||
|
|
John Harkins | ... | |
| Megan Follows | ... | ||
| Kyle Secor | ... | ||
| Michael Ensign | ... | ||
|
|
Don Hood | ... | |
| Jean Simmons | ... | ||
| Josh Clark | ... | ||
|
|
Scotch Byerley | ... | |
| Ebbe Roe Smith | ... | ||
|
|
Douglas Dirkson | ... |
Mr. Bannister
|
| Richard Lineback | ... | ||
| Tom McCleister | ... |
Bailiff
|
|
A teacher has taught about evolution in a small town in Tennessee. He has violated state law by doing this. Two great lawyers appear, one to assist in his defense, the other to help prosecute him. The town is divided in many ways which become apparent as the trial progresses. This is a dramatization of the Scopes Monkey Trial that pitted William Jennings Bryan against Clarence Darrow in a real case. Written by John Vogel <jlvogel@comcast.net>
As a standalone TV movie, this version of 'Inherit The Wind' has some value, and has interesting leads (Jason Robards and Kirk Douglas). The trouble is it doesn't quite work, and was preceded by perhaps the greatest version (with Spencer Tracy and Fredric March) and followed by a superior television production (with Jack Lemmon and George C Scott).
This version seems slow and, because it was made with commercial breaks in mind, doesn't flow that well even if you watch it with the breaks omitted. For a script and film which relies on some quite deep dialogue which requires some concentration to keep the interest and the mood, having the breaks was a major mistake.
Not the best of the three versions by any means, but interesting to see. It just isn't the version I'll be going back to the most. Robards is OK, Douglas less so (he feels miscast), but the film is a bit of a turkey.