Reviews & Ratings for
The Devil in Miss Jones Part II More at IMDbPro »

6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
I Love Lucy !, 1 January 2008

Author: Dirtymoviedevotee (dries.vermeulen@hotmail.be) from Brugge, Belgium

Hard to imagine in these sequel-infested times that it took over a decade for a follow-up to Gerard Damiano's seminal DEVIL IN MISS JONES to materialize. An even bigger surprise is that this second installment matches its illustrious predecessor every step of the way. Director Ron Sullivan (a/k/a "Henri Pachard") exchanged Damiano's brooding existentialism for a far more lighthearted tone, gently poking fun at – without ridiculing – the sacred cow whose footsteps it followed.

Justine Jones (a welcome return of seasoned Georgina Spelvin) has been in hell for quite some time now and is none too thrilled about it, especially since Lucifer (gay porn legend Jack Wrangler from Joe Gage's KANSAS CITY TRUCKING CO.) and the Devil's Advocate (Robert Kerman a/k/a "R. Bolla") have ordered a ban on orgasms. While there's unlimited shagging wherever you look, no one's allowed to climax. Every time someone's on the brink of coming, head office is alerted and the offender has to answer for his or her illegal actions ! This crisis forces Justine to get off in unusual ways, like humping the sizable proboscis of Cyrano De Bergerac (Alan Adrian), producing an image that must have inspired the prosthetic sex epics of Paul Norman (EDWARD PENISHANDS). By employing her feminine wiles, Miss Jones seduces the reluctant Lucifer ("Don't call me Lucy !") and blackmails him into sending her back to earth in another body. Candidate recipients for Justine's wicked soul include call girl Roxanne (fiery redhead Jacqueline Lorians), bumbling girl soldier Private Parts (Joanna Storm) and an outwardly prim 'n' proper Tupperware saleslady (Anna Ventura, one of Svetlana's original BAD GIRLS). Nun Samantha Fox is briefly considered but quickly nixed when the Big Guy Upstairs has his say about it ! Sullivan's finest films all have the advantage of genuine wit, never slipping into vulgarity. This diabolical screwball comedy proves no exception. Inspired dialog, filled with naughty double entendres, is delivered in rapid fire fashion. This enhances the pleasure to be derived from this first rate sex farce with subtle references to Hollywood classics like HERE COMES MR. JORDAN and (the Lubitsch version of) HEAVEN CAN WAIT. The uniformly splendid cast is up to the task. Spelvin's always great to see (the years had been kind) at the sunset of her explicit career, though she's not in the movie that much. Most of it rests on the strong shoulders of Wrangler whose wryly funny characterization of the constantly bewildered devil even overshadows Kerman's deliciously devious turn as his mischievous adviser and this is one actor unaccustomed to being surpassed. Sharons Kane and Mitchell appear in the infernal interlinking segments, Kane as a giggling harpy with literal dick head Ron Jeremy and Mitch looking positively radiant as Marie-Antoinette, even though her Egyptian profile suggests a perfect Cleopatra, played here by Deena Ferrara instead.

Sex simmers pleasantly from start to finish, nothing too hot 'n' heavy, mind you, yet perfect for the friskier contingent of the couples crowd. Spelvin once again shows how it should be done in her one big scene with the perplexed horned (and horny) one. The glowing cinematography by erstwhile Chuck Vincent protégé Larry Revene – a highly competent director in his own right as evidenced by WANDA WHIPS WALL STREET and RAW TALENT – complements the heady brew of lust and laughter, making the most out of deliberately grotesque set design reminiscent of the visual overkill in Fellini's kitsch classic SATYRICON.

2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Better than the first movie, but not all that good as they seem to forget there is supposed to be sex in an adult film., 28 April 2009

Author: Aaron1375 from Alabama

Yes, this movie is a slight improvement on the original as there are a couple of cute girls here and there. However, you will not be seeing very well done sex scenes in this porno, instead the movie is more of a comedy and the sex scenes for the most part are very underdeveloped. The movie is still better though than one as one had a unpleasant feel to it and just made me feel yucky. This one does not do that...granted it also does not excite or turn me on either which is what an adult film should be doing now is it not? There is one scene involving a cute gal who apparently sells household products and has very pretty eyes. I think there is about to be a great sex scene and instead I get maybe a two minute scene max. I do not really like the porno movies that are just sex scene after sex scene with no real development or lead up, but I prefer them to this type of film that is mainly all lead up and no real payoff. I understand you want to have plot too, but I have seen plots in porn where there is still really good sex like in the Little Girls Blue and to a lesser extent Debbie Does Dallas. These Devil in Miss Jones movies just do not appeal to me or to the bad boy I was who found their dad's dirty movie collection.

3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
A worthy sequel to a classic film, 26 October 2006

Author: ninjaalexs from United Kingdom

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Henri Pachard (best known for Babylon Pink) takes the reigns from Gerard Damiano for this sequel. This film relies mainly on comedy, unlike its predecessor. Fortunately, the film is genuinely funny and contains many memorable, funny lines. The comedy can take away some of the sexiness from various scenes as they can become a joke. There is however many varied scenarios (set mainly in the 'real world'). Some of these scenarios include: a Female soldier pleasuring the captain and a high priced call-girl pleasuring a Sheik.

The film also features more of a fantasy element than the first film. DMJ1 took place in the real world until Miss Jones was summoned to purgatory/hell. This film obviously takes place in hell from the start and features many strange historic figures including: Cyrano (with a penis for a nose), Cleopatra and Marie Antoinette. The sets could be accused of looking tacky but they do not look any worse than other films from around the same era such as, Flash Gordon.

The acting in the film is of a high standard. Jack Wrangler does a superb job of portraying a charismatic and troubled Lucifer. The female cast and male supporting cast deliver lines professionally and convincingly portray their characters. It is also nice to see Georgina Spelvin return for this sequel but it has to be said that she looks a fair bit older than in the previous film.

Summary: A good sequel which manages to be different from its predecessor. This film features some great acting and lots of funny moments. The sex scenes are interesting and varied but seem to take second place to the story and (comedy) dialogue. Henri Pachard has done a great job with the directing and co-writing of this film. A must see for classic XXX fans or people looking for an erotic film which is a bit different.

1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Great fun., 23 August 2010

Author: Boba_Fett1138 from Groningen, The Netherlands

Surprisingly enough I had great fun watching this movie. It's definitely more entertaining than the first movie and also has some higher production values but in the long run the movie is till being somewhat overlong.

This movie really is a direct, late, sequel to the 1973 genre classic "Devil in Miss Jones". It even features the same actress, Georgina Spelvin, in the lead again. She was now 9 years older and had obviously gained some more experience in the business. Back in 1973 she was still new and fresh to it all but in this movie she is taking things more from a professional approach and also spend some more time on her acting performance this time. But she was already well in her 40's at the time so her role is being cut a little short this time and she soon has to make some room for younger ladies. They did this in a quite good and creative way, when the devil herself sends her back to earth and she is forced to live in the bodies of several different and younger women, who of course very soon all get involved in all kinds of different sexual acts.

It was nice to see how 'serious' they approached this movie. They had obviously spend some time on writing a decent script and the movie did not just got shot at someone's back-room. They actually went to the trouble to make some costumes and sets for this movie. Nothing too impressive but it's all nevertheless still better and more expensive looking than the first movie. This movie is really a movie, which at times even goes at the expense of the sex sequences. I can definitely say that this movie has more story than sex this time.

I'm not saying that this movie is being anything brilliant but for within its genre it's simply a great one nevertheless. You really have to see these sort of movies in their perspective. You have to appreciate this movie for taking a real cinematic approach and tries to be more than just another average porn-flick.

But it's not as if the movie doesn't know that its not being much good as a movie. Even though it takes a more serious cinematic approach of things, that doesn't mean that the movie is taking itself serious as well. And this is what makes the movie so much fun to watch. It's a movie with plenty of humor and deliberately silly moments and characters in it. I won't lie, I enjoyed the movie quite a lot. The only complained is that it went on for too long. It started to drag and could had easily been cut down 10 minutes or so.

Guess that if you're really looking for some porn that this movie isn't going to be much good for you. In that regard the first movie was a better one. In this movie there are really not that many porn sequences and the ones that are in it are basically constantly more of the same, over and over again. It's also nothing too spectacular or exciting really.

A movie that is surprisingly fun and good to watch.

7/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

3 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
bow chika bow, 24 November 2003
Author: Jake from Huntsville, AL

The first DMJ was a classic movie...a really thought provoking artistic acheivement ..well not really it was after all just a porno but it was made alot better than porno should have been made but DMJ II...this is just a lotion movie..if you get what I mean..the women of course look lovely and the sex action is erotic..and hillarious the scene between Jack Wrangler and Georgina Spelvin (who looks LOVELY) had me on the ground laughing as well as the scene between Jacqueline Lorians and Bobby Astyr..now thats entertainment..but the humor almost seems..strange when the first one was such a strange and horrific tale of lust and horror. I guess this is the Evil Dead II of porno..so enjoy it for what it is..and don't forget to clean up

7.5/10

3 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
An improvement on the original, which isn't saying much., 12 July 2002
Author: honesty_in_a_bottle

The sequel to the revolting Devil in Miss Jones really isn't all that bad. Many scenes work quite well, and the more unpleasant elements of the first film are nowhere to be found.

Though Pachard's visual style isn't anything terribly special, it's on a level with many respectable films of the same period. The use of special effects is unusually well-handled for a pornographic film from 1982, and the makeup is a noticeable improvement over the original.

As it turns out, Georgina Spelvin isn't nearly as ugly as she looked in the first movie. The performances in this film are average for the most part. Their are no really aggravating moments, but not many truly inspired moments either. Joanna Storm's small role as a young soldier is impressive, but no other actors stand out.

Even though the film gets points for not being as bad as its predecessor, it's still a very limited picture with no real ambition.

0 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Funny, But They Crossed The Line Here, 9 January 2009

Author: elpaz79903 from United States

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

So Here We Have The Sequel To The Original DMJ. This Comical Yet Crude Porno Has It's Ups and Downs As Justine Jones Goes In And Out Of Hell To Have Live A Life Consumed & Engulfed By Lust. Justine Sleeps With Devil, Devil Sends Justine Back To Earth To Live Forever As A Call-Girl Named Roxanne. After A Few Customers Come-A-Calling, Devil Gets Jealous and Switchs Justine To Another Body, Pvt. Parts. Pvt. Parts Gives The Army Something To Salute as She Makes An Example Of Her Commanding Officer. Devil Gets Jealous Again and Puts Justine In The Body Of A Tupper-Ware Lady. Soon This Harmless Girl Is Selling Plastic Sexy Toys and Goes Wild On A Male Customer and Pleases Him With Her New Toys. Devil Gets Angry and Puts Justine In A Nun. Nun Is About To Get Temped, But Stopped By "The Light". Devil and St. Peter Argue and Agree To Put Justine Back In Roxanne. Roxanne Then Pleases Customer Looking For Love and Compares Him To Devil. Devil Leaves Hell For Justine and That's It.

For The Good, To See Ron Jeremy In This Movie Was Funny. What's An Eighties Porno Movie Without Ron Jeremy? It Was Great To See The Plot Go In Different Direction Than In The Original, But The Original Is A Superior Movie Than This. And Seeing Joey Silvera in Action With Roxanne Was Great.

For The Bad, It Was Very Distastful To Have Justine In The Body Of The Nun, and Worse, To Give Her Temptations Of The Flesh, Not Good. The Use Of St. Peter Is Also Not A Good Thing For Movies Like This. I Feel That THE Line Was Crossed Here. Anything Else Would Have Been A Better Idea Instead Of The Religion Angle.

All in All, This Is A Good Sequel To A Superior Movie, But The Whole Religious Angle Toward The End Made Me Give This Movie A Lower Rating Than What I Normally Rate. 6/10

Add another review

Related Links