MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 20,601 this week

The Sign of Four (1983)

TV Movie  -   -  Mystery  -  7 December 1983 (USA)
6.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.5/10 from 328 users  
Reviews: 18 user | 2 critic

Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson try to track down the Great Mogul, the second-largest diamond in the world.

Director:

Writers:

(novel), (screenplay)
0Check in
0Share...

On Disc

at Amazon

Editors' Spotlight

Sundance 2015

Watch our IMDb & AIV Sundance Studio Interviews with Keith Simanton

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 44 titles
created 20 Apr 2012
 
a list of 252 titles
created 08 Aug 2012
 
a list of 25 titles
created 29 Sep 2013
 
a list of 154 titles
created 04 Jan 2014
 
list image
a list of 58 titles
created 1 month ago
 

Related Items

Search for "The Sign of Four" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Sign of Four (TV Movie 1983)

The Sign of Four (TV Movie 1983) on IMDb 6.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Sign of Four.

User Polls

1 win & 2 nominations. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Crime | Drama | Horror
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

When latest heir to the Baskerville estate seems to be threatened by a family curse, only the master detective, Sherlock Holmes, can find out the truth.

Director: Brian Mills
Stars: Jeremy Brett, Edward Hardwicke, Raymond Adamson
Horror | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

When a nobleman is threatened by a family curse on his newly inherited estate, detective Sherlock Holmes is hired to investigate.

Director: Terence Fisher
Stars: Peter Cushing, André Morell, Christopher Lee
Crime | Drama | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6/10 X  

1910. Mycroft Holmes asks his brother Sherlock & Dr. Watson to travel to Viena and find the stolen plans & prototype for an electro-magnetic bomb detonator. Once there, they are reunited ... See full summary »

Director: Peter Sasdy
Stars: Christopher Lee, Patrick Macnee, Morgan Fairchild
Crime | Horror | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

Sherlock Holmes has retired. But when MacDonald asks him to take on another case, he says yes. There has been some mysterious murders, and there are no visible causes for the deaths. At the... See full summary »

Director: Roy Ward Baker
Stars: Peter Cushing, John Mills, Anne Baxter
Crime | Drama | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

A serial killer stalking the teen-aged daughters of the aristocracy brings Sherlock Holmes out of his drug-filled semi-retirement.

Director: Simon Cellan Jones
Stars: Rupert Everett, Nicholas Palliser, Neil Dudgeon
Crime | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.9/10 X  

When Sir Charles Baskerville is found dead in his country house, Dr James Mortimer asks Sherlock Holmes for help to save Sir Henry Baskerville, the only known heir, from the curse that haunts Baskerville family.

Director: Igor Maslennikov
Stars: Vasiliy Livanov, Vitali Solomin, Rina Zelyonaya
Crime | Mystery | Horror
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.7/10 X  

Sherlock Holmes comes to the aid of his friend Henry Baskerville, who is under a family curse and menaced by a demonic dog that prowls the bogs near his estate and murders people.

Director: Douglas Hickox
Stars: Ian Richardson, Donald Churchill, Denholm Elliott
Crime | Mystery | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

When a gentlewoman is found dead with her throat torn out, the villagers blame a supernatural monster, but Sherlock Holmes, who gets drawn into the case from nearby Quebec, suspects a human murderer.

Director: Roy William Neill
Stars: Basil Rathbone, Nigel Bruce, Gerald Hamer
Mystery | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson investigate the legend of a supernatural hound, a beast that may be stalking a young heir on the fog-shrouded moorland that makes up his estate.

Director: Sidney Lanfield
Stars: Basil Rathbone, Nigel Bruce, Richard Greene
The Crucifer of Blood (TV Movie 1991)
Crime | Drama | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.6/10 X  

A beautiful young woman asks Holmes to help her father, a former army captain and hopeless opium addict break free of the curse surrounding a stolen treasure.

Director: Fraser Clarke Heston
Stars: Charlton Heston, Richard Johnson, Susannah Harker
Crime | Drama | Horror
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

The mysterious death of Sir Charles Baskerville is blamed on a longstanding curse that has followed the Baskerville family for two hundred years. Enigmatic sleuth Sherlock Holmes is on the ... See full summary »

Director: Rodney Gibbons
Stars: Matt Frewer, Kenneth Welsh, Jason London
The Hound of the Baskervilles (TV Mini-Series 1982)
Horror | Mystery | Crime
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  
Stars: Tom Baker, Terence Rigby, Will Knightley
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
David Healy ...
Thorley Walters ...
...
Joe Melia ...
Terence Rigby ...
Inspector Layton
Clive Merrison ...
Richard Heffer ...
John Pedrick ...
...
Robert Russell ...
Williams
...
Moti Makan ...
Kate Binchy ...
Maid
...
Mr. Sherman
Edit

Storyline

Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson try to track down the Great Mogul, the second-largest diamond in the world.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Mystery

Certificate:

Not Rated | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

7 December 1983 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Im Zeichen der Vier  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

4:3
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

A brief establishing shot of Baker Street, with a street-cleaning cart passing by, is actually a piece of footage from "The Private Life Of Sherlock Holmes" (1970). See more »

Goofs

The police inspector played by Terence Rigby is named "Layton", but was supposed to be the more famous Inspector Lestrade. You can clearly see Ian Richardson and the other actors mouthing the name "Lestrade" throughout the production, but for some reason they were all dubbed over with "Layton". See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Above average Holmes adaptation
6 March 2006 | by (Nowhere Interesting) – See all my reviews

This is not at all a bad adaptation of Arthur Conan Doyle's second Sherlock Holmes novel. Ian Richardson makes a fine (if too affable) Holmes, and David Healy (though portly enough to be Mycroft Holmes) is one of the screen's better Watsons. It's quite entertaining...and when I first saw it, I considered it the best Sign of Four adaptation ever made. In later years, however, I would discover the Granada productions...and their adaptation of Sign of Four, which far overrides this one in terms of faithfulness, style, pacing, direction, acting, and suspense.

There are a few problems with this adaptation which could have easily been rectified. First off, the plot structure is changed so drastically from that of the novel. Not necessarily a problem, in itself. But in this case, too much is revealed to us too early on, leaving little room for suspense, and making Holmes's deductions seem fairly anti-climactic. Rather than learning of the particulars of various events through Holmes's brilliant deductions, we actually SEE the events first, then watch Holmes work them out via deductive reasoning. The other major disadvantage to this structure is that the introduction (a representation of events that Conan Doyle didn't reveal to us until the final act!) is quite labored and unnecessarily delays the introduction of Holmes and Watson. By the time Holmes begins to seriously investigate the matter of the one-legged man and his strange ally, we are nearly halfway through the film. We already know far more than we should, and many of the events which follow are altered due to the shifting of later themes to an earlier point in the film, giving a very uneven feel to the overall piece. The first two acts are far too leisurely, and the final act plays out at breakneck speed.

Beyond that, some of the characters have been changed beyond all recognition. Again, this is a needless change, and does nothing to enhance the story. In fact, in some cases, notably the alteration of Thaddeus Sholto, the changes detract from the effectiveness of various scenes. Conan Doyle's Sholto was an extremely nervous little man...seemingly on the verge of a minor nervous breakdown at all times. This greatly enhanced the suspense of the story...as being in his presence made us, as readers, a bit jittery, as well. So, naturally, presenting him as a dashing young man with a fine gift for articulation deadens the impact of the scenes in which he appears.

I know I'm focusing on the negative here, but I find it difficult not to compare this film with the Granada production which usurped it three years later. That adaptation was practically perfect in every way...fantastic performances all around (including a spot-on Thaddeus Sholto, courtesy of Ron Lacey), extremely faithful to the source material...easily one of the best Holmes adaptations ever committed to film. Still, this version has a lot to offer, and is quite fun in its own way. Though I would have liked to have seen Holmes indulge in a few mood swings (and perhaps brandish his cocaine needle, just for the sake of accuracy), Richardson is one of the better Sherlocks. And Healy is no slouch as Watson, even if he doesn't match David Burke or Edward Hardwicke.

The truth is, I was duly impressed with this film the first time around, and I still quite enjoy watching it from time to time. View this and the Granada version back-to-back and debate the pros and cons for yourself.


5 of 5 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Great Sherlock Holmes ganglehog
Discuss The Sign of Four (1983) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?