The Sign of Four (1983)Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson try to track down the Great Mogul, the second-largest diamond in the world. Director:Desmond Davis |
|
| 0Share... |
The Sign of Four (1983)Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson try to track down the Great Mogul, the second-largest diamond in the world. Director:Desmond Davis |
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Ian Richardson | ... | ||
|
|
David Healy | ... | |
|
|
Thorley Walters | ... | |
| Cherie Lunghi | ... | ||
|
|
Joe Melia | ... | |
|
|
Terence Rigby | ... |
Inspector Layton
|
|
|
Clive Merrison | ... | |
|
|
Richard Heffer | ... | |
|
|
John Pedrick | ... | |
| Michael O'Hagan | ... | ||
|
|
Robert Russell | ... |
Williams
|
| John Benfield | ... |
McMurdo
|
|
|
|
Moti Makan | ... |
Lal Rao
|
|
|
Kate Binchy | ... |
Maid
|
| Gordon Rollings | ... |
Mr. Sherman
|
|
Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson try to track down the Great Mogul, the second-largest diamond in the world.
Although in some parts not too faithful to the original story this is a good Holmes adaptation. Everyone involved is making a good effort and the the finished product is solid enough.
One thing I did definitely not like is the way Tonga was presented. I am aware that he was portrayed as "so deeply marked with all bestiality and cruelty (and that) his small eyes glowed and burned with a sombre light, and his thick lips were writhed back from his teeth, which grinned and chattered at us with half animal fury" (quote from the original story). I'm sure I can't apply 21st century political correctness to a 19th century story but the scenes where Small fed his companion with raw meat in an earth hole were definitely not necessary in a 1983 production.
Still, this being the only thing that bothers me a bit, this is a great movie. Ian Richardson comes close to my idea of Holmes and is second in line for my favourite Holmes, Brett AND Rathbone being in the fist place.