Great Performances

Tales from the Hollywood Hills: Natica Jackson (6 Nov. 1987)

TV Episode  -   -  Biography | Drama | Music
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 4.9/10 from 204 users  
Reviews: 11 user | 1 critic

Add a Plot



(based on a story by), (teleplay)
0Check in

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Picks: October

IMDb's editors share the movies and TV shows they are excited to see in October.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1837 titles
created 23 Apr 2012
a list of 1438 titles
created 14 May 2012
a list of 1285 titles
created 14 Jul 2012
a list of 50 titles
created 30 Oct 2012
a list of 26 titles
created 6 months ago

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Tales from the Hollywood Hills: Natica Jackson (06 Nov 1987)

Tales from the Hollywood Hills: Natica Jackson (06 Nov 1987) on IMDb 4.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Great Performances.
« Previous Episode | 349 of 364 Episodes | Next Episode »




Episode cast overview, first billed only:
Morris King
Bud Loring
Ernestine King
Bryan Montgomery ...
Young Soldier
David Ackroyd ...
Reginald Broderick (as Davis Ackroyd)
Assistant Director
Alan Hildred
Hal Graham (as Brain Kerwin)
Eugene Kallman ...
Tracy Bogart ...
Suzy Sharp ...
Beryl Graham
Jean Graham
Paul Jonathan Henry ...
Howard Graham


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


See all certifications »




Release Date:

6 November 1987 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


| (DVD)

Sound Mix:


Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


This chapter is subtitled "Power, Passion, & Murder". See more »


References Tales from the Hollywood Hills: Golden Land (1988) See more »


I Can't Get Started
Performed by Bunny Berigan and his Orchestra
Courtesy of RCA Records
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Odd Little Movie, with Considerable Charm
7 June 2006 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

There is a substantial list of reasons why this is not a particularly good movie, but not much point in going into them. That being said, there are some very good reasons to watch it, and it's not a bad movie either. Be prepared to tolerate some annoying lighting (which, though, is sometimes quite good) and plot twists, and some slow spots, and you might just enjoy much about it.

For one, the performances are just about all good to very good, usually, and I think in this case, a sign of good directing. Michelle Pfeiffer is huge fun to watch in one of her relatively early roles, several orders of magnitude better than in Scarface, made about the same time. That wonderful quality of hers of showing us her thoughts moment to moment through subtle shifts of expression is on full display here. Her character here is talented and complex, and that and the situations that arise give her plenty of opportunity to show it. Hector Elizondo and Darren McGaven (not listed above, but definitely a major character) also give good, nicely nuanced performances, and so do several minor characters.

Another appealing plus is that there's real chemistry between and among the performers. Pfeiffer's love scenes with a chemist she meets due to a fender bender (I've forgotten his name, sorry) are staged and charged with a subtle energy that most movie love scenes, for all their frenetic movement and heavy breathing, don't even hint at. Her interactions with her director on the set and with Elizondo also seem quietly real, the depth (or lack thereof) of their friendships evident in the mundane daily interactions all of us know. I can think of ten or twelve very nice moments, some among minor characters, that are wonderfully realized, and a reminder that any movie can be made with insight and humane intelligence: yes, these are insignificant and often misguided individuals, but they are human beings, too, and aren't they, the movie asks, interesting to watch? The script is problematic mostly because it's in service to the uneven plot, but much of the dialogue is realistic, with people having real conversations, rather than spouting epigrams and staring meaningfully at each other. And it's often clever, as well.

So, yes, this is indeed a small and very minor movie, and yes, everybody involved had to know it. And yes, the plot has some serious deficiencies, particularly a completely unexpected and unsatisfying ending, and the principles knew that, too. But they went about their business as professionals, and shrewd, talented, and intelligent professionals at that. I was annoyed at the ending, but enjoyed the movie considerably more than the average Hollywood dreck.

5 of 6 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Will this version be released on DVD? The Baron
What the hell is that 'Great Performances' title? sonlui
What the hell? (Jesus Christ Superstar 2000) kagom_jack
Diane Lane..Summer...Great Performances alnovitsky
Shame on PBS venussansfurs
The Gospel At Colonus michaelriley

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: