Out (1982)A self-styled "urban guerrilla" in Greenwich Village is sent on various assignments across the country by a mysterious "commander." Director:Eli Hollander |
|
| 0Share... |
Out (1982)A self-styled "urban guerrilla" in Greenwich Village is sent on various assignments across the country by a mysterious "commander." Director:Eli Hollander |
|
| 0Share... |
| Complete credited cast: | |||
| Peter Coyote | ... |
Rex
|
|
| O-Lan Jones | ... |
Nixie /
Dinah
(as O-Lan Shepard)
|
|
| Jim Haynie | ... |
Carl /
Tommy /
Optometrist
|
|
|
|
Grandfather Semu Haute | ... |
Empty Fox
|
|
|
Scott Beach | ... |
Sailor
|
| Danny Glover | ... |
Jojo /
Roland
|
|
|
|
Max Grodénchik | ... |
Arnold /
Boy
(as Michael Grodenchik)
|
|
|
Gail Dartez | ... |
Trixie /
Girl
|
In this largely avant-garde feature film, Rex is the member of a group of underground revolutionaries with an unknown agenda who receive their orders from picking letters out of a bowl of alphabet soup. Rex and his companion Nixie travel across the country and change their names with each stage of the story (the stages are separated by a countdown of numbers from 10 to 0). They begin in New York City and strive to make it to Los Angeles. Their adventures, misadventures and often bizarre happenstances form the bulk of the narrative. Written by thustlebird
If you've got more time than you know what to do with, and you're attracted to that which you just can't believe, then try to endure this faux pas in its entirety and kindly post your theories as to what the hell this is all about. I COULD watch it again, but I know that it'd STILL leave me shrugging my shoulders and scratching my head. At first, I thought that it was about a young couple who wanted to become part of an elite strike-force. Then, I thought that maybe it was a series of disconnected vignettes featuring the cast in different roles. (The "disconnected" part stays.) Finally, I realized that I had no idea about what was going on, but, if I hung in there long enough, perhaps it'd all come together. Well...it never did. And THAT was an Indian, several more vignettes, and a strike-force-reunion later. Except, instead of a strike-force, they were now an Independent Communal Unit, in tune with each others' thoughts. (But I doubt that anybody else is on their wavelength.) Sometimes I can overlook the obvious signs of a "cheapie", especially that low-budget audio and bottom-of-the-barrel acting, because there's a followable, ongoing message which is not dollar-conscious. Don't get me wrong, though... there's plenty of that inexpensive stuff here; but I almost missed it trying to latch on to ANY message. However, I don't think that there IS one. This is so ambiguous that I wouldn't even know what genre to put it in: drama? comedy? fantasy? (Horror, for sure; but not in the usual sense.) And it's based on a novel? Must be a bookful of blank pages. I shouldn't say that, though, because I found some of the dialogue quite interesting. (I'm not sure how it pertained to what was happening on screen, but, interesting nonetheless.) To say anything else positive about this movie, however, would, I think, without contradiction, be an impossibility.