| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 13 reviews in total |
26 out of 30 people found the following review useful:
Powerful Study of Self-Definition, 9 September 2002
Author:
mackjay from Out there in the dark
"Colonel Redl" bears some interesting comparisons with "Lawrence of
Arabia".
In both films, the central character defines himself through a military
career. Both characters are gay men. Both are ultimately exploited by the
military entities in which they have found some identity. "Colonel Redl"
could almost be called a 'chamber Lawrence': Redl gains no experience in
the
field--his exploits are mainly political, something he hates, yet is quite
adept at manipulating. Redl's homosexuality is made explicit, while David
Lean's film only hints at Lawrence's orientation.
One of "Redl"'s great strengths is its convincing portrayal of conscious,
yet suppressed, homosexuality in an earlier historical context. Redl's
scenes with Katalin--the perceptive sister of his love object--are models
of
expressing unspoken feelings. While a scene of Redl watching the handsome
Kubinyi have sex with a prostitute, and a later scene with his own male
lover are without ambiguity. At the same time, it must be said that
homosexuality in this film is not truly a subject. It really functions to
underline Redl's status as an outsider. He is also part Jewish, part
Catholic, part Ukrainian, part Hungarian. Within his socio-political
context, there is nowhere to fit.
Klaus Maria Brandauer, in a brilliant performance, embodies the tormented
conflicts of Redl, while maintaining a sympathetic side of the character.
This fascinating film is loaded with irony and pain at nearly every turn.
The DVD issue of "Colonel Redl" contains a 22-minute documentary interview
with director Istvan Szabo, featuring scenes from the 'trilogy' of which
"Colonel Redl" makes up the second part, and comments from
Brandauer.
21 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
Brandauer as the Microcosm of History, 3 March 2000
![]()
Author:
Guy_T from London, England
Brandauer again shows why reviews of his work often include the word
'magnetic' - You just don't take your eyes off him. His range is
remarkable, his control of the minutest gesture superb, the subtlety of
his
physical screen presence majestic.
Szabo's direction is again precise but not heavy handed. If this doesn't
have quite the sweep or sting in the tail of their previous collaboration,
Mephisto, it is still one of the finest European films of its
time.
The story is superbly crafted; to leave Muller-Stahl's Archduke Franz
Ferdinand out until the last hour or so is an outstanding narrative
technique, and if Muller-Stahl's performance is a trifle one-note, that's
as
much due to narrative constraint as actor ability - he's still pretty
effective, and its one of his best roles.
Szabo has an ability to investigate history in a curiously personal and
touching sense of the individual, but leaving that individual
dispassionately, and gazing at him objectively; thus what comes across is
a
really detailed and involving character struggling against an incredible
force of inevitability. Like Visconti, broad strokes, but painted in the
minutest of details - only unlike Visconti, full blooded and
direct.
It's at times witty, literate and touching, but always
beautiful.
12 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Can Devotion ever be judged as Treason?, 30 September 2007
![]()
Author:
Marcin Kukuczka from Cieszyn, Poland
The successful collaboration of Istvan Szabo with the Austrian actor
Klaus Maria Brandauer in MEPHISTO (1981) resulted in another
sensational movie, OBERST REDL (1985): again a story of a man in the
German speaking country, again psychological theme of self confidence,
again personal tragedy. However, in spite of the similar aspects that
both movies share, the latter appears to attract in a different way.
Is it history depiction that attracts? While MEPHISTO was a story of an
actor who desired appreciation and acceptance from the Nazis and, by
means of compromise and adjustment, hoped to survive (being at the same
time a very realistic insight into historical reality), OBERST REDL,
based upon John Osborne's play "A Patriot for Me" is a story of a
soldier devoted to the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Living in its fading
period, he gets through promotion and degradation. Yet, unfortunately,
history is poorly executed. The depiction of the empire does not appear
convincing. The Habsburgs are overly "cruel and cold". As a result,
relating Redl to Mephisto and the background power the both characters
serve would surely harm the Habsburgs since Mephisto cannot be
understood without the Nazis and Redl without the Habsburgs. So what
attracts in the movie and involves the viewer?
This is the story of a life...a very unique insight into the main
character's feelings and experience. His fanatical devotion that leads
to a personal tragedy; a "son of the emperor," as called once by a
priest in church, that turns into a "traitor"; an ambitious soldier
that becomes an indefatigable spy. Brandauer does a perfect job in the
role and I dare claim that, in the matter of the lead role, Redl is
much more appealing than Mephisto. He represents a blind service of
anyone who absolutely believes in political systems, governing bodies
and who places all his hope in military career when war is more likely
to break out. Redl is not a particular history but history in general
that so often experiences enthusiasm, devotion, trust, success, but
also disappointment, disillusion, fear, despair and madness. History
personified in human being. I am aware that this aspect was also
present in MEPHISTO, but here, the character can be analyzed within
history or outside history.
But from this clearly psychological analysis of the movie, we can
easily switch to general political aspect. "I hate politics" says Redl
after unpleasant events and disillusions. Why? Because politics leads
him to do the things he would probably never do out of his free will.
These are searches, imprisonments, investigations where people commit
desperate acts including suicide, where friends turn into enemies,
where one becomes Judas and where there is no room for humanity and
forgiveness. It's important to mention the disturbing search at Victor
Ullman's.
A lot of thought provoking moments will draw your attention. First,
consider Schorn's plot and the fatal duel. Who was guilty? Is death so
easy to accept? I also reflected on the case of the Jews. Redl
announces that contacting Jewish people will be unwelcome or, in most
extreme cases, punished; yet, it is him who in the following scene
writes a letter to Dr Sonnenschein, a Jew. Aren't we brutally masked
among other people? Doesn't political correctness blind our "selves"?
The famous mask ball in which Redl takes part clearly says for
itself...
As for performances, they are very good. As I have already mentioned,
Klaus Maria Brandauer does a great job portraying a man who is not that
easy to be discovered or interpreted. On the one hand, he is so
desirous of personal military career, on the other hand, he doubts... I
also loved Jan Niklas as Kristof Kubinyi, Alfred Redl's friend whose
fate occurs so unexpected. Gudrun Landgrebe gives a memorable
performance as Katalin Kubinyi for whom Redl seems to care and whom
Redl really loves. And marvelous presence of Armin Mueller-Stahl as the
Crown Prince - he supplies the role with a sense of royalty.
Except for the cast, the film's strong point is the excellent use of
visual effects, like locations, wardrobe and sets. It's magnificent,
luxurious, elegant and very subtle. In one little moment, Redl sees his
emperor, Franz Josef, standing at the lake and is absolutely
overwhelmed by seeing his "Kaiser". The scene is as if a moving picture
from the old photos that can be found in Austria and that remind us of
the charming but lonely years of the late emperor.
OBERST REDL is indeed an important movie to be seen by film fans. Yet
not for the sake of history whatsoever but for the sake of great
thought provoking content. Does the world judge our lives justly?
13 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
A great and under appreciated film!, 11 April 2000
![]()
Author:
gratian-2 (g3x3@bigfoot.com) from Near Geneva, Switzerland
This film evokes powerfully the period and place in which it is set. Its plot is both interesting and intelligent. The acting is of the highest calibre; both Klaus Maria Brandauer and Gudrun Landgrebe are both world class artists. Viewers should see more German film. This is a stunning piece of work by a director of great insight and ability.
6 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
The Patriot Destroyed By His Own Country, 1 June 2010
![]()
Author:
Eumenides_0 from Portugal
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
During the '80s Hungarian director István Szabó made a loose trilogy
with celebrated Austrian actor Klaus Maria Brandauer. Colonel Redl is
the second movie in the trilogy, and although it is not as well known
as the Oscar-winning Mephisto, it is nevertheless as interesting and
well made.
