Roper, a hostage negotiator catches a murderous bank robber after a blown heist. The bank robber escapes and immediately goes after the man who put him behind bars. The ending is played out... See full summary »
A Florida con man uses the passing of the long time Congressman from his district who he just happens to share a name with, to get elected to his version of paradise, Congress, where the ... See full summary »
A series of strange robberies brings Axel Foley back to Beverly Hills to help his two fellow cops solve the case. All the familiar faces of the first film are back... Written by
Chris Makrozahopoulos <email@example.com>
The only film in the trilogy that was shot on 2.35:1 aspect ratio whereas the first and third one where shot on 1.85:1. See more »
While en route to the City Depository, at the construction area, Billy spins the car around and we hear a crash, and Taggart shouting, "Shit!", and then they all jump out of the car as it is totaled. Yet the car does not actually hit anything. See more »
[after being ordered to Lutz's office to explain Rosewood's call to the FBI]
Can't keep God waiting.
I don't want to hear that kind of talk, Sergeant.
Oh come on, Andy! He's fired every cop who used to work for the old chief! The three of us is all that's left!
He's still head of this department, Sergeant.
See more »
Beverly Hills Cop 2 is pretty much just the same as the original Beverly Hills Cop but without the freshness and originality of the 1st. Murphy is still a perfect Axel Foley and with some good supporting characters such as his foul mouthed chief of police and Detectives Rosewood and Taggart the movie does have it's moments but the rules of diminishing returns still apply.
With a bit more originality in the script and a bit more daring this really could have been great. But for a sequel this isn't to bad just more of the same but not quite as good.
6/10 - Not as good as the original but far superior to the tepid third instalment.
5 of 6 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?