6.1/10
4,326
34 user 18 critic

The Manhattan Project (1986)

PG-13 | | Sci-Fi, Thriller | 13 June 1986 (USA)
A teen and his girlfriend make an atomic bomb with plutonium stolen from a scientist dating his mother.

Director:

Reviews

On Disc

at Amazon

1 win & 1 nomination. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
John Mathewson
...
Government Aide
...
Government Aide
Paul Austin ...
General
...
Scientist
Curt Dempster ...
Scientist
Bran Ferren ...
Lab Assistant
Christopher Collet ...
...
Elizabeth Stephens
...
Jenny Anderman
...
Science Teacher
Abraham Unger ...
Roland (as Abe Unger)
...
Max (as Robert Leonard)
David Quinn ...
Tennis
...
Craig
Edit

Storyline

A teen and his girlfriend make an atomic bomb with plutonium stolen from a scientist dating his mother.

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

Paul Stevens' high school science project has gotten a little out of hand. He just built an atomic bomb. Now he's got 11 hours to make sure it doesn't work. See more »

Genres:

Sci-Fi | Thriller

Certificate:

PG-13 | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

13 June 1986 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Deadly Game  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Budget:

$18,000,000 (estimated)

Gross:

$3,900,000 (USA)
 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (video)

Sound Mix:

Color:

(Technicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The film was part of a 1980s cycle of films about atomic bombs and nuclear warfare which had started in 1979 with The China Syndrome (1979). The films included Silkwood (1983), Testament (1983), Threads (1984), WarGames (1983), The Day After (1983), The Atomic Cafe (1982), The Manhattan Project (1986), Whoops Apocalypse (1982), Special Bulletin (1983), Ground Zero (1987), Barefoot Gen (Hadashi no Gen (1983)), Rules of Engagement (1989), When the Wind Blows (1986), Letters from a Dead Man (Pisma myortvogo cheloveka (1986)), Memoirs of a Survivor (1981) and The Chain Reaction (1980). See more »

Goofs

During the process of making the sphere of plutonium Paul doesn't use any type of protection (filter) from airborne plutonium particles. There is a high probability of death when plutonium is inhaled. As a minimum it results in radiation sickness. See more »

Quotes

[first lines]
Dr. John Matthewson: Now, the beta synchrotron sends the electrons through this magnet which bends the course of them down to the reaction vessel. Stay away from that elbow joint. All right. Bran, you want to get that? Now, this is a tunable excimer laser. It's tuned to the exact resonance of the plutonium-239 that's in the reaction vessel down at that end. Now, I think we're all set. Hit it.
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Can't suspend that much disbelief
18 August 2002 | by (San Diego, California) – See all my reviews

If the beauty of film is that it encourages us to briefly suspend our disbelief and enjoy experiencing a different world, The Manhattan Project simply demands too much suspension of disbelief to make this possible.

Almost every plot point in The Manhattan Project is an absolute impossibility in real life, even though the dramatic power of this film ostensibly derives from the notion that something remotely like this could really happen. From nuclear radiation triggering detectors without hurting people, to a single rent-a-cop defending an entire nuclear weapons lab, to one teenager doing in a month what took Oppenheimer and company years, to the U.S. military letting national security breaches walk away into the sunset, there is just no way to focus on the story when faced with so many intellectual insults.

On the bright side, the science in the movie is presented well and seems fairly accurate, so it does seem like the filmmakers at least tried to make something special out of an insufficient screenplay. The Manhattan Project is not a terrible movie, but it does suffer from too many inexcusable lapses to be called good. Just like the most realistic character in the movie, this film is a bomb.


11 of 19 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
LOL The Internet ca. 1986 at The Science Fair sundaggernm
Roger Ebert gave this ridiculous movie 4 stars dignan419
Radiation Poisoning? smellysocks
the brianteaser in the restaurant audiracera4
Did you notice Robert Shaun Leonard? kerrytrout
groan.... rp_roger
Discuss The Manhattan Project (1986) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?