| Index | 2 reviews in total |
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Love, death and betrayal, 5 November 2006
![]()
Author:
adamblake77 from London, England
This is a subtle and understated film about big subjects: what
constitutes betrayal and weakness in the way the living deal with the
legacy of the dead. It's also a true story. The noted New Zealand
writer Katherine Mansfield died of tuberculosis at the age of 33. Just
before she died she wrote to her husband, John Middleton-Murray, and
named him her literary executor. In the letter she instructed him in no
uncertain terms to destroy as many of her papers as possible and to
publish as few as possible. He ignored her instructions, destroyed
none, and published virtually all. In doing this he secured himself a
comfortable living in royalties from Mansfield's estate until his death
some thirty five years later. His excuse and justification was that, in
acting as he did, he gained posthumous fame and recognition for his
dead wife's writings and that this would have satisfied her desire to
be considered a great writer. The fact that she was a great writer
anyway is undoubtedly clearer now with the benefit of hindsight than it
was then, and it's easy to castigate Murray for being greedy and
disingenuous. But he does have a point: He did succeed in focusing
attention on her work at a time when it might well have otherwise been
forgotten or ignored.
But in creating a "cult of Katherine", and portraying her as a needy,
sickly, crushed violet of a woman, he did the true Katherine a grave
disservice. As this film points out: "she was tough, and funny." The
point of this film is to explore these issues and to dramatise them. In
this it succeeds admirably. John Gielgud gives a typically marvellous
performance as an ageing weakling troubled by a guilty conscience. Jane
Birkin is hardly in his league but she holds her own perfectly
adequately. The direction is taut and the script is excellent. It all
looks so perfectly chocolate box that the image of a vengeful,
tubercular ghost bearing down on Murray is all the more shocking when
it occurs. Similarly, the scenes of Mansfield alone in a string of
cheap hotels coughing up her lungs are delivered without sensationalism
or sentimentality - and are all the more effective for this.
For admirers of Katherine Mansfield, this film is an absolute feast but
that doesn't mean that it is irrelevant to anyone else. If you admire
fine acting, a good script and an original story about a genuine
ethical dilemma, then this film will engage you on all those levels.
Too bad it's so unavailable. I taped it off the television in the
1980's. I have made a DVD of my tape but it's not very good quality.
It's absurd that such a fine Gielgud performance should languish
unseen. Track it down if you can.
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Far from Everyone's cup of tea, 16 May 2004
Author:
Nicholas Rhodes from Ile-de-France / Paris Region, France
Much of this film was made at the Moulin d'Andé, a watermill on a loop of the Seine River not far from Vernon, in upper Normandy, France. Today this Watermill is a cultural centre with classical music concerts from all over the world as well as other cultural manifestations. The spot being pretty idyllic, this brings some relief from an otherwise flat and relatively uninteresting story. Only the true fans of Katherine Mansfield will derive some pleasure from viewing this film ; for those people who have never heard of her, the film will have little significance and they will have to make to with a series of beautiful sets. As far as I know, the film can only be purchased from video companies in New Zealand.
| Plot summary | Ratings | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |