Prequel to the first Missing In Action, set in the early 1980s it shows the capture of Colonel Braddock during the Vietnam war in the 1970s, and his captivity with other American POWs in a brutal prison camp, and his plans to escape.
Colonel James Braddock is an American officer who spent seven years in a North Vietnamese POW camp, then escaped 10 years ago. After the bloodiest war, Braddock accompanies a government ... See full summary »
Colonel James Braddock has a Vietnamese wife who was supposed to leave Vietnam with him when they evacuate. But she loses her papers and wasn't allowed in the embassy. Braddock went looking... See full summary »
Roland Harrah III
The archetypical renegade Texas Ranger wages war against a drug kingpin with automatic weapons, his wits and martial arts after a gun battle leaves his partner dead. All of this inevitably ... See full summary »
A 707 aircraft jetliner on its way from Athens to Rome and then to New York City is hijacked by Lebanese terrorists. The terrorists demand that the pilot take them to Beirut. What the ... See full summary »
After surviving an attempt on his life by his former partner, officer Cliff Garrett (Norris) exacts revenge on those who wronged him by going undercover as a hit man. He works to gain the ... See full summary »
A terrorist, Rostov, is planning to unleash a reign of terror on the U.S. but before he does he decides to go after, Matt Hunter, a former CIA agent, who lives in Florida, who once had Rostov's life in his hands but on orders took him alive, and now Rostov is plagued by nightmares of Hunter killing him. So Rostov goes after him but misses, so Hunter, who has already been approached by his former employers to go after Rostov, after initially turning down the job, cuase he believed that they should have let him terminate Rostov when he had the chance, decides to go after him. But he is only one man and Rostov has hundreds of men ripping the country apart, so how will he stop it. Written by
saw this back in my navy days while stationed in san diego. i think it pumped alot of the military up. sure it had bad acting
and a very far fetched plot(a small army of commie terrorists invade miami florida and start blowing up houses). I mean how did they think they were going to take over the US with an army of about 1,000 men.
But that aside i love watching chuck blow em away anyway, i see these movies for the action not the acting.Only thing that I dont like about some chuck norris movies are scenes which have nothing to do with the plot and this movie has those too.A few scenes involving rostov had nothing to do with the plot
Like Rostov meeting with a drug dealer for some unknown reason and then after completing the deal he kills the guy and a chick who was snorting coke gets shoved and the tube gets rammed up her nose,I guess Rostov didnt like her screaming so he ends up tossing her ass out the window and watches her do a swan dive 20 stories. What did this have to do with the plot? . the plot. Oh well, still fun to watch chuck kick ass ...
19 of 30 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?