The movie is a fictionalised biopic of Alfred Redl (Brandauer), who is
born to a poor Ukrainian family and in normal circumstances would have
been condemned to a life of insignificance; but, blessed with patriotic
fervour for the Emperor and influential people who take him under their
wing, he's sent to military school where he refines the talents that
will be useful to him all his life, namely knowing the right answers to
his superiors' questions, being fanatically devoted to the monarchy,
and having little moral qualms about betraying friends and comrades.
It's no surprise then that he has a steady rise in ranks until he
becomes the head of the counter-intelligence services. And that's when
his perfect, efficient career starts crumbling.
The Austro-Hungarian Empire is a tense place, bubbling with treason and
revolutionary plans, devoid of national identity, a mishmash of dozens
of peoples - Hungarians, Ukrainians, Czechs, Serbians, Austrians, not
to mention Jews - all hating each other. One's background can decide
what one's life will be or even get one killed. It's in this atmosphere
of subdued terror, lies, and paranoia that Redl, a Ukrainian hiding his
Jewish ancestry and ashamed of his poor background, operates a network
of espionage to ferret out traitors and criminals in the army, for the
army is all that sustains the Emperor's power in an Empire that has no
reason to know the concept of patriotism.
One day he's brought to the presence of Archduke Ferdinand and ordered
to find a patsy to alleviate inter-ethnic tensions. World War I is just
around the corner and the Archduke wants a sensational public case of
treason that will unify the Empire against a common enemy. When Redl's
first victim, a Hungarian nobleman, backfires on him, a plot is hatched
to make him look like a spy for the Russians.
Based on a play by John Osborne, the movie shows Redl as a Kafkaesque
anti-hero, an innocent man caught in the paralysing, faceless world of
bureaucracy, unable to extricate himself from it because it operates
under an incomprehensible logic. It's a far cry from the real Redl,
though, who was blackmailed by Russians into spying for them lest his
homosexuality be exposed. I'm not one to judge quality by historical
faithfulness, but I can't help thinking Redl's real story could make an
equally remarkable movie one day.
The movie is consistently interesting, although it develops slowly,
covering many years in Redl's life, from childhood to adulthood.
Brandauer plays a cold, reserved, callous man who nevertheless draws
sympathy for his devotion and work ethic. Although the viewer is left
wondering whether Redl didn't just waste his life being too loyal to
the Emperor, it is impossible not to feel sorry for him when the Empire
he lives for betrays him.
Armin Mueller-Stahl's performance as the Archduke isn't less
spectacular. Showing ruthlessness, control and a sharp mind, this
political strategist does what he has to do to keep the Empire
together.
Although the facts are fictionalised, the movie shows Szabó's eye for
historical details and no scene fails to produce wonder at the way a
dress or piece of furniture looks or at the magnificence of the
historical sites used for locations.
István Szabó and Klaus Maria Brandauer don't get enough credit
nowadays, but in the '80s they were an unstoppable duo and Colonel Redl
is one of their masterpieces.
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Szabo's unique revisionist vision, 24 November 2006
![]()
Author:
faraaj-1 (faraajqureshi2401@gmail.com) from Sydney, Australia
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I believe Colonel Redl to be Istvan Szabo's best film, a few degrees
better than his more celebrated collaboration with the great Brandauer,
Mephisto. Redl is in fact the middle part of a trilogy made by
Hungarian director Szabo and starring Klaus Maria Brandauer in the
title roles. Colonel Redl is a revisionist view of the events
surrounding the downfall and eventual suicide of Austro-Hungarian
counter-intelligence chief Colonel Redl during the early months of
WW-I.
Redl was of mixed Ukrainian-Hungarian stock but rose impressively
through the ranks of the Austro-Hungarian despite his Jewish ancestry
and non-aristocratic background. Redl revolutionized Austro-Hungarian
espionage and was eventually succeeded by his subordinate Maximilian
Ronge. Shortly thereafter, in a spy operation worthy of a Hitchcock
film, Redl was found to have been secretly spying for the Russians and
had given them considerable information on Russian spies, and more
damagingly, the plans for the disastrous attack on Serbia. He committed
suicide shortly shortly thereafter and it was revealed that he was a
homosexual who was being blackmailed by the Russians.
