MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 987 this week

The Whistle Blower (1986)

 -  Thriller  -  10 July 1987 (USA)
6.2
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.2/10 from 1,358 users  
Reviews: 19 user | 11 critic

A war veteran tries to investigate the murder of his son who was working as a Russian translator for the British intelligence service during the Cold War. He meets a web of deception and paranoia that seems impenetrable...

Director:

Writers:

(screenplay), (novel)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 33 titles
created 04 Sep 2011
 
list image
a list of 22 titles
created 22 Mar 2012
 
a list of 2310 titles
created 13 Jan 2013
 
a list of 414 titles
created 23 Feb 2013
 
a list of 23 titles
created 09 Apr 2013
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Whistle Blower (1986)

The Whistle Blower (1986) on IMDb 6.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Whistle Blower.
1 nomination. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Frank Jones
...
Lord
...
Robert 'Bob' Jones
...
Sir Adrian Chapple
...
Cynthia Goodburn
Barry Foster ...
Charles Greig
...
Bruce
Kenneth Colley ...
Bill Pickett
David Langton ...
Government Minister
Dinah Stabb ...
Rose
James Simmons ...
Mark
Katherine Reeve ...
Tiffany
Bill Wallis ...
Dodgson
Trevor Cooper ...
Inspector Bourne
Peter Miles ...
Stephen Kedge
Edit

Storyline

A war veteran tries to investigate the murder of his son who was working as a Russian translator for the British intelligence service during the Cold War. He meets a web of deception and paranoia that seems impenetrable...

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Within the Secret World of Governmental Cover Ups, Will the one man who dares to tell the truth survive?

Genres:

Thriller

Certificate:

PG | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

10 July 1987 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

The Whistle Blower  »

Box Office

Gross:

$1,500,000 (USA)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

(Technicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.66 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

GCHQ was originally known as the Government Code and Cypher School (GC&CS or GCCS) when it was first established after World War I. It was known by this up until 1946 when the name was changed to the GCHQ. See more »

Goofs

When Lord and Bruce are at the racecourse Lord's jacket changes to an overcoat with velvet collar. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Required viewing for all readers of the Guardian newspaper!
3 May 2006 | by (Gibraltar) – See all my reviews

I'm surprised that this movie has not got more attention on the IMDb, of course it's dated which might be the problem. Another problem is that the film print comes across as dreary and dull, I don't know if it was a deliberate attempt by the film makers to do this but it just makes it harder to watch. It's not a young cast, on the contrary it's an old looking cast, although a fine collection of British character actors (some who are no longer with us) of a bygone age. In addition unless you are interested in British political culture, history and the antics of the cold war you will find this hard going even if you are a Michael Caine fan .There is a lot of dialog and the story line is a little confusing at times.

However, in the light of recent events, Britain always going along with the USA, the Butler report on Britains reason for war in Iraq and the apparent suicide of UN weapons inspector David Kelly a critic and skeptic of the US and Britains claim of Iraqi WMD programs, as well as recent accusations that Harold Wilsons Govt in the 1970's was to be overthrown in favor of a military government either at the bequest of the US or at least with their blessing;I thought that it might have aroused more interest.

This movie was released in 1986 ironically at the time when the cold war was winding down but the fictional events depicted in this film were surly inspired by the Anthony Blunt scandal, the Jeffrey Prime case at GCHQ ( a British intelligence listening post), as well as the Thatcher government banning trade union activity at GCHQ on the grounds of national security. The film depicts skepticism about Britains so called independent nuclear deterrent which totally relied on US authorization, the inequities in the so called "special relationship" and CIA/MI6 meddling in British politics. Also, bugging, internal spying on British citizens, lack of intelligence service oversight, secrecy and lastly hypocrisy or double standard when dealing with moles and traitors. All in all a Guardian readers 'wet dream'.

The conventional thinking was that all Soviet sympathizers and potential traitors were from the working class. Well the problem was they were not. Many top members of the British establishment working in the civil service and the intelligence services who had access to sensitive information loathed the USA and that the Suez fiasco back in 1956 was a turning point for many of them. Although It has to be said that many British double agents and soviet moles were not just motivated by that but were recruited as far back as the 1930's. Many students from in the "Oxbridge" University systems who were Britains best and brightest destined for great things were motivated by their hatred of the Nazi/fascism passed secrets onto the USSR during WWW II and well into the cold war. Suez may have vindicated their beliefs.

The movie implies that the if you were from the respected establishment or of a certain class of person the 'official secrets act' did not apply to you. You would be spared the indignity of a public trial and the humiliation of exposure, however it was a two edged sword because it cut both ways. It would also cause too many red faces at the top as well as creating difficulties in the 'special relationship'. They would leave you alone to continue with all the perks provided you kept quiet and cooperated with the powers that be. On the other hand lower down the food chain you were not so fortunate. Not only were you likely to be prosecuted through the normal channels but if you were really unlucky you might end up being a victim of a CIA death squad who quietly knock off suspected whistle blowers and possible troublemakers rather than go through a costly and public trial.

As for the film itself there is good cast all round and many of the characters are very believable in their respective roles. Frank Jones (Michael Caine) is not fobbed off by an sweetheart investigation into his sons death which concludes suicide. While conducting his own investigation, he discovers irregularities and soon suspects a cover up, but worse that his own countries security services might be involved in his sons death after all. Jones a lifetime committed patriot and former navy man he is shocked to learn of the lengths that the British establishment go to protect one of their own despite their treachery at the expense of less mortals! I highly recommend this movie, check it out!


28 of 36 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Will it ever be released in the U.S.? Fatsnbul
FIlm Locations anthony1081
The whistle Blower thomas-busson
Medals PhillipNoir
Discuss The Whistle Blower (1986) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?