Told in Documentary form, the film depicts a group of five British film critics and politicians who venture off into the West Virginian wilderness in search of the "Tony Blair Witch" which ... See full summary »
Michael A. Martinez
C. Alan Ploegsma,
Costantino and Daniele are two friends which have very success with girls. Their wish is to work in the show business and they can achieve their goal when meet Valeria, top model and ... See full summary »
Ugo Fabrizio Giordani
The CIA asks for ex-spy Leonard's help in stopping an evil force that is brainwashing small animals into killing people. Leonard, however, has his own problems to deal with: winning back his ex-wife. Written by
Murray Chapman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
During his brief period as head of Columbia Pictures, David Puttnam tried to cancel production on this film. See more »
When Allison dumps the food onto Leonard's head, he goes back to his car and the amount of food keeps increasing and decreasing between shots. Look at the large leaf of Roamine lettuce disappear and reappear as Leonard Parker talks to Frayn. See more »
Saw them make the film: Not fun. Watched the film: Not good.
This film was made nearby where I lived in 1986. Many residents had to put up with trailers on the street and generators running into all hours of the evening. We did however, get to see Cosby shoot a scene, so that was fun.
When it came time to see his creation, the disappointment was even greater having expected at least something of fair value. The film is disjointed, as if the writer quit in the middle. The relationship between Cosby - a master spy living in an enormous house - and his unhappy wife (who lives in the enormous house next door, which is supposed to be a funny circumstance) took time to develop. Then it was immediately lost in some mad-cap chase scenes in a warehouse.
There is nothing interesting about this film. There must be a story behind how it got made. Cosby is a man of talent, but this film showed none.
16 of 17 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?