| Index | 10 reviews in total |
10 out of 11 people found the following review useful:
An Evil Man Who One Could Occasionally Empathize With, 17 March 2005
Author:
theowinthrop from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
There is a very good chance that if Benito Mussolini had been a trifle
more conservative and less egocentric he might have died in power in
Rome some time in the 1950s, leaving the running of Fascist Italy in
his surviving son's hands. He would have been somewhat like his
opposite number in Spain, Francisco Franco, who died still running
Spain in the 1970s. But Franco was lucky - his country was too weak to
give military assistance to a demanding Adolf Hitler after it's bloody
civil war, and Franco's Spain was across the Pyranees from the nearest
German troops in France. Italy did have the Alps between it and
Germany, but after 1938 the Austrian Anschluss brought the Germans to
the border of Italy. Mussolini would have been forced to give a
pro-Nazi neutrality to Hitler.
But Mussolini would have only himself to blame for what happened. He
had far too grandiose ideas for his country. Italy was a cultural hub
in Europe. In terms of real military power it was nothing. It's heyday
of military power was in the Roman Empire. There was a momentary change
in the 1860s under Garibaldi's army, but they were fighting to unite
Italy. After 1870 the Italian army became a joke again - in 1896 it
achieved an unenviable status in European history as the first colonial
power to be defeated totally in a war by a "third world" country
(Abyssinia - modern Ethiopia).
This situation continued in World War I where greed for territory made
the Italians join the Allies. They proceeded to lose battles for nearly
two years. So despised were they by their French, British, and American
Allies, that when they walked out of the Versailles conference the
three others ignored them until they came back on their own.
Mussolini came to public attention at this time, and he had larger
international support than certain people later wanted to admit.
Italian politics was pretty corrupt, and many non-Italians (like Austin
Chamberlain and Winston Churchill and George Bernard Shaw) actually
admired Mussolini as the strong man who would shake Italy into it's
proper position in the world. To an extent they were not wrong.
Mussolini did some repair work on the effectiveness of Italian life
(the phrase was, "he made the trains run on time"). With the aid of
some associates, his son-in-law Count Ciano and Air Marshall Balbo, he
improved the aviation industry and Italian diplomacy. He also would
demonstrate some wisdom - he would be the first person to question the
business honesty of Ivar Krueger, the crooked Swedish "Match King".
But he was ruthless suppressing dissent - he did arrange the murder of
Matteotti, the Socialist politician, in 1924. It almost caused his
regime to fall, but he was able (barely) to weather it. He kept
confronting Balkan states over territories that he felt were Italian by
right. His belligerence would continue over the years. Sometimes the
effect was actually not so bad: When Austria was nearly toppled by a
Nazi coup in 1934, Mussolini sent his tanks to the Austrian border as a
warning to Hitler not to move. It worked (the only time Hitler blinked
in the 1930s). Mussolini, to his credit, tried to continue this policy
with British and French support, but those two countries failed to take
him up on it. After he was roundly condemned in 1935 for invading
Ethiopia (and so avenge the 1896 humiliation), he found more in common
with Hitler, and this basically doomed him.
Italy's military ineptitude kept making it's allegiance a millstone
around the neck of whoever was "lucky" enough to join them. Besides
Ethiopia, Mussolini invaded Albania and Yugoslavia (and it helped delay
the Nazi invasion of Russia in 1941, thus helping bring about the
defeat of the Nazi invasion). The Italian navy was smashed at Taranto
by the British air force (an attack the Japanese noted, and used as a
model for the attack on Pearl Harbor). The African colonies fell to
British troops (alleviating some of the gloom of the British defeats of
1940-42). In 1943 Mussolini was overthrown in a palace coup. By 1944 he
was freed by Otto Skorzeny, Hitler's favorite special agent, and set up
in northern Italy as head of "The Republic of Salo". It was a temporary
success for Il Duce. When the Nazis fell, so did he. Instead of that
image I suggested at the start, he died in April 1945, shot by
partisans, and hung upside down in a square in Milan.
This film does point out some favorable or partly favorable aspects to
Il Duce. He did stimulate the country (far more than most of the
politicians of the teens and twenties). He had mistresses, but he was a
family man, with a daughter and two sons (one of whom was killed in
Ethiopia). His daughter loved Ciano, and when the Count was involved in
the palace coup (and subsequently captured by the Nazis), Mussolini did
not interfere with his execution. Raul Julia does very well with his
performance as Ciano, a weak man who gradually found he had to speak
out (in his posthumous diaries) about the evils he saw. And in showing
the emotional turmoil that Il Duce faced, George C. Scott does open up
some sympathy for the dictator - but not much. His daughter never
forgave him for not saving her husband.
I think the thing about Il Duce is that no matter how much evil he did,
and how many people he killed, he was a family man. Hitler was not, and
Stalin barely was. So he seems slightly more approachable to us than
the others. It does not excuse his evil, but it slightly waters it
down. This series managed to do this quite well.
6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Big Screen Impact, 28 June 1999
Author:
Red"V"
If you can find this anywhere, watch it. An excellent cast, featuring George C. Scott and Raul Julia, propel this engaging and often historically-accurate tale of one of the Twentieth Century's most influential men. Memorable production values.
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Raul Julia was marvelous, 9 November 2003
![]()
Author:
Gatto from Berkeley, CA
This miniseries has stayed with me long after I saw it. I was thinking about actors who never got rid of their local accents but were still great actors. Raul Julia was one of them. He could have played Count Ciano way over the top here, but he didn't. Yet he was so moving as Mussolini's conniving, but very human son-in-law. I hope you're doing well wherever you are, Raul.
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Great Film, 12 July 1999
Author:
Raynedog from Tennessee, USA
If you are lucky enough to be able to locate this film, it is well worth
the effort.
I found it accurate (to a point) and one of George C. Scott's greatest
works. This film did not receive the acclaim it should have. It must be seen
to be appreciated.
3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
This Is A Five & a Half Hour Program and Not Seven, 7 July 2007
Author:
Andrew from United Kingdom
Although it says here it is a seven hour title, I disagree. I recorded
the series when it was broadcast in 1985/6, in the USA on a Betamax
system, and it was five and half hours long.
I also recorded it in 1989 here in the UK on a VHS system.
The DVD is exactly the same running time today and is exactly the same
program scene by scene.
Unless it was drastically cut by one and half hours before it was
originally broadcast,I cannot see how it was seven hours long.
All three programs are exactly the same running length.
This does not detract from the program which I think is an excellent
portrayal of a man who was corrupt, immoral, and blinded by his own
power and ideology.
The acting by George C Scott and Raul Julia is superb,who demonstrate
the differences between the two men.
Although not always historically accurate, it does provoke thought
about WWII not just from the usual UK/USA & Germany angle, but to the
situation in Italy which was still only a country 50 years old and full
of conflict after the results of the 1st world war.
I would recommend this to any person interested in a different aspect
to troubled period.
3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
George C Scott triumphs as Ill Duce, 23 September 2006
![]()
Author:
lord woodburry (deanofrpps@aol.com) from The Society NY
Duce - Duce - Duce the crowd screams as the little giant struts out to
give the faithful a tough face. George C Scott best known for playing
the invincible George Patton on the silver screen has the mannerisms
and the facial expressions of the sawdust caeaser who led Italy into a
disastrous war and brought about his own downfall.
One of histories great ironies lies in this: Had the Deuce avoided WWII
which the Germans really didn't want him involved in anyway, he might
have had the acclaim for glory that he vaingloriously sought.
The film presents with a degree of historical accuracy the terrible end
to which Italy and its Deuce came as a result of the quest for glory.
It comes as a shock that the Anglo-Americans would bomb Rome. Count
Ciano lolling on the beach at Lido as the flying fortresses zoom over
exclaims, "The Pope lives here." This film is an excellent warning for
our time which has produced a new pied-piper. This one claims to
personally talk to God. The Deuce at least had the good graces to be an
atheist.
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Well worth the time, 26 June 2009
![]()
Author:
Grann-Bach (Grann-Bach@jubii.dk) from Denmark
This review is based on the DVD release that has it on two double-sided discs, and comes with no extras. I do not know much about the real events, so I can't say if this is an accurate account or not. This takes us through over two decades, starting in 1922. It is a tale of love and hate, rise and fall, life and death. From the very beginning to the ending... a well-chosen and memorable final image... this is engaging. The plot is good and well-written, as is the dialog. This is excellent, in the way of its characters... thoroughly developed, credible, and it doesn't try to include a greater amount than it can do justice to. Most of the drama comes from the interactions and relationships, not from the visuals. The acting is all marvelous, and the roles are well-cast. Downey Jr. is instantly accepted as the young and energetic Bruno, Byrne as the more serious Vittorio, Mastrantonio as the strong-willed Edda, Julia is charming as ever as Galeazzo, and last but by no means least, C. Scott adds tremendous depth to the part of Benito himself, in his portrayal. The score is fitting. This has nice cinematography and editing, if neither are beyond what we've seen from other mini-series. It was an interesting choice to cut in actual footage from the time. Of course, you can tell, still, it's reasonably well added in. In spite of what the cover and this site both suggest, this is about five hours and twenty minutes long... I suppose the other count is with commercials. The violence is not excessive or graphic. Sexuality is tasteful and not gratuitous. Language is infrequent. This has disturbing content, and is not for children. I recommend this to anyone who wants a presentation of the history of Mussolini, the man and the family, in the time before, during, and until the end of, the second World War. 7/10
An Italian American's Perspective, 11 August 2010
![]()
Author:
Joseph Brown (captainjosephbrown@gmail.com) from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Being a descendant of a Black shirt, I felt compelled to watch this film. I was pleasantly surprised, at how the movie made me feel. After further research about IL Duce I see that Mussolini was a good man on the side of tyrants whose legacy will be forever tainted because of a poor choice in allies. This movie tells of Mussolini's life from the point of the "March on Rome". The movie gives us a picture of Mussolini behind the propaganda. We see him interact with his wife and children and we get to see the life of Il duce close up. My favorite scene is when Benito fires the train conductor for being over three hours late, with the line, "Finished you will never work here again." I also loved how the movie showed Mussolini's unfortunate fall from being the strong man of Italy to a mere puppet of a Nazi puppeteer. I found this piece to be very accurate minus the ridiculous rape scene, which I found out never occurred and in some versions of this movie was cut out. I give 10/10 excellent Saluto Il Duce and to hell with Hitler!
3 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
true account not revisionist son was there need a copy vhs, 10 April 2004
![]()
Author:
(lmoll1@netzero.com) from maryland
a pity more credit not given this was an excellent true account a george c scott was great. war is tragic but after knowing 10 people in close circle of the truth vittorio mussolini version is accurate. raul giulia gabriel byrne lee remick are the best one can only hope to see this on vhs but i believe no copy exsists since a bias against this film is everywhere.George c scott was one of the best character actors and he more of the biographical truth type (patton)he would not do a portrayal that is false.Lee Remick is as serious as they come and in this film most who knew the duce's wife would say it is 99% accurate anyone who can get a copy (vhs) would have an excellent piece of history and those who were on the world stage changed the world as the moment and for centuries to come
1 out of 35 people found the following review useful:
difficult to watch, 19 July 2005
![]()
Author:
planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
It is not surprising that the life of Il Duce is depressing and awful--he was a brutal, evil little man after all. However, after watching it I was kind of wondering WHO the intended audience was. After all, you might have noticed that many of the worst monsters of the 20th century have been so rarely portrayed on film. While there have been a few films that talk about Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Idi Amin and Pot Pot, the lives of such evil men are rarely the sole focus of movies. Probably because the public has no interest in finding out about the real-life stories of these men--we ALL know they are scum! Instead, this has been more the domain of documentaries on the History Channel--and I think that's where these characters should remain. I don't want to see them humanized or explore their motivation (except perhaps in a psychological/sociological sense). And this is the heart of the problem with this movie. Benito Mussolini was scum--he cheated on his wife, was violent to those around him and was an inflated blow-hard. Not exactly something I want to see on the big screen or in a TV movie.
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |