The Jewel in the Crown (TV Mini Series 1984) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
42 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A super soap
pekinman16 January 2005
It was brave of Yorkshire Television to take on a filmed adaptation of Paul Scott's massive novel 'The Jewel in the Crown'. All-in-all they did a good job of it. Wisely the script focuses in on the personal relationships within the context of a changing India. The jarring complexities of "old" India rubbing up against the modernizing influences of the British Raj is vividly conveyed, mostly in the smaller, quieter moments, as when Harry Kumar takes Daphne Manners to visit his aunt and the behavior of the servants and the Rajput princess with whom Daphne is living.

It's true that there is a great deal of dialog, in a soap opera-ish sense. There are times in some of the later episodes when I thought I was watching some bit of trash on TV on a Wednesday afternoon, but then I'd focus in on what the characters were saying and realize that it was deep and important stuff. You have to pay attention to 'The Jewel in the Crown' or it does indeed become a muddle and a bore. If you lose the train of thought you will not be rescued by brilliant cinematography or sound-track because both are inferior, which is a big shame. Perhaps it is the awful A&E dvds that are the problem, something that could be rectified with a remastering of the original films and sound- track. As it stands the sound is execrable, oftentimes the music and background rumble drowning out the speaking voices of the main characters. The musical score itself is wonderful and the actual camera-work is very good, which makes the loss of a good picture and decent sound-track all the more frustrating.

As for the acting, the thing is chocked-full of fine performances. Some of the characters are indeed a little too clichéd and, in the case of Ronald Merrick, completely over the top, but Merrick's character works, as a dramatic contrivance, to add to the melodrama of the story... something which may or may not have been the purpose of Scott's creation in the first place. But that's entertainment!

My favorite performances were Eric Portman's crafty old Russian emigré, Count Bronowsky. Porter was a great actor and is greatly missed. I savor his every appearance in 'The Jewel in the Crown' because he evokes the old Northern world of honor and good breeding, now extinct. His character makes me wish for a great film of the true story of the White Russians who had to flee the Bolsheviks in the first two decades of the 20th century, for such disparate places as India, Paris and Manchuria.

Susan Wooldridge is superb as Daphne Manners, ditto Art Malik as Harry Kumar. I enjoyed Charles Dance's upper-crust but manly Sergeant and found Derrick Branche's Ahmed Kasim a fascinating and seductive person. Peggy Ashcroft's old missionary lady is heart-breaking in the loss of her simple faith in God, conveying, in the end, a powerful and sibylline persona. It is good to see Rachel Kempson (Mrs Michael Redgrave) in one of her last roles on film. Tim Pigot-Smith manages to make an unbelievable character, Ronald Merrick, human, well, almost. He's a monster of bigotry, jealousy and class envy, and Pigot-Smith plays him so convincingly that it is difficult to imagine a more effective portrayal of pure evil by anyone else. Pigot-Smith steals the show, on the whole.

This TV series is definitely worth owning on DVD; if only A&E hadn't tossed it off in such a haphazard manner. Still, it's better 'n nuttin'.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Breathtaking, tragic, complex, exhilerating, mysterious...
patnet12 September 2002
...just as I imagine India during these "interesting times". The plot (greatly simplified here!) revolves about a number of English expatriots living in India at the time of the Raj and during the difficult struggle for independence. The acting is superb, particularly Peggy Ashcroft; and as in so many British productions, great care is taken to cast brilliant actors in even the smallest of roles.

The many characters' lives intersect in the most surprising ways, there are regular dollops of action and violence--this is riveting television! I remember receiving only a sound broadcast for one episode--no picture--and I sat by the screen for the full hour in rapt attention.

There is much to learn about human nature, both the dark and the joyful, and about the politics of imperialism, and about an awe-inspiring country and culture, from this beautifully crafted series. Highly recommended.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
excellent 1980s drama
didi-58 December 2005
This mammoth series does a beautiful job of bringing Paul Scott's novels 'The Raj Quartet' to the screen.

The scene is the period of time at the end of the British Raj, the characters are well drawn and believable (particularly Tim Pigott-Smith as the racist and intolerant Captain Merrick, a complex character, and Art Malik as the intellectual Indian Hari Kumar). Scott's novel was an engrossing read and 'Jewel' does it proud.

One of those series which goes in all sorts of different directions before it comes to its moving and surprising conclusion. One of the great pieces of British TV drama.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not a soap opera after all
m_white11 March 2000
The person who wrote the other review here dismays me. I loved The Jewel In The Crown and highly recommend it! I think it's a very skillful and successful adaptation for TV from fiction.

My own views about this series have changed -- from good to better. A few years ago, I rented it and watched it over a couple days. I thought it was very good, a haunting, tragic story very well done. I realize now that I watched it then very literally, very matter-of-fact, and saw it mostly as a straightforward series of events in the lives of these people trying to cope with the turmoil of the last days of the British in India. I viewed it mostly as a sort of soap opera.

Recently I read all four of the books from which this story was taken, and what an illumination! These novels are brilliant, and I'm stunned with admiration for the talent of the writer, Paul Scott. So after turning the last page, I hot-footed it down to my local video store and rented the whole shebang AGAIN -- and this time saw it as a giant allegory, laden with symbolism, foreshadowing, and irony. The acting is top notch across the board -- you won't find better -- and it's visually striking. There are scenes in this movie that I'll never forget, in the same way the characters are haunted by them.

Instead of a meandering and random soap opera, I saw how event built upon event, how characters affected one another, how chance meetings changed lives, how it all slouched inexorably towards the climax -- or anticlimax -- of the devastating conclusion.

I am amazed at the skillfulness of the screenplay -- to compress those four novels and all their layers of complexity into this TV series. It really is astonishing how the *intent* and *spirit* of the story is communicated... it's not bashing you over the head, but it's *implied*.

I love how the story does not spoon-feed you. I love how the characters don't make sense and we must puzzle them out for ourselves. We're left with a hundred questions about why they did what they did, and I will enjoy speculating about that for years to come. (If you like pat answers, steer clear of this one.)

I loved this series, I intend to buy the videos, and I highly recommend it.
97 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Interesting mini-series
sueann26 May 2001
I first saw The Jewel in the Crown while I was in college on video. I was quite drawn in by it. There are many fine performances in this piece including Susan Wooldridge (Daphne Manners), Art Malik (Hari Kumar), Tim Pigott-Smith (Merrick), Geraldine James (Sarah Layton), Judy Parfitt (Mildred Layton), Dame Peggy Ashcroft (Barbie Bachelor), and Charles Dance (Guy Peron). It is these performances which keep the piece moving in the "less interesting" parts.

In fact, I think it is the persona of Sarah Layton played by Geraldine James that makes the middle part of the series really go. She comes across as being quite likeable and reasonable living in a situation and time that is full of discord and chaos. Judy Parfitt is wonderful as her mother. And when Charles Dance enters the picture as Guy Peron..... well I had hoped that Sarah Layton would really just settle with Guy. The chemistry they have on screen was quite palpable.

The series can be a bit stiff and starchy which is fitting considering the subject matter and the characters. I really enjoyed the Daphne-Hari romance. More wonderful chemistry between the characters. The world was well painted as full of turmoil for the British Raj whose rule in India was ending during the chaos of WWII.

Definitely worth watching. I recommend this work highly.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Stunning Piece of Craftsmanship!
snu_grad12 January 2004
This miniseries is compelling, well-told, beautifully filmed, and superbly acted. With a powerfully moving script, it tells the story of the complex relationship between the British and Indian people at the end of British rule of the subcontinent. It has history, romance, action, mystery, and even a mild dose of sex and violence. ;-) It definitely has something for everyone.

I cried, laughed, was amazed, and said "Oh my God!" and "I knew it!" several times. I was glued to the screen and later watched my favorite scenes a second or third time.

Absolutely its only shortcoming was that there were no subtitles. Being as old as it is and with the many accents, it's sometimes a bit hard to make out the exact lines. But it's so easy to follow (yet never dull) that I was never lost. If A&E ever re-releases this with enhanced sound and subtitles, I'll snag it up in a New York minute! Even my husband (who normally hates British films) really enjoyed this. He hated to miss a minute; by Chapter 3, he was utterly hooked.

See this wonderful piece of work if you can. It's well worth every hour.
32 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A crowning jewel of a series....one to see before it is too late
inkblot1118 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Daphne Manners (Susan Wooldridge) is an orphan, having lost her father and brother in the early going of World War II. She travels to Mayapore, India to work in a local hospital and to visit her aunt who lives in a neighboring community. Unexpectedly, she meets Hari Kumar (Art Malik), an Indian gentleman who was raised in England from the age of two, at the best schools, but whose own father died and left him penniless. Although an alliance is strictly taboo at the time, the two of them fall in love. Soon after, Daphne is raped by hooligans and chief of police Ronald Merrick (Tim Pigott-Smith) wrongly arrests and tortures Kumar. With Gandhi already urging Indians to break away from Britain, the rape and bungled arrest serves as a lightning rod for acute trouble between the Brits and the Indian population. Meanwhile, Merrick becomes a rising star in the British army, two sisters, Sarah and Susan, search for personal happiness in the crumbling empire, a former missionary lady (Peggy Ashcroft) endures the loss of her greatest friend and, subsequently, her mind, because of prejudice, and Guy Perron (Charles Dance) becomes a witness to the lethal personality of Merrick. How will over "three hundred years" of British rule in India end? Did you say badly? This lengthy but outstanding series has really too many happenings to relate in a brief review. Yet, the relationship between Daphne and Hari is the springboard to everything else that occurs in this complex and lovely story. The British had, and still do have, much to offer the world as a civilization but its empire reached too far when it trampled under the basic rights of its conquered people and territories, as seen in this examination of India. All of the actors in this film are beyond compare, with Pigott-Smith a wonder as the evil and misguided police commander. The scenery is likewise breathtaking, the costumes are authentic to the times, and the cinematography is very beautiful. If you have any interest whatsoever in the history of the world, or in the basic struggle of the human race, you should make time for this monumental series, as soon as possible. It is a richly rewarding, touching and truthful look at a pivotal time in the history of mankind.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A unique classic
keith-61830 September 2020
Ignore the poor reviews. This is an exquisite piece of work, possibly the best British drama series ever. I have watched this five or six times since it was first aired in 1984 and every time it's fresh. The casting is impeccable. The TV series launched the careers of Charles Dance, Tim Pigott-Smith, Art Malik and Geraldine James but also featured established actors of the day such as Eric Porter, Judy Parfitt and the legendary Peggy Ashcroft. (The latter's performance is a master class in simple - or seemingly simple - truthful acting - our hearts bleed for her character, Barbie. Peggy Ashcroft preferred theatre so there is not that much of her recorded on film. This is the very best of her recorded work and should, and will be, treasured). Of course in 2020 when I'm writing this review we are now well used to extensive and beautifully made HBO TV series but in 1984 Jewel in the Crown at 13 episodes was a rarity. Brideshead Revisited was released three years earlier in 11 episodes but such productions were rare - we were used to 6 episodes at most. But Jewel in the Crown was a true gem. Somehow Ken Taylor for Granada TV managed to condense Paul Scott's Raj quartet of four lengthy novels into 13 one hour episodes and Christopher Morahan and Jim O'Brien directed the impeccable cast with perfect pace and care. The result is wonderful and captures the turbulent time in India's history perfectly. We learn so much of the troubles of India in the last few years of British rule. The series is presented as a composite of interlocking stories and characters revealing the collapse of the British Raj from 1942-1947 just prior to the independence of India. It also reveals the snobbery and sense of entitlement of the British which today makes us feel uncomfortable. Now with another lockdown looming I think it might be time to read the original novels.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best thing ever to appear on TV
bookish42-814-59178716 April 2015
I first read all the books which are just marvelous and then I saw the TV adaptation. Can't count the number of times I have watched it. Watched the series rebroadcast on local public TV station and then binge watched it all over again.

The characters are unforgettable and so very realistic. The line "there's nothing I can do" appears over and over again to portray the impossibility of standing in the way of the change about to come over India.

Scott did a superb job of portraying the Raj, the Muslims, the Hindus, the English air of superiority and the class system of the English, all the while depicting the end of the Raj and the beginning of the new India.

It is also a feast for the eyes, showing many beautiful locations in India and depicting the railroad travel of the day in a fascinating way.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absorbing, well-acted period piece
preynold27 June 2001
Can't figure out why the negative comments here. Did these people really watch the series?? The overall rating given by viewers is far more accurate. Have viewed this 3 times, including once on TV. The best mini series I have ever seen. Outstanding performances. (True that Ronald Merrick is stereotyped, but this is how he is in Paul Scott's Raj Quartet, the books on which the series is based -- well worth reading.) The love story of Daphne Manners and Hari Kumar is poignant and lovely, and it is an interesting foil for the other "love stories" that follow (Susan and her husband, Sarah and the soldier, Sarah and Guy, Mildred and the colonel) -- all pale considerably. The racial prejudice is quite accurately depicted. All in all, a very satisfying viewing experience. (Probably women would like this more than men.)
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb reading
madeleinebecker14 February 2006
Saw the TV series first and then read all 4 books of the Raj Quartet. The books and the series are masterful and I have now purchased the DVD. The BBC and Masterpiece Theatre know how to present history. The actors are superb. I recommend the books and the series highly to anyone interested in history. What I found particularly interesting is the relationship between the Indians and the English Colonials and how the relationship changes over the course of the story which spans from 1939 - 1948 roughly. Paul Scott the author lived in India for a number of years and he fairly and painstakingly recreates the nuances, the feelings that flow between the occupier and occupied. It has been a pleasure to discover this series and the books. If you have not read them or seen the series, you are in for a great journey and treat.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
jewel in the crown
naveedmasih-0222610 November 2019
You need all the patience to watch this series.. it's unexpectedly lengthy and boring.
2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I really wanted to love it, but I didn't
vonna-056245 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I really wanted to love this series, and at first, It drew me in for the first few episodes, but then after that and by the ending, I was left with a feeling of lack of tying in of the story. We begin the story with a set of characters that then changes. New characters are introduced, such as miss manners aunt, but then later on, there is really no tie in at the end. It didn't make sense to me. We also hear that Hari Kumar is released from jail eventually, but it is rather anticlimactic. We never know what ends up happening to miss manners aunt and the child of Miss manners and kumar. In the end the "bad guy" gets it, but again it's all rather anticlimactic. no justice really was done, and this story is begging for justice. I didn't read the novels, so I have no idea how true to the novels the series is, but I was completely let down by the second half and feel I wasted hours of my life watching it.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crowning Glory
alfa-1614 September 2005
There's a small scene in the first 2 hour episode of Jewel in the Crown about 80 minutes in. Susan Wooldridge, a gangly maladroit, clearly not cut out for India, is sleeping. The long awaited rain wakes her and she gets up and walks out onto the balcony. The obsessional loving care and artistry that is evident in just this single minute tell you everything you need to know about the quality of Jewel in the Crown. The set and the lighting on the sleeping figure momentarily transforms the character who will later be known, pejoratively as "that Manners girl" into the Diana-like beauty she always imagined she would become. Wooldridge is convincingly asleep and wakes naturally, and surprise, delight and relief register on her face as she revels in the feel of rain on her face. Nothing is out the book. It's all fresh, original, new. A great piece of acting by Wooldridge, never surpassed or even approached by all the other actors and actresses who have had to play this popular little scene, present in so many other movies. A great piece of directing, lighting, scene setting and costume design.

Aside from this one, there are 649 other minutes and the same care and devotion is taken with all of them. In the episode "The Mughal Room", Sara Layton and Guy Perron spend Guy's last afternoon exploring the Governor's Summer residence at Pankot. 7 minutes go by without any dialogue in this little elegy for the cobwebbed glory of the Raj before they settle down in one of the bedrooms to make love. You won't find anything else like it in mainstream television. Very hard to do but very beautiful.

But then the whole story is excellent, beautifully paced, tragic, funny, pathetic, illuminating and exciting by turns. I've watched it a number of times and I never want it to end.

It really is the best drama series ever made.
69 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Positively a masterpiece!
isnogud-der-grosswesir3 September 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Arguably the best television series ever made, it captures perfectly the spirit of the novel and the time in which it takes place, a time in which the British were slowly losing India without properly realizing it till it was too late. The photography is breathtaking and the performances are outstanding by everyone. Dame Peggy Ashcroft as the haunted "servant" who has been accepted as a companion by Fabia Drake but who is later asked to leave when her protector dies and also by Geraldine James who slowly sees her world crumble before her eyes, unable to do anything about it, but finding at least SOME kind of solace in Tim Piggot-Smith's arms. Especially the first episode with the tender love scene between Susan Wooldridge and Art Malik (both utterly fantastic) is superb and not until much much later does the horrid truth about what happened that night occur to us.

In short: a pure joy, which keeps you riveted to the screen from start to end. I have watched the entire series twice and will surely watch it again and again, if only to marvel at the performances and the craftsmanship of the production.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A True Masterpiece
tristram-418 October 2000
With a cast that includes Dame Peggy Ashcroft, Geraldine James, Rachel Kempson, Judy Parfit and many more what else can you expect. This very well written adaptation of Paul Scott's "The Raj Quartet" demonstrates the quality of British TV Drama. There are some unforgettable scenes in this series that make it a must see.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent Depiction of the Last Days of British India
montferrato29 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
You do not see series like this anymore.

The Plot is superb, the actors are fantastic, and the "Last Days of the Empire atmosphere" is actually very good.

If you are looking for some action, this is not your TV serial. It is a drama, and it is slow. However, the characters are superbly developed, and are extremely real.

The story goes very deep into issues like racism, elitism, and the fears of a crumbling and hypocritical society. For some reason, the story also touches sexual repression, homosexuality, and sadism. There are even some veiled hints of lesbianism. While sex is not really the main theme, it is a recurrent part of the atmosphere in the series. The story starts with the life of a young, eccentric and idealist white & aristocratic British woman who is raped by a gang of Indian thugs. As you can imagine, the British establishment does not take it well and soon a scapegoat is found and blamed. The Scapegoat is subjected to a sadistic torture by a psychopathic British policeman who later joins the military. Funny enough, the British torturer is a repressed homosexual who enjoys inflicting pain and gets relief having sex with young Indian guys "Bazaar Style".

Terry Porter as the Russian Count is by far the best character of the whole series. I take my hat before such a superb actor. Again, the Russian Count is described in the series as an "European Pederast".

However, as I have said before, it is not really about sex. It is just a portrait of British colonial society in the last days of the empire. Very good, highly recommendable.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant. More relevant now than upon original release.
Littlebigfan4 July 2020
Oh that Beecham House had the blunt audacity this series has. The last days of the Raj and British racism at it's worst, portrayed a stellar cast. Few series hold up so well over time. Well done.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I Liked this series.
trevillian13 February 2002
This work kept me interested throughout, especilly enjoyed the photography and the insights into the Indian culture. Tim was totally evil and the girl was wimpy, but people are that way!!!! Sometimes your heroes aren't all that heroic, You don't have to love and hate every character in the show. If any fault at all, the characters could have been even more developed than this mini-series did them, and there could have been more explaination of some of the traditions of the Indian people. (like the Sutee scene.) Over all I enjoyed this series and rewatch and pick up new things every couple of years.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An inferno of human passion
rucricket29 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Fire is the dominant icon of The Jewel in the Crown. Much like its the theme, this 1984 English miniseries is, or was intended to be, an inferno. Fire as purifier and destroyer; the fire of human passions, love and anger; the fires of hell; the heat of the sun.

However, though it burns brightly, it is flame that threatens too often to eat up its fuel or escape its grating. Based on Paul Scott's Raj Quartet, the 14 episodes attempt to do justice to what is, I believe, a quite elliptical plot, not naturally suited to television.

While there is a visceral pleasure to the death, intrigue, violence and romance, the overall effect is somewhat bewildering. I can only assume this was Scott's impression during his time in India as an army officer during WWII.

The novels begin during the last days of the Raj, the English regime which controlled India, as WWII was reaching its zenith and a Japanese invasion of India appeared imminent. The episodes follow several storylines interlinked by characters, locations and actions, but not so much by plot.

The one constant throughout these stories is Ronald Merrick (played excellently by Tim Pigott Smith), a sadomasochistic and anachronistic English policeman and officer. He is evil, flat-out, a man who believes that all relations are ones of power, ruler and ruled; a racist who takes on a nannying, dictatorial style with 'the natives'; and a manipulative liar, willing to use any means to get on.

How people respond to him often indicates their moral standing. Those characters who hate him recognise in his brutality something of the English regime's treatment of India; those who accept him are either of that order, or see his political uses in ensuring the country doesn't get out of hand.

But while rejecting this icon of Nietzschean power, it's not clear what Scott proposes in its place. Merrick is killed in the end, and people who knew him surmise that he actually wanted to die, having fallen in love with an Indian boy. It is not the discovery of his homosexuality that upsets him, one character surmises, but the fact that the love proved his own racial theories false.

But romantic love is not set up on a pedestal in place of power. Death haunts the screen, and the dynamics of power disturb those of love too. There is little room for humanism, either. Charles Dance's Guy Perron concludes that all those Englanders who love India can really do is hope.

But a question hangs in the air, even here, at the conclusion - hope in what?

Regardless of the (perhaps deliberately) inconclusive story and moral scheme, the show was a treat to watch. The characters, complex and multifaceted, benefit from the wealth of acting talent available in England at the time. Piggot-Smith stands out for maintaining an air of menace and madness, without ever resorting to melodrama. Even as a one-armed, scarred villain, his pomposity has just the air of human frailty to keep any caricature in check.

Filmed on location in India (except the interior shots), there is a wonderful sense of place throughout.

It allows the themes of fire, heat and incomprehension to be conveyed televisually. The vast landscapes, the heaving streets, the beating sun... and fire, always returning to fire. Appropriately, the show ends with an image of the series' symbolic heart, a painting called 'The Jewel in the Crown', consumed by flame.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Even though it's dated, it really holds up well
Siddhartha144 June 2022
Amazing that I've never seen this. I thought it would be overwrought (although there are certainly instances of overacting, they are relatively rare) and cheesy like most of the series and/or movies from the 80s. It is really very good and provides a lot of food for thought. It also offers a rather nuanced overview of the British occupation of India and the detriment suffered by the Indian people as a result. There are certainly sympathetic British characters but frankly, they are a rarity. The vast majority of the British as portrayed are petty, silly, and completely full of themselves. A surprisingly good watch!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Jewel never shines
Sadies2 December 1999
This movie is supposed to be about a British family living in India. Based on the book "The Raj Quartet." Mini series is way too long. Characters are very static; you don't care for them at all.

One thing you do see, is lots of symbolism; rigidly put in there. You definitely see a lack of the British intervening with Indians; ironically, British are ruling in India at this time, yet they don't know how to live in it. This lack of making yourself at "home" is a theme in the story. You barely see any Indians in the story, and yet the story takes place in India.

Story begins couple years before India's independence in 1947. Great symbolism, of the concept of Britain being the "mother and father" of India, actually being false. You notice Mrs.Layton cannot even take care of her own two girls; if they don't know how to be parents to their own families, how prepared are they to actually rule India?

Many themes/symbolisms are pointed out within the movie. The Jewel is supposed to be India. The Crown means Britain. India is in Britain, too bad, the movie lacks its shine.

A movie that has good themes, but it just doesn't make ends meet. 5/10
7 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Marvelous
trpdean14 November 2003
This series is captivating. The wonderful way in which strands of plot are woven throughout the series in new and interesting ways, the eternally memorable characters, the fascinating background of historical events, the series' sympathy to people of every age, social and economic background, the charm of many of the protagonists.

Even the more minor characters are just drawn so well. Thus, one of my favorite characters in all of television is that of Nigel Rowan - who is wonderfully portrayed by Nicholas LePrevost; one of my least favorite is the major to whom Sarah is introduced by her aunt and uncle.

Such historical episodes as the decision by the princely states of India whether to accede to the newly independent India - or the creation of an Axis army by Indians who had been taken captive by Germans or Japanese -- these stories are engrossing and not so well known among those of us in the United States not well versed in recent Indian history.

The series is spellbinding - one cares greatly about these people and what happens to them is very interesting indeed.

The symbolism in the series deepens one's sense of the mood of the time, of the tragedy, of the ocean in which these characters swim.

I can't imagine a better series adapted from more wonderful books.
41 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Judy Parfitt...WOW
Victor-fitforlife30 December 2019
My favourite memory is of the then middle aged Judy Parfitt noisily and enthusiastically enjoying the, er, amorous attentions of a younger man! Apart from that, it was a great series!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed