Down 386 this week

The Alamo: Thirteen Days to Glory (1987)

TV Movie  -   -  Action | Adventure | Drama  -  26 January 1987 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.2/10 from 354 users  
Reviews: 19 user | 1 critic

Against orders and with no help of relief Texas patriots led by William Travis, Jim Bowie, and Davy Crockett defend the Alamo against overwhelming Mexican forces.



(book), , 1 more credit »
0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 40 titles
created 17 Feb 2012
a list of 10000 titles
created 26 Jun 2012
a list of 40 titles
created 15 Sep 2012
a list of 48 titles
created 6 months ago
a list of 1042 titles
created 2 months ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: The Alamo: Thirteen Days to Glory (TV Movie 1987)

The Alamo: Thirteen Days to Glory (TV Movie 1987) on IMDb 6.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Alamo: Thirteen Days to Glory.

User Polls

Nominated for 1 Primetime Emmy. See more awards »




Cast overview, first billed only:
Col. Black
Pvt. Danny Cloud
Senora Cos
Gene Evans ...
Michael Wren ...
Joe (Travis' servant)


The story of the famed siege of the Alamo during the Texas Revolution, in which a small band of soldiers held off an overwhelming army under the Mexican general Santa Anna long enough to allow the Texan army to gather its strength. Written by Jim Beaver <>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

texas | alamo | siege | soldier | davy crockett | See more »


See all certifications »




Release Date:

26 January 1987 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

The Alamo: Thirteen Days to Glory  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:


Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Of the Alamo's 180-odd defenders only 13 were native born Texans, 11 of them ethnic Mexicans. 50 of the defenders were European born. See more »


Although Travis ordered a uniform to be made, it was not ready by the time of the battle. See more »


Gen. Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna: History teaches us, gentlemen, that great generals remain generals by never underestimating their opposition.
See more »


Features The Last Command (1955) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Good "Alamo" film...not great "film" film
25 December 2010 | by (Earth) – See all my reviews

First off, I must confess that I am an Alamo junky. So my review might be a bit skewed. I've seen most films dealing with the Alamo or the Texas revolution (The Alamo (1960), The Alamo (2004), The Last Command, Gone to Texas, Heroes of the Alamo (930 B.C.), Davy Crockett at the Alamo, Texas, etc.) I just watched this one all the way through today for the first time since I was about ten.

I think this adaptation, despite it's flaws, probably ranks in the top three Alamo films. Strictly from a film perspective, it certainly has problems. The lack of budget makes for a handful of extras playing both armies. The Mexican army, which is suppose to number in the thousands, looks to consist of little more than ten soldiers the majority of the time. The battle scenes are laughable for the most part. Most of the footage, as has been noted many times, is lifted from the Last Command. The rest of the scenes feature rubber bayonets and men appearing to wrestle, rather than fight for their lives, in the background.

That said, I think with some money behind it, this could have been a great film. While every review I have read seems to praise the actor who played Santa Anna, Raul Julia I believe was his name, I find his constant yelling to be a bit over the top. I actually thought Brian Keith was a wonderful Davy Crockett. His down home yarns and backwoods twang comes across as entirely genuine. Also, note his expression as he swings his hunting knife just before his death. It is such a convincing portrayal of a last stand by a man. It is a pity that he is about thirty years to old to play Crockett. My hat goes off to him nonetheless. The same can be said for James Arness. His massive build and piercing eyes gives him that sort of John Wayne screen presence, to a far lesser degree of course. Again, a bit too old for the role. Alec Baldwin actually makes for a very convincing Travis. He is much closer in age and does a brilliant job. Highlights would be his last speech to the men as well as his conversation with James Bonham before hand.

I also thought the screenplay was very good. Minus some of the exchange between Daniel Cloud and his Mexican love interest. Although, it is more the acting and less the writing that hurts those scenes. The script moves the story along at a steady pace and is concerned more with telling the story and less with giving a history lesson, a flaw that haunts many Alamo films and period pieces in general.

Overall, I think this is a good "Alamo" film. It is probably not a good "film" film. That is to say unless you like the Alamo, you may not enjoy this movie. As made for t.v. movies go, especially in the eighties, it is not that bad. You have two great icons in Keith and Arness playing lead roles, as well as the upstart Alec Baldwin. Not a bad cast at all for a low budget film. Burt Kennedy does a good job of directing considered what he is given. As an "Alamo" film, I would probably rate this as a 7 or 8 out of 10. But as a "film" film goes it gets about a 5 out of 10. With a bigger budget and a younger Brian Keith and James Arness, this could have been a great film. It might have won Oscars in the Golden Age of Hollywood!

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Santa Anna marmac2768
strongly hated it Guess_Who05
Unnamed members of the cast bullit2513
MOVIE REVIEW: The Alamo: Thirteen Days to Glory (1987) Crazyhorse30
Discuss The Alamo: Thirteen Days to Glory (1987) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: