Down 6,766 this week

Détective (1985)

 -  Comedy | Crime | Drama  -  23 August 1985 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.2/10 from 998 users  
Reviews: 15 user | 9 critic

In a palace of Paris. Two detectives are investigating a two-year-old murder. Emile and Francoise Chenal are putting pressure on Jim Fox Warner, a boxing manager, who owes them a huge ... See full summary »



(screenplay), (screenplay), 3 more credits »
0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 25 titles
created 12 Jun 2011
a list of 44 titles
created 21 Apr 2012
a list of 29 titles
created 17 Jan 2013
a list of 28 titles
created 9 months ago
a list of 49 titles
created 1 month ago

Related Items

Search for "Détective" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Détective (1985)

Détective (1985) on IMDb 6.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Détective.
2 wins & 1 nomination. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  
Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Alain Delon, Domiziana Giordano, Jacques Dacqmine
Oh, Woe Is Me (1993)
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

Romance about Simon Donnadieu and his decision to leave his ever-loving wife Rachel.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Gérard Depardieu, Laurence Masliah, Bernard Verley
Comedy | Drama | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  
Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Jane Birkin, Dominique Lavanant, Pauline Lafont
Documentary | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

Godard, Miéville and Gorin (aka the "Dziga Vertov Group") examine the parallel lives of two families - one French, one Palestinian - using an exploratory combination of film and video.

Directors: Jean-Luc Godard, Jean-Pierre Gorin, and 2 more credits »
Stars: Jean-Luc Godard
La Chinoise (1967)
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

A small group of French students are studying Mao, trying to find out their position in the world and how to change the world to a Maoistic community using terrorism.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Anne Wiazemsky, Jean-Pierre Léaud, Juliet Berto
Made in U.S.A (1966)
Comedy | Crime | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

Set in the near future, Paula, a leftist writer, goes from Paris to the French town of Atlantic-Cité when she learns of the death of a former colleague and lover, Richard P. Is she there to... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Anna Karina, László Szabó, Jean-Pierre Léaud
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  

Charlotte is young and modern, not a hair out of place, superficial, cool; she reads fashion magazines - does she have the perfect bust? She lives in a Paris suburb with her son and her ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Bernard Noël, Macha Méril, Philippe Leroy
War | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

During the Algerian war for independence from France, a young Frenchman living in Geneva who belongs to a right-wing terrorist group and a young woman who belongs to a left-wing terrorist ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Anna Karina, Michel Subor, Henri-Jacques Huet
Thriller | Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

Chris, a sexy teenager who appears mostly bare-breasted on the French Riviera, has a crush on Romain, her mother's lover. In reaction to her inability to attract his attention, she experiments with other risque affairs.

Director: Christopher Frank
Stars: Bernard Giraudeau, Valérie Kaprisky, Caroline Cellier
Cours privé (1986)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.3/10 X  
Director: Pierre Granier-Deferre
Stars: Élisabeth Bourgine, Michel Aumont, Xavier Deluc
Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

In Godard and Gorin's free interpretation of the Chicago Eight trial, Judge Hoffman becomes Judge Himmler (who doodles notes on Playboy centerfolds), the Chicago Eight become microcosms of ... See full summary »

Directors: Groupe Dziga Vertov, Jean-Luc Godard, and 1 more credit »
Stars: Yves Afonso, Juliet Berto, Jean-Luc Godard
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

The film reveals how and why a supposedly revolutionary Italian girl has in fact fallen prey to bourgeois ideology.

Directors: Groupe Dziga Vertov, Jean-Luc Godard, and 1 more credit »
Stars: Cristiana Tullio-Altan, Paolo Pozzesi, Jerome Hinstin


Cast overview, first billed only:
Laurent Terzieff ...
William Prospero
Aurelle Doazan ...
Inspector Neveu
Françoise Chenal
Claude Brasseur ...
Emile Chenal
Alain Cuny ...
Old Mafioso
Xavier Saint-Macary ...
Pierre Bertin ...
Young Son
Alexandra Garijo ...
Young Daughter
Stéphane Ferrara ...
Tiger Jones
Eugène Berthier ...
Old manager
Wise young girl
Cyrille Dajinckourt ...
La fille


In a palace of Paris. Two detectives are investigating a two-year-old murder. Emile and Francoise Chenal are putting pressure on Jim Fox Warner, a boxing manager, who owes them a huge amount of money. But Jim also owes money to the Mafia, and it seems the boxing match he is counting on to bail out will not be sufficient... Written by Yepok

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Comedy | Crime | Drama


Unrated | See all certifications »





| |

Release Date:

23 August 1985 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Detective  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

,  »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:


See  »

Did You Know?


Film debut of Julie Delpy. See more »


Tiger Jones: Tiger Jones - - I'll knock him out!
Françoise Chenal: Isn't he Tiger Jones?
Jim Fox Warner: Yeah, but a champion always fights himself.
See more »


Referenced in O Cinema Falado (1986) See more »


Written by Richard Wagner
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Excellent; one of Godard's most playful, rewarding and radical experiments in genre and design
26 June 2008 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

THEME: A murder in a hotel room. Who was killed and why? And by who? Is it past or present? And does it even matter? Three characters are detectives watching the story unfold and interacting with it, much like we, the audience. They piece together the clues to a story that eventually becomes their own; folding between the facts of a crime committed two years ago that repeats itself within the film and eventually leads both us and them towards the actions of the film's final act. It's subtle, but presented in Godard's typical style that many seem to have a problem with. DECONSTRUCTION #1: Here we have a detective film about detective films and about the relationship in such films between the characters and the audience. So we have ourselves represented by Laurent Terzieff, Aurelle Doazan and Jean-Pierre Léaud, who hide out in a cramped hotel room and observe the entrance of the building with the aid of small video camera which presents the image back again on a TV monitor.

CINEMA: If you're familiar with Godard's work then such devises should be recognisable, with the film using the clichés of detective cinema as window-dressing to express greater themes on the notions of relationships, as well as the role of cinema itself. We also have the self-referential aspect suggested by the opening shot, in which the scene that we are looking at and hear commentary on turns out to be something that has already happened, played back from the detective's surveillance video. We also have the notion of film as a background cacophony, with a number of scenes taking place in rooms where television sets conspire to distract us from the action at hand. DECONSTRUCTION #2: Three characters caught up in the clichés of a post-war crime picture, with a secondary plot about money and a farcical plan from both sides to double-cross the Mafia and each other. Does it matter? Yes and no. I disagree with the first reviewer who claims that this film is something of a throwaway in Godard's career; one that puts formal experimentation over content and theme. The plot is silly, but it's silly for a reason and goes back to Godard's earliest film, À bout de soufflé (1960), in which he played with the codes and conventions of American gangster cinema in a way that was progressive and entirely deconstructive.

ACTEURS: The film works as a result of the perfect casting. In fact, I'd say that the acting in this film is far better than any other film of Godard's that I have seen, and I've seen 25 of them. Léaud is obviously something of a regular in the films of Godard and his manic energy and uncomplicated air of boyish precociousness as this mysterious detective - trying to piece together a murder that may have happened or may be about to happen - is as bright as it was in films like Masculin, féminin (1966) and La Chinoise (1967). Likewise, Nathalie Baye, familiar from the director's earlier, more experimental feature Sauve qui peut (la vie) (1980) gives one of her best performances as a despondent housewife caught between two men as she tries to retrieve money to start a new life, but remains unsure of which man to draw allegiance to. The two men are boxing promoter and American cinema construct Johnny Hallyday, who breezes through the film chain-smoking and shooting pool as gangsters and cops threaten his plans from both sides, and Claude Brasseur, a pilot and the husband of Baye's character, once again, desperate to play both sides off against one another for the benefit of financial gain.

DECONSTRUCTION #3: Once again, we have Godard reducing the characters to meagre iconographic constructs that are placed in a knowingly cinematic environment that is continually challenged by the director's experimentations with content and form. Despite this however, the characters remain likable, intelligent and recognisable, with the convincing performances from the incredibly talented cast managing to compete with the cold, deconstructive formality that Godard strives for in his presentation. L'ARGENT: A film made for financial gain about financial gain, or at least, the promise of such. According to film critic Colin McCabe, Détective (1985) was produced as a favour to Alain Sarde so as to secure the funding for the director's dream project - the subsequent 'Je vous salue, Marie' (1985) - and this notion of desperation, and the wanton pursuit of money is almost self-referential in design. CRITIQUE: I honestly can't understand why so many admirers of Godard's work found this film disengaging. If you're already familiar with Godard's characteristic approach to cinema, then half of the work is already done. For me, the film was rich in character and ideas, and intelligently put together in a way that made the viewing of the film interesting and unique.

GODARD: Many would have you believe that Godard peaked in 1967, but this simply isn't the case. He's produced many fine films - Détective included - that require patience and perception on the part of the audience, and all released post-1980. This particular film might be considered a throwaway work by many Godard fans, but I would politely disagree. Like his best work, Détective is filled with ideas and a sharp commentary on the nature of cinema and the relationship between the director, the film, the characters and the audience. It does take work, but I feel that the work is worth it when we're dealing with something as interesting and progressive as this; with Godard throwing in all sorts of little jokes and observations (the detective as Prospero, aided by a character named Ariel, and with Léaud as the comic personification of Caliban, who eventually overcomes his master), whilst simultaneously turning in one of his most radical and well-rounded deconstructions on the nature of film and film viewing.

6 of 10 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Which one of the young girls was Julie Delpy? Dr_Keating
Who was the director shown in the old footage towards the end? Stevenzzz
Discuss Détective (1985) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: