Broadcast News (1987) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
158 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Clever, witty and funny
MovieAddict201627 May 2005
James L. Brook is one of those directors who always seems to take a quirky look at life. He isn't only the producer for "The Simpsons," he has some classic comedies under his belt -- "Broadcast News" is one of them.

Although it doesn't match his later effort "As Good As It Gets," "Broadcast News" is still a very clever, funny and witty movie about a television broadcasting station and all the problems they suffer. There's a great comedic sequence of physical humor where Joan Cusack is running around the building trying to rush a news tape to the editing room in a matter of mere minutes before it is to be broadcast live on TV.

This isn't only very truthful in terms of how hectic broadcasting stations are operated, but also a skillful and honest portrayal of human beings.

A low-key, subtle movie with good acting (especially from Hurt, who I don't always like so much) and apt direction.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beware of TV news!
davidholmesfr31 January 2003
Essential viewing for anyone who watches TV news as it may help to become a little more sceptical, or even cynical. On a personal note I recall taking a course some years ago about being interviewed for TV - what to do, what not to do. The course instructors impressed on us that TV news was a "branch of show-biz". That depressing view, which is probably even more valid today than when it was made, is reinforced by this film. Never mind journalistic integrity, what counts is the ability to look good and smile nicely. And make sure you don't sweat on camera.

The interactions between the three main characters form the centre-piece, each with his or her own ambitions, capabilities and beliefs. Brooks takes these differences and sets them into the volatile setting of a TV news studio, and adds more than a pinch of love interest to the mixture. The result is a complex, if somewhat overlong, portrayal of how we compromise every day in order to meet our ambitions and take others with us. It is always entertaining, although the final scene was, perhaps, unnecessary given everything that had gone before.
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Did Walter Cronkite act like this?
helpless_dancer23 April 2000
Excellent movie about a big media firm and the goings on both on and off camera. Covering several years, the film centers on 3 upwardly mobile, young hopefuls, all striving for their place within the corporation. Well written dialogue, flawless acting, and a riveting story made for 2 hours of solid entertainment.
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Smart scripting.
movibuf19624 February 2003
BROADCAST NEWS marks the first time I saw Holly Hunter and I was mesmerized at her focus, quickness, passion, and finally her eccentric prettiness and sex appeal. The movie is hers from start to finish, and makes the 'love triangle' subplot almost unnecessary. She's so smart in the film (a rarity for a lead female) that you almost think if her only romantic choices are William Hurt's style-but-no-substance anchor or Albert Brooks's neurotic but intellectually arrogant reporter, she'd be better off with Robert Prosky. Though I can best relate to Albert Brooks (the guy who loves the smart, alluring girl who only sees him as a 'brother'), he still ticked me off a bit. My favorite scene in the film is him pouring his heart out to Hunter on a front porch confessing his love, then taking her by surprise and kissing her romantically (the only time he gets the chance). When he goes petulant later in the story, it's a bit hard to take. Fortunately, the James Brooks script and direction are a joy throughout, culminating in two perfect scenes: one with Joan Cusack unraveling seconds before a tape feed, and a marvelous 360 (?) pan thru the studio showing a live news feed from producer to anchor in one shot.
53 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Except for socially, you're what I aspire to be..."
moonspinner5529 July 2007
The television news business, half a sharp, friendly satire and the other half a deadly serious drama about thirty-somethings struggling to find love and meaning in their lives. A lopsided romantic triangle consisting of a spunky female news producer, a shallow anchorman, and a scruffy, amiable reporter runs hot and cold as each of the participants take turns one-upping each other. Despite good performances (including an unbilled Jack Nicholson as a network Big Fish) and a literate screenplay, the characters are truly too old to be acting like such lovestruck juveniles. Writer-director James L. Brooks proves to be a bit shallow himself, though he knows his way around a strong dramatic sequence and understands this milieu incredibly well. Unfortunately, the boy-girl stuff eventually cancels out the funny office in-jokes, leading to a flat, dispiriting conclusion wherein nobody gets what they want. **1/2 from ****
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A forgotten classic which should be re-evaluated
chua1 July 2002
For me this wonderful rollercoaster of a film bears repeated pleasurable viewings. Its about the tangled lives of three very different people. Holly Hunter is the obsessive workaholic producer. Albert Brookes plays the unprepossessing but brilliant journalist. William Hurt is the affable but dumb new kid on the block, news anchor.

The classical love triangle emerges with the stunningly witty and self deprecating Brookes in love with Hunter but she of course is attracted to Hurt.

This film works on many levels. At the very least it is a brilliant comedy with the one liners flying so thick and fast that each viewing bears a new harvest of ones that you may have missed last time. Its also a film about attraction and unfulfilled romance.

But perhaps most importantly the film examines the modern obsession with physical appearance and its ultimate triumph over intellect as a valued human attribute. This is personified by the meteoric career success of the Hurt character in contrast to Brookes relative decline.

Despite being fifteen years old the film has some startingly relevant messages about modern news values and the continuing decline in journalistic standards.

This film is a classic in every sense and it is difficult to understand why it has been so neglected
103 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great acting, great dialogues, but the story is way too long and after an upbeat first half the movie slowly grinds to a somewhat bland ending. What a pity.
imseeg24 July 2018
These characters are to die for. Acting is truly amazing. The story is rather bland and becomes even somewhat tedious near the end, but the acting and the dialogues are so terrific that I forgive the somewhat bland ending.

The story is about 2 competing news men and one woman: William Hurt, Albert Brooks and Holly Hunter. Besides the fact that these 2 guys are competing who is the best at covering news they are also competing for the same girl. Who gets the girl? Who gets the most prestigeous job? That's the suspense. The story may sound rather cheap, it is kind a, but that doesnt matter. This movie is all about budding romances and the insecurities that we all have when we first start longing for someone but dont dare speak out about it. Love hurts. Even when you are an middle aged adult. Love never becomes easier...

The story ends on a melancolic note. That's unexpected, because the movie started so upbeat and joyous. But I must admit that the director did achieve to make these characters become so real. That is so refreshing. True to life characters, I long for that so much in every movie I see, because when I truly feel with all my heart that those characters could be friends or family of mine, I can get lost into the fantasy of the story. I need realism first, to lose myself in fantasy. Does that make sense? I truly felt after seeing "Broadcast News" that I had to part with some friends I had gotten fond of so quickly.

Albert Brooks really has got an incredible talent of making characters likeable and full of human shortcomings that are so funny and endearing. Few other directors have such an effect on me. Still I must admit I will only give it 7 stars, because the second half part of the movie just lacks originality. It could have been better... Still a joy to watch.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sadly true and great.
Juliette200521 October 2005
I say sadly because if you see this movie now, you realize how low our media has sunk- all the warning signs are in this movie.

It's a great film, I think the last great James Brooks film, but others may disagree. It has rich characters (who are believable as well), great acting, great writing, and although the music got a little cheesy, I even liked that.

William Hurt has never been better. Holly Hunter is stunning. And Albert Brooks walks away with every scene he's in- this triangle of people is beautifully drawn and compelling and made the whole movie soar above it's vital and important topic of the News, and how it's slowly being compromised in our nation.

Watch this with NETWORK for a truly fun and frightening evening.
46 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
James L. Brooks Wimped Out...
paramitch3 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
**Spoiler alert!**

I feel like a hypocrite, because I love a lot of this movie (and own it) but also hate the last ten minutes every single time I've seen it. And just don't get those who fall to pieces over the character of Aaron, played by Albert Brooks, who's frankly one of the most unlikeable asses I've ever seen onscreen.

Although the performances (lead and supporting) are all superb and worthy of all the praise they got, "Broadcast News" is one of those that sounds better -- and feels better -- than it is. In retrospect, it's one of those whose moments have come up often for me -- the young Jane's "obsessive" speech, Joan Cusack's dash with the videotape, Jane's disastrous public speaking event, etc.

But in reality while the movie's witty and beautifully acted, I always secretly feel James L. Brooks let us viewers down. He is widely publicized as being unable to come up with an ending for his characters -- hence the hideous non-ending which embarrasses the Hunter character unnecessarily and adds further loose ends to a movie already full of them. Brooks should have held true to the spirit of the story -- which was obviously going to be an ending in which Jane chooses style over substance (Hurt) -- or substance over style (Albert Brooks).

Although frankly, Brooks's character is such a petulant, insecure, acid-tongued and (worst of all) verbally abusive ass that I can't imagine any woman going for him. I loathed this character and never found him likeable in any way. Just MHO, but the guy never deserved Jane for a single moment. His behavior throughout the last half of the film is incredibly cruel, without the right to be so, as he has never been Jane's lover (and she has never treated him as one) -- just a friend to whom she's kind because she knows he has feelings for her. And an undeserving one at that.

And then we have William Hurt, who fabulously plays the slightly dim -- yet very perceptive and lovable news anchor who catches Jane's eye. While written to be a laughingstock, Hurt manages to find the humanity in his character, making him attractive, willing to learn and improve, and honest (even when it comes to his own failings). So every time I've seen this, Jane's decision to punish Hurt comes across as false to me, and as having very little ethical merit. And of course -- any news producer worth her salt would've known ages before how that interview was filmed, so the final chapter's drama is poorly manufactured.

And the ending (or non-ending) just flat sucks. It's an embarrassment to Jane's character and Hunter's lovely brave performance -- why is it that the heroine of the film in this footnote scene a few years later is the one person who hasn't seemed to have moved on? Yuck. Brooks wimped out.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absolutely terrific
hdavis-2919 December 2010
It's been over 20 years since I've seen this film. Like others on this site, I lament how 'forgotten' it is. I remember liking it a lot, but found it to be absolutely terrific. The writing and direction are first-rate, but I cannot remember seeing three interwoven performances as good as these. It's easy to minimize Hurt's work because his character is the least likable of the three. That would be a mistake. Hurt is wonderful here and leaves us wondering if maybe he's not as dim as he appears to be. Hunter and Brooks, on the other hand, just shine. This is career defining work for all of them. The ending (which I won't reveal here) is powerful in the least-clichéd way possible. The movie has aged very well. See it if you can - either again or for the first time.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Broadcast News
jboothmillard22 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
From producer/writer/Golden Globe nominated director James L. Brooks (Terms of Endearment, As Good as It Gets) this is a really good satirical comedy film showing behind the scenes in the life of a news reporter/anchor/journalist or producer might be like. Basically Jane Craig (Oscar and Golden Globe nominated Holly Hunter) falls for new reporter Tom Grunick (Oscar and Golden Globe nominated William Hurt), but correspondent Aaron Altman (Oscar nominated Albert Brooks) also has strong feelings for her. The network prepares for big changes, and sparks will fly with all members of the studio. Also starring Jack Nicholson as anchor Bill Rorich, Moonraker's Lois Chiles as Jennifer Mack, Mrs. Doubtfire's Robert Prosky as Ernie Merriman, School of Rock's Joan Cusack as Blair Litton, Peter Hackes as Paul Moore, Christian Clemenson as Bobby, Robert Katims as Martin Klein, Ed Wheeler as George Wein and Stephen Mendillo as Gerald Grunick. The comedy is subtle but strong, the romance has its moments, and it is certainly a believable situation film. It was nominated the Oscars for Best Cinematography, Best Film Editing, Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen and Best Picture, and it was nominated the Golden Globe for Best Motion Picture - Comedy/Musical and Best Screenplay - Motion Picture. It was number 64 on 100 Years, 100 Laughs. Very good!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Broadcast News
Scarecrow-881 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Broadcast News is a sterling example of the right script and cast coming together in perfect harmony. A romance blooms between a green anchor (William Hurt; this was a great period for the actor), coming up from Sports, and television broadcast news producer (Holly Hunter; she has hardly ever been better) while both are rising professionally in their young careers in a DC station. Journalist Albert Brooks (proving he can tackle drama as well as comedy; melding both exceptionally) is stuck in a rut at the station, wanting desperately to progress, both in terms of broadcasting the news (his writing and reporting aren't disputed, but his anchoring the news is) and a relationship with Hunter. The whole point, besides emphasis on integrity in the news and being authentic and real as a person, is the love triangle that splits Hunter in two directions. Hurt proves to be less as sincere/ethical as she hoped (this pointed out by Brooks, in regards to a piece on date rape, through the use of a camera to capture crocodile tears), while Brooks can be so brutally honest with her in how he feels that she is sometimes taken aback by his reactions/replies to her acknowledgment of feelings for Hurt. Excelling as a news anchor due to his ability to broadcast and interview while in front of the camera with relative ease, skill, and poise, Hurt's career is on the uptick while Brooks' time at the station seems to be drawing to a close (a disastrous anchor night where he sweats profusely could very well be the death knell); these developments further add melodrama and tension to their relationship with Hunter. The love triangle dynamic isn't hard to digest because the characters are equipped with organic dialogue and situations determined by day-to-day factors faced every day in network news broadcasting (particularly, the messy process of putting together news packages and stories and sudden unemployment/layoffs), and rough transitional phases that happen when people fall hard for each other, trying the best they can to confront these feelings, often resulting in hurt and disappointment. My favorite scene has Brooks and Hunter discussing her feelings for Hurt and Brooks' feelings for Hunter; he tells her to get out of his house, then calls her back afterward (it's saying something out of anger, realizing that response is real but misguided, trying to rectify it immediately instead of allowing this to walk out the door without proper resolution). Hurt's first big anchor behind the news desk (a Libyan incident) with Hunter guiding him through it, and lots of busy activity behind the scenes is a real doozy. Robert Prosky is wonderful as Hunter's mentor; when Hunter must replace him, and he is "retired", it is crushing to her because she is supposed to be happy with such a promotion yet the anguish of his departure leaves mixed emotions, to say the least. Jack Nicholson is the big-shot main anchor whose place Hurt will be groomed to eventually take. The station layoffs, with several employees packing up and moving on, is really tough to watch. Joan Cusack, as Hunter's harried aid, is a delight. If you enjoy smart romantic dramedies and a look at the inner-workings of a news station, give this one a spin.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Mary Tyler Hunter Show.
rmax30482329 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
If you liked highly successful "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" on television, you'll love this movie. It's brought to you by the same people, many of the same personality traits peep through the new performers, the budget is bigger, and the ending is the same.

Holly Hunter, as someone said, is cute as a button -- and she's petite and sexy too, a lot more so than Mary Tyler Moore, who was raised in a nunnery. Would Mary Tyler Moore try to seduce a handsome stranger and, when that fails, rip off her pantyhose and fling them away in frustration. No. No, Mary Tyler Moore would not do that, whereas Holly Hunter would and does.

The males that figure in the story are both attracted to Holly Hunter for obvious reasons. William Hurt is handsome, pleasant, but a bit vacuous. Albert Brooks is plain, neurotic, and brainy. Brooks has a hilarious scene. The threat of mass firings hangs in the air and he wants to anchor the news for the first time in years. As the moment approaches he turns into a neural shambles, and as he proceeds his carefully prepared clothing becomes soaked through with sweat. "Is this normal?", he asks the crew, opening his jacket to show a shirt that suggests he just climbed out of a swimming pool.

As in the TV show, the humor and the slight drama are based on interactional nuances. There's a brief but keenly perceived argument about whether a rebel should remove his boot if the TV crew prompt him to do so. There are a couple of cuss words -- this being a feature film and not a TV episode -- and Hurt cops a smooth feel of one of Hunter's appealing breasts, but there's nothing coarse about the humor, and the drama hints at disappointment, never at tragedy.

It's a gentle story, but it's contrived too. It's impossible to believe that producer Holly Hunter, who has been in the business for years, will break off her budding relationship with William Hurt just because he faked a tear during an interview with a rape victim. Hell, any moron glued to the nightly news must assume that something like that goes on all the time.

There are a few minor structural weaknesses. Near the beginning, when a tape is need at once for broadcast during the news, Joan Cusack grabs it and runs a long obstacle course to get it to the control room just in time for a staff member to whip it out of her hand and insert it into the slot so it plays immediately. Cusack is panting and almost collapses with relief but the audience hasn't been properly set up for the scene. It comes too early, before we have a chance to begin rooting for the team's success.

That's carping though. It's an entertaining film. It ought to amuse everyone with its everyday familiarity and it should offend no one. That's entertainment, right? Just like the news.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Broadcast: Stay Away?
Howlin Wolf23 November 2010
I had the same problem with this as I had with - amongst others - "Terms of Endearment" & The "Big Chill"...

They all contain characters who are intelligent, which is a plus, but there's no WARMTH to them; it's all a massive game of one-upmanship concerning who can prove that they're more 'switched-on' than the rest... Intelligent, but self absorbed clueless schmucks, the lot of them... If these accurately represent the middle-classes in America, then I want nothing to do with them.

Give me characters I hate, because at least then they're giving you back some kind of energy, even if it's a negative vibe... Here, the characters were dull because they were defined by their job, and how it made them see themselves, so I never wanted to spend any time with them. People are interesting when we get to see who they truly are - whether good or bad. This is not that type of film, because of the type of environment they're in, these folk are constantly posturing for other people instead of relaxing and being who they really are.

It's an interesting commentary on the type of behaviour it takes to succeed, I suppose... I just didn't see why I should care when it was all fake.
26 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The World of Network News...
wrdiggs23 February 2001
Warning: Spoilers
BROADCAST NEWS brings the world of network television newscasts to the screen in a very realistic way--where ratings rule and flash wins out over substance and the "charisma" of the anchor who brings us the news is seen as more important than the news itself.

The film was nominated for seven Academy Awards, including Best Picture and acting nominations for each of the three leads. Amazingly, no statuettes were achieved.

Holly Hunter deservedly won an Oscar six years later for THE PIANO, but her portrayal of Jane Craig, the no-nonsense producer for the Washington News Bureau, is perhaps her most memorable performance.

Craig is an "old-school" newswoman who came up the hard way, by being a good reporter. She is disturbed over what is happening in the broadcast industry as she sees quality being sacrificed over the battle for good ratings with a cheap pricetag. Hard on her peers in her demands for excellence, even against the flow of pressure in the other direction, she manages to turn everybody off, including potential relationships. Whenever she's alone with her thoughts, even for a moment, Jane breaks down in tears, then is incredibly able to go right back into a professional mode at a moment's notice.

William Hurt is Tom Grunick, the young newscaster with no experience but plenty of good looks--and, after all, that's what the public wants. Tom finds himself attracted to Jane, but she is at first upset with what she perceives is his undeserved success. Tom Grunick is exactly what Jane Craig has been campaigning against.

Later, though, even Jane succumbs to Tom's charm, much to the dismay of newswriter Aaron Altman, played by Albert Brooks.

Altman is the antithesis of Grunick--a gifted journalist who really knows his stuff, but lacks the presence and confidence that Tom displays before the cameras--and he's been secretly in love with Jane for years.

Brooks is one of the funniest actors of all-time. When the station starts to cut back in personnel to cut expenses, Brooks' character, Altman tries to save his job by trying out for the weekend anchor position. In the middle of the newscast, Altman breaks out in the worst case of "flop-sweat" in history--"Even Nixon didn't sweat this much."

Frustrated when he sees Tom getting ahead of him career-wise as well as winning the affections of Jane, Aaron pours out his heart to her, calling Tom 'the devil.' "He'll be attractive, he'll be nice and helpful...he'll get a job where he influences a great God-fearing nation...he'll never do an evil thing, he'll never deliberately hurt a living thing...he'll just bit by little bit lower our standards where they're important...just a tiny little bit.........and he'll get all the great women."

In the end, Jane finally recognizes Tom for the phony he really is, but that doesn't stop him from going all the way to the top. Altman, rather than compromise his standards, leaves the Washington Bureau and goes to work at a small station in the Pacific Northwest where he will be appreciated. Years later, they all meet again and find they've come to accept each other and how they fit in the grand scheme of things.

Anyone who has spent any time in the broadcast industry will recognize some of the inner workings of this crazy business--and will be able to laugh and cry right along with Jane and Tom and Aaron.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Intelligent, brightly written newsroom comedy...
Doylenf1 January 2007
BROADCAST NEWS opens with a series of brief vignettes that are a clever way of starting a story about TV anchors who have no clue as to what they're reporting about.

At a speech before a group of would-be reporters, all of whom are bored by her presentation, most of them leave. When the last one exits, the co-host of the event says quietly to HOLLY HUNTER: "I don't think there will be any Q&A." Subtle line in a brilliantly written low-key comedy, a farce about the show biz aspect of TV anchoring.

WILLIAM HURT is the inept news anchor who finds himself working with HOLLY HUNTER as the network anchorman. Hurt badly needs help in remedial reporting and Holly refuses to take the bait--at first. He knows he's only capable of looking good, but is not a reporter. He proves to be a quick study as long as his earpiece is working and he's getting all the straight info from executive producer Hunter.

Holly's other anchor friend (ALBERT BROOKS) helps by feeding her information she passes on to Hurt. Of course she becomes conflicted about her feelings for ace reporter Brooks and equally strong attraction to the pretty-boy anchorman Hurt, who's having his own dalliance with a pretty staff member.

You have to wait until twenty minutes before the film ends to find out which man she'll end up with. Brooks tells her that Hurt is the wrong one because he represents everything she's against. In this unpredictable comedy, there's no telling who Hunter (the neurotic heroine) will end up with.

Fittingly, HOLLY HUNTER, WILLIAM HURT and ALBERT BROOKS were all nominated for Oscars (Brooks in supporting role), as was the film itself and director/writer James L. Brooks. All in all, seven well deserved Oscar nominations.

The script doesn't opt for a conventional happy ending--and, in this case, that's the only flaw for the brilliant screenplay. I felt cheated and somewhat let down by the wistful conclusion.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Terrific and smart
Doogie D5 July 1999
I'm sitting around going through movie listings and not really seeing anything I want to see. My appetite keeps saying, "Something like BROADCAST NEWS." That's what I want. Something smart and funny, with adult ideas and great acting and writing, and a directorial style that doesn't call attention to itself. This may well be Hurt's best performance (is this or THE BIG CHILL, to my mind): however eccentric, Hurt is smart, and to play an unintelligent person without making sure -- wink wink -- the audience knows -- wink wink -- hey, I'M not stupid... well, that's fine acting right there. Hunter is note-perfect, and Albert Brooks is a revelation. (And he can read and sing at the same time!) Great, great work.
39 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good film with compelling characters
schwallerkate4 November 2015
Broadcast News is a compelling story of three very different people in the news

business. The characters, played by Holly Hunter (Jane), William Hurt (Tom) and

Albert Brooks (Aaron), are a dynamic trio of very different and conflicting

personalities. The movie follows the three characters through their lives and

struggles inside and outside of the newsroom. Overall, Broadcast News was a

compelling, funny, entertaining watch. A good use of time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of My Favorite Comedies
ArizWldcat16 March 2002
This movie is one of my favorite comedies of all time. The dialog is crisp, the pace is fast. Not only is this a clever comedy, this is an interesting look at what goes on behind the scenes in the television news business.

There are so many funny lines...a couple of my favorites:

Ernie Merriman: (sarcastically) It must be nice to always believe you know better, to always think you're the smartest person in the room. Jane: (seriously) NO, it's not, it's awful!!

Aaron: He must be good looking Jane: How do you know that? Aaron: No one invites a bad looking idiot to their room!

The performances of Holly Hunter, Albert Brooks, and William Hurt were absolutely brilliant! Even years later, I remember this movie well. Often forgotten is the wonderfully funny Joan Cusack! I love the scene where the newsroom personnel are racing to beat a deadline. There are so many funny scenes that it's hard to pick a favorite. I highly recommend this film.
35 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
thinkers vs pretty boys
lee_eisenberg21 June 2006
I don't really know when it was that TV stations began preferring to have handsome men as their reporters - regardless of the mens' IQs - but it was clearly a problem by the time that "Broadcast News" came out, and the movie does a really good job looking at it. Portraying a love triangle between pretty boy air-head reporter Tom Grunick (William Hurt), intelligent but nervous reporter Aaron Altman (Albert Brooks) and producer Jane Craig (Holly Hunter), the movie pulls no punches. Probably the best line in the movie is when Tom says something like: "I don't really understand any of what I'm reporting." And in the era of FOX News and such things, a movie like this becomes even more important.

All in all, definitely a movie that I recommend. Also starring Robert Prosky, Lois Chiles, Joan Cusack, and Jack Nicholson in a supporting role as the anchorman.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Best Film of 1987
asc8515 July 2006
Not only do I think this was the best film of 1987, it's probably in my own amorphous list as one of the 10-20 best films I've ever seen. For whatever reason, I really connected with this movie, and it is one of the most personal films I had seen at that point in my life (I was 26). For better or worse, I strongly identified with the Holly Hunter character (and I'm a guy!). She plays an extremely bright, loyal and intense woman who couldn't figure out romantic relationships. There were so many things that she said in this movie that were things that I would say or have said to others in similar circumstances. And the ending of the movie I find to be so very, very sad.

Obviously, this role was the big break for Holly Hunter. Clearly, I was not the only one to think so highly of it.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Will Never Ever Remember!???
Pittwater29 December 2002
I have seen this film at least 5 times but I never ever remember the end. This is because it is so forgettable. Why? It starts off well. The story is interesting and the three lead actors are superb, ...but Hunter's and Brooks' characters were very annoying. Makes a good soapy, full stop.

Hunter is a neurotic woman with many many many hangups. Too many issues would signal halt at any pace to a guy but she's still being pursued by the two male actors. Brooks' character is the kind of smart-a** jerk-geek combo who we all can comprehend why he's usually beaten up in school. Rest assured, it's all self-inflicted. He's full of petty jealousy and lacking of any self respect. This is then topped with a high dosage of whiny self pity. The kind of person people loathe. Hurt is the overly nice guy who have resisted in putting Brooks through a wall. I still give it a 7/10 for acting but the 2 characters were so annoying that I never attempt to remember what the film was about. Hence, the vicious circle of re-viewing. Might be a plot of the director/script writer's to get me to watch it more than just once (which would have been ample).

Having said that, I could remember some other films I have seen 20 years ago and could still see it over and over again and still enjoy it.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Smart Romance, A Funny Comedy and A Sly Satire, in short: A Masterpiece
MovieDude189312 August 2009
Broadcast News {dir. James L. Brooks, 1987}

****/****

Although it lacks the emotional punch of Brooks's debut feature, (Terms of Endearment) Broadcast News is a superlative film, with exceptional performances from each of the three leads and a script that feels as genuine and well-researched as a hard-hitting news report. Let it be known, this is a character film first and foremost and a satire second. In my mind it succeeds on both levels on its own terms. The film's characters are given surprising depth and dimension , while the satire remains sly and never bitter. Comparisons to Network are unnecessary because the films have two completely separate goals and attitudes. While also a great film, Network is a cynical and weary work; in other words, its mad as hell and fed up with the state of television. Network's style of satire feels more extreme and guerrilla. In contrast, the characters populating the news rooms of Broadcast News love and live for their jobs (sometimes to the detriment of their love lives.) They derive pleasure from the stresses and satisfactions of news reporting, just as the audience derives pleasure from watching this sweet and romantically realistic masterpiece.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very Good Movie, but Tell Us Who Tom Is
Snowgo9 September 2016
The acting, screen-writing and inter-personal dynamics are very good in this movie. The plot is cohesive and mostly coherent and no scenes were wasted on trivial "fluff". The only thing I wish had happened was for William Hurt's character to be more developed. This was an over-sight in the film's script, in my opinion.

Tom Grunnick is too-nice-of-a-guy to be the malevolent, shallow, sensationalist manipulator of the public that both Albert Brooks' character and Holly Hunter's (eventually) make him out to be. It seems like the director wanted to have his news and read it, too:

A mellow, likable, moderately-intelligent, but good-looking sports caster is thrust into the role of anchorman, probably on his looks and connections, and is then accused by some of his closest workmates of shallowness and sensationalism, but we are given only one instance of Grunnick embodying and displaying this propensity.

What we needed was to meet Tom Grunnick. We are never given much indication of what is important to him and what he considers good news casting/reporting. This is a problem with many movies, where character development is minimal or absent. At the very least, Jane should have asked him (in the car) "What made you choose the subject of date-rape as your first original piece? Why is that important to you?"

Why didn't she ask to collaborate on this piece, given her alleged social altruism?

We see, here, that Holly Hunter's character needs development, too. We know she is ambitious and her timing and inter-personal skills are good, but what are her ideals that Albert Brooks' character alludes to toward the end of the movie? Jane Craig is much more moral and substantial than Tom Grunnick? If so, we need to see and explore this. Director and screen-writer James Brooks should have spent more time illustrating and emphasizing this dynamic.

Albert Brooks' character may have been the best part of the movie. His even-tempered caring for Jane, covering a simmering passion and sometimes anger, were acted in an excellent manner. With the theme of date-rape in the movie, we half-expect Aaron Altman to take advantage of Jane at some point, but he never does. I found his humor and self-discipline very well displayed.

All three; Brooks, Hunter and Hurt do great acting in this movie and the dynamics are excellent. A little more character development would have gone a long way.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wonderful performance by Holly Hunter, but other than that I found it quite boring
jimbo-53-18651115 January 2018
Broadcast News is a film that gives an insight into the daily goings on within a Washington based news company. The film focuses mainly on three individuals; 2 x male television reporters Tom Grunick and Aaron Altman (William Hurt and Albert Brooks respectively) and executive producer Jane Craig (Holly Hunter). With both men employed at the television company, an awkward love triangle develops when Jane falls for Tom and Aaron falls for Jane...

Sky Movies proudly boasts Broadcast News as being an Oscar Winning comedy and to be fair given the premise I didn't expect this to be in-your-face comedy and was looking for something that would prove to be suitably humourous. However, in my book there is a very fine line between subtle humour and almost non-existent humour and herein lies the problem with Broadcast News...

Maybe that's part of the problem in that I was sold on in being a comedy and in fairness whilst it does have amusing moments here and there it doesn't have enough funny moments to work as a comedy. OK so what does that leave us with? Well we do get an insight into the daily goings on of a news channel (mildly interesting, but not really strong enough to carry the majority of the film). Therefore if you take this aspect out of the film then you are merely left with a love triangle between the 3 leads - this takes up the bulk of the focus and sadly is the least interesting aspect of the entire film.

The only thing that partly redeems this film is Holly Hunter whose superb central performance really 'anchors' the film (obvious pun). She's the heart and soul of the film and really lights up the screen whenever she's in front of the camera. Her co-stars are all OK I suppose, but no-one else really makes the same impact as Hunter and they all fail to really make any kind of impression on the picture.

In Broadcast News though things end up going from bad to worse with a tagged on silly ending which added nothing and felt completely unnecessary. Still it seems that mine is a minority opinion (the critics seemed to love it), but for a film whose main focus seemed to be on a rather boring love triangle centring on 3 mostly uninteresting individuals then the end result is sadly a film that I found to be a fairly uninvolving experience.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed