| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Index | 77 reviews in total |
69 out of 75 people found the following review useful:
Sense of place, sense of menace, 14 December 2004
![]()
Author:
damien-16 from Lao People's Democratic Republic
I am a little amazed that, so far, only 40 comments have been entered.
Fortunately most are of high quality, and all the important points
related to the film are clearly highlighted. So, I will not repeat what
has been well said by others. I want to explain one additional point,
it has to do with my personal experience but might be interesting to
mention.
I'm a professional expatriate, living overseas for 25 years. I'm not
talking about an American in Paris or an Englishman in New York, I mean
African steppes, tropical jungles, Indian slums. Living in a totally
foreign country, in a totally strange culture, imperfectly
understanding the local language, bewildered by alien logic, you
experience a permanent sense of unease. You adapt, you learn to cope,
you make what you hope are friends. But you never forget that you are a
stranger in unknown territory, and that you are vulnerable.
You may peacefully walk on the street one minute, the next minute
bullets are flying all around you. In the evening you have a pleasant
drink with your neighbour, in the morning you are arrested, accused of
being a foreign mercenary. When you travel inland you come at a road
block, not knowing if they'll let you pass, or harass you for a couple
of hours, or confiscate your car. As a foreigner in developing
countries, you are constantly confronted with uncertainty, an
intangible menace lurking around the corner.
I find that TYOLD transmits this sense of menace very poignantly. Many
people have commented on its brilliant sense of place, the accurate
depiction of Indonesia and the events that took place at the time.
Others mention that you get a very real feeling of the tension and
uncertainty journalists in times of upheaval are subjected to. But I
would like to extend it beyond journalists. The sense of menace in
TYOLD is eminently recognizable by all who have lived in countries
where the police is not there to protect you, the laws are not there to
make society more civilized, the hospitals are not there to cure you.
In TYOLD, the menace is made visible because of the troubles that
erupt, but usually you do not have to live through civil war when
overseas. Still, the menace is not less real, and the sense of
foreboding haunting every expatriate was very convincingly conveyed in
the film.
45 out of 57 people found the following review useful:
Pretty much a flawless movie, 2 April 2004
![]()
Author:
SuperfluousChap from Washington, DC
I watched TYLD after a prof recommended it in grad school. I had to rent
it
from an obscure-movies rental place in Alexandria, Virginia and I now own
the picture.
There are three elements, mixed together, that make TYLD superb, rich
cinema. First, it captures the feel of westerners living abroad, the
cluster
of expat personalities that you find were you to live or work
abroad.
Second, it is one of the best love stories ever crafted, with a "fleeting
end of summer feel" between Mel Gibson and Sigourney Weaver. They are both
young; Weaver is stunningly gorgeous. Their romance ends almost as
abruptly
as it begins. We've all been there.
The movie also captures an awesome historical moment and is fascinating
Cold
War history. The movie is flawless.
39 out of 49 people found the following review useful:
A Truly Beautiful Film See It If You Get The Chance!, 7 September 2004
![]()
Author:
lalumiere from SC
The film is wonderfully sensate, alive and filled with exotic beauty
and deep passions.
The colors, textures and sound have a dimensionality that draws the
viewer right into the scene, the place the time... when it rains, the
viewer can feel the rain, when the hero, Guy is being drowned in a
dream, the viewer senses the suffocation...
The chemistry between Mel Gibson and Sigourney Weaver, as young lovers
in exciting times, is breath-taking!
But Linda Hunt is the biggest gem in the movie, playing a little man
named Billy Kwan. She is incredibly credible in this role. Few female
actresses can believably pull-off playing a male character, but Hunt
did it so well that, at first, the viewer feels a familiarity with the
person playing Billy without realizing he is being played by a woman.
When I realized it, I was totally amazed. Hunt is a great actress
well-deserving of the Oscar she won for the portrayal.
The film is evocative and enthralling. And so alive, so utterly alive!
_The Year of Living Dangerously_ has and is everything a film should
be.
34 out of 40 people found the following review useful:
A brilliant exposition of Indonesia circa the 1965 revolution, 17 December 1998
![]()
Author:
Hisar Maruli Manurung (hisarm@dai.ed.ac.uk) from Edinburgh, Scotland
15 years after its release, I finally get to see what to my knowledge is the
only english-speaking film that tells the story of Indonesia circa the 1965
revolution.
A very young Gibson is convincing as the inexperienced but ambitious
reported determined to make his mark in telling the story of Sukarno's last
moments in power. Equally brilliant is Sigourney Weaver, and yet one feels
that this film did not give her the opportunity to show her true
calibre.
The one who ultimately steals the show, then, is Linda Hunt, playing the
enigmatic and passionate Billy, who understands the true psyche of Indonesia
better than any of the other foreign characters in this
story.
When Billy solemnly expresses his disappointment to Guy, proclaiming, "I
created you", it evoked images of Weir's latest masterpiece, The Truman
Show, where Christof has fashioned the persona of Truman Burbank for his TV
spectacle. Perhaps a running theme in Peter Weir's work? Must check
out...
I marvelled at the authenticity of the setting. It certainly looked like
Jakarta. The faces, the atmosphere, the buildings, and yet, those scenes
were shot in the Philippines, with mainly Filipino actors! Just goes to show
the similarity among Indonesia and the Philippines.
I see now why this film was never made available in Indonesia (to my
knowledge). The last few moments of the film show the stark reality of
communist executions by Soeharto's new military regime, horrifying pictures
of mere pawns being slaughtered... and the parting message from a
self-confessed PKI member:"Am I stupid for wanting to change my country's
condition?" is one of the best lines in this film.
22 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
Politics, Mysticism and Romance, 25 November 2003
![]()
Author:
ProfessorFate from Las Vegas
In "The Year of Living Dangerously" director Peter Weir attempts much and
accomplishes most of his goals. It's a socio-political essay on the dangers
of Western meddling in Third World countries. It's a fascinating view into
the challenges of journalism in a volatile foreign country. It's a steamy
romance involving two beautiful, intelligent characters. It's a distinctly
Far Eastern morality play that seems to delight in yin/yang paradoxes. Plus
it's one of the best films at evoking the mood, texture, and sensuality of
life in Southeast Asia. Don't be too harsh on Weir for the lapses in
historic accuracy and plotting, because it's a complicated, busy landscape
he is painting here. The best things about the film are:
-Linda Hunt's amazing performance. Unlike other gender-bending performances
(Julie Andrews in "Victor/Victoria", Dustin Hoffman in "Tootsie") you never
once give any thought to the fact that this is a woman playing a man. It's
a seamless transition and a performance of immense heart and honesty. The
image of a distraught Billy pounding at his typewriter, pleading "What then
must we do?" while an aria swells around him and the eyes of Jakarta's poor
stare at him from his own photographs, is an incredibly moving scene.
-The atmosphere created by the combination of Russell Boyd's cinematography
and Maurice Jarre's score. Take a look at the scene with Weaver walking
through the streets of Jakarta in a tropical downpour. The effect is
breathtaking.
-The chemistry between Gibson and Weaver. You can feel the heat between
them. Unlike other posters here, I believe their romance is one of the
film's strong points.
I agree that the ending is a bit of a letdown, but it doesn't diminish
Weir's accomplishments. "The Year of Living Dangerously" is a startling
unique film, and certainly one his best.
24 out of 27 people found the following review useful:
Despite some weaknesses, a strong movie, 16 July 2001
Author:
Geofbob from London, England
Peter Weir's movie, set in Sukarno's Indonesia in 1965, can be seen as four
films in one. The first is socio-political, focusing on the plight of the
impoverished Indonesian people, the impending insurrection by the communist
movement, and the bloody, chaotic aftermath of the coup. The second,
coloured in Graham Greene-ish tones, has a cast of western journalists and
diplomats failing to make sense of what's happening around them, and falling
back on sex, drink and cynicism. The third - and most important in
commercial-cinema terms - is a convincingly acted romance between rookie
foreign correspondent Guy Hamilton (Mel Gibson) and British diplomat Jill
Bryant (Sigourney Weaver), culminating in an unlikely and sentimental ending
to the film.
But it is the fourth of these "sub-movies" which is the most intriguing;
this concerns the diminutive and enigmatic Australian/Chinese photographer
Billy Kwan, an astonishing - and Oscar winning - portrayal by actress Linda
Hunt. Billy sees himself as a puppet-master, pulling the strings of friends
and colleagues, particularly of Jill and Guy, whom he throws together. But
his need to take control also motivates him to help local people, not
through indirect and political means, but directly like an early Christian,
and this apparently benign course leads to tragedy. Billy is the true heart
and conscience of this film.
Weir is not entirely successful in weaving these strands together, and
leaves a few gaps in both plot and characterisation. He is also occasionally
guilty of melodrama (a fault which, in the movie, Jill warns Guy about),
especially in the film's closing scenes - though certainly not where he
shows communist sympathisers being shot, which is factual. On the whole,
however, the movie works on both commercial and artistic levels, and should
be seen.
22 out of 26 people found the following review useful:
One of the best of all times, 16 May 2001
![]()
Author:
Sandy Bergeson (thegolfgoddess) from chicago, Il
How anyone could have seen this movie and not recognized the depth of its social commentary and personal integrity is beyond me. This movie is written with power and intelligence, is performed impeccably and directed with cinematic genius. If you have not seen this movie, take time out to be touched in your head and heart.
17 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
riveting, and this film is not aging, 17 December 2000
![]()
Author:
L. Lion (laughing_lion@yahoo.com) from Los Angeles
I just caught TYOLD again on PBS, not having seen it for perhaps ten years.
Wonder of wonders, compared to many other films of the early '80s, this one
is just as riveting as it was when I first saw it and doesn't look like it
has aged a minute. In addition I am picking up many nuances of the film
that I had never seen before.
What I know, and knew, about the tribulations of Indonesia in the 1960's is
contained in the reels of this film. The subject matter is so far outside
of the typical Western/American perspective that it is amazing that the film
got made. Gibson is very good as Guy Hamilton, and his performance is much
more lean and energetic than what he has done since - he hadn't had years of
Hollywood gloss and Lethal Weapon familiarity to file down his performances
into the predictable boxes they have become. Sigourney Weaver is elegant,
although her English accent is never really convincing and sometimes
disappears altogether. Linda Hunt's portrayal of Billy Kwan is astonishing
and won her a well-deserved Oscar in an incredible gender-switching
performance that was inspired casting.
One thing I never noticed before was how Billy placed each of the three main
characters in their perspective as the Indonesian puppets he explains to
Guy. Arjuna, the hero who can be fickle and selfish (Guy). The princess he
will fall in love with (Weaver's character). And the dwarf, who carries the
wisdom for Arjuna (Billy Kwan).
I haven't much more to say about this film aside from how much I admire it
and recommend it to anyone who hasn't seen it. Beautifully shot, well
paced, with good performances and about an interesting and important subject
matter, it is well worth your time.
13 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
One of the Great Atmosphere Films, 22 June 2006
![]()
Author:
jwkearse from United States
Ever since I first saw this film, it has been one of my favorite. The performances are not perfect, but the chemistry between the main characters is electric. The semi-fictitious plot (it is said to be somewhat based on a period of the life of reporter Peter Arnet) melds so nicely with the historical events of 1960's Indonesia. Linda Hunt well deserved the Academy Award, but I felt that it should have also been nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay, Director, Film, and Cinematography. The story follows the novel of which it was based better than 95% of the time. The Atmosphere of the film always leaves me awe-struck. By the end I feel like I have lived Guy's life. It is a romantic film with a small dose of action that both men and women should enjoy.
11 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
Luke 3:10, 27 June 2001
![]()
Author:
RodReels-2 from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Having just watched this movie again after seeing it in its original theatrical run back in the early 80's, I can truly say I was more impressed by it the second time around. Several comments here have pointed out the nuances in the film. Let me point to one more. Rarely has a movie used a passage of scripture so effectively. Billy Kwan (Linda Hunt) mentions to Guy Hamilton (Mel Gibson) at the film's beginning Luke 3:10. His simple rephrasing of it is, "What must we do?" It's a question that haunts the character throughout life. I went back and reread it after the movie. John the Baptist has just called the Pharisees a brood of vipers for not practicing their religion with any measure of compassion. In answer to their question "what must we do?", he instructs them to share their excess of clothing and food with those less fortunate. Billy dies tragically in the film while hanging a banner which reads "Sukarno, Feed Your People." It is the poverty and oppression of the people which drives Billy throughout his brief life, even as he recognizes the futility of his own efforts.
| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Amazon.com summary |
| Ratings | Awards | Newsgroup reviews |
| External reviews | Parents Guide | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |