6.0/10
152
14 user 2 critic

The House of God (1984)

R | | Comedy, Drama
Follow a group of interns in a large teaching hospital. When Jo, Chief Resident, has a breakdown the interns are reluctantly placed under the tutelage of the senior resident known as The ... See full summary »

Director:

Writers:

(based on the novel by) (as Samuel Shem M.D.), (screenplay)
Reviews
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
Fats (The Fatman)
Michael Sacks ...
...
...
...
...
...
Richard Brestoff ...
...
Kathryn Dowling ...
...
...
...
...
Edit

Storyline

Follow a group of interns in a large teaching hospital. When Jo, Chief Resident, has a breakdown the interns are reluctantly placed under the tutelage of the senior resident known as The Fatman. Like "M*A*S*H," "The Hospital" and "St. Elsewhere" (which is drawn from this story) this film is closer to the truth than the public wants to know. Written by Raymond Clay <banquosa@concentric.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Every year in July, 6,000 young Men and Women leave the comfort and safety of medical school confident in the knowledge that they will become interns in the greatest system of medical care in the History of the universe. Some actually survive.

Genres:

Comedy | Drama

Certificate:

R

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Also Known As:

Isten háza  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

(Technicolor)
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Never released theatrically; it debuted on cable TV. See more »

Goofs

The Fat Man refers to a bed position where the head of the bed is lower than the foot as "the Hindenburg." The proper term for this bed position is "Trendelenburg." See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

This house is condemned
1 May 2004 | by (Victoria, BC) – See all my reviews

United Artists never theatrically released this movie, often claimed because of the hectic going-ons at UA during the time of its completion (the studio was still recovering from HEAVEN'S GATE, the studio had been sold to MGM, and there was new management.) Looking at the completed movie itself, I think UA saw it being simply uncommercial, especially seeing how they also shelved it for several years. I've never read the book, but the movie is a mess. There's no real plot to speak of, the characters are barely sketched out, and things seemingly happen at random. In fact, a lot of scenes have a strong feeling of improvisation. The biggest sin the film makes is that the supposedly humorous moments simply aren't funny - and as you probably know, there's nothing worse than a comedy that isn't funny. Even the talented (and yet-to-be famous) cast can't do anything with the lame material.


2 of 5 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?