MOVIEmeter
Top 5000
Up 233 this week

Flowers in the Attic (1987)

5.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.5/10 from 6,413 users  
Reviews: 157 user | 28 critic

Children are hidden away in the attic by their conspiring mother and grandmother.

Director:

Writers:

(novel), (screenplay)
0Check in
0Share...

Watch Now

From $2.99 on Amazon Instant Video

Editors' Spotlight

Fall TV Premiere Week

Many of your favorite shows are coming back, along with plenty of series premieres. Here's a list of the shows premiering between Sunday, September 21 and Friday, September 26.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 30 titles
created 28 Dec 2011
 
a list of 24 titles
created 24 Apr 2012
 
a list of 22 titles
created 05 May 2012
 
list image
a list of 39 titles
created 12 Aug 2012
 
a list of 49 titles
created 10 months ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Flowers in the Attic (1987)

Flowers in the Attic (1987) on IMDb 5.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Flowers in the Attic.

User Polls

1 win & 1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Petals on the Wind (TV Movie 2014)
Drama | Romance | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

A decade after Cathy, Christopher, and Carrie escaped from their grandparents' attic at Foxworth Hall, Petals on the Wind continues to follow the twisted plight of the family as they ... See full summary »

Director: Karen Moncrieff
Stars: Heather Graham, Rose McIver, Wyatt Nash
Flowers in the Attic (TV Movie 2014)
Drama | Romance | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6/10 X  

After the sudden death of their father, four children face cruel treatment from their ruthless grandmother.

Director: Deborah Chow
Stars: Heather Graham, Ellen Burstyn, Kiernan Shipka
Lizzie Borden Took an Ax (TV Movie 2014)
Crime | Drama | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.7/10 X  

The true story of Lizzie Borden, a young woman tried and acquitted in the 1892 murders of her father and stepmother.

Director: Nick Gomez
Stars: Christina Ricci, Clea DuVall, Gregg Henry
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Director: Mário Cabrita Gil
Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
Grandmother
...
...
...
Ben Ryan Ganger ...
Cory (as Ben Ganger)
...
Marshall Colt ...
Nathan Davis ...
Grandfather
Brooke Fries ...
Flower Girl
Alex Koba ...
John Hall
Leonard Mann ...
Bruce Neckels ...
Minister
...
Caretaker
Clare Peck ...
Narrator (voice) (as Clare C. Peck)
Edit

Storyline

After the death of her husband, a mother takes her kids off to live with their grandparents in a huge, decrepit old mansion. However, the kids are kept hidden in a room just below the attic, visited only by their mother who becomes less and less concerned about them and their failing health, and more concerned about herself and the inheritence she plans to win back from her dying father, to the point of murder... Written by David Gibson <djg6@ukc.ac.uk>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

They have come to a house where secrets are kept....where the future is haunted by the past.....where the innocent live in the shadow of sin.....where a dark legacy awaits to destroy all who defy it..... See more »


Certificate:

PG-13 | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

20 November 1987 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Flores en el ático  »

Box Office

Gross:

$15,151,736 (USA)
 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(Ryder Sound Services)

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Author Virginia C. Andrews died shortly before the film's release. See more »

Goofs

During the party when Corinne and her date are dancing, she is wearing a strapless dress and there are clearly no scars or any indication that she was beaten with a whip. See more »

Quotes

Mother: [after poisoning her son and telling the children of the death] Cory had pneumonia. The doctors did all they could. There won't be a funeral, he's already been buried.
[leaves silently]
See more »

Connections

Referenced in Chelsea Lately: Episode #8.10 (2014) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Why isn't anyone else ripping their hair out at this movie?!
7 June 2005 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

I had been debating with myself for years about watching this movie. Having been an avid fan of the entire series of "Flowers in the Attic" books, I knew there was a strong possibility the film would do nothing but irritate me by way of poor acting and even poorer script-writing. What I didn't realise, was how much of a massacre the film was going to make of such a beautifully written book.

First off, and I'm sorry - but it is a shallow comment to make: Those kids; Chris, Cathy, Carrie and Cory are supposed to be stunning. "The Dresden dolls" because they are *that* striking. Whoever cast the film seemed to have sorted through the "Village of the Damned" rejects in order to find the two youngest (scariest looking couple of children I have ever seen) Chris was, I'm sorry - just nothing like the original character and while Kristy Swansen is very pretty - she just didn't cut it as Cathy.

Which brings me to my next point - Cathy's thing is ballet - she's an excellent dancer - and aside from a couple of pathetic scenes involving Swansen trying to get her leg higher than her hip-bone, they ignored the one thing that the entire character centres around.

And just out of interest - where was the relationship between Cathy and Chris? I know having an incestuous relationship played out in film has got to be controversial - but don't bother even picking up a pen to write a script for a story if you have absolutely no intention of keeping the central story-lines. And if you do, don't have the audacity to pass it off as the film version of a highly acclaimed book just by giving it the same title.

"Flowers in the Attic" was based on a true story. (As stated in the prologue of the copy I have anyway). How - HOW is it OK to just butcher such an awesome piece of work? It's like passing Pokemon off as the Mona-Lisa; sick and entirely wrong. They have completely missed the point of the story: It wasn't about 4 kids sitting in an attic waiting to die or be let out; it was about four children adapting to a situation wherein they have to become adults long before their time. It was about how the relationships between the siblings evolved, and the psychological consequences of losing one parent through death and another through greed.

For anyone who has watched the film and is ready to dismiss the books because of it - seriously; don't be fooled by such an obvious lacklustre attempt at a book adaptation. There are not enough words in the English language to explain how wrong this film is - how utterly and completely pathetic the script, setting, acting, casting, directing and the 101 other ways in which the movie sucks beyond belief.

And just... just don't get me started on the ending. Every time I think about it I just want to do nasty things involving pointy objects to the script-writer.

Please tell me someone agrees with me?


140 of 171 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Were the kids in the mothers plan as she pleaded with them? arimor1
What really happened to the mother in the book? johanlouwet78
The Rape zakkery-starr
Did they really take corey to the hospital? zyggums
is this movie worth watching dirtyguy56
perfect choice, physically, to play cathy is - colorxoxmexox
Discuss Flowers in the Attic (1987) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?