Szabo's film has a revisionist view on the entire affair and its a film
steeped in the politics of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Redl comes out
as perhaps the most patriotic man left in the Empire who had to be a
fall guy to set an example for the army. His homosexuality, while
broached, is not the central theme of the film. The first and most
noticeable thing about the film is the superb use of locations. A lot
of time seems to have been invested in sourcing the best locations and
the authenticity of period detail makes this an instant classic.
Then there is Brandauer's performance as Redl. His Redl is similar to
Mephisto in his blind ambition and loyalty to self. But there is a
great change in the acting. Where in Mephisto he was pure energy and
physicality, here he is a restrained Army officer and acts the part
perfectly. Brandauer is one of the most talented actors of the
twentieth century - the German Olivier - and the DVD extra has an
interview with him that is very interesting. His view is that acting on
stage requires a lot of ability and understanding. However, a person
from any background can act in film because it requires no skill and
isn't challenging. That is why he avoids working in films. Only an
actor with his obvious ability could have the nerve to say such a
thing!
Szabo has obvious strengths in extracting brilliant performances from
all actors. He is also very good at handling epic, historic subjects in
an intelligent manner, concentrating on the period and political themes
rather than cheap spectacle. What I found to be his weakness in this
film and Mephisto are a poor background score. The music just doesn't
blend well with the action. Also, his narrative is typically choppy and
the editing is poor as always. Without these weaknesses, I would
certainly have rated Redl 10 out of 10.
NB: There is an autobiographical scene from Szabo's youth towards the
beginning of Redl where he saves his own and his best friends skin by
informing on fellow cadets. On 26 Jan 2006, the Hungarian weekly 'Life
and Literature' revealed that Szabo has worked as an informant of the
Communist authorities after the 1956 Hungarian uprising and made
reports on classmates in University.
4 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Muddled History, Great Cinema, 13 March 2008
![]()
Author:
kayaker36 from Queens, NY
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Does Brandauer overact as one commenter has charged? At some parts of
this brilliant, enigmatic film it could be argued that he does. But
some histrionics might be expected from a man alone in a room who has
been ordered to shoot himself and be quick about it.
This is as much a political movie as a biographical one. It takes many
liberties with the historical record. The generally accepted version is
that Alfred Redl was being blackmailed by the Russian secret service
which had learned of his homosexuality. There are NO Russians in this
movie. That Redl was homosexual is only obliquely stated until the
final thirty minutes. Indeed, before that he has relations with several
women: a Vienna prostitute who acts the Happy Hooker indeed and the
(married) sister of a fellow officer.
In this film the poor performance of the Austrian armies in World War I
is explained by an officer corps more concerned with drinking, card
playing and skirt chasing than with military matters. Redl's handing
over to his Russian controllers the troop dispositions for the Austrian
armies is generally believed to be the cause of the losses during the
opening stage of the War.
The doomed Archduke Franz Ferdinand's only fault supposedly was that he
lacked charm. Here the veteran German actor Mueller-Stahl portrays the
**Thronfolger** as a political schemer, a shabby little man (he always
appears unshaven) trying to hold the Monarchy together through
trumped-up conspiracies and the playing off of one nationality against
another.
What this picture does best is portray the hollow grandeur of Habsburg
Austria during its final years. The sets are magnificent. In one
telling scene early in the picture, the boy Alfred, invited to an
aristocratic home, spills some coffee and **four** servants come to
clean up the spill.
One minor quibble: this German-language movie is set in the Austrian
Empire, much of it in Vienna the capital, yet no one sounds Austrian.
The accent is very different from High German (Americans may compare
Kissinger and Schwartzenegger). It would be like "Gone With the Wind"
with all the Southerners speaking a kind of Oxford English.
5 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
COLONEL REDL (Istvan Szabo, 1985) ***, 22 March 2006
![]()
Author:
MARIO GAUCI (marrod@melita.com) from Naxxar, Malta
The second of director Istvan Szabo's collaborations with actor Klaus Maria Brandauer (I have also watched the first, MEPHISTO [1981, but not the third, HANUSSEN [1988]) is a well-mounted and stately production, typically meticulous and thought-provoking, highlighting the actor's towering leading performance. Once again examining the country's history at the time of a major upheaval (the eve of WWI) and with Brandauer - very ably inhabiting every facet of his complex role - giving another subtle, compelling portrayal of misjudged pride and the shameful exposure (thankfully, the homosexual angle of the plot is barely stressed) at the hands of the regime he had devoted his life to serving.
13 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
Sure, they START fluffy!, 26 December 2005
Author:
(futures@exis.net) from Ronn Ives/FUTURES Antiques, Norfolk, VA.
"Colonel Redl" (German, 1984): Starring Klaus Marie Brandauer, directed by Istvan Szabo. This is the second film of a trilogy. (The first, "Mephisto", the third, "Hanussen" I do not own, but will try to find for rental.) Here we are in Germany again, but before WWI. A young man decides that the only way to raise himself from his peasant roots is to enter the aristocratic military world and is willing to do anything to get in, stay in, and advance in. This he does, but there's always The Price. He slowly loses those things and people which held any meaning or joy for him. He finds himself an amateur in a world that is completely Darwinian, and long-practiced in the art of manipulation. Like "Mephisto", the ladder climber seems to reach spectacular heights, only to be tossed down when it most serves those who were never out of control. These films of Szabo start light, start fluffy, and slowly change into foreboding, evil, hopeless stories with NO optimism towards the human spirit, organized groups of humans, or Time being a teacher. They are very insightful essays on these subjects.
3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
There is no such thing as being TOO paranoid., 5 September 2007
![]()
Author:
Robert J. Maxwell (rmax304823@yahoo.com) from Deming, New Mexico, USA
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
The film traces the military and romantic careers of Colonel Alfred
Redl from his humble beginnings, through a military academy, into the
Austro-Hungarian army, to the guileful environment of high political
intrigue, to his ultimate altruistic suicide in 1913. It's supposedly
based on a true story but since so little seems to be known about the
true story, the epistemology of the plot is questionable. Nobody really
knows what happened.
Brandauer delivers a remarkable performance, displaying great range,
especially for a man with a face of such ordinariness. He looks like a
guy who should be managing the produce section of a supermarket. Yet
for all the talent of Brandauer and director Szabo, we don't get to
know too much about what's going on inside Colonel Redl's head. The
role doesn't give him a chance to pour out his soul to anyone, and,
indeed, it's improbably that the real Redl would have done any such
thing. His marriage, to a good-looking babe who loved him, was a matter
of convenience. His friendships with his colleagues was constrained out
of necessity because of Redl's latent homosexuality and because, after
all, real men don't talk about their feelings -- they blow their brains
out, but they don't talk about their feelings. Example: How does Redl
feel about his early youth in the provinces? Well, while passing
through his home town, he instructs the driver to pass the old house in
which he spent his childhood, and he rubs a vacancy in the frosted
window so that he can stare at it without expression for about five
seconds. What's going on? What wheels and gears are turning in his
memory, if any? It's anyone's guess.
Nice score. Nice period decor and wardrobe. Nice performances from the
other players, especially Armin Mueller-Stahl as ruthless Archduke
Franz Ferdinand. He has such handsomely clear blue eyes, and he's soft
spoken, reasonable, and as treacherous as a rattlesnake. Not that it
does him much good, if you remember what started World War I. Elegant
music -- Strauss and Chopin. Great marches, full of traps and whistling
piccolos and irony. Makes you want to become an officer in the army in
1913 so you can shoot yourself.
The film is paced kind of slowly and the intrigue is never overstated,
so a certain amount of patience and attention is required. If anyone
has a mind adjusted to the lightning-fast editing of a modern action
movie, he's unlikely to find this film satisfying. The rest of us will
find it interesting and, in the end, rather tragic.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| External reviews | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |