Down 1,418 this week

King Lear (1987)

Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.8/10 from 808 users  
Reviews: 14 user | 11 critic

Everything returns to normal after Chernobyl. That is, everything but art. Most of the great works are lost, and it is up to people like William Shakespear Junior the Fifth to restore the ... See full summary »



0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 44 titles
created 14 Apr 2011
a list of 46 titles
created 15 Jun 2011
a list of 31 titles
created 21 Jan 2012
a list of 38 titles
created 3 months ago
a list of 29 titles
created 1 month ago

Related Items

Search for "King Lear" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: King Lear (1987)

King Lear (1987) on IMDb 5.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of King Lear.

User Polls

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Notre musique (2004)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Divided into three "kingdoms" -- Enfer (Hell), Purgatoire (Purgatory) and Paradis (Paradise) -- Notre Musique is an indictment of modern times.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Sarah Adler, Nade Dieu, Rony Kramer
Hail Mary (1985)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.7/10 X  

In this modern retelling of the Virgin birth, Mary is a student who plays basketball and works at her father's petrol station; Joseph is an earnest dropout who drives a cab. The angel ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Myriem Roussel, Thierry Rode, Philippe Lacoste
Comedy | Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

Carmen is a member of a terrorist gang who falls in love with a young police officer guarding a bank that she and her cohorts try to rob. She leads him on while dragging the two of them ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Maruschka Detmers, Jacques Bonnaffé, Myriem Roussel
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

In part one there is talk of a project on the subject of love, with the example of three couples, one young, one mature and the other elderly. At this point the author comes into contact ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Bruno Putzulu, Cécile Camp, Jean Davy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

A symphony in three movements. Things such as a Mediterranean cruise, numerous conversations, in numerous languages, between the passengers, almost all of whom are on holiday... Our Europe.... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Jean-Marc Stehlé, Agatha Couture, Mathias Domahidy
Numéro deux (1975)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

An analysis of the power relations in an ordinary family.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Sandrine Battistella, Jean-Luc Godard, Pierre Oudrey
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

An examination of sexual relationships, in which three protagonists interact in different combinations.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Isabelle Huppert, Jacques Dutronc, Nathalie Baye
The Soldiers (1963)
Comedy | Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

During a war in an imaginary country, unscrupulous soldiers recruit poor farmers with promises of an easy and happy life. Two of these farmers write to their wives of their exploits.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Patrice Moullet, Marino Masé, Geneviève Galéa
King Lear (1999)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.7/10 X  

King Lear, old and tired, divides his kingdom among his daughters, giving great importance to their protestations of love for him. When Cordelia, youngest and most honest, refuses to idly ... See full summary »

Directors: Brian Blessed, Tony Rotherham
Stars: Brian Blessed, Hildegard Neil, Jason Riddington
Made in U.S.A (1966)
Comedy | Crime | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

Set in the near future, Paula, a leftist writer, goes from Paris to the French town of Atlantic-Cité when she learns of the death of a former colleague and lover, Richard P. Is she there to... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Anna Karina, László Szabó, Jean-Pierre Léaud
Comedy | Drama | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

A film with idiotic prince and Rita Mitsouko who records a new album.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Jane Birkin, Dominique Lavanant, Pauline Lafont
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

A famous French filmmaker is hired by a major Hollywood producer to make a documentary on the state of post-Cold War Russia. The filmmaker, though, subverts the project by stubbornly ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: László Szabó, Jean-Luc Godard, Bernard Eisenschitz


Uncredited cast:
Mr. Alien (uncredited)
Freddy Buache ...
Professor Quentin (uncredited)
Edgar (uncredited)
Virginia (uncredited)
Professor Pluggy (uncredited)
Suzanne Lanza ...
Kate Mailer ...
Herself (uncredited)
The Great Writer (uncredited)
Don Learo (uncredited)
Michèle Pétin ...
Journalist (uncredited)
Cordelia (uncredited)
Peter Sellars ...


Everything returns to normal after Chernobyl. That is, everything but art. Most of the great works are lost, and it is up to people like William Shakespear Junior the Fifth to restore the lost artwork of the human race. He finds strange goings-on at a resort enough to remind him of all the lines of the play, dealing with mob boss Don Learo and his daughter Cordelia, a strange professor named Jean Luc-Godard (sic), who repeatedly xeroxes his hand for no particular reason. He is followed by four humanoid goblins that keep tormenting Cordelia. There is also the gentleman whose girlfriend, Valerie, isn't always visible. Then the film is sent off to New York for Mr. Alien to edit. Written by Scott Hutchins <>

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis


Fear and Loathing. A Study. An Approach. A Clearing. No Thing See more »


Comedy | Drama | Sci-Fi


PG | See all certifications »




| | |

Release Date:

3 April 2002 (France)  »

Also Known As:

Jean-Luc Godard's King Lear  »

Box Office


$2,000,000 (estimated)

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:



Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Godard's deliberate artistic use of stereo sound effects is an often-overlooked important part of this film. Some VHS or DVD releases do not have proper sound reproduction. See more »


The Great Writer: For words are one thing, and reality, sweet reality, is another thing, and between them is no thing.
See more »


References The River (1951) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

the artistic struggle to create meaning
26 September 2013 | by (bangkok) – See all my reviews

This must be a candidate for the most difficult film ever made. Great reviewers can't make head nor tail of it. It's Godard's own Finnegan's Wake-like dreamscape of the making of a film on the theme of King Lear, beginning with the contract, ending with the editing - a project that apparently turned into a nightmare. Hence the disjointed narrative, Alice in Wonderland elements, weird juxtapositions, elaborate pseudo-philosophies - all familiar components of delirious semi-consciousness. It's an anti-film, a film made deliberately to be disliked as much as it dislikes itself. Just as Godard's film about Lausanne, Lettre a Freddie Buache, consists of his refusal to make a film about Lausanne, so King Lear is his refusal to make the Lear required of him, while contract bound to make something.

It opens with an actual phonecall from the producer giving Godard a roasting for failing to deliver the film. The film that follows is Godard's response and is basically a middle finger to the Cannon Group and everyone else, focussing as it does, on the key word in the play: Nothing.

In the opening scenes, Norman Mailer and his daughter discuss the King Lear script he has just finished. It's unclear whether Mailer's actual script was ever going to be used, assuming he wrote one, or why Mailer himself would want to act the part, or why Godard would ever have agreed to make a film written and acted by Norman Mailer. Obscurities matched only by the resulting film itself. In any case it wasn't going to work. Perhaps to deliberately abort the project, Godard quickly succeeded in pissing off the Mailers who left in a huff. Godard blames the petulance of 'the great writer' and his daughter's inability to handle the pressure from various sides, including her father. That's one hell of an opening for a film, leaving us blinking and wondering what is going to happen, or not happen, next.

A kind of story pops up. A descendant of Shakespeare (Peter Sellars) is trying to recreate the Bard's works after all art has been lost in a nuclear catastrophe. In a Swiss hotel he finds Burgess Meredith and Molly Ringwald, vaguely recognised as Lear and Cordelia (power and virtue in contest), and from whom he gradually reconstructs the play. Mailer's idea of making Lear a mafia don resurfaces here. Meanwhile, Sellars is in pursuit of the mad Professor Pluggy (Godard, in a truly bizarre performance) who has crucial knowledge of how images should complement the words.

Pluggy's long and solemn thesis on words, images and reality is at the centre of the film. Life and images of life.Telling and showing. There is more than recreating a universe of words (says Pluggy). Images are purer. Images serve to connect two realities and meaning is created by reconciling these two realities. Their coming together in image form releases the emotive power. Contrary realities (Lear and Cordelia) don't come together. The strength of an image lies in the association of ideas it contains. Bringing them together is the function of the artist. This presumably also applies to sound - the use of sound in the film is astonishing - layered, atmospheric, and apparently insane - and presumably explains the seagulls that are heard at random intervals, even during interior scenes. This is all dream-theory. Barely understandable on a single viewing - perhaps complete gibberish - yet key to what the film is about: the struggle of the artist to create.

At the end, Woody Allen is splicing the film with safety pins while reciting an irrelevant Sonnet - a final swipe at the Americans who clearly should never have messed with Godard in the first place. His response was to deliver something that is probably Nothing with an artistic fiendishness ungraspable by mere mortals. According to your fondness for the director, it's either highly entertaining or unendurable punishment.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Don't Bother cls5832
Huh?!? freewaydog
Peter sellers MJBell25
godard and kozintsev tracyfigueira
Discuss King Lear (1987) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: