| Page 1 of 29: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 281 reviews in total |
63 out of 71 people found the following review useful:
Unique and twisted, 14 March 2004
Author:
Gafke from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This is one of the sickest and most depraved horror films of its time,
and I love every minute of it. Where other films had only touched on
the barest suggestion of the link between sex and death, Hellraiser
shoves that fact right in your face.
Frank Cotton (who starts out the film as the main character) is a
soulless man who lives only for life's pleasures. He will go to great
lengths to satisfy his lusts, and thinks nothing of who he may be
stepping on to get there. He is offered a small, strange puzzle box
called The Lament Configuration by a strange man in what looks and
sounds to be a Mid Eastern market. The box, he is promised, will open
the gates to a world of pleasures that no mortal can possibly imagine.
Frank takes the box, but he doesn't understand that the pleasures the
box offers are to the demons who live within it. The Cenobites,
sadomasochistic creatures who live eternally beyond the gates that the
box can open and close, take great pleasure in ensnaring new human
victims to toy with, imprisoning them forever in a labyrinth of pain
and suffering. Frank disappears, and many months later, his brother and
sister-in-law come to live in the abandoned home.
The film then switches gears and gives us a new main character: Julia.
Julia, the wife of Frank Cottons brother Larry, is a cold woman.
Beautiful and immaculate, she is icy and distant and seems to derive no
pleasure from anything, least of all her husband and his daughter from
a previous marriage, Kirsty. Julia's only private joy are the memories
she has of Frank, with whom she once had an affair. Frank seems to be
the only man who was never intimidated by Julia, treating her roughly
and breaking down her defenses. Little does Julia know that Frank never
left the house; he is upstairs, in the attic, having escaped from the
Cenobites and now biding his time until he can return to a world of
flesh and blood. When Larry accidentally injures himself and bleeds on
the floor of the attic, Frank is brought back, feeding on the fluid and
slowly regenerating, growing back bones, muscle and skin. Julia soon
discovers the terrible secret in the attic. After her initial shock and
disgust, she agrees to help Frank, for whom she still lusts, and begins
bringing him men she picks up in bars. She bludgeons them to death and
Frank feeds on them, each one helping him in his regeneration.
The film then switches points of view once more and Kirsty becomes the
main character. Kirsty, who has never liked the pretentious, frigid
Julia, becomes suspicious. Her suspicions are soon confirmed when she
comes face to face with "Uncle Frank" and barely escapes his bloody
clutches, the Lament Configuration in her hand. She accidentally opens
it, and when the demons within, led by the now-famous Pinhead, threaten
to take her back with them to their dimension, she makes a deal: she
will lead them to Frank, and they can have him instead of her. From
there on out, it is a countdown; will Kirsty find Frank in time? Can
her father be saved from the adulterous couple plotting against him in
his own house? Or will it be too late for all of them?
This is another sex-equals-death film, but with a slightly updated
feel. Julia is Bad; she cheats on her husband and likes her sex rough.
Kirsty is Good, but she is no virgin, living with her boyfriend and
eagerly engaging in premarital sex. Larry, a dull-as-paste husband who
seems to genuinely love his wife but doesn't quite understand how to
treat a woman, falls victim to his own blandness. He never sees what's
coming because he possesses no imagination, no foresight; he is just
the everyday, mundane man mowed under by his own unspectacular
existence. Frank is the ultimate Bad; he is a user. He likes sadism,
but not when it is turned on him. The Cenobites are the real reason
this film was so successful; expressionless zombies in black leather
and fetish wear. Led by the majestic Pinhead, they come into our world
equipped with chains and hooks and all manner of painful devices,
literally ripping their victims apart without batting an eye. They are
what Frank wants to be, but Frank is not strong enough. He collapses
beneath the weight of his own ego; he wants to think he is a god, but
he is only an insect after all.
This film received an X rating when it was first released, but seems
pretty tame now. The gore effects are only a tad dated, but they're
still quite shocking. I think the X rating might have been due more to
the films unrelenting sadism than anything else. It's sick and
remorseless, but that's not to say it's bad. It's innovative. Nothing
like it had been seen up to that time, and it still remains an
original. It never imitates; it's all fresh and frighteningly new and
should be appreciated for that if nothing else. Followed by one pretty
good sequel and a handful of really bad ones, this first installment
remains the best. Should be seen at least once.
86 out of 118 people found the following review useful:
It ain't SUPPOSED to be Macbeth, here folks...., 28 December 1998
Author:
Skip from High Prairie, Canada
In a decade of cheap, exploitive slashers, we finally get this one.
Relief.
Instead of some maniac ripped from Halloween, we get a simple wooden box.
Simple, or so Frank thought.
What results is a cinematic masterpiece, a great mix of gore and violence,
as well as a great musical score and some nice drama. The acting is fine,
but there are imperfections. One common complaint: The characters are not
pleasant enough we can latch onto them. Maybe that's because these seem
more realistic than the characters we CAN latch onto. Just a thought, don't
jump on this.
What really gets me, though, is the people calling it down, saying it's not
quality entertainment. Come on guys, if it was SUPPOSED to be Shakespeare,
it would not advertise as being able to "tear your soul apart."
The presence of the cenobites was originally intended not to carry the story
but to emphasize it. As usual, the sequaes ignored it. Hey,
merchandizing.
This is the only one of the series that depends on the story more than the
demons. We hardly ever see the infamous Pinhead at all.
all in all, this was a fun movie. No Shakespeare, but it's not supposed to
be. Just dramatic, gory, groundbreaking horror, delivered to us excellently
by Mr. Barker.
81 out of 121 people found the following review useful:
It Took Ten Years Off My Life Watching This, 20 August 2002
Author:
Big Movie Fan from England
Hellraiser was a bloody good film but part of me wishes I hadn't seen it
because it made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I remember
renting it out on video along with A Nightmare On Elm Street back in the
late 1980's. I thought Freddy Krueggar was bad but those cenobites scared
the you know what out of me.
The acting is good throughout the film and praise must go to everyone. The
characters were very interesting characters from the humans right up to the
cenobites.
There was a lot of gore in this movie and it was quite sick at times-not a
film to watch if you're eating.
The storyline of the film is a very intriguing one and very original
indeed.
But those cenobites didn't half scare me particularly when that pinhead
said, "We will tear your soul apart!" Then again, that is what a good horror
is all about-scaring the you know what out of it's audience.
If you're looking for a quality horror movie of the 80's then check this one
out. Just don't be surprised if it sends you hair grey.
43 out of 57 people found the following review useful:
Pure horror!, 29 January 2002
![]()
Author:
HumanoidOfFlesh from Chyby, Poland
I first saw this brilliant shocker when I was only ten years old and it scared the hell out of me!I still think that this is a really effective horror filled with gruesome imagery(for example rats nailed to the wall)."Hellraiser" reminds me a bit such Italian horror movies like "The Beyond"(1981)and "The House by the Cemetery"(1981),mainly due to its surreal atmosphere of total dread.Add also plenty of gore and some really gruesome special effects made by Bob Keen("Proteus")and you have a winner!I like "Hellraiser" series in general(especially "Hellbound:Hellraiser 2" which is,in the unrated/uncut version a nasty gorefest!),even Part 5("Hellraiser:Inferno")that almost only get bad reviews.It surely is the lowest budget film of the series so far,but it tells a gripping story of one's personal hell with Pinhead involved."Hellraiser:Bloodline" is the only one I really don't like,although it's quite interesting too,because you can see that post production was a mess(making it a Alan Smithee film in the end).
34 out of 42 people found the following review useful:
Gothic, Gory, Romantic, Beautiful, Colorful, and Tasteful horror film. A Gem!, 28 October 2007
![]()
Author:
TruPretender from Sundance, Utah
Contrary to what one might conceive in their minds BEFORE watching this
classic horror movie, it should be said that Clive Barker has delivered
us a real gem of a horror story, packed with intensity, both
emotionally, as well as physically. "Hellraiser" is about love, lust,
pain, and pleasure. It's been called an "otherworldly tale of pain and
torture". It's been referred to as a grim, Gothic romance. Needless to
say, it's gore following is much more in numbers than that of the "Lord
Of The Rings" trilogy. Truly, this film is everything one see's it to
be, from a romance, to a gore show, to a good ol' fashioned scare show.
Either way, it's a fine film regardless. I might add, however, that it
may come as a surprise upon first viewing. What is surprising, is the
way it plays out very dramatic. Our characters are very down to earth,
each with their own personal idiosyncrasies and inner demons, not to
mention personal strengths. Each of them stands like a look at the
different human desires, fears, joys, and sorrows. It plays out like a
grim, Shakespeare play. A man and woman, Larry and Julia Cotton, moving
into a home where memories dwell upon like haunting spirits. Larry is a
charismatic optimistic gentleman, full of love and compassion for his
wife, and his daughter, Kirsty. Julia is a human relic of baggage and
fallen dreams, because she bears so many dark secrets, one of which is
an affair with Frank, her husband's younger brother. Frank is alive,
and replenishing himself after a rather nasty encounter with a
Pandora's Box. Larry's blood, spilled over a hardwood floor, brings
Frank back to life from an excruciating death, in one of the finest
special effects sequences in cinematic history. Once Julia and Frank
reunite, their love is more dangerous, and powerful than imagined.
Together they conspire in the grand tradition of "McBeth" and
"Othello", to reign in pleasure once again. Enter Kirsty, Larry's
daughter, and Frank's niece. A warm hearted, but determined soul who
crosses paths with Julia and Frank before they can finish their
diabolical plan. Kirsty eventually encounters the dark secret beheld
Frank upon his death, a puzzle box. It brings pain, pleasure, and
death. Creatures of darkness; the Cenobites, angels to some, demons to
others, come to Kirsty when she accidentally calls upon their ghoulish
powers. Once unleashed, they must take someone back, and Kirsty knows
now, how Frank is back, and she intends to return him to his deathly
justice, and save her family...
The writing is just remarkable. Clive Barker has given us people,
humans, planted in their own desires, and determinations, and he tears
them apart with fear, pain, death, destruction, and total degradation.
The Cotton family are the perfect example of purity, torn to shreds by
hate, lust, and anguish, and he takes great glee in showing us all the
gory details.
The production is a real high! This is what the best type of films are
made of. Real, gory, bloody human remains, connecting to each other in
divine sequence, to create a 100% greedy man. The colors are plenty and
gorgeous. The look of the blood, and the shine of the lights, and the
way the actors are lit... It's just beautiful. The music of the film is
brilliant. Composer Christopher Young chills the film, and drenches it
with his dramatic variation of the main title, and the rest of the
music contains harsh strings, brass horns, music box cues, and rhythmic
cues that speed the pace up with action.
Clive Barker is such a great writer and director, and filmmaker
altogether. He has given us a great thriller that crosses the line
between reality and fiction, in great taste and color, literally. It's
no wonder twenty years later, the film stands on it's own, aside from
it's sequels, and remains an ultimate horror classic to end them
all...well some of them anyway. It's not the only horror film to
portray itself intellectually, and it certainly has it's gore effect to
an all time high. Still, it's quite a dashing and artful film, and
always a treat to watch every time.
38 out of 52 people found the following review useful:
Evil in its purest form, 20 June 2003
![]()
Author:
Coventry from the Draconian Swamp of Unholy Souls
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
HELLRAISER is the definition of horror ! I don't think there are much
films who represent the genre better than this one. The story is
original and horrifying, the make-up effects are flawless and very
brutal, the characters get under your skin and the villains ( if I may
call the Cenobites that ) will haunt your thoughts long after you
finished watching this movie. Clive Barker is one of the most talented
authors in the field of horror. He did a great job here in filming his
own writings. He knows exactly where to put the stress, how to create
the right atmosphere and when to attack the viewer with some great
twists. Larry Cotton and his 2nd wife Julia move in to his parental
house. It seems that Larry's brother, who was always a rather morbid
person, has been there too but there's no sign of him. When Larry
accidentally spills blood to the floor, something real strange happens.
Because of the blood Frank, who was caught in the wooden floor, comes
back to life. He escaped from hell and the torments of the Cenobites.
Julia discovers Frank, who is still very weak. Because she always loved
him and had an affair with him once, she promises to cure him
completely. She brings home men for him, but it has to happen fast,
cause it's only a matter of time before the Cenobites find him. It's
Kirsty, Larry's daughter, who discovers this horrible secret. She
steals the box and gets in contact with the Cenobites. As a sort of
deal to escape hell, she gives her word that she'll take them to
Frank...
Like I said, this is pure horror. This is one of the rare films that
makes you shiver and sweat. The character of PINHEAD, the lead
Cenobite, grew out to one of the biggest icons in horror. In fact, he's
the only who really deserves this status. He's pure evil, but ...fair.
As strange as that may sound, he's bound to rules and he doesn't break
them. You have to be in his world before he's a threat to you, but when
you are there's no escape from his evil. When you may fire off quotes
like:"no tears, please. That's a waste of good suffering" or "we'll
tear your soul apart" you are EVIL, no discussion about that.
HELLRAISER is praised everywhere. Even other big names in the genre
declared this a masterpiece. Stephen King himself was very impressed as
well. Clive Barker has done some other great works like NIGHTBREED and
LORD OF ILLUSIONS. The also famous tale of CANDYMAN is from his hand as
well. All recommendations if you liked this film, and it's hard to
imagine that you didn't. Hellraiser was followed by many sequels.
Hellraiser 2 is great as well and a logical continue of the story. All
the rest are inferior, but still very entertaining if you're a big fan
of Pinhead...like I am.
25 out of 31 people found the following review useful:
The Greatest Horror Film Ever Made, 21 May 2004
![]()
Author:
Theo Robertson from Isle Of Bute, Scotland
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
A lot of people on this site are moaning that HELLRAISER isn't all that
scary . Well define " Scary " ? opening an electricity bill and finding
that it exceeds your life savings causes my heart to miss a few beats
but will anyone be making a horror film about someone getting a massive
electricity bill ? I don't think so either and very few films have
terrified me and the notable few that have scared me witless like
THREADS , QUATERMASS AND THE PIT aren't strictly speaking horror movies
. In fact the one thing that used to terrify was DOCTOR WHO and what's
that ? A childrens TV show shown at tea time so let's not kid ourselves
horror movies are scary
!!!! SPOILERS !!!!
What I absolutely love about HELLRAISER is that it's not really a
horror film as such - It's a macabre love story with loads of subtext
about how love and sex can destroy us and in many ways it can be viewed
as an AIDS allegory ( 1 ) . Larry doesn't satisfy his wife in a sexual
matter and it's this sexual inadequacy that leads to his death , Julia
lusts after Frank which leads to her death , men who've just met Julia
go back to her flat for some casual sex only to be murdered , while
Frank lusts after Kirsty ( Who can blame him ? ) and it's this
obsession that leads to his death at the hands of the Cenobites
ah yes the Cenobites . A lot of people seem upset that the Cenobites
aren't to the fore in this movie but it should be pointed out that
they're the catalyst of the story not the focus . The story revolves
around Frank and Julia's relationship and Julia's dissatisfaction with
her marriage . In fact you could easily rewrite the story with Frank
being on the run from a criminal gang instead of demons from another
dimension and you'd still have the same story
I will admit there are some flaws to the movie such as the bizarre
dubbing but I should point out that this was done post production in
order to make the characters more identifiable ( 2 ) to an American
audience hence English characters speaking with Bronx accents which
does make some of the performances laughable . Ironically the only
performance which can be described as bad is genuine American Ashley
Laurence as Kirsty , but hey she's gorgeous so let's not complain too
much lads . Writer/director Clive Barker's strengths do outweigh any
weakness , take for example the scene in the hospital where a nurse
watches TV and it's not a TV show she's watching but a rose in bloom ,
and for me the greatest image isn't the murder and gore but the scene
at the end where a photograph of Frank burns to a haunting soundtrack .
Barker does get good performances out of most of the cast namely Andrew
Robinson who isn't as good as he was in DIRTY HARRY but he'll never be
able to top that and he is good as uber wimp Larry , Claire Higgins as
femme fatale Julia and Sean Chapman as the human version of Frank. I
thought Chapman might have gone on to become a big name after this
movie but strangely not . Even stranger I thought Barker would have
gone onto bigger and better things but for some reason I found myself
disliking his other stuff and seems to have disappeared from film
making all together and I can't say I'm all that upset
HELLRAISER is a classic story on the themes of love and death . Such a
pity someone wanted to turn the movie into a franchise
( 1 ) The same week HELLRAISER was released FATAL ATTRACTION topped the
US box office charts . One can't help thinking HELLRAISER would have
been better regarded if it came out a few weeks earlier since the
subtext is very similar to the Michael Douglas blockbuster
( 2 ) HELLRAISER spent several weeks in the US box office reaching a
peak of number three on the charts and taking millions of dollars ( Not
bad for a movie costing one million bucks ) so the dubbing is probably
justified
25 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
Trash to some, a horror masterpiece to all those who know what they're talking about!, 27 October 2005
![]()
Author:
The_Void from Beverley Hills, England
I have seen Hellraiser many, many times; but my most recent viewing of
the film was different to the rest. It was different because this was
the first time that I've seen the film since reading Clive Barker's
novel "The Hellbound Heart". The novel both enhanced my enjoyment for
the film, and exposed some of its flaws. With the book, Barker really
allows the reader to get inside the character's head, which ensures
that the horror is more shocking. His descriptions are also a lot more
macabre than what is shown in the film, and the way that certain things
in the book are missed out/abridged shows some of the wasted
opportunities of the story. This isn't really a criticism of the film,
but rather of books being turned into movies on the whole. People often
say that the book is better than the movie; and in this case it's true!
Even so, Hellraiser is an absolute classic horror film, and easily one
of the best of the eighties; not to mention all time. The plot simply
follows Frank Cotton. Frank is a man in search of unknown pleasures,
and in order to achieve that he buys a mysterious music box. This box
does give out pleasure; but it's inflicted by a band of demons, known
as 'Cenobytes' - and their idea of pleasure differs from Frank's! The
story picks up when Frank's brother and his girlfriend, Julia, move
into the house where Frank was taken...
The main reason Hellraiser stands out among horror films is because of
its themes. Barker weaves shades of love, eroticism and, of course,
pain and pleasure into his tale of demons and scarred flesh - and this
really makes the film. We can care for the characters and what happens
to them because of what Barker puts between them, and it's always
evident that this film is head and shoulders above the rest of the
schlock-horror sub-genre. The special effects, particularly on the
screen time surrounding Frank, are simply stunning and show how real
effects beat all this CGI rubbish hands down, while also showing that a
low budget can be overcome. The film is never gratuitous with its gore
or effects either, and everything in this film is there because it has
to be. This is what annoys me about non-horror fans - films like this
are dismissed by them because they're "too gory" or "stupid" - but
Hellraiser breaks the mould because it's a truly original story and the
way that Barker implements a macabre love story amidst a plethora of
shocking horror is extremely skilfully handled, and more than
challenges many of the so-called 'A-class' films.
A writer directing his own work tends to ensure that it will get proper
treatment, and this is mostly true here. Some things have been changed
from the book for no apparent reason (mostly with the characters of
Larry and Kristy), but the only thing that really annoyed me was the
ending. I suppose it's due to the time that it was made, but the ending
feels tacked on to me. Barker's ending in the book was perfectly judged
- just open enough to hint at more, while closing the story enough so
that the reader is satisfied. Here, we have a schlock finale that is
entertaining, but pulls away from the closed atmosphere that Barker has
spent the film creating. This film differs from most other eighties
horror films because of the fact that the actors are a talented bunch.
You come to expect bad acting from this sort of film - but Hellraiser
has none of it! The entire cast shine, with Clare Higgins making the
biggest impression as the evil Julia. This was Clive Barker's
directorial debut, and at times, it's clear that this is the case; but
Barker makes the best of his locations, and while his camera sometimes
feels enclosed; it fuses with the tragic music brilliantly, and all
this helps the film to create that fabulous atmosphere so convincingly.
Overall, I have pointed out a couple of flaws here; but I really can't
bring myself to give this masterpiece any less than full marks. The
originality on display throughout Hellraiser is astounding, as is the
atmosphere and the performances pulled out of the actors, along with
the fact that this film has entertained me many times and is still as
good today as the first time I saw it. All of this ensures that
Hellraiser will be an endearing favourite of mine for the rest of my
life. If you consider yourself a fan of horror and haven't seen this;
shame on you. Make sure you read the book, too!
17 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
More Urbane and Interesting Than Other 1980s Horror Movies, 28 October 2007
![]()
Author:
jzappa from Cincinnati, OH, United States
Hellraiser may not be an incredible work of horror genius, but it
certainly is one of the more inventive and engagingly dark and twisted
horror films of the 1980s, when horror films were almost all dull,
poorly made, recycled, and absurd. Hellraiser's themes include
sadomasochism, in an intriguing concept of the slasher figure in the
story, which is a Gothic- looking antique puzzle box that summons
ruthless demons to victimize the person in possession of it by
subjecting them to a world of debilitating eternal pain. It also
involves a femme fatale on the level of a chiller that does not involve
fantasy, played brilliantly in an extremely acute performance by
beautiful Clare Higgins. There is the layer of plot surrounding her
that inhabits late-thirties, early-forties married and adulterous life
with her almost frustratingly naive and unsuspecting husband, which is
invaded by the devilish embodied soul of her ex-lover, brutalized by
the demons of the puzzle box. Finally, at the core of the story is the
pivotal character, as her fill of screen time patiently awaits to the
point where she is revealed to be so, and she is the teenage
stepdaughter, played by Ashley Laurence, one of the sexiest actresses I
have ever seen. Everything from her voluptuous body to her
scream-bloody-murder portrayal of the stepdaughter makes me wonder why
her career never went any higher than this.
So yes, the movie is more urbane than the vast majority of other horror
films in that decade. It's even set in England. It's interesting that
no one has an English accent in England, according to this movie, but
nevertheless the locale serves the film with a dark atmosphere of
sophistication and antiquity, which suits a story that surrounds an
age-old puzzle box. This feel of the movie that I speak of is
interrupted, quite inexplicably by beer-drinking, dirty-T-shirt-wearing
American furniture movers, which I didn't know they had in England.
Hellraiser is quite an enormous entertainment despite its 1980s-style
inconsistencies that I suppose it just couldn't help but have. It's
especially enjoyable during autumn, mainly during Halloween time.
22 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
A nasty lil' auld box that'll give you pain or pleasure., 6 March 2004
![]()
Author:
Miyagis_Sweaty_wifebeater (sirjosephu@aol.com) from Sacramento, CA
Hellraiser (1987) is a dark masterpiece from the twisted world of Clive
Barker. Based upon his novel "The Hellbound Heart", Mr. Barker takes us
on a trip where people desperate for kicks search out for the ultimate
thrill. A sleaze ball named Frank manages to get his oily mitts upon a
gaudy looking Rubik's cube that he bought at a bizarre bazaar from a
greasy moth eating merchant. Frank (never the sharpest tool in the
drawer) gets more than he bargain for when he some how manages to open
it up.
A great horror flick that'll send legit chills up your spine. This film
not only marks Clive Barker's feature length debut but it introduces
the world (and pop culture) to Pinhead! If you don't know by now
Pinhead is the coldest and coolest fiend to ever come across the screen
in years. He only has an an extended cameo in this one but he'll be
back in the latter films. I highly recommend this horror classic.
Not only does this film has some scary elements but it has some classic
lines.
"What's your pleasure sir?"
"If you cross us your suffering will be legendary, even in hell!"
"Come to daddy" Frank's mac daddy line.
"Jesus...wept."
| Page 1 of 29: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Amazon.com summary |
| Ratings | Awards | Newsgroup reviews |
| External reviews | Parents Guide | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |