MOVIEmeter
Top 5000
Down 168 this week

Highlander (1986)

7.2
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.2/10 from 84,230 users   Metascore: 24/100
Reviews: 299 user | 94 critic | 7 from Metacritic.com

An immortal Scottish swordsman must confront the last of his immortal opponent, a murderously brutal barbarian who lusts for the fabled "Prize".

Director:

Writers:

(story), (screenplay), 2 more credits »
Watch Trailer
0Check in
0Share...

On Disc

at Amazon

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Exclusive Trailer

View the Foxcatcher Exclusive trailer with Steve Carell and Channing Tatum


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 24 titles
created 04 Mar 2011
 
a list of 46 titles
created 19 Sep 2011
 
a list of 31 titles
created 06 May 2012
 
a list of 21 titles
created 04 Jun 2012
 
a list of 30 titles
created 04 Aug 2013
 

Related Items

Search for "Highlander" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Highlander (1986)

Highlander (1986) on IMDb 7.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Highlander.

User Polls

1 win. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Action | Comedy | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3.9/10 X  

In the future, Highlander Connor MacLeod must prevent the destruction of Earth under an anti-ozone shield.

Director: Russell Mulcahy
Stars: Christopher Lambert, Sean Connery, Virginia Madsen
Fantasy | Sci-Fi | Action
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.2/10 X  

Deceived that he had won the Prize, Connor MacLeod awakens from a peaceful life when an entombed immortal magician comes seeking the Highlander.

Director: Andrew Morahan
Stars: Christopher Lambert, Mario Van Peebles, Deborah Kara Unger
Highlander (1992–1998)
Action | Adventure | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

Duncan MacLeod is Immortal, and must live in modern society, concealing his true nature while fighting other Immortals.

Stars: Adrian Paul, Stan Kirsch, Jim Byrnes
Action | Fantasy | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4.5/10 X  

Immortals Connor and Duncan Macleod must join forces against Kell, an evil immortal who has become too strong for anyone to face alone.

Director: Douglas Aarniokoski
Stars: Christopher Lambert, Adrian Paul, Bruce Payne
Action | Adventure | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3/10 X  

Duncan MacLeod and his fellow Immortals quest to locate the Grail of their world.

Director: Brett Leonard
Stars: Adrian Paul, Thekla Reuten, Cristian Solimeno
Highlander: The Raven (1998–1999)
Action | Adventure
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.1/10 X  

A female Immortal and thief tries to redeem herself with the help of an ex-cop.

Stars: Paul Johansson, Elizabeth Gracen, Patricia Gage
Animation
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.7/10 X  
Director: Frederic Dybowski
Stars: Lawrence Bayne, Benedict Campbell, Don Dickinson
Mortal Kombat (1995)
Action | Adventure | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

Three unknowing martial artists are summoned to a mysterious island to compete in a tournament whose outcome will decide the fate of the world.

Director: Paul W.S. Anderson
Stars: Christopher Lambert, Robin Shou, Linden Ashby
Animation | Action | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

An anime continuation of the HIGHLANDER saga, following immortal Colin MacLeod's quest for revenge in the future.

Directors: Yoshiaki Kawajiri, Takuji Endo, and 1 more credit »
Stars: Alistair Abell, Debi Mae West, Zachary Samuels
Night Watch (2004)
Action | Fantasy | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

A fantasy-thriller set in present-day Moscow where the respective forces that control daytime and nighttime do battle.

Director: Timur Bekmambetov
Stars: Konstantin Khabenskiy, Vladimir Menshov, Mariya Poroshina
Action | Fantasy | Sci-Fi

An immortal Scottish swordsman faces off with other immortal warriors in order to obtain a coveted ability.

Director: Cedric Nicolas-Troyan
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
Alan North ...
...
...
...
Christopher Malcolm ...
Peter Diamond ...
Billy Hartman ...
...
...
Alistair Findlay ...
Edit

Storyline

Born in the Highlands of Scotland in 1518, Connor Macleod is immortal. When he is wounded in battle but does not die, he is banished from his village. He meets another like himself, Ramirez, who teaches him swordsmanship--the only way to kill another immortal is to take his head--and the ways of the immortals. Modern-day New York is the location of "The Gathering," where Connor and the few remaining immortals must battle to the last for "The Prize." Written by Jeff Hansen <jmh@umich.edu>

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

There can be only one. See more »


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for strong action violence, a scene of sexuality and some language | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

7 March 1986 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Los inmortales  »

Box Office

Budget:

$16,000,000 (estimated)

Gross:

$5,900,000 (USA)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (theatrical)

Sound Mix:

|

Color:

(Technicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The character of Sunda Kastagir was originally written to be an Asian Immortal (Mongolian or Chinese) in the original script. See more »

Goofs

Sparks flying off the railing in front of the car supposedly causing them. See more »

Quotes

[Just before the MacLeod clan goes to war]
Kate: Angus, you'll keep him in one piece, ya hear?
Dugal MacLeod: And we all know what piece that is!
See more »

Connections

Featured in Dream Me Up Scotty! (2013) See more »

Soundtracks

Hammer To Fall
(uncredited)
Performed by Queen
Written by Brian May
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Magical - Don't Miss!
12 January 2004 | by (England) – See all my reviews

When I first saw this movie, I loved it. Having recently seen it again after several years, I found it to be every bit as good as I remembered – in fact, better. So I thought I would visit IMDB and see what others had to say. I learned four things;

1/ This movie was a flop at the box office. Funny, I had always assumed it was a hit – it was so good, and spawned three (soon to be four) sequels and a television series.

2/ I expected some to be less than entranced with Highlander, but was interested to learn that there are those who think it complete rubbish.

3/ Some people think the sequels are good movies. How could they?

4/ Some people don't like the Queen soundtrack. How could they not?



It is always interesting to see different viewpoints, especially when they are completely contrary to your own. But for me, this movie was perfect. The premise was intriguing, the story was beautifully told, the joy and pathos of an immortal amongst mortals revealed with great skill. There was great action, romance, the tragedy of love lost – and the baddest of bad guys to overcome.

The casting was excellent, as was the acting. Sean Connery's contribution was exactly as it should have been, and no more. Clancy Brown's performance as The Kurgan was joyfully terrifying, Christopher Lambert was spot-on.

The screenplay was excellent, as was the script. I was especially impressed with the way that flashbacks were interwoven with the ongoing story. In fact, this is the only flashback movie I have ever liked.

I was also thoroughly impressed with the action sequences. Unlike so many recent movies, none of the action involved the physically impossible (with the obvious exception of the fact that the immortals were immortal, of course). This added enormously to the appeal, in direct contrast to so many movies made in the last decade. I despair when I watch movies where people perform the impossible. Even the classic scene `Oh, I'm falling – but it's OK, I can just grab this rope/branch/flagpole/whatever, and even though I have fallen 30 feet and am travelling at 20 mph, I can just stretch out my hand and arrest my fall as though I was no heavier than a feather' destroys all credibility in the action. I know, this is a fantasy movie anyway, so what does it matter? Well, realistic action is even more important in fantasy movies; it helps the audience to willingly suspend disbelief. This is very difficult to do when you are busy giggling at the latest fantastical feat you have witnessed. No such concerns in this movie – the action was perfectly judged to reflect the prowess gained from centuries of experience, whilst avoiding the impossible and the ridiculous.

I was intrigued to find one user comment on IMDB criticising the use of `unnecessarily large and heavy weapons'. Anyone who has used (or even picked up) any edged weapon will be aware that they are very heavy. Moving that kind of mass means lots of momentum, and involves very distinctive body movements to counterbalance the weight. Most movies use toy weapons – plastic, fibreglass or wood – and the lack of mass shows in the actor's movements. For the uninitiated, this may make for flashier and faster action – but for those who know, it looks like children playing pretend. The use of weapons with real weight in Highlander adds tremendously to the realism. It was particularly impressive that the actors could use the weapons properly (at least to the extent demanded by the choreographed scenes – and that is all that is required for movies). Clancy Brown (as The Kurgan) deserves special praise here – he had the largest and heaviest weapon, yet wielded it like a veteran. One can only imagine the endless hours he spent perfecting his movements and balance.

I do understand why some would find the soundtrack intrusive, but for me this was another area that was perfectly judged. Queen's songs enhanced the mood of the moment whenever they played. One related fact that some might find interesting – a few years ago I saw a list of the top ten best movies for music as voted for by students. Highlander made the list – the only non-musical to do so. (In fact, I think it came in the top five.) So I would guess that the soundtrack works for most people..

I also understand why the accents in the movie (Christopher Lambert's and Sean Connery's) are a problem for some. However, I was happy with Lambert's accent; it was Scottish enough for the Highland scenes, and suitably indefinable for the modern settings. Sean Connery was, of course, Sean Connery – he never adopts any accent other than his own. But that's OK – it doesn't detract from the film, any more than it detracts from any of his films (such as Red October). I tend to agree with his point that accents don't matter – emotions are the same, regardless of nationality.

Just a quick word about the sequels – disappointing. I am not one to decry all sequels as inferior. In fact, many sequels are very good, and some are better than their progenitors. However, the Highlander sequels were without exception very poor. The original film was obviously conceived as a one-off, and was all the better for it. The story was complete with Highlander, and the sequels were necessarily contrived. However, Highlander II exceeded all expectations in this regard. The plot changed the story of the immortals beyond all recognition. Egregious just isn't a big enough word to describe it.

The sequels are best viewed as being entirely separate from the original. If you haven't already seen them, be prepared for a decidedly tepid experience.

But Highlander itself – ah, there's a real movie. Sit back and enjoy!

9.5/10


186 of 211 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Why did Russell Nash wear such an awful old raincoat emuir-1
Highlander = Corny Terminator with Swords? web-104
Someone please help me understand this. Macman67
In alot of ways, it really sucked. But... captainonionpits
Perfect ending dan-willi84
The scene in which he recues the kid makes no sense kelkechose
Discuss Highlander (1986) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page